Rare Thing
This is one of those truly rare things that makes people say 'we should have always been doing this'. Good on this guy for a great idea.
5059 publicly visible posts • joined 30 Nov 2011
I hate to support such a bleak view as yours but you are correct. Any privacy we currently have is only there because large corporations don't like to share too much between themselves. Unless you deal solely in cash (doable but inconvenient) don't use the Internet or have a mobile phone or a drivers license (or at least not buying age restricted products) you're being observed.
I don't think it will scale. It will be popular with the Segway & Bluetooth Headset crowd but I don't see it going much further. I'm still trying to figure out what it is good for. The one guy at my office who is excited about it gets excited about every new shiny thing. I think those types of people will be the market.
The Mars habitat people knew that on the other side of a 1/2" plywood wall their friends and civilization were out there & if something went terribly wrong medics would be there to help and an ambulance could take them to the nearby hospital.
There is no valid way to test what a marooned group will do on Mars without sending them to Mars. Any attempt to simulate the experience on Earth will have to be heavily rigged to even get close & I'm pretty sure that no one is going to allow and experiment where someone will enevitably die to take place when help was actually available. Knowing that at least one person in the group is doomed and no help is coming will significantly change the group dynamics. Behaviorists are going to love studying them.
The thing is psychological profiles are a summation of expected and socially acceptable reactions based on previous experiences observed in others. There are no profiles for what to expect when a group who has been exposed to modern civilization is suddenly cut off from that civilization. Decades long separations from all society has never been observed. You could send a 'lost' tribe or highly trained individuals and what's going to happen is a complete toss up. I figure the colony would have the best chance of survival if they sent fairly 'Earthy' types who know how to make things and manage effectively through force if necessary (so rednecks or rural Kiwis or even prisoners seems to fit well). Sending highly educated people will just end with a Jamestown, VA type event.
The Dragon Riders of Pern series, the later (awful) Ender series and some Star Trek TNG episodes have taken a look at the issue but even in those stories they had access to some reasonably advanced technology. I think they should look into a recipe book for preparing Humans for dinner: Seems more useful than sending scientists and engineers who will cease to be useful the minute they're presented with a situation outside their training (most everything they'll experience).
There are serious risks to using human excrement in garden fertilizer: Hepatitis being the foremost. In the U.S. you can't use human poo for food crop fertilizer for precisely this reason. Previous experiments with sterilized poo got rid of diseases but also destroyed the nutrients and bacteria which made it as effective as dumping sand on the garden.
That's precisely why it was smart. They can be complete dicks if they want but they aren't betraying the ultra high (low?) bar they set with 'evil'.
I doubt if individual employees take notice though. Do you really buy into your company mission statement? I don't think I've met anyone who really believes all that crap. They should say "Our mission is to make money" & skip the bullshit.
It was pretty smart to have 'Do No Evil' as part of the company ethos. Nothing they are doing is evil (douchey yes but not evil). It takes a lot to descend into evil and ascribing evil to things like tax evasion/manipulation/dodging/minimization or patent and product protectionism or personal privacy demeans the word evil. Are Google guilty of being a bunch of festering assholes in a lot of things; Yes. Are they being evil; No.
We have a new Windows 8 touchscreen PC in our lobby. I hate it. It has nothing to do with Windows 8 (which i don't like either) it's just that if you're doing anything with it you couldn't do with a tablet your arms are waving about like a lunatic and if you get it close enough that you can rest your elbows on your chair then the monitor is so close you can almost see through to the backside. Plus you get smudges all over the screen and it looks like a toddler has been set loose on the desk.
I think that's why the things don't sell, not because of the OS but because they are awkward to use.
In my mind governments should be carrying the load for large scale infrastructure projects which show little or no economic gains but still deliver a worthwhile service. If a project is simply monetary then we have companies that will do it. If they don't do it then the market won't support it. If we want governments to be run like companies why not just let companies run the government (in the open, not behind closed doors)? I don't think anyone really wants that though. Expecting a government to function like a company but still have cultural, national or scientific aims is foolishness however, someone has to do those things. Is it government? I think that's their correct role.
The tax is not punitive (anymore than any other tax anyway) it is the tax due.
Besides R&D is deductible, maybe Apple should look into some new product development and use the cash for growth. They are getting perilously close to the 'too much money horizon' by being so greedy they won't spend the money they make.
Not many modern aircraft can complete their missions if their electronics aren't functioning properly. They'd be lucky to return home safely. The few that can function without all systems at high operational capacity are from the 1970's and fallback on massive cannons for air to surface assaults.
Deploying your munitions tends to expose your non-stealthy side as well...
In all seriousness, putting the munitions on top is not only technically challenging, from an engineering standpoint it is backwards. Where possible you never design something that accomplishes through technical prowess what physics takes care of for free (i.e. if you want something to fall you put it in a place where it will fall if left to its own devices).
Most all tech is used to enable something. Rightly viewed, technology is a tool and the problem with tech companies and too many tech oriented services is that they want to view themselves as the goal instead of an enabler. This is a very real and very burning problem for countries that have shifted their economies away from natural resource utilization and manufacturing. Tech heavy economies experience a short term gain from this but if every 'valuable' company only makes tools everyone ends up with a well stocked toolbox but with nothing to work on but other tools. The tech industry as we know it is maturing and for many years now we've seen nothing but incremental improvements on the existing tools, not many new tools. Someone needs to come up with something to work on...
The most feasible sort of industry to move "somewhere else" is manufacturing. The equipment can be moved & locals trained for the bulk if the work. What are not very feasible to move are service, marketing or sales operations. Those are extremely difficult because they demand a local presence with a finger on the pulse of the locals. No amount of connectivity or virtual presence will ever replace face to face meetings, especially in high value deals.
What I'm getting at is these companies are not going to pack up & go somewhere else. They have be there and the governments can force them to play by the rules. They won't like it but they'll play.
I said exactly this the other day. The guy was in violation of export controls and I got the shit downvoted out of me (a personal record). I said the guy was playing loose with the law & it wasn't fair to the rest of us who do go through a lot of hoops and lay a lot of liability on the table in order to play by the rules. I stand by what I said the other day.
The law (in the U.S. anyway) says that tax money does not belong to the individual and you are in effect acting as the collection agency on their behalf. Until that changes expect no respect for the funds.
I do think it would be funny to fight back using their own terminology: Cut back on their 'entitlements'.
Until 'The Global Fight on Tax Evasion' becomes the 'Global War on Tax Evasion'? As soon as we declare another war on a thing then any real hope of sorting out the issues is lost in back room spending deals & the creation and/or expansion of bureaucracy. Maybe we should just skip to the bombing part & save a lot of paperwork.
I would hazard to guess that those people who get picked on in the South because of their feelings of Atheism probably share their opinions too much down there. In effect picking on people who don't share their beliefs. I grew up in the most Southern part of the South where racism is still rampant and women are a half step above property and never, not one single time in four+ decades, did I hear a proper Southerner start a religion based argument. They just respond (poorly) when someone insults or belittles their beliefs.
I've never understood the reluctance/refusal to do it either. The tech does exist and not using it to sell a few extra phones (it's really not a big number when tens of millions are sold every year through legitimate venues) simply isn't much of a sales strategy. There's obviously a significant advantage to not doing it but I can't figure out what it is.
If it wasn't an extraordinarily invasive news outlet who had been subject to this I would feel different. As it stands I don't have a lot of respect for major press organs who get their dirty laundry sifted through. They do it to people all the time using unscrupulous, but not illegal, methods. When someone does it to they don't seem to like it so much. Boo hoo for them I say.
Is that the only way this sort of behavior doesn't manifest at other companies is for customers to go through the process, validate their identity then cancel the order. If people refuse to hand over the documents then Apple (in this case) will assume they've stopped a fraudulent transaction. If Apple proves that this method cuts down on charge backs then the practice will grow everywhere. The only way to document that legitimate sales are being negatively impacted is for people to cancel after proving who they are: This is a real clusterfuck for everyone.
But that's where everything gets weird. The Chinese will never believe that companies are blocking them of their own volition, they'll think the Govt is behind it. I'm sure the Chinese have conspiracy fans too, like the 'Utah' comment up there. It would end up causing a big mess I'm afraid.
Good on Musk for stepping out if this mess. Zuckerberg is a silly young boy with scads of cash who is bending over and taking it in both ends (simultaneously) from the politicians. He doesn't have much to offer the knobs in DC other than money, so they'll take his money & even pretend like they're listening until he gets too demanding then they'll leave him confused wondering why no one wants anything to do with him.
In all fairness, military issued rifles are pretty awful. A nice civilian sporting rifle is more reliable and more accurate. We do more than a little failure analysis and repetitve stress testing for firearms manufacturers and if I had to pick I would prefer a civilian sport rifle any day. They have considerably higher quality components and tend to wear better and be more accurate than military rifles which are cheap to manufacture and designed to be rebuilt/tossed out after a surprisingly short lifetime.
You can make a fabulous crossbow with a leaf from the leaf spring of a car, some steel cable from Home Depot and a piece of black metal pipe (also from the DIY home store) & the catch from a fence gate latch and some angle aluminum for a guide rail. You need some mechanical help to cock it but it will fire gutter nails with the heads sawn off completely through both doors of a car or round hay bale. It is loads of fun.
For less dangerous fun you can also make a small crossbow using the metal hanging strips from legal size hanging file folders and laminating them together with light epoxy.
Possibly more than my soldering iron, LEGO was my greatest tool as a child. I've been responsible for leading legions of settlers in the building of colonies on far away planets and in building super computers that could manufacture anything I wanted (as long as it was in a primary color and didn't have rounded corners). I also terrorized my parents with brightly colored caltrops which were left on the fields of epic battles and lost in the high grass (carpet). I tried Playmobil because at the time the people were better but the scale went to hell.
I just thought I'd inject a bit pendentrary into this wholly logical and completely rational conversation to point out that being anti-Semitic would mean being prejudiced/biased against anyone of a Semitic culture which includes Arabs, Jews and Palestinians and such. The term anti-Semite is often used incorrectly to exclusively define a single people.
But don't let semantics get in the way of this enlightening dialogue about Semitic countries.