Re: Science will suffer
Science suffers when the truth cannot be heard. By this I mean, we have a media obsessed by trivia, politicians obsessed by achieving the appearance of acting, and companies obsessed by the pursuit of profit at all costs.
The talk by the David Keyes (who i have met a few times and has a fine singing voice...;-) repeats an observation of a number of scientists in the US, although the analysis could be applied equally to any country.
Basically everything you think of a science in the USA comes from this tiny fraction of the federal budget. NIH, NSF, DOE , FDA, NASA, NOA.... EVERYTHING. Computing only benefits the world because there are applications that are written using algorithms developed by scientists and engineers towards the solution of scientific problems.
The problem with politics is the need to be seen to be doing something - i.e. picking winners (the spin is the obvious counterpart picking losers). Companies all want something for nothing. Hence, politicians spend more on entitlements , lobbyists get tax breaks for business, and less money is spent on funding creative activities. Putting a man on the moon? Sequencing the human genome? Anti-cancer therapies? Smart phones as powerful as the supercomputers of old running on a battery?
None of these are isolated activities they all require the blending of many, many iterations of scientific publication and engineering implementation. If you want to reap the benefits of science and technology you need to support the people involved in it. And that is not just in education but in the government agencies that (should) implement policies on behalf of all the people, and build the intellectual capital which permits a varied industry and supports a sustainable future.
The NIH doubled its budget in a decade and has had an enormous effect on creating new industries where there one (e.g. therapeutic genome sequencing, genotyping etc.., personalised medicine ). What could we achieve with a doubling of NSF?
I understand the frustration with the climate change fiasco, but this only goes to underscore my point. The real world is far more complex than the 19th century principles our society has modelled itself on. Don't throw the baby out with the bath water! The vast majority of science is independently verifiable and we all benefit as a result.
Computers are an astonishing technology, but without continued investment it will never reach its full potential.
P.