Why would a foreigner need to pretend to be someone else to suck your national resources dry when they're already doing it legally?
14 posts • joined 25 Nov 2011
Actually, it's fossil fuel that keeps the lights on and the heating working for most of the world. Real science, not your "science", is about using observation and experimentation to predict future behavior and outcomes. Skepticism is vital for science, especially when the predictions of apocalyptic fear-mongers consistently fail.
"You should try learning something about it - especially the part where being noisy and opinionated doesn't excuse you from being dead wrong." At least, you are right about something. Now, if only you would take your own advice.
If you want people to believe your folderol, a good first step would be to tell the leaders of your movement to stop flying around the world on private jets.
Since we are talking about the BBC, unless you are a hardcore neo-Nazi(or radical Leftist, to the extent there is a difference), you would almost certainly see a lot less antisemitism and oikophobia masquerading as news. The sniffles and hand-wringing over entrenchment in "self-referential groups" is a bit ironic coming from defenders of the cloistered pseudo-intellectuals at the BBC. It is, however, a stupid idea.
Hitlery said virtually the same thing, but not surprisingly there's not a lot of stories about it.
Hillary Clinton said on Sunday that the Islamic State had become “the most effective recruiter in the world” and that the only solution was to engage American technology companies in blocking or taking down militant websites, videos and encrypted communications.
“You are going to hear all the familiar complaints: ‘freedom of speech,’ ” Mrs. Clinton said in an hourlong speech and question-and-answer session at the Saban Forum, an annual gathering at the Brookings Institution that focuses mostly on Israel’s security issues.
Hopefully, that POS won't win either.
"Overturned"? It's the SUPREME COURT. The case the plaintiff should have brought would be a civil one for the false arrest and imprisonment. A prison(or even a jail) certainly can't allow prisoners to carry in weapons. Otherwise you end up with a prison where the inmates run the err...asylum. It is curious that the conservative justices sided with a uber leftist county. Democrats support arresting people for just about anything; they have no interest in human rights,,,until you get arrested.
It thinks Wikipedia is a reliable source for political material. Isn't that cute? Turtle(Oh, I get it. Slow...), you spout allegations(from some nutjob "independent reporting center". Wha?) with no evidence(because they didn't happen of course), even managing to work in the Kochs. We have actual evidence, on the other hand, that certain companies gave obscene sums of money to BO's campaign, and in return received tens of billions, at the least, in subsidies and "loans"(many have gone bankrupt, so the taxpayer will take the shaft). This is a matter of public record. You have nothing but innuendo
In reality, the countries invaded all had corrupt (and murderous)governments and trashed medieval infrastructure before anyone from the US military was even in the hood. And if the US "stole resources" they must have hidden them pretty well. But don't let the facts stop your nonsensical declamations.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019