It doesn't seem to matter.......
.....how many photos of my knackersack I upload, M&S still don't seem interested for their summer bus shelter ad campaign....
568 publicly visible posts • joined 22 Nov 2011
I do think that Apple seem to have missed an important market segment in not optimising their user experience for the low temperature water based customer market (many of whom have very thin stick based arms which must make any touch screen use tricky).
But back to my original point, though, the only reason those older windows systems would get infected in an hour if left unchaperoned in 'club internet'* was because they were so much more popular than OSX, Linux et al, not especially because of some greater secureness inherent in those other OS's.
Essentially, I don't buy the argument that there was no way to create malware that could infect those other OS's in the same sub-hour timeframe as the windows devices, just that there was not a big enough potential target base to make it worth the while of the malware creators.
Granted, as software becomes more sophisticated and OS creators are prioritising security higher than before they have become more secure overall.
I would posit that the sucess of a particular OS is a direct driver for how quickly it's security level has increased as this is the driver for how much that security is tested, not any inherently greater security attached to one OS over any other.
For example:
- Windows, the most popular OS for years, has increased massively in security but over the course of those long years.
- OSX is only a bit more secure than it's previous iterations as it is only a bit more popular than it used to be.
- Android is suddenly much more secure in very recent builds than it was only a few years ago but it's popularity is suddenly skyrocketing so it has to make big security leaps.
*Drinks are free....
Increasing malware attacks are just a sign of sucess, nothing more. Malware attackers want to hit as many targets as possible with their attack so they naturally aim them at the biggest markets.
The more users of a particular OS (or app or programming language or whatever) there are, the more malware will exist for it.
Whatever evengelists for any particular system may think*, there are security flaws in all OS's - any such system is invariably a compromise between security and useability and vulnerabilities are a result of that.
* If you dont regard yourself as an evangelist, ask yourself why you are about to post a fervent denial to this post pointing out how <insert OS name here> is inherently better than <insert other OS name here> despite the fact that malware exists for all OS's of any consequence.
...I realise your definition of 'good' may not be exactly the same as mine (I prefer the term 'Alternately Ethical' as it is less hurtful than 'Evil') but if you could see your way to cramming one of these down the central heating flue this year I would certainly re-examine some of my behaviour patterns in future.
Yours Sincerely
Great Bu
My elderly PS3 has on-board storage (160 Gb - not much, but quite a bit better than 8 Gb...), supports BD, DVD and optical 5.1 output, HD video and allowed me to get rid of all the other boxes under the telly except for the Sky box ( content streamer for networked stuff, DVD player et al) and play games too.
Why would I replace it with a Wii U when I could just go and buy an actual iPad for the same money ? Is assymetric gameplay worth that ? I haven't tried it but I struggle to see how it could be all that good.
I can fly return to New York for £350, bring back 20 of these in my suitcase (22kg in weight) having paid a total of $4980 for them (~£3112) and even declaring them at customs* and paying 20% VAT plus import duty (~£780) it still works out £738 cheaper (£350 flight + £3112 Purchase Price + £780 Tax = £4242) than buying them here (20x249=£4980) !
Scammalicious.
*Instead of wrapping them in condoms and swallowing them, which would significantly increase my profit**
**Although some discomfort may be involved....
I have been with Barclays, NatWest and Santander and I am happy to report that all of them are universally shit.
I'm considering switching to the bank of underthemattress but for the fact that that institution appears to be over-committed in the old shoes and mysterious fluff market.......
I am inventing an Automatic Automatic Number Plate Recognition Camera Recognition System - it consists of a camera in your car that recognises ANPR enplacements (possibly with a GPS tie-in for known sites) and activates an LCD display mounted in front of your car number plate.
When inactive the LCD is clear, when activated it flickers alternating squares at 25fps in front of the number plate.
To the human viewer the plate appears normal (maybe slightly dimmer, but certainly readable).
To a camera it will appear to conceal half of the number plate characters, making ANPR reading impossible.
To avoid legal complications it could be set to only work on private land (where there is no legal requirement to display a number plate) although careless programming on my part (and the inclusion of a switch or soemthing) will probably make this feature suprisingly easy to disable.......
How do you get on Dragon's Den again ?
....is not to enact more and more draconian traffic laws to ban any possible distraction from the driver, but to massively raise the standard of driving required before someone gets a license.
My proposal is that anyone who cannot keep their car in it's lane on a motorway at 135mph whilst simultaneously:
- snorting a 12" line of cocaine off the dashboard
- texting his x-factor vote
- eating a supersize big mac meal
- receiving oral sex from an Albanian prostitute
- having already downed a bottle of tequila
should simply not be allowed to drive.
All other road users (and near-road users) should be aware that this will be the default state of awareness in all drivers they see, and should take that into account when deciding whether to venture out of their front door.
Didn't they bin this idea a while ago (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-15014288) ?
NHS staff (in or out of hospitals) dream about integrated health records - it would be so much better for all an individual's records (Hospital, GP, District Nurse, Mental Health, lab results, prescriptions, pharmacy records, radiology reports etc etc - from anywhere in the country) to be available at all times, but the complexity and cost of getting any such system to integrate sucessfully with every existing solution turns out to be more than we were willing to spend on it.
Was there some secret other part of the article that claimed this technology was a panacea for all the ills of the NHS ?
Or did you feel that these innovations were not worth instituting simply because they only improve things a little ?
Nobody is claiming technology as a cure all, but it would certainly help to reduce the amount of time wasted on pointless activity like copying someone's demographic details from a computer screen onto a piece of paper by hand (I see this every day).
The hospital you refer to would very likely have been able to deliver better care to it's elderly patients if the staff caring for them had more time to spend actually with the patients instead of just writing about them. I am innately suspicious of any trust that returns perfectly complete data on all the various monitoring tasks as it often suggests a trust which places a higher priority on those than on direct care activity.
(on a side note, part of the job of someone working as a sister on a hospital ward is to provide leadership to their team in relation to efficient use of their time and what constitutes an appropriate task for anyone to perform.....)
The reason Nurses spend so much time sitting at the nurses station is that the amount of paperwork and form filling has increased by around a gazillion percent* but the number of nurses on a shift remains at the level we had in 1982.
When I started nursing the average 7 1/2 hour shift consisted of 6 1/2 hours of patient contact followed by 1 hour of writing it all up. Now out of the 7 1/2 hours most of my staff nurses have to spend nearly 4 hours filling out forms who's only purpose is to reduce our legal liability (smoking rates, alcohol consumption, dementia screening, deep vein thrombosis screening, pressure care assesment, nutrition scoring, cannula monitoring, fluid balances etc. etc. etc.... all these are things that used to be done as a matter of course by nursing staff but now must be recorded on separate forms for every patient in order to reduce our public liability insurance premiums. When I started 15 years ago the average patient admission generated about 10 pages of records per day, that number is now closer to 50 pages per day ).
The 'care in nursing**' has essentially been beaten out of most nurses by systems that prioritise legal liability reduction over actual looking after people - I have never seen a nurse fired for not having enough time to talk to a patient but I have seen some fired for not filling out forms.
Any technology that can act to reduce the amount of time taken out of a nurses' day to fill out forms can only improve things (of course, the challenge is to make it something that actually works).
*Roughly
** It's all too easy to rant on about 'care in nursing' but like most of my colleagues I have little regard for the opinion of people who don't have the need to develop the emotional ability to alternate between dealing politely with a complaint that the tea round is a bit late today immediately after they had to tell someone that their mum just died as part of their everyday job.
"nobody issues legal tender made from precious metals anymore."
Some low denomination coins are still worth more in scrap metal value than the face value of the coin itself - that's why many countries make it illegal to melt down currency and why many are trying to reduce the number of low denominations they mint at all or what they make them out of (especially copper pennies - UK ones changed to alloys of steel in the 90's)
Of course, silver dollars and gold coins went that way decades ago.
(US coins for example: http://www.coinflation.com/ )