Words not stats
Boris is right, Jane is wrong as is Norgrovery. The wording is the importantime bit not the figures. Control is the key.
641 posts • joined 10 Nov 2011
Boris is right, Jane is wrong as is Norgrovery. The wording is the importantime bit not the figures. Control is the key.
Sea Shepard is basically a pirate ship.
"What happened to the republican politician that published pictures of her opponents in a gunsight - and then one of them was assassinated?"
That was Sarah Palin and it was a visual effect commonly used in many situations. And on of her opponents was not assassinated, that was a just an attempt to make a non-existent connection by her opponents who were losing and doing desperate things to try and win.
"I would do it just to rile up the green junkie paris liberals. this guy is a hero and the judge is just another silly billie."
Government creates some rules about something. Engineers do their best to work to it. However company needs to satisfy the needs of the public to make a profit. A clash. So the company tries to work around the system. Government wins (all the time) as it has force behind it.
"Troll or arsehole, either way you should be ignored."
So no one can have a different opinion then. To have the wrong thought is a crime next?
Violence is always started by AntiFa. They use it to get the media coverage they crave, though the MSM is so left wing that its not hard to get some media coverage.
Everyone is an alt-right Nazi when the default position is to be a Communist which is what AntiFa are really. AntiFa are also the biggest fascists as they use fascist techniques to further their message, ie. force.
"If you are in a march with, a small number" of people carrying a Nazi flag you either ask them to leave, leave yourself, or accept that you a fucking Nazi."
So marching with people carrying communist flags makes you fucking commie. Communism and it's bed mates Marxism and Socialism have killed more than the Nazis did.
@diodesign, a small number were nazis. Why tar the whole crowd because of a few. It's like calling all social justice protesters communists and marxists because a few in the crowd wave communist flags or SWP signs.
The domain name has disrupt, as in stop, hinder, interfere with, the inauguration in its name. That's a bit more than free speech and anything against the president is a crime, be they right wing or left wing.
@Jason Bloomberg, So you think that the whole public is pristine and innocent and kind and gentle and it's Hopkins articles that make them hate others? Do you not think that she is just saying stuff that many of the public already agree with?
I thinking you have a visual problem. You didn't look at Eddie picture in the tweet, nor read the story properly. Eddie is not dark (other than maybe a tan from living on the South Coast which gets more sun than the North). Eddie was not being lippy, he was not giving his name to someone who had no authority to ask for his name, in other words a civilian member of the police.
All spouted by vested interests only interested in keeping their salaries and not caring one jot about the UK.
@Shady: "Global fossil fuel subsidies were $5.3 trillion in 2015. The good ol' US of A subsidised $600 billion of that. Global renewable subsides were $88 billion in the same period."
Well done, mixing global and US subsidy figures to confuse the issue. Then not reading the Wiki article you link to which shows fossil fuel subsidy to be about $4b.. And I bet you think that a tax credit which all businesses get counts as a subsidy when applied by the Oil & Gas industry.
Or it could be that POTUS was renamed to POTUS44 and a new POTUS was created which immediately garnered millions of followers so putting a lie to the hate factor. How many did the original POTUS gain in its first few hours?
Why isn't Soros listed as one of the billionaires. Could it be that he is one of those who funds Oxfam and that lefty lot so he's a good guy in their eyes?
Certain sections of the press got away with abusive behaviour. They were eventually punished. What S40 wants to do is punish everyone because of the actions of a few. Just like in a classroom where the whole class is kept behind because one kid wrote "Teacher is a twat" on the blackboard.
So you want a state regulated press. Just like the good old USSR then.
So Mosley can sue El Reg under section 40. Bye bye El Reg.
You are talking about the one who reported that he had seen a badly named WiFi hot spot and put 2 and 2 together to make 5 aren't you?
"So, according to you, it's perfectly OK if someone (a presidential candidate, say), threatens or plans reprehensible and unconstitutional actions. You will continue to support that candidate fully even after he is elected, and even when he is actually President, as long as he only threatens these actions. You should only start to complain when he actually starts to implement his ideas."
So according to you, it's perfectly OK if someone (a presidential candidate, say), commits criminal acts or takes money from foreign government. You will continue to support that candidate fully even after she is elected, and even when she is actually President, as long as she only threatens the other side. You should only start to complain when she is actually jailed.
Vegans are basically following a belief system. Just like Christians and Muslims. And because it's a belief, and all beliefs can conflict with each other, everyone can take the piss out of everyone else. So don't feel ashamed about criticising someone's beliefs. The basic human right of free speech means that you have the right to offend someone else because they will be offending you, be it by spouting some religion or political opinion.
"It is an inefficient use of our time to sit in front of the gogglebox staring at other people doing absurd things for our entertainment. It is an inefficient use of our lives to spend a majority of it in an office staring at a screen and typing away on a keyboard making 1's and 0's fly around the world."
Oh, so I suppose you want to go back to grandparent's time and do lots of manual work and work long hours with very little leisure time? That must be efficient use of your time. Me? I'd rather use efficient technology that makes my job easier and faster with with less physical work meaning that I have more time for my own pleasure, which might involve the gogglebox.
As a chemist you should be doing what you did at university, READ. If you read the article or any of the other news reports about the story, then you'd read that it's used in the manufacture of the polymers, in the pellets. And if you read a bit more, maybe like doing RESEARCH (again something you must have done at uni) you'd find that it's used as a lubricant, you know something to help all the pellets move along through the production process.
Stating the stereotype that many Mexican immigrants are criminals etc is not racist. It's stereotyping and xenophobic at worse.
Media writing about beautiful people is stating a fact. Just look at how the write about Hollywood stars.
Rosie O'Donnell's face is ugly. But misogynistic? Nope, she is an individual. She's not a whole gender. Extrapolating from one to all is just like stating that all Trump voters are identikits.
Grade? F-, please try harder.
"Um what? Did you happen to miss when he said of mexicans "They're bringing drugs. They're bringing crime. They're rapists."
That's totally not insulting or demeaning a minority, no not at all..."
99% of Mexico is populated by Mexicans. I don't see that as a minority. Or is that your double-plus good definition of minority?
No comment here, not needed
I see one down vote from a progressive lefty liberal twat.
Lots of modern cars are very quiet if not silent. It's the tyre road noise that you'll hear, not the engines in most cars.
You mean the pilots of the civilian aircraft?
Woman interviewed by BBC was not a member of the public, she was a member of Corbyn's team. #BiasedBBC.
High time the BBC was scrapped. All it shows is crap now a days.
Yeah, like your link. It's so full of obvious crap.
@Pascal Monett - I can do links too*.
Are we really “choking the ocean with plastic”? Tracing the creation of an eco-myth - https://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/12/24/are-we-really-choking-the-ocean-with-plastic-tracing-the-creation-of-an-eco-myth/
An Ocean of Plastic - https://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/12/17/an-ocean-of-plastic/
Garbage: Another environmental claim proven to be hyped - https://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/01/06/garbage-another-environmental-claim-proven-to-be-hyped/
* Well not clicky ones, but you know how to copy & paste.
@JeffyPoooh "Hint: Somebody should figure out how the plastic is getting into the ocean."
The plastic isn't getting into the ocean. Enviromentalists are extrapolating from a couple of locations which happen to contain a tiny bit of tiny pieces of plastic (specially chosen to help their case) and making a case that all the world's oceans are filled with plastic to the same level.
@theModge "Who sometimes still manage to compete with each other on price!"
Look up Price Discrimination. The microeconomic process of charging different prices for the same product to different customers. For those that can afford it, charge more. For those that are looking for a good deal, charge less. The end result is more items sold which increases turnover which is good from a business perspective.
It'll still be a UK company employing UK staff and paying UK taxes.
What about Milo Yiannopoulos? A well known right winger and a dangerous faggot* to boot. So dangerous that Twitter had to ban him for life for upsetting one of the Ghostbusters actors.
* His own words
What about the pain created for us by the EU which we and our next generation don't really need?
It's not the average person who does the repair, it's engineers like Lois Rossman (look him up on YouTube) and many other independents who do the repairs. And they can be cheaper and better than the big companies. Because they care about their customers. So it can be economically viable to repair in many cases.
OxFam aren't squeeky clean over their handling of tax either. They use dodgy methods to get as much money as possible, using techniques that could be seen as evasion if HMRC got off their arse and decided that it wasn't what Parliament wanted when the laws were written. See how they handle GiftAid on donations of non-cash items. Plus they don't really spend that much on the needy, keeping a load for themselves to pay the high salaries of their executives.
The ASA can't even ban an advert. All it can do is ask that the advert is not shown again - usually after the campaign has finished and the advert not likely to be shown anyway.
People have been taught not to think for themselves as everything is managed by the state. Now that people can't think, other people who do think are taking advantage of them. And rather than teach people to think for themselves, the ASA wants to dumb down people even more. #ScrapTheASA
Udoo are combining the Arduino killer with a PC killer, a quad-core 64-bit 2.24GHz processor.
Or is that three?
A small number of the leaders of the IT industry. There are many other leaders in many other industries and not all of them are for staying in the EU. I suspect all of them will make sound logical decisions based on what they think and perceive and believe will help their personal interests. I also suspect all of them will make their decisions based on what they are told to say to keep the the status quo so that their personal interests are maximised.
Occam's Razor and all.
Or am I being a bit too cynical?
Fear Uncertainty and Doubt.
The remainers are playing up the scaremongering to extreme hype levels because they don't have any real facts that are totally down to the EU doing something good. Many of what they spout could just as much happened if the UK was outside the EU. Look at all the other countries in the world, they aren't part of the EU, but have they suffered? Sure some have (mostly socialist despot ridden countries, a bit like the EU :-) ), but overall the world is a better place than when the EU was created, and it isn't down to the creation of the EU.
@Jess said "The outcome of a brexit is totally unknown."
True. But also the outcome of staying in is totally unknown too. Do you know what regulations the EU will create next month, next year, next decade? If you asked someone in the 70s if there would be stability because of the EU, you'd probably get an affarmative but the reality of all the petty gold plated regulations and banning everything such as imperial measurements means that the everything was unknown by being part of the EU.
Theft is theft, there is no time limit or extenuating circumstances such as saying that you were going to return the item eventually.
"but realistically if he doesn't want to press charges over anything, which he really doesn't have anything to press charges over, then there isn't much the police can do (whether or not they have the will to). "
No such thing as pressing charges in the UK. You've been watching too many US cop shows. It's the CPS who make the decision whether or not to progress a case. The most a victim can do is refuse to co-operate which in effect the same as not pressing charges. But the victim can't force the charge through.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2017