Is it laziness or a lack of self-confidence that makes a cat design a mouse trap?
295 posts • joined 14 Oct 2011
Helping people who don't have safe drinking water is a laudable aim - but not one that is incompatible with re-examining our own water supply infrastructure.
Intuitively there's something daft about making water that is safe to drink and then using it to flush our crap away but our first thoughts on the process aren't necessarily correct.
A single, national infrastructure to supply drinking-quality water for all purposes may be cheaper that a series of more local systems for water collection and re-use.
As the water itself is not 'wasted' it's reasonable to make a decision based on cost (you might want to include 'green' costs if you are that way inclined).
"please will all the people in London stay in London - and not come and destroy what little is left of Britain's countryside building more houses, shops, roads. "
Those are all things that people in the sticks want - if anyone comes from London to the country they want it to be the country, not an extension of the dreadful suburbs.
Londoners do not care if country folk have no homes for their kids, no affordable shopping options, and slow, twisty commutes.
Frankly I doubt Londoners think that schools are necessary in order for people to grow ample bosoms and sell scones which seems to be their preferred rural option.
"Dropbox plan to take over the enterprise through individual consumers."
Well we're seeing demand for it already so the pressure is there but I can't see it working the way Apple / BYOD did.
With the latter the existing infrastructure supported those devices and there really wasn't a problem from a security point of view - using something like Citrix means no corporate data leaves the organisation - Dropbox would be the complete opposite, no one is comfortable with the security implications and the existing remote access infrastructure works against its adoption.
This post has been deleted by a moderator
"It's a phone - what can you actually do apart from better battery, better camera, better screen...?"
Samsung have returned to pen input (with a reasonable degree of success IMO), Motorola have toughened devices and Sony have incorporated high level gaming features - there are some differences but I do agree they are slight and the innovation is as likely to come from the apps developers as the phone manufacturers.
"Jony Ive's stuff is fashionless, not (un)fashionable. Like a Technics 1210, A Maglite, or a well made pair of boots."
The design may be but the desire to have one possibly isn't.
There are more people wearing trainers and playing their music at the back of the bus on a phone than there are wearing properly tailored boots as they spin up some vinyl on a classic turntable. Even in Shoreditch.
It's not impossible (though highly unlikely) that it could become a fashion faux pas to be seen with an Apple product and this would certainly harm their sales and their margins on those sales.
Apple do make very good phones and tablets but the margins they command is not down to this quality but to the brand and to the efficiency of their supply.
Ives continues the design, Cook continues the efficiency but Jobs is no longer around to maintain the brand.
It can be done without him but to assume that it will is to underestimate his importance.
"If, after well over a decade, you still don't understand why Apple's kit sells, you are not only missing the point, you are part of the problem."
"If you genuinely want to help save the planet"
?! I really think you're on a different topic from the rest of us.
"It never ceases to amaze me - the number of people whose incisive insight is so vastly superior to that of those who run these companies."
Saying Apple need to do something is not the same as saying Apple's executives don't realise this and will not do anything. I'm sure the situation outlined is one they have considered.
"There is an awful lot of cars in the world right now. Only a very small percentage of them are Ferraris, BMWs, Jaguars. Don't see those companies wearing sackcloth & ashes and wailing "We're all doomed".
Ferarri don't make commodity items - in computing terms they are more Cray than Apple. They certainly don't even try and deliver the sort of growth that has fuelled Apple's recent rise.
Jaguar didn't make Ford any money - I don't know how it is doing for Tata. One of its approaches in recent years has been to make cheaper models just as BMW makes hatchbacks now.
Then there's Rolls Royce . . .
Apple are a long way from being in trouble but it would be naive in the extreme to think that they have nothing to worry about and never will.
"Acorn Atoms were still being used to drive experiments in the first-year physics labs at the University of Kent into the early 90s"
BBC Bs were still in use in the Oxford computing labs as late as 1994 (when I was buying my Viglen 486 PC).
Admittedly it mostly seemed they were used to play the second processor version of Elite.
Does it faithfully reproduce the hugely irritating click noise I seem to remember the machine producing with each keypress?
"I suspect any "AI" entered into this competition is engineered with a focus on this particular test anyway."
Yes, good point, but it would be a shame if any effort was directed at making responses less perfect than they might be just in order to win the prize.
I mean you could consider adding in possible responses along the lines of "Yeah, my mum always says that" or "That's not how I learned it at school" to try and fool the judges but it wouldn't advance the core technology at all.
"is email not the best medium to use when sacking anyone?"
The actual sacking may have been done face-to-face - the email reads like a standard admin procedure for departing staff rather than a "you are fired" message.
But I wouldn't want to suggest Aviva isn't utterly incompetent and uncaring - in their line of work doing so may count as harmful to their reputation.
"I use the kit that my employer provides to do the work with which they task me. I am not prepared to provide my own kit to do that with it"
With respect I think you are approaching this backwards.
The trend here is not for businesses to force employees to provide their own kit but rather for them to cater to the preference some staff have to work on their own devices.
If someone wants to work on an iPad that they bring in from home and we can make that workable then why not?
Obviously if they don't want to bring their own kit then they can use the PC provided for them which is a suitable as it ever was.
I'm somewhat cynical about the 'stick it to the man' credentials of all this but both this and Pebble are interesting projects that I'm happy to have donated to, and Fargo's 'Kick It Forward' plan to redistribute profits is interesting.
Looking forward to a Kickstarter project where one of the rewards for funding is a share of the eventual profits - sort of distributed venture capital plan.
at Apple's behaviour here - it's not like they need the cash. You'd think they'd want as many units shipped as possible to increase their hold on the apps market - this sort of thing will result in some large customers not picking them as something to standardise on.
If you want 300 delivered and inventoried with a single point of contact for proper support you aren't going to head down to Regent St with a company credit card.
Almost certainly equals no good reason for me to prefer it to a Android / iOS tablet at work.
I think we're likely to have sorted out the management of these devices before Microsoft comes along with anything useful in this regard and once we've put the effort in they will struggle to win us back.
Customers seem to want iPads (apart from one who is sold on RIM's PlayBook for some reason) and if there's nothing given to us to make managing Windows devices better and cheaper we're going to give them what they want.
The only useful statistic when comparing the safety of different methods of generation is lives lost per gigawatt generated
Whether or not that is true does anyone really give a monkey's about the safety aspect?
I mean no one wants a disaster but if we really cared about people dying we'd have a serious look at what is going on on our roads for example.
All the indications are that economic motives outweigh safety concerns.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2020