No, they just borrow ideas...........
2111 posts • joined 4 Oct 2011
No, they just borrow ideas...........
Sneaky sneaky sneaky, but we should not be surprised.
Once they get their teeth into gaming there won't be enough space on the servers for the rest of the world.
Population 1,354,040,001 as of the 27 December 2012
Never a truer word said.
Why do these people think that anyone working on a building site will need a bash resistant smart phone with less functions?
Stick with whatever phone you want and buy a decent case for it, Lifeproof, Otterbox or Gumdrop etc.
I work outdoors, go on site and have dropped my phone on a number of occasions, it survived.
This CAT phone is trying to solve a problem that doesn't actually exist.
If they give these people what they want it will see the demise of the Xbox quicker than an ice cream on Brighton beach in a heat wave.
Would not be surprised to see sales slump.
Still, the US has had access to the system for years, it's just that they don't talk about it.
Well maybe his vision might work in a city, but elsewhere? I think not.
I have a car because I don't like sitting on bubblegum strewn seats, breathing in other people's bad breath, smelling their sweat, there is no real bus service where I live and no railway station nearby.
Oh, and except for the odd three car traffic jam, it's a pleasure to drive here.
I am not a number.
PCs of all shapes and sizes can do most things well enough. PC sales were once driven by the need to update hardware to keep up with complex software.
Except for trying to make a PC more power efficient there is a distinct lull in real innovation.
It is the ideal way to recruit eye candy for front of house work. You can sift through and reject the ugly ones.
Heins reminds me of Major General John Sedgewick at the battle of Battle of Spotsylvania Court House 1864 who said the infamous words:
'I'm ashamed of you dodging that way. They couldn't hit an elephant at this dist..........'
I am perplexed that Heins cannot see the wood from the trees.
I'd rather I didn't have a phone, just to have a bit of peice and quiet, like the old days when people phoned back if it was important or left a message on an answer phone.
Imagine a day, no wife moaning and demanding I bring home a bottle of milk, no children demanding a taxi service, no customers demanding instant service, no boss demanding instant demands, no spam, no telesales, no messaging.
That would be a wonderful world, and in 20 years or 40 if the Government keeps messing about when I retire early I will throw my phone into the sea.
Profits don't come from upgrading to the latest Android operating system. Profits come from having to buy a new phone and subsidise the handset through a contract.
That's one reason why I decided to end my relationship with Android, that and the fact that the severely delayed ICS update destroyed a good phone.
Now I buy a new phone every year, sell the old one on and spend no more than £12 a month on a sim only contract. The economic benefits are simple when you consider I usually get in excess of 70% of the original value of the phone I sell. A two year old end of contract phone on the other hand has very little value on the second hand market.
The phone in question, well I don't have to explain, but it's the one that has the highest resale value.
It's all economics really.
Throw as many designs and sizes against a wall and one might stick. Seems to be a policy of design first and see if anyone wants one then keep bringing out stuff in the hope that they will sell.
I just wonder what the longevity of these other designs are, especially as the iPad has been relatively unchanged since day one and still sells.
If it can be stabilised in the air then great, but you'd see nothing if a spin bowler were to throw it.
Why do you think the Labour Party tried to introduce this monitoring and surveillance during the time it was running the country. Why do you think that the Conservatives are now trying to introduce a similar law?
They want to legitimise reading our emails, listening to our phone conversations and knowing who we ring, who we talk to and how we live.
Yet we know they are already doing it anyway and in secret.
It's all about power, they want to know what we think, what we say, what we do because they want to have control over us. Information is power.
Of course, they do excuse themselves by saying they are only doing this to protect us, and if you have nothing to hide...... You have nothing to fear.
If they had the technology they'd enact a law that made mind reading compulsory.
The more these kind of authoritarian countries use censorship the more likely they are to promote dissent.
'Fanny Schlatter', you just couldn't make a name like that up could you!
Her boss wasn't by any chance a Brazilian was he?
Everyone knew it was Israel and the US, it was the worst best kept secret in the security services. Though now it has been made 'official' it must hurt.
I wonder how long it will be before Mr Snowden meets with an untimely death in a car crash/aircrash, bee sting, food poisoning, slipped on wet floor getting out of a shower, drowning in the bath, overdose, bumping his head on a window ledge or falling down stairs?
You have got to feel for the guy.
If you haven't erased your profile then now is the time to do it.
It matters not, the bigger the business the bigger the accountancy department used solely to minimise tax liability. HMRC and the like just don't have the staff or brains to chase the convoluted snake trail of tax avoidance schemes.
Tho Samsung, Apple etc etc, this is money worth spending.
Instead, tax is squeezed out of small businesses because it is easier to chase and collect and bully.
There's not much you can do to prosecute an 10 year old script kiddie who works out of his mum and dads basement. The worst that could happen to him is to take away his milk and biscuits and make him go to bed early.
The guilty pleas and then the lenient sentences were so that no one dug down deeper into this. Bet there was a lot more that they didn't want to air.
As a small business owner that had a number of contracts with Government departments when everything was done at a local level I can tell you this.
The Government brings in facilities management companies to take over from locally led Public sector departments. The facilities management companies then ask for tenders for the same service you had been providing but they want it done on a 'national level' which pretty much excludes any small local business that was able to operate on a local, county or regional level.
The tenders are weighted in such a way that local businesses have no chance whatsoever of being successful.
The resultant winners of the 'tenders' are the always the big companies.
Lip service and bullshit again.
The courts will be sympathetic to anyone who gives a google glasses wearer a good smack in the chops.
By going to another supplier, especially a smaller one, Apple have more exclusivity and may well be able to demand more and may be more innovative. The risk is not with Apple, it's with the company that makes the components for them, especially if all eggs are in one basket.
3 days later...
Sorry Apple we made a mistake, please don't sue us.
(All the paperwork is elsewhere!)
Yes it is just a Game Show with a prize, that anyone takes it seriously is beyond me.
Just sit back, watch it and enjoy the fact that you can watch a bunch of inadequate self publicist idiots humiliate and make fools out of themselves.
It takes over where Big Brother left off, it's fun to watch.
The fact that they all take themselves so seriously is even funnier, I mean, we all know people like this exist but to bring so many together in one place, amazing!
Once you get to top speed.... How the hell do you stop?
For my Zimmer frame.............
Ask questions later,
Collude with colleges,
Amend pocket book to suit the situation,
Lie in court.
Might not be a good idea to get this out in public.
Empires fall, empires decline.
With all that is being reported, the USA has all but got cameras in every room of every house.
They preach privacy and human rights and at the same time they fcuk from behind.
It's all kept in storage until the day they use it against you....... And they will.
I bet what is being reported in the press is nothing compared to the bully boy tactics the US administration is using behind the scenes.
Yes but you could get a lot of sweeties for 1d in old money.please note not p but a d
They used to give grants in North Wales until the Welsh Assembly came into being and diverted all the cash to Cardiff.
When the grant runs out they will move on.
He will be walking from a bar to his apartment in Ecuador, he will hear a brief crunch of gravel.....
He wakes up to find himself in an unfamiliar hotel room, there is a knock on the door.
He opens to do to be confronted by two rather large police officers.
'Good Morning Mr Snowden, welcome to Florida, please come with us, we have a few questions we need to ask you.'
Statement regarding his capture, 'Acting on annoymous information that Mr Snowden had returned to the US we attended.....'
Keep saying it an someone might believe you.
Only in America.
In the hands of an American nutter with a grevance I doubt that the ammunition can differentiate between children and Muslims, though I'm not a betting man I bet they kill more innocent people than they kill those that they were designed for.
New Galaxy Tab 2 £241.98
New iPhone 4S £445.00
Prices Courtesy of Amazon.
Great deal is it not?
These stories appear about a month or two before Apple announce a new product or update to a product.
It's only done to get publicity.....
The original card was for 20 journeys, if you worked Mon-Fri and didn't travel at weekends it would last 4 working weeks.
The new card is a 7 day pass so over the same period you would need to buy an extra two passes to get you through 4 working weeks, a total of £48.
Or if you divided it up into single journeys it would be £1.10 against £1.71 per journey.
It is as they claim 'better value' could they please come to a televised forum and explain why?
Obviously it has been introduced to increase revenue at the expense of travellers......
In Brazil the Government quickly changed its mind over the fare increases there, it just depends on how strongly you feel about it and if you want to protest.
Some people see the word 'free or cheap storage' and then really abuse the system.
90% of the photographs are just stored snaps that over the course of a year or two are pretty much forgotten and not looked at or ever used.
These storage facilities then become dustbins and filled to over flowing with crap.
In the old days, the crap you'd accumulate, including photos that never developed properly were sorted and thrown out. However now some people think they need to store everything.
The Cloud providers can't keep adding and expanding their storage indefinitely, it's up to people using it to be sensible.
If they had to store it on their own hard drives they might be a bit moe discerning.
If Americans all changed over to cars that manage a minimum of 33 miles to the gallon, if the Chinese stopped building coal fires power stations, if the Indonesians stopped slash and burn, if wood burning stoves wee banned in India, if Australians stopped digging out minerals, if farmers stopped field run off into rivers, if fracking had not been invented, if the world population was put on birth control, if if if if if if if if if ....
Then we might have a chance.
Simple solution to this has been around for years, just write a letter.
When they develop an electric car that has a range of 500 miles at 80mph and does this on two Duracell AA batteries I will buy one. Until then I will continue polluting the atmosphere.
What is really ironic is that the country that is supposed to protect the individual, promote freedom of speech and guarantee their privacy and freedom of expression , namely the USA is a backdoor oppressor of these rights.
The worst part is that it is all underhand and without transparency. They can't very well criticise other regimes now can they because they have become a regime and all with the collusion of big business in the name of security.
When they outsource and bring in foreign workers, those workers are not paid in the currency and country they are working in.
These workers are paid in their country of origin and in the currency of their origin and at a lower rate hence the 'cheap labour'. Also save an inordinate amount of tax.
Disinformation/misinformation just for the sake of a headline?
You'd have thought that the Dutch company would have got in contact with Dotcom and asked if he wanted his data or not. It is not as if they could not find him to contact him.
I doubt it was US preseure but I find it most odd, unless they are trying to cover up something they have been party to.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2017