As you say, Amazon wants to rule the world. So does Google.
The Kindle Fire therefore is a bit like Lex Luthor having to team up with the Joker.
188 publicly visible posts • joined 25 Sep 2011
Well said indeed.
This study appears to lump genuine smears (which in my experience are rare) in with people who have genuine grievances but tend to overstate their case or employ course language...as people who have grievances often do (that's human behavior, nothing more).
But even if you lump both types together and call them all "trolls", at the end of the day there is still more truth in what these trolls are spouting online than contained in all of corporate advertising.
...some advertising, but completely untargeted? (Because they're not gathering any information on users, obviously). Every ad would have be in English, for starters. Sorry, France.
I would not object to such a change...much. We absolutely do need open alternatives to Fascesbook (not a typo, look it up when you look up "diaspora") but you're starting to wonder whether the Diaspora guys are remotely competent.
That's right. Those kids aren't dying because they don't have frickin' lasers, it's because they can't afford plain old mosquito nets, cheap though they are.
About the only realistic way this tech will ever reach its intended target, is by donating it to orphanages and such where it might be used to cover one large space with many beds. Maybe.
Once a cookie is blocked, you have to unblock it not through Cookie Culler but through Firefox's own built-in cookies list ("Exceptions" under privacy settings). The reason for this is that the extension behaves in a subservient way to Firefox's built-in cookie settings and defers to it. All this is explained in the FAQ ( http://cookieculler.mozdev.org/ffaq.html ) but the developer admits that it can be confusing. Still a very good extension IMO.
Thanks very much for this exhaustively researched article.
Cookieculler is a dream come true: no cookie is kept apart from the ones I really need and want. Configuring it to do that is a gradual process but quite easy.
Ghostery is, by quite a margin, the best privacy add-on since NoScript, AdBlocker and TorButton. It doesn't conflict with any of those, either, so nothing is stopping you from using them all at the same time. Anonymity is like an onion, after all: several layers of protection are needed.
I have considerable doubts regarding opt-out tools such as TACO, Keep My Opt-Outs, and Firefox's built-in Do Not Track feature. Voluntary regulation of companies usually doesn't work at all, and internet companies seem par for the course. Nothing is stopping those companies from either ignoring or cleverly circumventing the opt-outs.
The final bit of the puzzle is how to prevent them from identifying users by the information contained in user agents and other browser configuration info. , as detailed by the Panopticlick project ( https://panopticlick.eff.org )
Extensions such as TorButton, User Agent Switcher and Random User Agent attempt to remedy this, but so far remain inadequate.
Those modes are designed to keep your doings hidden from the other people using the same computer, or potentially from hackers or investigators who gain remote or direct access to the machine. They don't enhance your anonymity in any other ways.
When it comes to computers, there are two types of privacy: privacy from those with access to your computer, and privacy from internet companies who monitor everything. These two types are almost entirely unrelated. I wish people would stop conflating them.
This applies less less in Europe, where you have high-speed rail everywhere and people are somewhat less attached to cars. If you live in, say, the outskirts of France, then you take the high-speed train to the big hub in Paris and take the plane from there.
Ditto for Japan: you take the shinkansen bullet train to either Tokyo or Osaka, the big international hubs.
Even with the various improvements to airliners, trains continue to be more energy-efficient per passenger, and getting more efficient still. They are also far more environmentally friendlier.
http://files.gereports.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/FINAL-3_Transportation1.jpg
Not surprising, therefore, that Airbus has gone with the A380 idea. From a European and Asian POV I think it makes sense and is quite forward-looking. From an American POV it makes less sense, but that may yet change.
It will be interesting to see how both carbon and scandium behave during the first major crashes. They've run all manner of tests, of course, but nothing completely substitutes for the real thing. Will the planes break up more or less easily, and will they break into more or fewer pieces?
Granted, the answers may simply turn out to be that it's all exactly the same as with the old planes.
Last time I checked (the study "European Privacy and Human Rights" of 2010 by Privacy international), Britain still ranked as lowest in all of Europe, not including Turkey whose European status is debatable.
Allow me to repeat that: in all of Europe.
Hague hasn't lost his touch when it comes to setting new standards of hypocrisy.
@Craig 12
They have indeed made it a society-wide rule that it is always better to have too many employees than to have too few. All those low-paid menial jobs are indeed to keep unemployment down. Also because there is much more social and psychological pressure to make yourself useful to society...even if it is just scraping gum off the handrails for a living.
I lived and commuted in Tokyo for a year and no train was ever late by more than a minute, except on those few occasions when someone killed themselves jumping in front of one. Maybe it was a particularly bad month for suicides when you were there.
Still the finest public transport in the world, IMO. No offense meant to the folks employed by British rail companies, but BR is more like the very opposite.
You are right, the Japanese employ enormous numbers of engineers and cleaning crew to make the whole system run like clockwork, usually working at night. And at the same time, the systems themselves contain many automated, advanced components that require little human input.
BUT, and this is where the irony comes in, neither have they stopped manning the trains and stations with surprisingly numerous employees:
- There isn't just a driver, often (in Osaka, for example) there is a guy at the back of the last wagon, checking whether the crowds have got in okay and the doors can close.
- Even though the ticketing systems are mostly automated, long-distance trains still have people going down the length of the train to check, anyway.
- In the big stations you actually have guys standing around waiting for every train to arrive, apparently doing little more than keeping an eye on things and calling around information.
- Finally, in Tokyo occasionallly you still have those silk-gloved attendants who literally push the crowds into the trains during rush hour.
In short, to the Japanese, highly advanced public transport still needs numerous human employees in order to provide the best possible experience to the travellers. They value both the engineering AND the human presence. This is by far the best philosophy, IMO, but it's not the cheapest approach obviously.
"All just a bit of ground work for when we finally subjugate every potential user in the world, chaps. Omelette, eggs, all that."
Are we just collectively insane, as a society, that we allow draconian information-gathering businesses like Google and FB to operate as they please with only the barest minimum of regulation and oversight? Seriously, it's an increasingly pertinent question.
The American shareholders of Apple benefit from all that. So it's not so much the benefit of Chinese citizens vs. the benefit of American citizens (altough that's often what it looks like at the worker level, certainly) but Americans with capital vs. Americans without capital. Put differently, it's the 1% versus the 99%.
Funny how so many things can be reduced to a single issue (inequality) these days, is it not?
Always suspected that for these drone operators, killing real people on the ground is just like killing people in a video game. Columbine much?
How comforting to know that American killing machines are flying overhead controlled by amoral gaming nerds. The future coming at us fast.
And how appropriate that they were playing not just any game but one (assuming it really was Mafia Wars) in which they act as gangster mafioso!
Which suggests to me the possibility that neither society has much to look forward to, other than a slow spiral into obese, brain-dead decadence. But that's probably assuming too much from too little information.
In any case, the term "brand corporation" makes me want to throw up as much as that double cheeseburger with coke did on a trip to Virginia. It paints a picture of corporations branching out into whatever industry they can stuff with shoddy product. "Why certainly I will buy a car made by Coca Cola. It is my favorite soft drink after all...waddaya mean it's actually made by a different corporation employing Indian kids?? Surely not if it's got the Coca Cola label on it!"
Actually, it gives the judiciary a (potential) veto on what can be sent over the internet. The government writes the laws, but the courts decide whether something is conform to the law, i.e. "lawful".
And the courts already had this power, otherwise we would never have had any copyright lawsuits whatsoever.
So your point stands but only in those cases where the courts side with the federal government.