Re: Un-fool
Well played, well played.
4156 publicly visible posts • joined 6 Aug 2011
"The Register understands that is a reference to Digital Asset – a startup that champions the Digital Asset Modelling Language (DAML) ASX is using on the project. "
So they're swapping out a language where it's main knowledge base are dying (not the language itself), and swapping it with a language that's not widely used or really standard?
I mean, that can only ever end well.
"And the activity is called "computing" not "compute", and you don't sound all trendy and with-it with that loathsome bit of attempted jargony language mangling."
To be fair to that dickhead Rishi, he didn't get the term "compute" from Silicon Valley.
He got it from Red Dwarf, where Rimmer asked Queeg "What does compute mean?" when he's given a feck load of stuff to put in to his Commodore 64.
"Cannot for the life in me understand why people sign up for these subscription schemes, unless they arent aware of how nasty the printer companies are"
For the most part, the consumer buys a printer like they would do a fridge. They buy it and expect it to just "work". If the printer manufacturer advertises the benefits of paying per month compared to buying the cartridge when it runs out, the consumer will go for it as there is an illusion of a benefit to them by doing so. Say their kids are printing stuff for school, wouldn't it be great to get the cartridges every month so that you won't run out half way through on a Sunday night.
That's how companies get away with it. The great tech hive mind know HP/Epson's game, but in the grand scheme of things we're a minority in many ways. They don't care that we know they're gangsters, as long as Bertie Big Biscuits' kid can print their homework via a subscription service without questioning it.
I used it once, and I didn't like it. I think it broke on it's first update, I needed to do work, so didn't bother using it again after that (time pressures). I'd rather use Debian, or Devuan now (thanks systemd).
BUT, that doesn't mean I don't appreciate the impact it's had on Linux and the community as a whole. For that I am thankful, so have a picture of a beer as a thank you.
He's also demanding the closing of Ukrainian skies, which even my 3 month old baby boy knows would mean WW3.
So while I feel for him and his country, he needs to be realistic about the support that can be provided rather than the support that would be liked.
It would seriously hurt the Chinese economy if they did such a thing.
Why would they limit the products they sell to countries with GDP's higher in orders of magnitude to help one of their customers with a tiny economy?
"The UK government can be prone to signing contracts for major IT projects before it has a good understanding of the requirements, according to a National Audit Office (NAO) director."
Can't wait for the next article about water continuing to be wet, although I would argue that it's not just IT projects that get signed off without understanding what it's about. Literally every other aspect of government that requires a signature to unleash funds is done without understanding what is needed. It happens in Health (especially), Education etc.
But do you know what part of the whole system that gets signed off with 100% clarity, foresight and understanding? Aspects relating to wages, expenses, and how to get a peerage.
The average Russian isn't as stupid as you're led to believe.
Over the weekend, a large factory went on strike as they were only paid half of their salary due to the collapse of the rouble.
The average Russian is fairly reliant on western services, and the more they are turned off, the more the babushkas talk to other babushkas about the text messages they've received from their sons detailing how utterly shit and depraved the whole situation is, you'll have more public pressure generated within Russia to put a stop to this.
"I mean - leaving the Ukrainian airforce at least semi-functional (MiGs and drones); leaving the comms and power networks up; neglecting to ensure that logistics keep pace with frontline units, leading to those units running out of fuel & supplies; lining up your mobile units in a "40 mile long" convoy (according to latest reports) where they're a sitting duck for aforesaid drones; dropping clusterbombs on civilian areas... surely these are what might be termed schoolboy errors? OK, with the exception of that last one, because Putin has previously shown that he doesn't give a rat's anus about the Geneva Convention or international norms."
It's almost as if he wants to lose, isn't it?
I'm going to give Apple the benefit of the doubt here.
I'm going to say that the people involved in this process, the designer, the accountants, the person/people who puts the patent together are just of an age where they don't remember such a thing being done.
You know, a bit like when Homer Simpson puts the legs on his chair to stop him falling over, thinking Edison had never had the same idea.
"Reports over the weekend suggest that Putin is now threatening to invade Finland and Sweden."
They can't even give the young men they sent to Ukraine enough petrol to run the tanks or food to sustain themselves (leading to looting by the young Russian conscripts). They're not going to have the fuel, weapons or resources to have a pop at another country.
"It's in moments like these that we must be loud, vocal, and clear.
I stand with a free, independent Ukraine."
The thing is, being loud vocal and clear only works if the bully is listening. And like most bullies, he's not listening.
They only hear you when you kick them in the balls. Repeatedly. Until they bleed.
"Come on Apple, you goofed. Own up to it, retire the product and think of a better version."
Why is it Apple's fault that people are dicks?
Come on God, you goofed. Own up to it, retire the product and think of a better version.
I think the issue is that various distributions tend to just say "We're doing X now" without any real consultation, and no real tangible benefits to the Linux ecosystem as a whole. Which then splinters their user base even further.
One such thing would be the use of Snap to install software on to our machines. Ubuntu, bless them, have gone all in with it. Linux Mint, quite rightly, abstained from such a decision. Ubuntu have form remember, with Unity, and have since dropped that altogether to go back to Gnome which they wanted to get away from in the first place.
What needs to happen, and to some respects does happen, is that an application should be installed regardless of the version or flavour of Linux it's being installed on. There are several applications that are available on the "Snap" store, but not as a .deb or through the command line using apt without having to jump through several hoops.
And that's all before we get on to the systemd bullshit.
There are a number of us who use Office 365 this week that have seen first hand how Microsoft tends to defend its users from these scammers.
By listing the domain names of the user's company as being infected with Malware. Then going through all of the emails for that user and their company, removing them from their mailboxes and throwing them in to quarantine en mass.
At which point, they then say "Oops, sorry" after a full 2 days of these shenanigans without so much as an explanation as to why, to only then (from last night) remove emails that have been received this week and then redeliver them to the same mailbox, as if the emails have just been sent.
Colour me surprised that no one seems to have covered this monumental faux pas, that's affected a fair number of customers?
I've absolutely no idea, and I don't think the midwives would even know what I was on about if I asked.
It's hard to describe, I would say it was probably Microsoft Dynamics and tiny checkboxes and text fields littered the page. Imagine, if you will, a WYSIWYG program someone created a form with. It was that basic to the point of unhelpful.
I'm not sure what it is though. I could find out, but that would take 9 months!
"Get some software designed based on what frontline staff *need* to record, and not what the government *wants* them to record"
At times, I'm not sure they know what they need.
In December my wife gave birth to our son, and she was at a Dudley hospital for a week. I was there for the 21 hours she was in labour, and at points where she was out of her head on gas and air, I would sit and watch what was going on around us.
The midwife and her student had a terminal in the room, which they would put their ID card on and it'd log them on. The first thing here I noticed was that every time they would log in, it would take a minute for them to be able to do anything. It seemed that at every log in the computer would load absolutely everything back up for them from scratch, as if it had just started from a cold boot. But between the two of them, both logging in to their respective accounts, and this would happen every time.
I then found out that the maternity unit of this hospital had only just gone digital a few weeks before our boy was born. So the staff were getting frustrated with it taking forever to record an observation that they could throw in to a paper record in seconds. But the biggest frustration they had was with the system.
This particular hospital's trust decided that they wouldn't use the (what I can gather) "Tried and Tested" system hospital trusts in Wolverhampton use. This trust would roll their own. A woman who was training to become a midwife had come from an IT background apparently, and she was tasked with designing the system they have now. I would watch them go through various screens and it was painful to watch them enter the details that they needed to. It was so long, convoluted and difficult to actually work out where a piece of information needed to go. And this was something designed by someone who would end up using it!
Providing better working conditions for nurses, giving them the pay rise they deserve, remove the reliance of 3rd party service providers by bringing that all back in to the NHS would go a long way to resolving the issues.
That didn't cost me £500,000,000 to suggest, and it's all things that are painfully clear (amongst other items) that anyone who's used our NHS in the last 6 months alone would know or seen.
But of course, none of the above suggestions puts money in to the brown envelopes of people with close personal ties to various people involved in the decision making process.
When my friend started about 8 years ago, they found out someone had a fully built Land Rover Defender at their house. They had been lifting parts from the site and bringing it home. It was fully built too, minus some wheels, and it was the wheels that got him caught.
Not the engine, chassis, and other large items. No, the wheels!
"Jaguar Land Rover, the custodian of those iconic British car brands owned by India's Tata Motors, this week announced lost £9m in the final quarter of 2021 in part down to the global semiconductor shortage which followed the start of the COVID-19 pandemic."
Of course the loss is down to chip shortages.
It has absolutely nothing to do with:
- poor build quality
- poor quality control
- poor management of line staff building the cars
- poor design of the components used
- poor direction from management staff
I've been behind a chap at the petrol station in his brand new Range Rover - 20 miles on the clock, just picked up from the dealership - with diesel gushing out of the underside of the vehicle as he's filling it up. Why? The car is saying it's out of diesel, yet they hadn't bothered to connect the fuel tank properly.
A friend of mine works on the line for JLR, and he's 5ft 9. He's tasked with fitting a specific part on to a Range Rover (not the fuel tank I might add!), and he can't reach it. He has to strain and contort his body in order to fit it, resulting in hurting his back which then results in him going on sick for 2 months. When he returns, even after the obligatory health and safety check with occupational health, they stick him back on the same job - even though they have noted and said that he's physically unsuited to the job. A week later his back is gone again, and he's off for 2 months.
Every car JLR build goes on a run. Specific employees get the keys to these cars and take them for a mixed run. Slow speeds, then fast speeds on various roads around the factory. It's been known that these idiots thrash the cars in to hedges etc, scuffing/scraping the paint along the sides of the cars. Instead of owning up to it, they park the cars in a part of the car park next to skips, so that they can say they didn't damage the car but loading of the skips did.
I could go on, but it's ridiculous really for JLR to point their loses on chip shortages when they have far more endemic, entrenched issues at hand that they're not addressing.
There is a very simple counter argument, that the lay person can understand.
Would you willingly accept someone you don't know standing outside of your front door, and when the postman comes to deliver your letters, this person would take the letters and read them before putting them through your door?
No?
Then why would you be against E2EE?
The trust of the employers in their employees didn't match the pandemic. There are managers who are still of the belief that if they can't see you working then you must not be working. How could an employee possibly work if their manager isn't there to keep a beady eye on them?
I'm lucky in that the place I work that there are just as many managers who do trust their employees as there are those who don't. My manager trusts me to do the job, and so far going in 2/3 days a week has been great for me and for the production of the work I'm undertaking.
A friend isn't so lucky, having to meet quotas while at home that can't be met even if they work in the office. His business, up until Brexshit anyway, had a high staff turnover. It doesn't pay much and there was a steady stream of people to do the job. Except, now, people have left and they're struggling to get people in. Not so much that they're getting the wrong applicants, it's that they're not getting applicants at all. And instead of addressing work place conditions and pay, they've decided that the current staff need to step up to fill the gaps, which has resulted in more people leaving etc etc. My friend, incidentally, will be leaving as soon as his wife's maternity is up to become the full time parent at home, as it makes more financial sense for him to do that than to go to work. Which is insane.
We are, whether you like it or not, through the looking glass. Businesses will prosper as they start to genuinely treat their workforce with respect and help them properly. Not in the way that companies of old did, where they provided you a house etc as long as you worked for them. These businesses will provide them with a means to better their life, and a happy workforce is a productive workforce and a loyal one too. Businesses who start to fold, or bitch and moan about recruitment and blaming things like Brexshit, won't have learnt the lessons that played out during the pandemic.
Anyway.
I could not be less bothered by this. The older I get, the more disenfranchised I am of the gaming scene. Long gone are the days where you could just switch on the console and jump in to a game for a quick 5 minute blast. Now you have to sit there while the console decides whether or not to install an update, and when it does it takes forever, then you get bombarded with loads of screens about "what's new" and it's always f**king new skins or new ways to steal money out of my wallet. Your 5 minutes goes fairly quickly on witnessing bullshine.
That said, thankfully there are still smaller studios and developers who are making games that are truly unique and hark back to an earlier time when the game play and story were everything in a game. Instead of now where the consumer demands movie like games, and then pour total scorn on anyone who tried and stumbled to deliver a unique experience. I'm thinking of Cyberpunk for that one, but there's LA Noire as well.
Because of this, studios have to be bigger, have more people working for them for longer hours for (ultimately) less pay, and have to deliver a game that suits the market because a studio or it's owner won't stomach a loss. The margins are razor thin, so they have to sell in the millions otherwise it's failed. That's why we're drowning in a sea of unoriginal games like Call Of Duty and FIFA. Just rinse and repeat, and the sad thing is people are buying in to it.
Bring back my Nintendo 64, all is forgiven.