You should tell America's Cup helmsman Nathan Outteridge you can't do a foiling tack/gybe in a monohull - https://youtu.be/ta12lE7xiSk
207 posts • joined 21 Jul 2011
You should tell America's Cup helmsman Nathan Outteridge you can't do a foiling tack/gybe in a monohull - https://youtu.be/ta12lE7xiSk
There are already more boats provisionally entered for the America's Cup regatta in Auckland, than Ellison attracted to any of his AC regattas.
The new boats may be monohulls, but they will be foiling monohulls, not displacement boats.
Ben1892, you are trash talking an event you no nothing about.
There are more announced entries for the America's Cup regatta in Auckland, than Ellison could ever hope for in his "series".
Now that Ellison is out of the America's Cup, other US yacht syndicates are entering. American's don't want to play boats with Ellison, they aren't all stupid.
What makes you think they aren't all owned by Oracle already?
If the Russians didn't have anything to hide, why turn any of the AIS off, AIS is a safety system.
Funny how the Brits, the US, the Chinese, the Indians, the Italians, the South Koreans and the Turks all have carriers currently under construction and Russia and Brazil have announced plans for further carriers. Without the required ships to make up a Carrier Strike/battle group, carriers are vulnerable. They are not "lone wolf" operators, they are deployed as part of a coordinated force.
From time to time I work with systems on board race boats. Apart from the media and regatta management feeds, all communications to or from a boat, including telemetry and voice, is encrypted, all the time. This has been the case since the mid-80s. And that includes the team support boats as well.
Seriously it isn't difficult. I cannot imagine that vessels such as LPG tankers are not using encrypted links. But the reality is that strange things happen. For a surprising amount of time, the Taliban used to watch the video feed from the drones that were spying on them. The issues of latency when using VPNs over satellite links are well understood these days.
When the Kuznetsov was swanning around the Eastern Med and and whilst underway from and to its home port in Arctic Russia, it was always easy to find her, despite her AIS (Automatic Identification System) being turned off, her escorting tug usually left the AIS on. And if it wasn't the tug, it was one of the auxiliary support vessels. Perhaps everybody's matelots are a bit dim in this respect.
For Enterprises and SMEs the Gin factory has become less and less relevant.
So booked sales become unbooked as what's in the box doesn't deliver in reality. For example, they do not have a deployable branch security appliance (no LTE failover capability despite a USB3 port, incapable of passing multicast that originates from the WAN), but they will sell one.
I am old enough to remember the lengths to which the Irish government went to temps foreign businesses in general and Apple in particular to Ireland, At the time it was a complete package - taxation rates that undercut all the logical alternatives, development and establishment subsidies, funded training schemes, including a soft ride through the regulatory agencies; news of the deal was received with astonishment around the world. There are still Irish politicians around who will do anything not to become implicated in the discussions about the relationship between Eire, government members and Apple. It goes far further than corporation tax.
The EU is the largest trading bloc in the world. Placing a data centre on its periphery in an isolated nation with poor infrastructure and an under-educated workforce only makes sense if the sweetheart deal lasts.
The only reason Apple is planning a data centre in Ireland is to benefit from the sweetheart deal the corporation has with the Irish State.
These tax dodging and development "deals" amount to little more than bribery and are in the process of being dismantled by the EU. At that point Ireland will discover that data centres are amazing portable, if Apple doesn't abandon the project first.
There are plenty of outstanding and smart US sailors, they won't go sailing with Ellison.
Cyclors are not banned. They are always more efficient than grinders and generating power, as long as they are in the loop. Previously when the Swedes tried them they were out of the loop, and it was a bit uncoordinated, so people dropped the idea. But foiling monohulls probably need the power house to be more mobile than a cat does.
Ellison has been involved in sailing for a long time, remember Sayonara? He just doesn't like it when the boat goes up and down. Because he has dropped out, we look like having multiple US entries for the next America's Cup regatta. Ellison is not much liked, many syndicates would rather miss a regatta than have to compete with him.
The top end devices, specially the Surface Book and Surface Studio are eye-wateringly expensive, and use old tech components. How can this be a low margin activity, unless the fixed and marketing costs are out of wack?
Show me a Surface Studio user who wouldn't like to have a second matching monitor. Yet where is it?
Why cripple the processors with too few cores? And can they stream 4K films/TV that is protected? DDR4 memory? Thunderbolt 3?
There is other stuff missing too, but detailed specifications appear to have been removed from the MS web sites.
Why they didn't design it to use the the next gen hardware and release once the components were generally available, is a rookie error.
If a user needs a top end workstation or ultrabook, it is almost guaranteed that the user will need more than one screen. Even spreadsheet jockeys need multiple screens.
Maybe marketing types are unaware of this, MS appears to be completely overwhelmed by them.
Actually Microsoft and Formula 1 have a lot in common - pointless complications and mammothly underwhelming.
And they treat the punters as numpties.
Not true actually, I can photograph cheques and pay them into my account.
Computed X-Ray Tomography
They have tweaked some scanners
Why is this site publishing this story. Why don't they wait until a 'droid presenting TV gets paid more than the humans?
Funny as it is that you say that . . .
better not to open that particular can of worms.
I was there at the time, I was the initial customer for a distributed Prime WAN deployment in my country, that went global; subsequently I was processed through Prime's internal SE course, as a "reward", and worked as part of the benchmarking team on a number of US government tenders, including classified ones.
The Honeywell origins were freely acknowledged if anybody asked, mostly, they didn't.
Quite a lot of OSes were called OS.
Some years ago, when there was a plethora of super-minicomputer company manufacturers, one of the leading lights was Prime Computers. Their operating system, Primos, was based upon Honeywell's development of Multics for super-minis.
Primos was a class act and well ahead of its time in many respects.
I wouldn't dismiss Multics out of hand.
I don't have to justify anything to somebody posting as an Anonymous Coward.
My comment is not in the least xenophobic, unless being concerned about the erosion of individual rights, restriction of democratic rights, the growth of cronyism and the revision of history is defined as xenophobic.
Ten minutes googling reliable sites will show you the extent of what is occurring.
Slovakia is one of the Visegrád group of nations.
Sadly, such shenanigans have become commonplace in those states.
Its the "thumb down" vote that intrigues me ;-
I know of consultants specialising in ERP configuration and implementation that rely on teams of developers living in the Ukraine. With so many flavours of Open Source ERP being promoted, from a very small original code base, this could be an important vector.
Who said sociopaths don't work? Usually they are obsessive about it.
You are making up facts and are way too defensive. Probably sociopathic.
Open Source community "nasty"?
I can think of a few other Tech related groups that are positively scary by comparison. It would be superfluous to identify any in particular, but most of us know a few.
The nature of IT attracts sociopaths, always has.
The MS hardware division remains largely unaware of Thunderbolt 3. The latest Surface feels three (four?) years old.
You must learn to determine when your friends are exaggerating.
Did they also tell you about the testicles hanging out the back of some of the race winning females? (They don't).
One is more likely to deliver a two headed lamb than a multi-headed horse.
Much of the time, telco encryption is deliberately weakened (set the 16 leading bits of the key to 0), so that officially interested parties can freely access users and conversations they wish to monitor. It is so much more convenient that way, no warrants, no oversight.
Right from the outset, the MNOs did not wish to know about SMS, they didn't notice, in any material sense of that word, its capability when GSM was introduced, but they did shut down the (ISDN compliant) dual SIM capability (because customers use it to save costs). MNOs had to be brow-beaten into accepting that users would make use of it, especially when roaming. Believe it or not, they took the same approach to data, remaining in denial about customer take-up until too late.
There are a number of organisations which have official and court approved access to telco switches. However, the number of staff who have access to the data centres which process the telco back-end systems is huge. A number are outsourced. I know of one that outsources its data centre processing to a company that has been bought by its principal competitor. They remain quite relaxed about this, despite ample evidence that there is much to be concerned about.
MNOs should not be allowed out.
The Surface 4, Surface Book and Surface Studio were launched using old technology.
Microsoft did not plan for what would be mainstream when they launched the products, and even the revised versions are off the pace. Not only do they choose the wrong chip sets, but the wrong processors and the wrong memory. And no Thunderbolt 3.
The Surface Studio is promising, what happened to the second screen? Without it is not functional. Hybrid drives in a premium product c'mon!
Even at the eye-watering prices, I'd love to have a dual screen Studio, or even a properly equipped Surface Book or Surface 4. But paying way over the odds for yesterday's bargain bin parts, is not going to happen. Microsoft has achieved the impossible, they have made everything else look affordable, and often faster.
The attractions of Munich, as a base for a Hi-tech business are considerable.
Forget the Oktoberfest, Munich is one of the most cultural cities in Germany, it has great elegance, good schools, including a choice of international schools, universities that teach degree courses in English. The night life is varied, and safe, it has an invigorating climate, and is a terrific base for outdoor pursuits and exploring Europe.
As far as start-ups are concerned, it is already one of Europe's most important research and hi-tech hubs. The sorts of services required by start-ups are on the door step. Direct connections to London, Boston, Atlanta, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Singapore and most other tech centres are plentiful, unlike Berlin (which can't even build itself an airport).
As an enviably pleasant place to live, property prices are higher than say, Berlin,which is a reflection on the comparative desirability and convenience of the two cities. To put it into context, on German reunification, a number of businesses and institution refused to move back to Berlin, despite government pressure for them to do so.
I never had any issues with bank/debit/credit cards in Germany. But then credit card debt is dumb debt, so perhaps the Germans know a thing or two about the matter. If one is not a natural planner and budgeter, then expect to be regarded as irresponsible. Cautious and thrifty German habits are easily acquired. Cash is king, use that to your advantage.
The title says it all - will future releases be in Ahab prior to beta? Will there be a Pequod? Is one of the developers called Ishmael?
So Docker becomes Dicker.
What a bunch of Dock-heads.
Generally speaking Americans and their nation are usually referred to as Number 2's.
The space is not solely for the exclusive use of Battistelli, it also has a conference room, and a hospitality suite. I have no truck with the man's behaviour, he is vile. The board of the EPO is demonstrably incompetent as their ineffectual attempts to rein-in or dispense with the man demonstrate.
Transparency is a relative concept, in much of the world. in this case, some photographs got out, that is pretty transparent by some standards.
Cost £4 Billion, to which add £ 3 Billion of debt = £7 Billion to get out. Not a chance.
Shrinking market - the only reason for anybody to pay more than change for this financial equivalent of a black hole is if the purchaser has an alternative use for the existing towers, such as automotive connectivity, or emergency networks.
Neither of Ark's data centres is inside a "bloody great army base", in the vicinity of, yes. As far as the security goes, I've had to deal with much more secure data centres, elsewhere.
There are locations in Britain which have pretty secure and resilient redundant power supplies together with network access. These are natural locations for data centres as well as government/defence facilities.
As I understand it, the UK originally wanted the new cat system for its new carriers. Then for political reasons it crippled the carriers by mandating that they would not be nuclear powered, which meant the alternative power systems could not generate sufficient electricity to operate the new cats, and the engine rooms did not have sufficient space required to generate sufficient steam to power traditional design cats . . .
So Britain is left with carriers that it cannot afford to equip with sufficient aircraft, carriers that cannot operate with the tanker and AWACs aircraft required by a carrier battle group. A battle group that has a longer RFA tail than is ideal, as a great deal more fuel has to be dragged around the ocean by the auxiliaries, than is the case with nuclear carriers, and there are not sufficient or properly equipped warships to provide the protection a carrier in a hostile situation requires. To make matters worse, shore based reconnaissance is going to be problematic as the newly bought/leased Poseidon aircraft require air tankers with refuelling booms, rather than the drogues, which British aircraft are configured to use.
I'm reasonably confident that the new tech cats will have their gremlins solved, and most likely before either of the British carriers become operational.
I is another "for the want of a nail . . ." saga, but worse, if that's possible.
Channel switching is important - take too long about it and it is a show stopper.
A few years ago there were plans for DVB-H (handheld), along with DVB-T (terrestrial), DVB-C (cable) and DVB-S (satellite). Trials went well, most of the technology issues with respect to playout centres and network design were solved and costs were as anticipated. The killer was that it took too long to switch channels, from memory 4 seconds. This channel switch delay sent viewers back to streaming over the internet. Fortunately the mobile networks managed to cope, but there was a lot of serious interest from all the usual suspects across Europe.
I suspect that if changing channels takes too long on DAB, people will look for other solutions. However, I do notice when changing channels on my online radio app, the delays are irritating.
This isn't a 4G/5G choice, both are required. Professor Webb is behaving like a Luddite.
Quote - "Jersey, the island we nicked from the French,"
and there I was thinking the Channel Islands belonged to the Normans, who nicked England from the English.
traditional meters mostly have an expected lifespan of 30 years. For smart meters it is 5 - 7 years. My apartment complex has quite a time to go before it is 30 years old.
Power billing businesses will charge the consumers for the marked up cost of smart meters and their removal and installation costs at inflated rates. So they replace meters 5 times over 30 years . . . one can see why they like them.
I'm getting badgered to install a new meter. I live in a modern purpose build apartment complex with centralised heating and hot water. There is no gas. My electricity bills are between £20 and £30 per month. The amount mostly depends on whether I use the hob to prepare a stock of dishes to freeze down, or not. Modern solid state computers, network equipment and television are pretty economical to run, my "designer" lamps have LEDs, appliances were all selected with a view to being economical to run.
What is a smart meter going to to do, tell me not to pre-cook my dinners? Go out and watch a friend's television?
Despite telling the garlic-munching electricity company that there are no worthwhile savings to be made, they still want to install a new meter. They must be making money out of this.
Europe was also tabbed as a strong market, particularly in the industrial sector where growing connectivity of appliances means larger networks and the need for cables
The industrial sector needs fibre, rather than copper. I ordered fibre 35 years ago, those sites are still running fibre, in really hostile conditions. The price of fibre to copper converters with PoE injection is dropping all the time.
Even a small switch needs 10/40 GB uplinks, and "campus" deployments should not link buildings using copper, if only to keep the insurance company happy.
I expect lots of disasters in China (not gangnam ( OK Seoul), but, Lightning Style).
As I look at my innocuous and entirely factual original post, I see that I have acquired 3 "thumbs down".
What is objectionable, apart from the fact that I might just know what I am writing about?
People have been running Sybase ASE (where MS SQL Server came from) on Linux (RHEL and CentOS in my experience) for over a decade. I recall running ASE on various flavours of Unix for getting on for 30 years. I wonder if MS had to do a deal with SAP, the company which bought Sybase a few years ago?
I hope it is coincidence and not prescience, but the castle in the photograph at the top of the article is Bodiam.
Bodiam was one of the last, if not the last, castle licensed to be built in England. It wasn't built to defend anything, it was built for show. The curtain walls would have crumbled as soon as an enemy looked at them.
Is Win 10 security any better than Bodiam's?
Who says Google is being given any personal information? It is normal practice to substitute meaningless identifiers, so that once the data sets have been processed, any individual cases of interest may be identified for further investigation by the appropriate clinicians.
This project is being crawled all over by the paranoid, the conspiracy theorists, Chicken-Lickin', fanticists, and the deeply, deeply concerned looking for yet another topic to worry to death.
It is in nobody's interests that there be a breach of privacy. Everybody involved knows this. Far better than all the people getting on their hind legs and screaming about it. One has to wonder are they really concerned about people's privacy, or do they just imagine they are? Is protest what they really want to do, do they just to wreck a big project regardless of its potential benefits?
Some quite bright people get involved in this kind of research, patient confidentiality is one of their overarching principles, they know a great deal more about how to do that than the people protesting.
The culture at MS has changed. As a result the entire organisation is in a ferment of, largely faux, or trivial innovation (does the planet need yet another chat program). Nobody is on top of what is going on. And the side effects can be alarming.
For example -
Carrying out what looks like a normal Win 10 Pro 64-bit upgrade, and, on restarting, finding that the machine is locked out. It appears that when the new version was installed, the "Do not allow (local) accounts without passwords" box was selected by default. Well the machine is in a secure place and never leaves it. It uses a password to access all remote accounts. No particular need for it to have a password, it is physically secure. The only cure for this was to install a new OS version that revealed the short comings in the remote back-up and sync strategy that is in place.
Exchange on-line server - implementing this required a comparatively high level MS tech/engineer logging onto my local machine and carrying out actions he was unable or unwilling to explain. Certainly, I have been unable to find adequate documentation on this matter. Since the incident requiring a fresh OS install, my email system (Exchange/Outlook) does not function correctly - like many people, I have a Business email address and a private email address, different domains, I can no longer send mail from my secondary private email address. Microsoft support has no answer to this problem.
The third example of how out of control MS is, and how absolutely useless their off-shored support teams are, involves access to MS mail accounts (outlook.com and live.co.uk). Office365 / Azure AD have decided that the two mail accounts no longer exist and therefore I can no longer log into them. (They do exist because they are still forwarding new emails to the exchange mail account). I have twice tried to get MS Support to solve this problem. Support appears to not understand what happens, they repeatedly ask the same questions, which I reply to, including screen shots, where required. But Support mindlessly responds by re-asking questions I have previously answered. They are out of their depth and requests the they refer the problem elsewhere are ignored. This is unfortunate, whilst I cannot access the mail accounts, I cannot access the OneDrive account associated with those private email accounts.
Documentation available on-line is confused, out of date or missing. The same goes for the various hard copy/electronic books, and MS Virtual Academy is woefully out of date.
The culture of shovelling inchoate software out the door will come back to haunt Microsoft.
And it is not just software that is stuffed. I have problems with some new expensive hardware - couldn't find an adequate support channel, so wrote a view setting out my problems - received an email saying my post did not fit with MS policy and had accordingly been deleted.
MS repeatedly tries to dodge, and deny the exist of problems.
I do hope somebody in MS with a detectable pulse reads this.
A long time ago, I was told that the name memset() is a nerdyish in joke . . . but as somebody who wrote non-compatible tape conversion systems in Fortran, I was in no position to say anything
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2017