Re: Identifying the original owners...
130 posts • joined 12 Jul 2011
My Mk 1 build made quite a dent losing power at 50m, as it was hauling a Canon camera at the time. As per the regulations, there was nobody anywhere near.
Fly a drone? Gonna crash. Some operators seem to forget that. Don't forget your hard hat.
It is of course Gordon Brown's fault for removing tax relief on dividends in 1997, and thus screwing all UK pensions.
He thought he could get away with it as returns were good at the time, but then came a crash. And later, another crash...
20 years later, and defined pensions are a thing of the past.
Then again, you could be a Wagnerian (although some may say this is just early Prog Rock).
4 tracks, 15 hours. Though I suppose you could have a break after each act if you are a lightweight. :-)
Whether the heavy mob would drag you out of the opera house during a performance to return you to your padded cell is yet to be tested. One day...
Perhaps we should just leave this EU single market thingy.
Depends if it is a mass limit or a weight limit, I suppose...
If it really is a weight limit, then I'm definitely building a UAV airship.
eg See http://www.silent-runner.net/index.php/Main_Page
"Advanced" meaning the civil servants don't understand it and it will cost us all a lot of money.
You jest, but one particular DEFRA application form that I had to deal with once was the worst Excel spreadsheet disaster I've ever come across. How farmers were supposed to deal with that horror I've no idea.
There was a course (££) on said form for land agents but that was mostly about how to work around the broken bits.
I don't think the bizarre EU driven rules helped, either.
It certainly doesn't take more than 5 minutes to think of the many ways that cars can be used to harm society. Ban them now!
As for the idea of automated cars? Even worse.
A grand gesture. We should lend them a similar cultural icon in response. How about HMS Victory?
According to that BBC article "Semi-conductor chips are found in many of the world's computers".
Obviously someone out there is still using valves...
The criteria appear to have been selected to support an agenda (whatever that is). The best sort of statistics, obviously.
This isn't exactly new data, the Corine data set has been available for years and the urban part isn't exactly hard to examine.
I imagine most parts of suburbia under their criteria are 'not densely built on' because they have, shock horror, gardens.
You could go to the other extreme and look for areas with no modern human structures visible (shrinking very rapidly due to wind turbines) - and there isn't really that much.
"Urban" land cover by most definitions is between 5-10%
Flying into a plane engine deliberately would be very difficult, although not completely impossible.
You are right though, none of the bad things can be stopped by technical rules or import bans as the technology is used everywhere.
Maybe the idea is to add anyone to the monitoring list who buys drone parts without also having a licence, but given you could use a mobile phone as a flight controller with a suitable USB interface board, I'm not sure that will really help.
There is no evidence that a consumer drone could bring down an airliner.
I would guess drones are the new UFOs when it comes to airline pilots. Try identifying something 30cm across at 400 knots. How long can you actually see it for?
Don't bet on at least half of these sightings not being geese, plastic bags, etc etc etc.
I'm in the same boat - built in about 2013, dropped into a field from 50m after a power failure and rebuilt with a collection of parts. Thinking of replacing the old 16-bit flight controller with a new one, just because.
I'm not about to fly it anywhere stupid, because crashing happens. I just take monitoring photographs of a wildlife site miles from anywhere. As there is no useful mobile signal there, what good would an app be?
None of the legislation will 'apply' to the idiots anyway.
The man who actually buys Photoshop is as rare as he who is really penitent; indeed, he is exceedingly rare.
Those who believe that they can be certain of their salvation because they have paid for Oracle licences will be eternally damned, together with their finance department.
The article doesn't say what job they were doing.
I'm guessing a large number were in the City, and not necessarily doing development. That's where a lot of Oxbridge science graduates end up.
Hence why the salaries bear no relation to normal computing jobs...
I can "cost" a Bugatti, but that doesn't mean I can afford to run one.
Your 'recent car accident' calls are nothing to do with a recent car accident, unless they actually have the full details.
They call everybody. I get them despite having about 20 years claim free.
I always ask them whether they mean the Rolls-Royce or the Ferrari.
Indeed. I ALWAYS have a paper map and compass in the bag, even if I'm using a phone (with spare battery) for convenience.
Though I don't normally have to count steps on a compass bearing in a whiteout any more, or do a box search for a summit cairn (Scottish winter can be 'interesting'), I do at least know how to do it.
Also, if you are following a bearing in poor visibility, you do actually need a proper compass. Electronic ones are rubbish and I've never seen a sighting compass on a phone.
Anyway, business speak or not, OS maps have always been a promise of adventure to me. Even the ones in SE England.
You mean, I do something useful, someone gives me a token for it, and I can then exchange the token for beer?
I'm sure that would never work.
I'm not particularly a fan of ski resorts, but the impact of Cairngorm ski area is fairly limited in comparison to the entire mountain range. Without tourism, Speyside would struggle.
You won't meet many people on Beinn a' Bhuird, for instance, even in the summer.
Maybe, but this is a UK website.
You could go up to the Jungfraujoch on a train if you want steep cog railways, to a height of 3454m, but we aren't in Switzerland either.
The weather in the Cairngorms is Oceanic rather than Continental, so the temperatures are slightly less extreme than in the US. I suspect there are actually more days of terrible weather in the Cairngorms than on Mount Washington, and they are spread throughout the year.
I don't think a few mph of windspeed either way makes much difference if you are out in it (although the anemometer on the railway actually measured 194mph in 2009).
Two climbers died on Cairngorm at a height of only 2400ft or so on a main path because they were unable to make the last few hundred yards to the car park into a wind-storm. Due to the oceanic nature of the environment, snow is often thawed and then refrozen into ice, which makes finding shelter extremely difficult.
Anyway, the expensive train set on Cairngorm is a bit of a white elephant, but an amusing one. I would normally walk up, though.
I'm still using one!
I have a 'smart' phone but when you are going somewhere that doesn't have power sockets every 50 yards, then it is by far the better option for making phone calls.
Shares down close to 20% last time I looked.
These people shouldn't be "leaving the business", they should bankrupted and in jail.
I'm guessing the point was that, yes, a human pilot can make a split second decision to land on the Hudson and pull that off, but a human pilot can also decide to press on without enough contingency fuel and crash into a mountainside. Or just decide to crash into a mountainside for the hell of it.
So just because an autopilot can't land on the Hudson (if that's even true) doesn't mean that it wouldn't be better overall.
300W is a lot. If you could average that kind of output you would be winning the Tour de France (although you might need 400W to keep up on climbs).
Walking is about 50W.
Not that this makes any material difference to the result.
And even fewer voted to stay.
Odd how prerogative can be used to sign the Lisbon Treaty (albeit in a cupboard after the main event) - thus removing powers from parliament - but not invoking A50, which will by contrast return powers to parliament.
So you support the locking up of academic papers in journals that nobody can afford to read?
If it was in Yorkshire, the pensioner using the £1 shop might well be the one with £150k to spare.
He is serious — and don’t call him Shirley.
obviously I don't know them all as there's a limit to how much someone talking about themselves you can take.
How do you know when a fast jet pilot comes into the bar?
He tells you.
There are different sizes of infinity I'm afraid - for instance there are more real numbers than positive whole numbers, but both sets are infinite.
See: the work of Georg Cantor
This isn't going to work that well (other than as a first pass) as many flowers are very similar, and a large number of plants require you to look at more than the flower to separate them.
Portable DNA sequencing is the future, and it will probably reveal all sorts of interesting data about plant sub-species and population relationships.
You can already mow a meadow, whizz up the cuttings, and identify all the plants from the juice. Great Crested Newt surveys can already be done by taking a water sample and sending it off to check for environmental newt DNA instead of (much more expensive) trapping and night-time searches.
It surely won't be that long before your smartphone (or a similar sized machine) will able to do sequencing in the field.
Peugeot made good bikes long before it started making rubbish cars.
Looks like Ford now want to make rubbish bikes long after it started making average cars.
There are plenty of better options if you really wanted something like this for nefarious use. 550g is quite a low payload as far as some UAVs / multicopters / model aircraft go.
However, the most recent incidents seem to involve people with no regard for their own safety, so why go to all that trouble?
Besides, almost everything can be used for ill. You can deliver a lot more than 550g with a car or a truck (ask the IRA) but we haven't banned them yet. Mobile phones make excellent triggers but we haven't banned those either.
I'm more interested in doing useful things with new technology than worrying about what anyone else might do with it.
He [Yossarian] had decided to live forever or die in the attempt *
* Joseph Heller - Catch 22
The problem with pork is a parasite, Taenia solium:
Best avoided if you can't cook it properly and/or the farming environment isn't controlled.
This is the main reason for several religions banning it. Probably sensible at the time...
Ah, but if all the cars are automatic, there won't be anyone jumping the red light.
In fact, there probably won't be a need for a red light either, but that's level 2.
It will be illegal - except for those above the law, eh?
Who lobbied the bureaucrats? They don't usually come up with this kind of thing on their own.
It is definitely inclined at some angle. Possibly as much as 30 degrees.
You can see one of the antennas resting on the surface in the bottom right of the image.
Perhaps it bounced along until it hit a rock?
Worry is that the solar panels won't get enough power. Maybe they'll try and bounce it again with the harpoons, the drill, or the flywheel after they've done some science.
I'd expect them to make no profit at all in the UK if their accountants have done their sums correctly.
The question you need to ask is:
How much profit does the entire organisation make?
(I think it was US$1.5 billion last year)
It is still mine and you can prise it out of etc etc etc...
News for Jake:
We are all going to die, I'm afraid.
I just can't tell you when.
It is for me.
The less entertainment, the better!
Anyway, flying things around is not new - RC has been around for 80 years. Things flying themselves around - that's different.
At spiffy prices!
Good if you've got a Hollywood budget and you are replacing an even more expensive helicopter.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2018