Re: Already turned off on my One+3
Same here, just checked, also off, also no memory of doing this myself. Also a One+3
665 posts • joined 17 Jun 2011
Same here, just checked, also off, also no memory of doing this myself. Also a One+3
<pedant> I assume you mean 8 Mbps, not actually 8mps?</pedant>
If so then you have way more than enough even for iPlayer HD content, let alone SD.
SD in iPlayer is 1.5 Mbps, it maxes out at 2.8 Mbps for their HD content
Your issue seems to be either a local problem (like poor wifi), or an over subscribed ISP, rather than actual bandwidth per se.
Are you a MS Insider, and asked for the update specifically?
If not, then as mentioned in the article, it's not out yet.
I've had similar with emails with + chars in them (essentially an alias).
Create a new account, + is fine, log in, no issue, then get to some internal settings page that includes the email, and it refuses to accept the +! So edit the + out, save settings, then go to the main admin page and change the email back again, as that page is fine with the +!
Promptly followed by two emails arriving asking me if it was me that changed the address!
Quite: "Honest question here. Why would I need to download a driver for a USB device?".
Basically USB provides connectivity to the device, but doesn't necessarily provide the driver to actually use it.
Many USB devices, such as keyboards, mice, data drives etc. Follow a USB standard, defined for that device type (the 'class'). For example keyboards and mice should be using the USB HID class (Human Interface Device).
The idea being you plug any keyboard or mouse in (and other devices) and USB, and so the OS, knowns how to work with it automatically. A driver is still used, it's just that it's included as standard with the OS, and so is basically transparent to the user. (It's also why you can plug USB keyboards into devices like an XBox One, smart TVs, Sky box etc. and they actually work).
But for rare devices, not covered by a specific class (recent examples being VR headsets for example), as mentioned in the article, they may not be covered by one of the standard USB device classes, and so need a specific driver to be installed to be used (the computer knows a USB device has been plugged in, but not how to use, or at least not properly, it till the driver is installed).
In the early days of USB, many USB device needed it's own driver, these days it should be fairly uncommon to need to install a separate driver..
See here for a list of the standard USB classes:( I know, wiki!)
Including presumably the legal maximum speed for a HGV, which certainly isn't 55.9mpg on a single carriageway in the UK (It's 50 in England and Wales, 40 in Scotland).
Quote: "U2 spying flights in Soviet airspace fell into the same innocent-unless-caught category"
No they didn't, spying is not 'innocent', not unless it's in international airspace (and even then debatable), and flying through someone else's airspace with a military aircraft, without permission, is also not 'innocent'. Put both together, and that's a perfectly good reason to shoot them down.
It's why the U2's were built for such high altitudes, in the hope that it would keep them out of range of the USSR anti-air missile systems. Which of course worked, for a while anyway!
I had a quick look, and this looks more like improving granularity in permissions.
In that answering the phone, and reading phone numbers, can already be done by applications. So this isn't adding something that couldn't previously be done.
The new permissions, as far as I can see after a quick bit of looking around, are around creating a specific permission for that specific function (and some improvements to related APIs), rather than giving blanket access to the phone.
Although of course this does need developers to update their apps to use the new permissions.
Quote: Oh when will Google allow us to revoke permissions to apps.
Settings > Apps > Select an App > click Permissions.
You just turn on and off as you want. Obviously switching off a permission could break the app, but apps are required to play nice, and when launched, it should simply ask for the permission again if it really needs it.
Also permissions these days are on a 'when needed' basis. i.e. Apps should only ask up front for a specific permission, if that permission is needed immediately. Otherwise permissions should be asked for as needed.
As an example, I've got Amazon Shopping on my phone, it has 7 permissions listed, such as Camera, Contacts etc. Not one of them is enabled, as I've never used a feature than needed them (I just check orders, and occasionally buy something).
I think it's awesome that a space probe launched in the 70s, is not just still out there, and running, but still managing to do useful science!
Ditch the solar panels, we need more plutonium powered probes :-)
(Icon, well why not!)
Part of the issue here is that the data still needs to be useful.
Remove too much information, and it's no longer of use.
That anonymous data could potentially be cross-checked with other data sources, and you can then de-anonymise it, despite no directly identifiable information being left in the original data.
For example it might be work absence data, just containing dates and a reason for the absence (holidays, sick etc), and no other details. With the company using the data to predict things like cover requirements (like getting temps in over summer etc).
But someone with access to their time management system, could correlate the dates in the anonymous data, against absence dates in the time management system, and de-anonymise it again.
I think it's this type of scenario that the new law is trying to block.
Still need good laws on the creation of the data in the first place of course :-)
Also a lot of corporate machines around still with Win 7 desktop on.
Gone (for the most part) is the automatic replace/refresh after ~3 years, to a replace/refresh when it breaks.
If your 3+ year old laptop still works, good chance it's still on Win 7.
I also guess a lot of people who'd like an updated corp laptop, are holding out on a refresh, as they don't want to loose their Win 7, and end up being put on 8 or 10!
Oneplus 3 here (original version, not the updated one), and I get OTA updates every few weeks.
Current Android version is at 7.1.1, at a security patch level May 2017. It's rarely more than a month behind Google themselves.
Any other manufactures better than that? I'm genuinely interested to know?
It doesn't help that the popup is over keen as well, turning up a few seconds after boot up, warning that the AV client is out of date, this before the AV client has even managed to check online for updates (which it completed a few seconds later)!
Thanks for the link, it's worth a read of the page if only for a laugh!
Some highlights: (bear in mind this is an RJ45 Ethernet cable!)
* Solid 100% Silver Conductors : Perfect-Surface Technology applied to extreme-purity silver provides unprecedented clarity and dynamic contrast.
* Directionality - All audio cables are directional. The correct direction is determined by listening to every batch of metal conductors used in every AudioQuest audio cable. Arrows are clearly marked on the connectors to ensure superior sound quality. For best results have the arrow pointing in the direction of the flow of music. For example, NAS to Router, Router to Network Player.
* Dielectric-Bias System - All insulation slows down the signal on the conductor inside. When insulation is unbiased, it slows down parts of the signal differently, a big problem for very time-sensitive multi-octave audio. AudioQuest’s DBS creates a strong, stable electrostatic field which saturates and polarizes (organizes) the molecules of the insulation. This minimizes both energy storage in the insulation and the multiple nonlinear time-delays that occur. Sound appears from a surprisingly black background with unexpected detail and dynamic contrast.
What do these people smoke!?
Don't forget it needs to be gold plated as well, you can really tell the difference when they are, honest!
Part of the content issue is time.
It takes 3+ years to produce a AAA title, plus a lot of the big risk averse studios, want a bigger market before diving in, so you end up in a catch 22 situation of people don't buy VR, as there is nothing of interest, and studios not producing, as there isn't enough user base.
Things should start to change over the next 6 months or so, as some of the larger games start to come out (i.e. more than the 4 hours long, and are not just basically the $5 tech demos you have now (other than ED)).
Fallout 4 VR should be an interesting test of the waters, a full AAA tittle in VR.
I would also suspect moving forwards, that a new non VR 3D game will be easier to convert to VR, as long as it has been designed appropriately from the beginning (i.e not used 2D overlays for weather effects, or weapon selection menus etc, which are common issues with porting many existing games).
If it's all already fully rendered in 3D, with a bit of forethought, then less effort (and so less cost) to make it VR friendly.
There's no real reason why the next CoD/Battlefield type game couldn't be VR ready with only minimal effort, if planned in from the begging. (All mainstream game engines, as used by almost all AAA titles, have VR built in now, and have done for some time).
Doesn't fix the other issues though, although as someone else already mentioned elsewhere in the comments, about 25% of existing Steam users already own a VR capable machine, and about 25% more only need a better GFX card, and for entry level VR, that's about $200. Meaning about 50% or so off the current PC gaming userbase, is either already VR ready, or not too far off.
We just need to content!
Why would you say it's a non starter because you wear glasses?
I you're shortsighted, you can usually just use VR without your glasses (at least my friends who are shortsighted do that, and without issue).
I also wear glasses, but I'm longsighted, so don't have the option to be without, and I have no issues in VR (I have a Vive) with my glasses on, and can happily be in VR for several hours without discomfort or eye strain.
Granted you can't have the VR lenses adjusted quite as close to your face as you can without glasses, but the only impact that has is your field-of-view is slightly reduced (I also have contacts, so have tried with both contacts and glasses as a comparison, there was minimal difference).
The Vives headset also doesn't impact on the frames themselves, i.e. it's not pushing the frames into the bridge of your nose. (At least not in my case).
The only time I could see it being an issue for people with glasses, is if you've gone and bought some of those 70s/80s style large and/or thick frames ones, or if you only have bi or vary-focal lenses (as the bottom part of the screen is blurred), I know this personally, as I have vary-focals these days, so I just wear an older fixed lens pair of glasses I have as a backup.
She's right, it's not a sport.
For something to be a sport, it needs to be a challenge, so I don't think baiting PC World staff would qualify in that regards!
Pint, because, well why not.
Last time I went in to a PC World, dressed as a geek (my normal look), one of them started asking me about Chromebooks, and if they could use it for college work!
Why would ARM be a direct threat to Intel?
ARM don't produce chips themselves, and Intel are licensed to manufacture ARM based chips already.
Even if ARM do take off in the server and/or desktop space, it could well still have an Intel badge on it, and you can bet the budget holders when given the choice of purchasing and 'Intel ARM' chip, or some other brand, would likely stick with Intel simply as they already have an existing relationship with them for their existing x86 estate.
The one thing it could bring is some better competition, but even then, Intel probably have the most advance FABs around. So could likely produce some decent chips, if they put the same effort into ARM as they do currently with x86.
The last personal Laptop I bought was a Acer, back when Win 7 was still newly out. (So 2009, maybe early 2010).
Acer released a grand total of one, yes just one update for it, over the next 5 years. This despite the hardware providers (chipsset, sound, GFX etc) releasing many updates for the underlying hardware, some of which fixed real issues, or improved performance etc.
Seems Acer just couldn't be bothered to do the work needed to add these patches to their update service :-/
I eventually (a couple of years back) did a clean install, from my own media, and just let Windows install what it wanted. Result, a much cleaner, more stable, and fractionally faster system.
Don't think I'll be bothering with Acer again.
Can't thins 'feature' simply be removed from browsers?
Dangerous driving and speeding are not the same thing (one could contribute to the other of course).
I'd be curious on the legality side in the US around dangerous driving in this case, if this happened in the UK, and speed was considered a factor in causing the accident, even if the driver was still within the posted speed limit, the driver could still be prosecuted for dangerous driving.
Quote: "Why is it that modern aircraft, designed and built entirely with modern CAD/CAM techniques and the latest materials, are a lot less reliable than the old designs drawn by hand and made by the lads in the shed out the back before they tootled off to the pub for lunch?"
It's called over engineering.
Designers of old (my Dad was one), had to work things out by hand, (my dad always used a slide-rule, and a handful of reference books). Materials science wasn't as well known/accurate then, so you'd add a bit more here and there, 'just-in-case'. A lot of this would have been gut-feeling, based on experience. My Dad designed gear-boxes and turbines for large vehicles (think quarry trucks. shipping container vessels, hi-speed trains etc.).
Theses days it's all done in the software, to the exact amount they think is needed, with little room for tolerance other than what has been asked for in the specification. I would suspect if they were to add 5% for strength/resilience, 'just-in-case' on top, the weight etc. would all go up too much, and the design would no longer meet it's targets of speed, range or whatever was needed, and of course, the cost would go up!
Old engineers built things to work, to last, and hopefully built something they (and their team) could be proud off.
Modern engineering, like so many other industries, is all about cost, period.
And what relevance does any of what you said, have to the (quite sensible imho) question asked?
Quote: People learn far more from their mistakes than successes. Sure fire the IT dept, but can bet your boots those guys/girls won't make the same mistake twice.
Except in this case, they obviously have, not once, but multiple times. Their databases have been deleted on several occasions, and replaced with warning messages, and they have had to restore the databases each time, and yet apparently, at no stage did they wonder why this was happening, or investigate ways to stop it.
They are most likely different people/teams. The devs were probably hired to build the system, and have likely long since gone. Being replaced by a likely cheaper support team (or person), who probably doesn't know much about MongoDB itself.
There was no mention of paying the ransom, so I'm guessing they just restored from a backup each time (as mentioned in the joke above).
Quote: "By default the power-off button in Windows 8.x and 10 puts the computer into a suspend state. It's not actually off."
Don't know about 8, as never had a copy other than a very early pre-release to have a look at (shudder).
In Win 10 doing a shut-down does power off the device, it's not a suspend (does by default for all the Win 10 Home machines I've set up so far anyway).
But, and here is the catch, Windows 10 uses a hybrid hibernation when you select shutdown, rather than being a 'proper' shutdown.
Basically it closes all the the running Apps and logs you out, just like a traditional shutdown would, but then hibernates the PC. The idea being that you've basically hibernated a running OS, that's already completed its initialisation processes, and so booting back up should be faster.
Within Windows 10, it's know as 'fast startup', which you can disable in settings. Disable this, and shutdown becomes a normal shutdown, and boot up, becomes a cold boot each time, rather then the restore from hibernation that it is by default.
I decided to disable fast startup (and hibernate) on my main PC at home, it's running on SSDs, the boot up time did increase, but only by a second or two.
I suspect, unless you're running on a slow HDD, the 'fast startup' option just isn't really needed.
Plus disabling fast startup reduces writes to the SSD, (as you are basically hibernating every time you switch off), so seemed like a good idea to turn off anyway from an SSD life point of view.
One little tip for the Win 10 Microsoft Account issue, is don't connect the device to the Internet until after you've finished the install/initial set-up. i.e. Don't plug in the Ethernet, or select a Wi-Fi network.
Without Internet, Windows 10 bypasses all the Microsoft Account stuff, and only asks you to provide a local username and password.
Obviously once set-up is complete, you can connect and do what you want afterwards.
One additional warning for anyone using a local account in Win 10 (as I do), if you do use MS services (like XBox/hotmail/O365 etc), and you decide you want to access those services when logged in to Win 10 with the local account, be careful, as some services when adding an MS account, will ask if you want to move/convert your local account to the MS one. Don't do it, just don't!
Never really liked Uber as an entity, but at least they seemed to have shaken up the Taxi market somewhat.
In the past 20 years and until very recently, the only real customer facing technology changes most taxi firms seems to have adopted, were SMS notifications that your car is nearly there, and phone number recognition when ordering, i.e. "Press 1 to be picked up from <blah blah>, otherwise Press 2 to talk to an operator".
But now, even my local Taxi firm has a mobile App (I'm guessing some branded app that multiple taxi firms use), that includes favourite locations, geolocation pickups (i.e. "I have no idea where I am, just come pick me up"), shows where your taxi is on a map in real time, with a real time ETA, a call-your-driver button, payment processing if you want/need it, so no need for cash or messing about with cards in the car, automatic notification when you car is a minute away, so you can make your way outside to meet it etc etc.
I'm fairly sure, if Uber didn't exist, then little would have changed in the last 2 or 3 years.
We had the 6310 as company phones back in the day. We only needed to charge them about once a month!
I think I was still using my 7110 at the time as a personal device, although by then (2001/2002?) you had to manually slide down the bottom plate, as using the spring-loaded release would propel the plate, which held the mic, at great speed onto the floor.
This then mean having someone on the line (as it answered the phone at the same time), going "Hello? Are you there?", whilst you tried to refit the front plate, (with the mic in it), before the person hung up!
First HDD I ever bought for personal use was an 80MB 2.5" drive to fit in an Amiga (an A500 with an adaptor).
I even partitioned it for specific functions, full Workbench on one, trimmed down version for gaming, another command line only boot etc.
If you're on Sky Broadband, IPv6 is enabled by default, (once the local hardware is updated to support it of course).
I've got a ~3 year old Sky Hub, and noticed about a year ago, while I was looking into network configurations for a VM, that my desktop now had a v6 address assigned, as well as a v4. A quick look at the router config, and sure enough I now had a v4 and v6 Internet address, and v6 was routing to the local LAN.
As an example, the above mentioned test site (http://test-ipv6.com/) gives me a 10 out of 10 score on my Desktop PC.
Just as a warning, not all devices at home will support v6 yet, although I was surprised at how many did support it in my house once I checked them out!
As an example, my Sky Box (standard HD box from about 4 years ago, not the newer Q version), only picks up IPv4, and my NAS server is also only IPv4, although the later is simply me not getting round to doing anything about it yet (It's a Linux OS, and had v6 disabled by default).
But all other devices I have, do seem to support IPv6. So that's an XBox One S, two Android phones (OS 6 and 7), my TV (an LG smart from a couple of years back, although is usually disconnected from the network), an old Android LG Tablet that was never supported past 4.4.2, and also my first gen Nexus 7 (2012), all support IPv6!
Quote: "My only complaint is that they took away the bloody delete key..."
Just in case you're not aware, Alt+Backspace should be Delete (doesn't get the button back, but better than nothing!).
For anyone that doesn't know, there are tons of keyboard shortcuts in ChromeOS. To view them on the Chromebook, just hit Ctrl+Alt+? and an interactive overlay should popup, just press the Ctrl, Shift, Alt buttons to see what each modifier key does.
Oldish Lenovo N20P here, and that also has cursor keys.
I found that some of the 'Admin' rights issues could be
fixed worked around by installing apps to a non standard folder, like C:/Apps rather than to 'Program Files' (which of course is a special location for Windows).
Still works now for some legacy XP era apps running on newer Windows.
Didn't work for everything of course though.
Personally, I think disabling things like obsolete security options by default in a mainstream browser like Chrome is a good idea, at least for the vast majority of users.
Although I know what it's like trying to do development work with Chrome on older environments, as I've had issues myself with access etc.
It would be nice if Chrome had a Developer/Super User type mode, where you could then re-enable things, perhaps on a case-by-case basis on a chrome://somename page.
For security, you could even have it based on zones, i.e. specific addresses listed in zone 'XYZ' can use RC4 with TLS (or whatever is needed), anything not listed in zone 'XYZ' (or some other explicit zone) is automatically in the default zone, which still uses the default security, so leaves your Internet and other sites still locked down.
Judging by this chromium bug discussion.
It seems the previous 'Details' button, which took you directly to the Security tab in the Dev tools window, was always just a temporary thing to bring attention to where the security info is located (i.e. inside the Dev tools).
Looks like the plan was always to remove it after a while, as they seem to think regular uses don't need to view the certificates. (Not sure I agree with this myself!)
The new 'Learn more' button is for regular users, rather than developers, so just takes you to the generic web page documenting what the various icons mean etc.
Seems the chromium devs didn't like the idea of regular users landing in the dev tools: Quote '...so that regular users who are newly clicking on the lock icon (due to icon/verbose UI changes) don't click on it and end up somewhere unexpected.'
Like I said, not sure I agree with this approach, and a few people on the chromium forum even suggest having a new link/button to take you directly to the certificate details.
But for now, seems we are stuck with Ctrl+Shift+I, or the More Tools -> Developer tools menu, then click the Security tab :-/
The article seem to indicate that manufactures of Chromebooks would be annoyed....
Quote: "...it is almost certain that antitrust authorities will see it differently: as Google again using its position to force manufacturers to include specific Google software on their systems."
But this doesn't seem to cover the fact that there are no custom apps on Chromebooks! Everything on a Chromebook is already controlled by Google as they all get the same identical OS *.
Manufacturers have to differentiate themselves with the hardware, so the keyboard, screen, battery life etc.
I would suspect that Manufacturers will actually be very happy at this announcement, as it means Chromebooks, which are a tiny, although still growing market, are now more capable devices, without the manufacturers really having to do anything (perhaps some testing, but the devices are the same), and they can now be treated as large Android devices for marketing purposes.
* The one caveat being that eventually devices are dropped from support of the latest builds. Although from what I've seen, this seems to be typically be a much longer time period that a typical phone (4+ years), and support seems to mainly be around hardware capability, rather than New shinny, so old shinny has been dropped tm.
I'm not aware of Google ever stating that the beta would be rolled out to any other devices other than the small handful they've been using to date.
The supported device list (linked in the article), that's been available for quite some time now (well over a year), isn't a roll out list, it's a list of devices that can support the new Android capabilities, and so they plan to support those once the final version is out.
My guess is the devices they chose to support in beta, cover a wide enough cross section of underlying hardware, to cover most (or all) of the other devices.
Quote: "No - the difference is MS never locked out all competing software like Apple and Google do."
Neither do Google.
Apple I can understand, but for Google, you're free to install 3rd party app stores on Android, for example you can download and install the Amazon app store direct from the Amazon web site.
Plus of course a lot of Android devices are the Amazon Fire Tablets, as they are cheap, and readily available (in stock in local supermarkets etc), and those don't come with Googles app such as their Play store.
You sure you've got your dates right?
Stewart was born July 1940 (76 years old).
NG aired in September 1987, so Stewart would have been 47 (on air date, perhaps 46 during filming).
Wheaton was born October 1972, so is currently 44 years old.
So still 2-3 years to go.
Still makes me feel old though :-/
Basic computer usage, such Internet safety (both malware and pervs etc), as well as why backups are important etc, aught to be a mandatory part of school IT lessons.
At least then the kids could pass that on to their parents back home as well.
Unfortunately 2 years seems to be about the sweet spot. Past that and you 'might' get security patches for another 12 months, but most likely nothing after 3 years.
The Nexus devices can last a bit longer, with support usually only being dropped once the hardware can't keep up, but unfortunately that range is no more (the Nexus devices still for sale are basically what's left of the stock).
To me the Pixels are too expensive for what you get, and I'm happy with my OnePlus3 anyway.
Quote: "New platform features arrive via new phones - hardly anyone upgrades Android from one major version to the next using OTA updates."
Isn't the issue here the lack of the OTA updates themselves, rather than the users not doing the updates? Which is what the sentence above seems to imply to me.
Most OTA updates are done automatically, click Yes to a prompt, and you've got an updated phone. Most current Android phones these days get an OTA update every month or two, (although normally just security patches), and most Android phones (at least in my experience) will usually get at least one major OS update in their lifetime (although rarely more the one).
One issue tends to be that manufactures time their new phone releases with new OS versions, and once the new phone is out, they typically drop support of older models in the same range. Perhaps still supporting one previous model, from the year before, but dropping support for models from 2+ years back (maybe just security patches, but no more OS version releases), even through the devices themselves could likely run the OS perfectly fine!
Quote: "Whilst the manuals state that, what did the salesman state?"
That's one of the things the judgement kicked up, basically stating Tesla needed to do more to make it clear in-car that this isn't a fully automated self driving car (at least not yet), and this needed to assume the drivers have not read the manual or other documents etc. i.e. like they've just jumped into a new car and set off, and then hit the autodrive button.
Not just unlawful access.
If something went wrong on the system, even if completely unrelated to your brother, and the investigation then showed unauthorised access around the same time, they could well assume he was involved and call the authorities.
Even if not guilty, just having the police requesting you come in to help with their enquiries doesn't look good to other people.
Quite: "Imagine if Facebook were to collapse overnight, and the servers were turned off. I don't think it would be much of an exaggeration to state that the Western World would fall to pieces.".
I think that's very much an exaggeration!
Facebook may be financially sizeable, but that's almost all (if not all of it) advertising revenue, due to the number of users of the service.
If FB where to suddenly vanish, all that would happen is that people would go elsewhere for their social 'fix', and the advertising revenue would simply go with them.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2017