* Posts by Rampant Spaniel

1813 publicly visible posts • joined 26 May 2011

Microsoft, Adobe, wilt during Australian price gouge grilling

Rampant Spaniel

Re: Gouging

Yes its market forces \ charging what the market will bear etc but it actually works against the USA at times. Look at drug prices in the USA and how it affects the price of healthcare. Europe & Canada pay a fraction of the cost for the drugs because if they don't agree to the pricing they don't get to many customers (NICE in the UK basically negotiates pricing) in that country. So the USA basically makes up most of the profit so it isn't entirely one sided.

The argument for cheap educational software is simple, I got loads of free software legally in university as the university was given it to ensure they taught it. Want a load of oracle engineers, bung the uni a load of software. Same for photoshop, office, spss etc, these people will go out into the workforce being familiar with those programs which aids their purchase by companies. Not sure it's entirely right but I appreciated it at the time!

Fukushima switchboard defeated by rat

Rampant Spaniel

Re: You actually take TEPCO's word for it?

Thats not entirely true, a rat did valiantly perish whilst trying to initiate an unplanned test of backup cooling systems (i.e. a bucket chain).

Rampant Spaniel

Re: Maybe the rat is a mutant,

They need to check the car park for a pink ford anglia with a hamster in the passenger seat!

Rampant Spaniel

Re: Nuclear mutant rats wreaking havoc?

It sounds more like the Whales outsourced their revenge!

Rampant Spaniel

Re: wow

@ ac

I did for 30 years. Right now I would be very happy to have a nuclear reactor on island, all we have is an oil burning power station and a token wind farm.

So you are saying people did die and it got hushed up? How very convienient for your point of view. Yes there may be long term health problems but the point I was making was that it could have been far worse and if commercial interests hadn't been allowed to compromise the safety of the plant in the first place it could have been lots better.

It certainly is not as bad as some people would like to make it out to be. The reality is that we will be using nuclear for a while, it is better to focus on improving security and safety than wage an impossible battle to stop it.

Rampant Spaniel

Re: wow

Leaving cost aside, is nuclear actually all that dangerous in practice? Look at Fukushima, how many people have died? How bad would have the incident been originally if some nerp hadn't fudged the books over the height of the wall required?

I'm not a huge fan of nuclear, but I think for now it has a place as part of our overall strategy for energy generation alongside gas \ wind \ solar \ tidal \ geothermal etc. The sanity of putting nuclear power stations in areas with a history of earthquakes \ tsunamis etc if questionable at best and the continued use of nuclear necessitates an entirely new look at how safety is implemented and monitored so commercial interests cannot fudge things again. Having said that, nuclear isn't as shocking as some people make out and until something better comes along to take up its share it will probably continue to be used.

Vietnamese high school kids can pass Google interview

Rampant Spaniel

Re: Nature/nurture: fight!

I agree with a lot of what you say regarding the quality of education in the states but as regarding overeducating, I'm not sure I agree entirely. I understand your point and it may be true for some people but not everyone. My degrees are in biology, chemistry and computing (but sure as hell wasn't any in English lol) but I ended up taking pictures of people for a living. I've used my degrees along the way and had a lot of fun but I have also had some very random jobs that didn't use them, a few of them would be considered 'menial'. I'm honestly just as happy landscaping or being a human forklift truck or taking pictures as I am working in a lab etc. Perhaps that is just a matter of different people judging themselves by different criteria? Theres nothing wrong with judging yourself by your achievements, I think perhaps we just pick different achievements to focus on.

Bitcoin prices spike on Euro woes

Rampant Spaniel

Re: In troubled times...

Bitcoins safe? I'm not sure I would rank bitcoins as safer than euro stored in a bank backed by a deposit guarantee, the ecb and Germany's determination to keep it's latest conquest of Europe (sorry I meant the single currency) together.

I think bitcoins are interesting, not useless, but I personally would shift my life savings into them even if the alternative was a Spanish bank. Isn't it more possible people are trying to game the exchange rates by taking advantage of the sheep effect in investing? If I was worried about my Spanish bank, a quick trip to Germany to open an account would be a possible solution. Failing that, pick a stable foreign currency thats actually backed by a central back, government and economy.

Osborne slashes growth forecast by half in bleak economy statement

Rampant Spaniel

Re: There are no easy answers for what went wrong over so many years

True, and the goods they buy can be sold on, but not at face value. It's more of a principal thing. The US (and it's not often I'll say they get it right) nailed it with their WIC program. As I understand it, you get a set of vouchers that detail exactly what you can buy with them. They are aimed at improving the diets of pregnant and new mothers and their kids. It will literally say 1 gallon milk, 1lb cheese etc on each voucher. You go to the store and redeem them. You can't even use them on something easy and popular to resell like phone cards or washing powder. Sure you can try and resell a basket of healthy food but good luck with it. I'm sure there is a level of abuse, but I think it does far more good than just giving parents cash to spend in the bingo hall or cheap booze shops.

To be clear, I fully support giving all kids a great start in life and th concept of family tax credit is great. The execution was piss poor. It was a simple vote buying exercise and far too many kids got no benefit from it. The government viewed it's job as getting kids out of poverty and measured this by a baseline income level. They didn't measure if the kids were actually helped or if their parents spent it on smack, bingo, fags and aldi vodka, just that they had given them the money. Not everyone makes great decisions, sad as it is, it is a reality that a huge chunk of all that money just got wasted and if anything made the situation worse. Sure some parents used it as it was intended but a trip to somewhere like Hull or Wythenshawe or Middlesbrough might open some eyes as to just how much didn't.

Rampant Spaniel

Re: Make voting compulsory.

Very true. I don't think we could get close to requiring voting unless there was a genuine option for dissent \ protest voting. I think in recent years turnout has been between 60 and 70 percent for general elections, I know stateside it can be really low for county elections.

The current buggers have it far too easy. If one lot screws up badly they get sin binned for 4-8 years then they are back again. Look at how many got caught with dodgy expense accounts and carried on, and not just carried on but deliberately found a way around the rules by renting houses to each other. I'm sorry but it's insane. They have to be dealt with properly. If I included an invalid expense on my bill to a client I wouldn't work again, at least not in the same job. Yet they can do it publically, repeatedly and all they have to do is some pseudo catholic confession on tv routine, a quick hand through the candle, a hail tony and all is forgiven.

I do think it's our duty to vote, I respect thats old fashioned and unpopular, but we have a duty to try and keep improving. Right now the system is just fundamentally flawed with very little chance of repair.

Rampant Spaniel

Re: Make voting compulsory.

@m gale

Thanks! I wasn't suggesting locking people up nor forcing them to vote for any party. My thought was actually the opposite, capturing the 'they're all scum, drown the buggers' vote.

My reasoning was basically that right now a big chunk of people don't vote for various reasons, some because they can't be arsed (but usually manage to complain the most) but a lot because none of the options are any good. Thats a really valid vote, 'none of the above' needs to be recorded and frankly if the count is high enough then they have to start over with new candidates \ policies.

As it stands you don't get a free vote. You get a chance to vote for one of 3 main parties (at least for your vote to count) and the leader they select. What if 50% of the population think they're all crap and doesn't vote, one of them still gets in as that opinion isn't counted. I do think we need to take some steps to address voter apathy and ensure our leaders are selected by a genuine majority. It might make them start to behave.

Again thank your for explaining your point!

Rampant Spaniel

Re: Make voting compulsory.

You'd hope! Depends how long the queue is and how long your shifts are. With a solid postal \ electronic voting system, decent poll hours and capacity it shouldn't be an issue but lets face it, we aren't talking about people known for their ability to coordinate a pissup in a brewery. It's crazy over here, huge queues, not enough ballot papers, none of it is innocent. Politicians take every chance to try and sway the vote by making it harder for people who aren't in their parties demographic to vote. Then if they do manage to get to the station there can be huge queues which doesn't work if you only have 2 hours to vote in. Never underestimate how low this lot will stoop.

Rampant Spaniel

Re: Make voting compulsory.

Theres 30-40% of people don't bother to vote, I bet they don't bother to stop bitching about things they disagree with. If you implement a none of the above option then compulsory voting is fair. Some countries have it already. As long as people have time off work to vote there aren't many reasons why people shouldn't vote. If you want a protest vote then tick none of the above and maybe the duck house gets a little higher!

Just curious but why wouldn't you want compulsory voting (with an exception for those not capable of voting for reasons of mental handicap \ illness etc).

Rampant Spaniel

I guess they were created after labour pissed away a fortune during the 'good years'. Not that the tories and their minions in yellow are any better.

It could all be fixed petty easily. Make voting compulsory. Add a none of the above box. If more than 40% of people select none of the above you drown the theavin gits and start over. If you like poetic justice drown them in a taxpayer funded moat and bury them under a duck house.

GoPro accused of using DMCA to take down product review

Rampant Spaniel

Re: Sounds like they asked for it...

It's far from uncommon for that to occur, apple are the same, even mandating which color of their phones are to be used in shots. Hell even working inside a company the brand management folks go bugshit at you if you get the size of a logo wrong on a presentation or a colour isn't a perfect match when printed. It's just sad little twats who couldn't get a real degree trying to justify their pathetic, meaningless existence.

However, this has a huge whiff of bollocks about it. The excuse seems to be just that, made up when they realized how much of a mistake they had made trying to get a review they didn't like pulled.

Feds cuff ex-NASA boffin at airport amid state-secret leak scare

Rampant Spaniel

Re: The first question should be

The only rational explanation (assuming some of the best funded and equipped spook operations actually have a clue) would be to feed them disinformation and try and discover any network of spooks that might exist.

The more likely explanation probably involves somebody being blackmailed into allowing it or just general stupidity. My money is on a picture of someone rogering a sheep.

Rampant Spaniel

No kidding, a return ticket would have been cheaper as well! I don't know whats worse, the fact that such a basic attempt at espionage nearly worked, or that he was employed in the first place. If this isn't some kind of double agent scenario I hope a few folks at spook central and NASA take a long walk off a short pier.

Virgin Media boss to Osbo: Bung city fibre cash into small biz

Rampant Spaniel

Re: I agree that Virgin should expand their network

I can sympathise with you, it is frustrating! However, MDU's as they term them (multiple dwelling units) are an absolute arse to cable. You'd think it was easy everyone in one place, but the civils work may be easier than digging up roads, but the actual work on the property is a lot more delicate. You have issues with dry riser access, capacity and condition, you have an insane mesh of rules about physical changes to the property (some council owned mdu's has this funky plastic skirting you cant touch) whereas homes you pretty much have carte blanche to do whats needed as long as it looks ok at the end. From swept t to stb in a home is quicker and cheaper. Having said that they were supposed to be infilling their network (last I heard anyway) so all this may get overlooked in the future.

Rampant Spaniel

Re: Getting modern - they just don't get it

Exactly, not every business needs a website or can sell their wares online. If there is a sound financial argument for an online presence then it's likely a firm already has one or has reservations about it that are unlikely to be nullified by a quick course. The govt doesn't have money to waste, they are supposed to be using that cash for infrastructure, something people will benefit from, not lining pockets. There are plenty of free or cheap courses \ books etc about the internet and how to take advantage of it.

Adobe reports great re$ult$ but loses CTO Kevin Lynch to Apple

Rampant Spaniel

I can't help but wonder if this isn't a get going while the goings good situation. Adobe is not far off the situation MS is in with Office. Their products are already pretty damn awesome, they're already switching people to a subscription model which is a good sign they think people aren't going to cough up as often for upgrades. Lightroom still has legs on it, but they've dropped the pricing. PS & PPro (and to be fair most of the rest of the master suite) are very mature products so beyond the obligatory upgrades to support new codecs and cameras and improvements to gpu assist they are probably facing a harder job finding new killer must have features as time goes on. All credit to them, they have some great products but I haven't felt the need to update ps et al since cs2 and theres many that are in a similar situation. It just doesn't justify the cost.

He has probably looked at what he has done and said it ain't going to get much better here, theres a nice offer elsewhere, time to wander and if the new job tanks I have a proven track record to say it wasn't my fault look what I did at Adobe.

Of course I could be completely wrong on that :)

Microsoft issues manual on Brits to Cambridge exports

Rampant Spaniel

Re: Agree totally on the Take-Aways

Yes and No :) India has some very hot dishes. Nothing compared to Thailand where it tends to start at battle cruiser melting hot and quickly head past needing to be held is a magnetic field. Decent quality anglicized curry tends to have less oil (if you'd call melted ghee oil, or just fat) and salt than more authentic Indian dishes although the picture is clouded heavily by a multitude of really poor cheap curry which is laden with junk.

Rampant Spaniel

Re: fanny-packs

ghee is clarified butter, used in Indian cooking (amongst others). You basically heat up butter, remove the foam off the top, continue to heat until it starts to turn a bit brown (but not burnt) then filter. It has a nice buttery taste but can tolerate a far higher heat without burning. At least if I'm remembering it right! Haven't made it in a while.

Rampant Spaniel

Re: Heaven

No kidding, the mrs and I have a game, seeing who can get in and out of officemax or home depot without being asked if we need help.

It's not the staffs fault, just moronic management policies.

Rampant Spaniel

Re: Agree totally on the Take-Aways

It depends where you go, there are great Chinese takeaways in the UK. Actually run by Chinese people as well, unlike the US where pretty much every kitchen, no matter what the cuisine, is staffed by Mexicans. If anything it's impressive how versatile they are, but saying Chinese takeaways are stuffed full of msg is pretty 1970's. If any country has a thing for salt, sugar and lard it's the country that invented using deep fried chicken in place of a bread bun, and lets not overlook the 72oz soda cups.

One issue many folks overlook is that China is a pretty large place and it's not certain different countries will have a majority of Chinese immigrants from the same province.

First sale doctrine survives US Supreme Court

Rampant Spaniel

Re: Do my eyes deceive me?

As long as he is paying all applicable taxes \ duty then good on him. I'm ****ing sick of paying over the odds whilst other countries pay far less simply because they have less money. I can vaguely understand limited subsidies on medicine but if you basically charge westerners disproportionately more than developing nations for goods, expect someone to exploit that. Hence the UK being full of coke cans from random countries, it's cheaper to buy a truckload of coke in a developing country and import them than buy direct.

Truly a great day to see some common sense in a court!

4K video may wow vidiots, but content creators see pitfalls

Rampant Spaniel

Re: Back-of-napking calculations

Most HD and virtually all UHD is compressed prior to storage and editing. There are applications where a pure feed is taken from the camera to a broadcast truck or similar via sdi but the vast majority of footage is stored in one compressed form or another. The sony f65, which sony would love to tell the world is an 8k camera (it;'s actually something like 6.5k but the pixels are rotated 45 degrees) takes a 19gbps stream and drops it down to between 1.5gbps and 5gbps. This is what is stored for editing and sony are rather high up the scale on the bitrates, their other 4k offering is 600mbps for 60p 4k raw. .

Arri make a camera called the Alexa which can record pretty much uncompressed but I haven't used it so I'm not sure if it doesn't just output that to an external recorder which then compresses it on the fly for editing. People get a little confused and assume that because it says 'RAW' it means uncompressed full bitrate. In reality even in cameras (i believe nikon does this) raw can be compressed either lossy or lossless and retain its ability to grade \ alter colour temp etc. It's highly impractical, and to some degree has been since HD was released to store raw data streams uncompressed. Even sony's $60k camera compresses the data. Depending on what software you do your post in and what camera you use you can still work realtime and if you are stuck you can often work realtime at half resolution. If you are really stuffed you can transcode it to a better codec for working but this is less common now as computers are faster, coding is better, there is often gpu support or add in cards and cameras often use a decent codec onboard anyway. AVCHD used to be a ballache, now that isn't an issue and it can be edited pretty much on the fly at full res. Studios won't be loosing much sleep over this. They will have decent arrays and a long term storage option and by the time they get sick of replacing hard drives in the array the entire film and raw footage will probably fit on 2 drives anyway.

The hobbit was a great film for seeing all that in action, they made a big deal about it being 48fps and that allowed you to see how they actually did the work. Digital, even 4k, is significantly cheaper than filmstock for purchase, use and storage. Honestly if it wasn't it wouldn't be used. Film was and is very expensive. A small event shooting company, mom and pop style, will have 250-400k sunk into cameras, glass, lighting, power, audio etc. These are the folks I tend to work with, they think nothing of shooting 2-4TB a day of 4k across 2 cams. Storage costs aren't high, maybe $300 for a couple of external drives that you need to replace every 2-4 years by which time drives will be bigger etc. They'd take between 15k and 20k for that shoot. They're good :)

Rampant Spaniel

I picked 200gb because I was pretty sure sony had a prototype 200gb bluray, not sure if it was rewriteable. I can't remember if it was pioneer or toshiba but someone was working on a 400gb and 1tb blurays. No idea which will come to market, maybe none but the tech is out there :-)

As for players, cables and tv's. Yes to all 3 most likely, although its going to be a newer hdmi cable capable of higher rates. Version 1.4 of hdmi supports 4k. I'm not running out to buy 4k, but my next video camera will most likely be 4k even if it is a few years before the TV is, did the same with HD and it worked out well. I guess everyone makes their own choice that suits them best.

As for whats on it, couldn't agree more! It really pisses me off when I pay good money for a bluray just to be forced to watch anti piracy messages and adverts for other movies.

Rampant Spaniel

Re: Back-of-napking calculations @Annihilator

In teh early days that was very valid, processors alone (and to a lesser extent still) didn't stand a chance alone. Red developed the red rocket as a hardware assist for realtime decoding, debayering, output and encoding of red raw footage. Adobe also updated ppro (cs 6 maybe?) with the mercury engine which uses your graphics card for realtime editing at full res, its absolutely lethal with a top range nvidia card. Not sure about avid \ sony etc but where theres a problem with money behind it someone will come along.

I honestly can't see any huge issues that haven't been solved already besides networking.

Rampant Spaniel

Re: Rough calculation on RAW storage costs

Some bitrates from 4k (some 422 in there probably, some 444)

Redcode36 is 36MBps so 288mbps?

Sony is using between 240mbps (24p) and 600mbps (60p) on the f55. The f65 has a native stream of 19gbps compressed to between 1.5gbps and 5gbps (iirc).

Canon's 1dc is 500mbps.

These are all in use today, the hobbit used red cameras and seem to be likely to break even :-) Storage costs just isn't an issue. It's still going to be far cheaper than film.

Rampant Spaniel

Re: Rough calculation on RAW storage costs

8 bits per pixel? And your bistromath is using 8k not 4k. Just out of interest do you work with video or are you just basing this off guesswork and teh interwebs? See my post above for a more realistic calculation based on what is already being used in the industry.

Rampant Spaniel

Re: Is there any point at the consumer end?

Not for everyone, it's certainly a desire not a need, but so is HD. It's a subjective call, go to a store, watch them side by side and see if you think the 4k is worth the extra funds (be fair and do this when it is more established, right now it makes a lot less sense).

Once the viewsonic 4k's cost less than a car I will have one for editing but thats a niche requirement. Once there is a 4k ecosystem then I'll make the call for our home. Can I 'see' the difference between hd and 4k, sure but I haven't seen a truly unbiased test so I'm waiting.

Rampant Spaniel

Re: Back-of-napking calculations

Studios may only store RAW, but RAW does not have to be uncompressed. REDCODE compresses somewhere between 8 and 12 to one depending on which you pick although it is lossy (red claims visually lossless).

Prores is pretty popular at about 220mbps for 4:2:2 1080p, prores 4444 seems to be the closest for figuring our a real storage requirement, 264mbps for 4:4:4 at 1080 24p so x4 and it should be below 1056mbps for 4k. Thats 132mb per second or about half a TB an hour of footage. Not exactly insane requirements. 512GB SSD's could easily top an hours footage and cope with the speed so we aren't talking warp drive technology.

Rampant Spaniel

Re: Back-of-napking calculations

In effect it does the same thing, nd filter = less light = longer shutter time, just at the other end of the shutterspeed range, I just gave one example. Using an ND filter does not increase the depth of field! In video it is used to facilitate the opposite if anything, using a shallower dof for a given gain & shutter.

Rampant Spaniel

Re: Back-of-napking calculations

Nothing to do with maintaining a 180 degree shutter in bright light with a wide aperture then? You are right to some degree about the fetishism, but in the stills world at least it is driven by clients not the togs.

I am curious how a ND filter stops down a lens and changes it's hyper focal range? :) Please do share! In stills they are used to effectively extend an exposure for example to get a dreamy water effect. Video \ Film is very sensitive to the shutter speed so this is fixed. Then you add any grads required or polarisers. Next you fix your ap as determined by the required depth of field. Then you see where that leaves the gain, you see if you need to add or reduce the light.

Rampant Spaniel

Re: Back-of-napking calculations

AFAIK (I'm a stills guy, rarely do video), but broadcast TV was stated in vertical resolution, cinema film \ digital in horizontal resolution. It's not so much a move from one to the other overall, it;s just a move in content i.e. cinema at home and a convergence.

Rampant Spaniel

Re: Hollywood stops making films, digital storage too unreliable/expensive

Maybe we should club together and help upgrade them to 750mb zip drives.

Rampant Spaniel

Sony have a prototype 200gb bluray. That coupled with h265 (as you mention) should fit a feature film at 4k on a single disc. Streaming will benefit, netflixesque streaming should run around 20mbps so in a while we can see that more mainstream.

8k is more of an issue. We aren't really in a place to make 33mp video sensors mainstream just yet, although a triple ccd solution could work if we have the accuracy to mount them. It will happen at some point, although I'm not sure it will make financial sense for a long time (so about 5-10 years then!).

Re editing and storage, I don't think it's so much an issue for small scale houses, it is more an issue for larger productions where the networking gets very expensive but mostly I think this is just whining to justify a price hike or a reluctance to adopt because they haven't milked the last generation tech enough.

Rampant Spaniel

4k\5k Shooting, editing etc has been around for a few years already. Red were shipping them 5 years ago? Admittedly a lot went to indy or boutique producers but they have been used by studios. Whilst 4k cameras do increase storage requirements etc but HD has been around a long time and computers have been improving. It's fair to say 4k will cost more than 2k does now, but its also valid to compare 4k costs now to 2k costs when HD entered the mainstream market nearly 10 years ago.

There will always been some whining when costs go up, but it's not like studios won't recoup it. In another 2-4 years 4k screens will likely be down to top end consumer pricing (maybe $5k ish range), bluray will have 200gb+ discs for storing the content. No doubt they will add 10 bucks onto the cost of the discs to recoup this, but part of me thinks the additional cost of 4k will be dwarfed by the cost of the riders for any a list celeb.

ARM head legs it from core body: CEO Warren East retires

Rampant Spaniel

Re: Good headline

It's great to see decent headlines returning after the seo madness subsided.

Rampant Spaniel

I thought the same! It's not like apple give any of their supplies any credit at all (think corning gorilla glass). Other companies would use it as a selling point but thats not Apples way (which is fine, it's their game), it's special apple glass. Apple may have brought volume but so did RIM (although they did use some intel 386 chips for a while?) with xscale chips.

Supreme Court silence seals Thomas-Rasset's file sharing fate

Rampant Spaniel

Re: Only 10k per song?

It always did seem rather arbitrary. Something closer to cost of track X number of copies made by others x up to 300% (as punitive damages) would have more legitimate and have more precedent in law. Higher than 400% is bordering on unconstitutional

I'm not attempting to comment on how appropriate it is or isn't to copy music, just that the legal recourse sought seems hideously unconstitutional.

Beijing IT biz taunts Microsoft: Show us your licence for Office 365

Rampant Spaniel

@snake

Agreed, but lets be honest, properly licensed and registered means letting us snoop and greasing our palms. The EU and US are just as bad at the first, a little too incompetent or bought to collect the taxes on it but thats another story.

If MS wants to do business in China it should play by their rules, it surprises me that they haven't. This just smells like someone found out someone else got a bigger present and is kicking up a stink until they get another one.

Rampant Spaniel

Re: Fix for Chinese Bureaucracy

True, but having dealt with the local fiefdom the states is no better, at least not here. Campaign donations and outright brown bagging is pretty much the only economical way to get anything done at a county level (and that is when you ARE complying with laws \ statutes and just need permission to do something entirely legal). It's the same the world over, since 'we' elect politicians based on who can tell the most lies on TV which requires money, their arses are for sale to the highest bidder.

Freeview telly channels face £240m-A-YEAR shakedown by Ofcom

Rampant Spaniel

Re: IPTV is complementary. @Rampant Spaniel

So all those folks with satellite dishes on caravans aren't sensible? :)

You are saying it is more sensible to have to completely different broadcast networks, one of which is stupidly ugly, rather than just use what we already have and is already capable to doing the job. Multicast is already out there, a raspberry pi is perfectly capable of decoding the streams, the only slight issue with is in areas the last mile capacity isn't there. This could easily be addressed by selling off the liberated spectrum and allowing BT some assurances that it could recoup the cost of a national ftth network. Where it is more economically sound to use fiber they can, where it isn't they can use mobile. Even LTE, given a reasonable amount of spectrum could easily deliver significantly faster broadband than most have today. We already use netflix which has to be one of the least efficent methods of delivering programing, multicast would be significantly more efficient for landlines and leave streaming for on demand and mobile.

For sure I agree in the immediate term it makes less sense, as it's a big change. But you seriously cannot see any logic in making one big change now, one in reality we should have made 10 years ago anyway, as opposed to making tweaks every few years leaving folks needing new equipment each time.

Rampant Spaniel

Re: IPTV is complementary.

Did you read my post? Ever watch netflix on your mobile? Ever seen a caravan with a sat dish? Not portable my arse!

Rampant Spaniel

If it was structured correctly you could probably get darn close to 100% coverage using mobile or satellite to fill the gaps. The biggest issue with mobile for that is national parks or areas of outstanding natural beauty where masts (but apparently not foreign military bases & huge ass radar installations) are verboten or highly restricted.

3-5mbps using lte with a shedload of spectrum, especially with fixed installations in houses with the potential to use boosters \ directional aerials \ link aggregation etc should be possible for nearly everyone and would finally get us off the merry go round of shuffling shit about a bit at a time. The vast majority of homes could have 50-1000mbps and a mobile service with decent coverage and 20-40mbps over most areas. That should be good enough for a while and most home installations shouldn't have an issue with 4k streaming.

Rampant Spaniel

It's about time to make aa big decision. Do we keep pissing about with small measures every few years or make a big decision which will make quite a few people upset in the short term but makes more sense in the long term.

Shift all TV to IP using multicast over ftth and for those that want mobile TV (many genuine uses from caravans to mobile phones) can using mobile data (or sat in some cases) over the shedload of frequency freed up. Yes it would mean problems with a lot of equipment being useless, but many stb's get scrapped after less than 10 years anyway for one reason or another, be it freeview, cable or sky. I realise it's not popular, but I do see some sense in at least discussing a bigger, more long term solution rather than little fudges here and there that will be changed every few years anyway.

Mobile data use is exploding, home data use is. If we want BT to foot the bill for a national ftth network then they need assurances they can make their money back (fair is fair, and ofcom ain't), otherwise the gov't needs to fund it (way less efficent), the additional mobile capacity should help lower mobile data costs, assuming the gov't compensates folks for old kit pretty much everyone wins and we don't need new boxes every 5 to 10 years or it's combined with pc or smart tv upgrades.

CCTV hack takes casino for $33 MILLION in poker losses

Rampant Spaniel

Re: Got access to the casino's CCTV systems

It's interesting they managed to do that without breaking any laws. That would suggest the access was authorised for another reason? Unauthorised access etc would normally fall under some law in most countries right?

Reader slain? 'Even the Google apologists on G+ are p****d off'

Rampant Spaniel

Re: An idiotic sheep baaaaas ...

I understand why google does this but I think it would be interesting if they did a trial of turning it into a subscription service. I know a paid service is a long way from what google does but given the shift to mobile marketing being a little bumpy (more so for fb) a trial on a relatively popular service for a year would unlikely kill them and could provide an interesting oppertunity for additional revenue. It has to be worth a shot just to see. They do charge for biz access / accounts so it isn't unprecedented.

AdBlock Plus BLOCKED from Google Play

Rampant Spaniel

Re: It's my device

That was my thought. They can remove it if they wish but they can't stop it being used so it seems rather petty and pointless to remove it. I don't tend to notice many ads on mobile sites so I hadn't bothered to install an ad blocker, methinks it's time to now just because.

Thanks for bringing it to my attention google!