Re: But seriously...
"would that pass Italy's record for # of elections in 1 year?"
We had two general elections in 1910 and two again in 1974.
3279 publicly visible posts • joined 23 May 2011
"My heating system also requires a mandatory yearly check by an approved technician - and I wouldn't like some idiots mess with its firmware, given what it burns."
WTF?! You're using a nuclear reactor to heat your home? God, you're brave.
"I do agree that something needs to be done but not by the governments , it needs to be done by the people themselves, they need educated by professionals not by marketeers."
If people were going to educate themselves they would have done it by now. And anyway, how does an uneducated person separate a "professional" from a snake oil saleman "marketeer"?
The government is us. Today, of all days, that should be apparent. We nominate our representative. They talk to the experts and make decisions on our behalf.
"So either we have strong security or we have no security."
False dichotomy. The government can look at my bank records but my nosey neighbour can't. And similarly we could escrow messages without backdooring the crypto -- giving me more security than rot13 but less than end-to-end encryption. So your job is to explain to my nosey neighbour, without side-stepping the question, why Whatsapp chats should receive a level of protection greater than that accorded to my money or (AFAIK) my voicemail.
Because the end goal of the state is to make the use of end-to-end encryption a prosecutable offence anywhere in the western world. Sure the contents of a server might occasionally end up on the front page of the News of the World or on Wikileaks. But we've lived with that. We coped. And politicians would rather deal with an embarrassing leak than dead children. And my nosey neighbour, who anyway has a vested interest in reading my comms, would eagerly agree that's the right trade off to make.
Well some of the stuff you need to shield against isn't charged (X-rays and gamma rays) and the Earth has a shit load of shielding -- sufficient for life to survive without a magnetic field.
And the Earth's magnetic field may not be strong, but it extends 10 times the Earth's radius so has plenty of room to "bend" particles round the Earth. (It's much more complicated than bending - plasma physics with induced currents. Urgh.) So a couple of dipole magnets aren't going to do it.
And I don't know what the consequences of a larger field would be on our biology.
"That was the Christians, because part of the library was also used as a pagan temple."
According to Wikipedia, "There is little consensus on when books in the actual library were destroyed....Ancient and modern sources identify four possible occasions for the partial or complete destruction of the Library of Alexandria: Julius Caesar's fire during his civil war in 48 BC; the attack of Aurelian in AD 270–275; the decree of Coptic Christian pope Theophilus of Alexandria in AD 391; and the Muslim conquest of Egypt in (or after) AD 642".
"[A webpage is] written and hosted outside the US. Company in the US logs in uses page. How much do you charge?"
The first thing would be to determine whether duty was even due. Imagine a lengthy rulebook that determines whether a service is SAAS or something else (e.g. logging into a medical database might not count---since the software is incidental to the service provided---but logging in to Office 365 clearly would). That might push companies into purchasing the end service, rather than buying software and employing locals to provide it.
If duty was due, it could be a flat tariff. But it would more likely be a percentage of the price. That's easy to see if there's a purchase. But if the service was provided internally, from a foreign arm, then accountants would be required to concoct a price -- with plenty of paperwork to support their assertions. Or perhaps companies would switch to free software, and donate to open source devs in foreign lands.
We could attempt to explain why this approach would be bad, but I'm not sure your brain would cope.
(Question for experts: would the US constitution allow tariffs to be applied unilaterally to one company?)
"I know that rain reflects Radar and seems to slow my microwave linked broadband but maybe someone here knows if mm waves are similarly affected."
My simple rule of thumb is to compare the wavelength of the signal with the thickness of the conductor; EM waves won't be attenuated by anything much smaller than they are (as the conductor is not big enough to set up an opposing wave). The most dramatic example of this is sending radio messages to submarines: where the waves used are thousands of kilometres long.
I think Katyanna is garbling things again. The abstract of the preprint harmjschoonhoven dug up makes it clear these astroboffins have found high-star-forming quasar-free galaxies next to quasar host galaxies. It looks like things have then got muddled in El Reg's copy. We probably should report it.
I can understand how prematurely releasing the bombers name harmed the investigation. But what harm came from releasing pictures of bomb fragments? The Guardian's Editorial sums it up nicely. (That's the first time I've ever said that.)
I had the same thought. But a chunk of that year is probably allocated to trying to get the mass down, trying to make it work on the available power, trying to make it fit into the space available, and testing this fragile design. So maybe even the design team will thank you for lifting all those restrictions.
That''s why separating the yet-to-demonstrated-as-commercially-viable fusion from the commercially-viably-if-heavily-subsidised fission is important. Fission is "nuclear power" with its toxic legacy of negative PR. It's what causes stars to explode. Fusion is the "wholesome", "harmless" process which makes the sun's shine. The difference is that between a shark and a dolphin. Yes, they both swim in the water (or manipulate the nuclei) and they both have fins, but that's about all they have in common with each other.
Maybe, then, they need to be forced to provide a software version of ACPI. Or, at least, a common set of low level routines. I don't know what's the right level: provide routines to alter the state of the I2C bus directly, or routines to read and write whole bytes, or routines to read and write chunks of data.
But it doesn't seem beyond the wit of Google to create a reasonable abstraction layer. We would could call it the Android basic input/output system. The problem is political, not technical.
I'd look above at the answers to Thomas K. But basically, the analogy of expanding balloon is crap.
Let's try a different analogy. Suppose you're numbering the lines of a computer program. You don't want to run out of numbers so you make the first one line number 0 and the last one line number 1, and the lines inbetween are 0.25, 0.5 and 0.75. If you need to insert a line between x1=0.25 and x2=0.5 you can always use 0.375 so there is always a line number available. But if you count lines after the insert you will find that instead of x1 and x2 being next to each other, they now have one line apart. And as we carry on editing they might end up with two or three lines between them -- so they're moving apart; they're expanding.
That's closer to what's happening. Space isn't expanding, but extra places are appearing between matter. And, who knows, a quantum theory of gravity may show space is literally being pulled out of the quantum foam.
I hadn't heard of him. A quick google, found this.
"The question should rather be: why are the oscillations contributing more to expansion than to contraction?"
If I've understood everything, it's because the system has positive feedback.The author's explicit answer is "...the expansion outweighs the contraction a little bit due to the weak parametric resonance effect."
Apparently all (harmonically) oscillating systems have a net expansion when the frequency changes (?increases?) slowly. And iff I'm reading the paper right, the change in frequency is due to a change in the distribution of matter and radiation in the universe -- that's the feedback. So it may be the universe has a net expansion because there's a net expansion. But don't quote me on any of that.
They also say the net expansion would be zero if a cutoff related to the "micro structure of spacetime" reached infinity but they don't relate that cutoff to oscillations. However cutoffs are physicist speak for the "answer is in the unified theory of quantum gravity but won't bother us if we steer clear of black holes and big bangs".
the Linux API is far more stable than the Windows API has ever been....applications will continue to run despite upgrades while MS has clearly regarded using an incompatible API in each new Windows version as a marketing tool....I'm running C code that I last compiled in 2005 and that 'just ran' until last March...In March I moved from 32bit PAE kernels to X86-64 kernels and this did require my C code to be recompiled, but that was only to be expected.
I'm running 32 bit Windows code I last compiled under WIN 95 OSR 92 in the late 90s. (Borland C++) No need to even recompile when I switched to 64 bit OS.
Windows driver APIs have changed a lot and I'm not sure how far back Direct X compatibility goes. But bog standard Win32 API has been fairly tightly conserved.
"Why don't those clowns at the NSA release the exploits to the companies to fix?"
Maybe that's what TheShadowBrokers are hoping for? They only claim to have 75% of the NSA's exploits. Obviously the NSA want to hang on to the remaining 25%, but they probably don't know which exploits they are.
But perhaps TheShadowBrokers don't even have 75%. Perhaps they have just enough to keep up the illusion and are trying to bluff the NSA into revealing all their exploits. In which case, go Liara!
"Would he suggest not-buying antibiotics to pay for more nurses?"
I think he's been doing it the other way round: buying the drugs but increasing the workloads of nurses to the point where patients aren't getting fed or are developing bed sores.
"Or reducing ward hygiene?"
Yup, that seems to have been going on as well.
And we haven't talked about patients on trolleys and the increases in waiting times. (That's probably where it would have ended up: increased waiting times.)
"Even identifying vulnerable machines will be quite a challenge."
To be vulnerable a machine has to have been specifically set up by an administrator, and vulnerable machines can be found by a portscan.
Patching or disabling look less work than gluing up the port and installing a new NIC.