Everyone knows the maps are all upside down and the "Southern Hemisphere" is really the top half of the planet! Hence the expression "Australia is Tops!"
1787 posts • joined 11 Jun 2007
Everyone knows the maps are all upside down and the "Southern Hemisphere" is really the top half of the planet! Hence the expression "Australia is Tops!"
3D Printing will never come close to replacing mass production, but for low volume operations it "can" be more cost effective. And low volume doesn't necessarily mean "niche industry". Aircraft are only produced in lots of hundreds to thousands. If you have a single part that is expensive to manufacture for an aircraft by traditional methods then producing this by 3D Printing might be cheaper. The Space industry is another which can benefit hugely from 3D Printing.
3D print parts can be far more effective/efficient then many traditional parts, because you can build in a single part things which would take multiple parts in traditional manufacturing (think internal cooling channels, etc.). However, the technology is not really there yet except for on a very limited number of parts. The time for production of metallic 3D parts is still too high, and the cost/part analysis really only works on extremely short volume runs at the moment. 3D metallic parts also require significant amounts of post work machining (surface finishes, hole punching, thread tapping, support material removal, etc), so they will never replace the traditional workshop.
Still the metal 3D printing industry does hold some promise, just forget about it for mass production - areas like Space, Aero, Medical and custom engineering jobs can all benefit. Auto and consumer goods - not a chance!
Yep sounds like the kids at college alright...
I'm reading a lot of comments here, about how Boeing should keep their documents away from internet accessible servers. Well I'd love to know how you can do that when you're an international multi-site company.
I don't work for Boeing but I work for another International multisite company. I work on part of the design here in Germany, colleagues in the UK and France work on other sections, we all need to collaborate on the CAD models and documentation. Yes, the servers are secured, with all the usual jazz, but the fact is we all need to access to that data, and that means there is ZERO chance that we could run this company with all of the data locked away on servers with no access to the internet! Should we be sending that data around the world with memory sticks? Should every single worker in the firm be on a machine that has no access to the internet? Probably we should get rid of email as well, right, because that's an internet facing server?
In this day and age, it is not possible to run a multinational firm, or even a multi site one, without pretty much every computer having a potential internet presence. All you can do is attempt to lock down permissions enough that if someone is compromised that the level of compromise is negligible. And have the systems in place to quickly notice when a system is compromised.
From this article it appears, this guy identified the location of servers and the names of people to be targeted for phishing. Externals did the actual hacking. That would have made it harder for detection of the compromised information, as the hackers could zero in quickly to where they wanted to go. Still 3 years is a long time to get away with this. So Boeing needs stronger detection strength, but in the modern world you cant get away from having internet accessible computers. So accusing Boeing of being foolish for this, is just wrong.
I totally agree with this, but I'm willing to go further.
If the exposure of your extra marital activities was likley to lead to you wanting to commit suicide then sorry you are the last person who should be indulging in those activities. If you are going to have an affair you better be damned ready to take the consequences when it all goes pear shaped. The hackers might have brought this data out into the public when you werentexpecting it, but affairs have a way of being discovered by themselves anyway, despite what those in the act might think...
"The truth will out" applies in the case of an affair just as much as any other "conspiracy"...
Fraud - Wrongful or criminal deception intended to result in financial or personal gain. From the OED.
This certainly seems to meet those requirements. Perhaps the FTC should be passing the details over to the Feds for action. Because bastards like this should not get away so lightly.
if there are any argentinians here what they think of the whole Falklands debate?
Considering that the claim is based entirely upon the claim of the nation of River Plate's soverignty of the islands which lasted from 1826-1832 (and was not the first claims to the islands that being from the British and Spanish in the 1770's). It seems strange that the Argentinians are not also claiming the lands of Paraguay and Uruguay which were also part of the River Plate nation. The claim is also made weaker by the fact that there has been a continual presence of the british on the island since 1840 (all these details from wikipedia).
If 175 years of history isnt enough to claim to be one nation and not another, then I dont know what is....
I have to admit I cant remember ever using any website outside of the .com's (the various nationality ones), the .gov's (sometimes you just cant escape those), and the occasional .org or .net.
I know there are now dozens of other ones that have come out, but frankly why would I bother to go them?
Does anyone use one of them on a regular basis? Anyone?
If you read the article (and some other articles I've read seem to confirm this), then you'll see that the hackers took over the login webpages. Thus the passwords were grabbed before they were encrypted, similar to if someone had a keylogger installed on your computer.
From the details I read on a different website (but dont take this as confirmation) it seems that the hackers had the website under control for 1 day (March 3rd), but until some more details come out, that might turn out to be an underestimate...
Still, annoying for those people who use Twitch...
I never really get why bosses are allowed to sell stock in their own company whilst there still employed with it. Actually I would also set a limit that you cant sell your shares until you've been away from the company for more then 5 years.
That would mean you cant pump and dump the shares, you cant co-incidentally schedule a selling of your shares to happen a week or so after a brand new product comes to market, or before you announce something causing the shares to dive. You are stuck with the shares for good or bad. And you have to leave the company in a good enough position, and with a good enough person at the helm that your shares will still be worth something in 5 years time.
That would certianly provide incentive to make good decisions for the company and for its long term future. Still cnsidering how greedy the twats at the top are, something like that will never happen...
I feel like we do not have all of the facts here. He was thrown off the flight for being a disruptive passenger. Writing in a notebook hardly seems like that would count. I have no doubt once the cops got him THEY probably looked at his notebook sure, and probably asked him some hard questions. But as they have released him without charge then they didnt take that stuff seriously (well done the plod for not being stupid!).
BUT we seem to be missing the information as to what he was doing that was disruptive and why he was thrown off the flight. Airlines dont throw people off a plane for writing in a book. More info please El Reg, otherwise it feels like your going for clickbait.
There is one easy way to fix the US Patent system. When you submit a patent application, you pay the full amount and whether they approve it or not you lose the money. Allow one appeal for rejections. If the appeal is rejected, and someone wants to resubmit with additional paperwork, they pay again.
The USPTO would then have no reason to just approve anything that comes, because they get paid either way. It would also decrease there workload, as fewer cranks would be willing to stump up the fee knowing they were going to lose the money even if their patent was rejected. Simple and effective.
Am I seeing an increased likelihood of crime around the El Reg office in the next month? Well I guess it is Friday, and some things have to head out the back door whilst the bosses are enjoying their Friday liquid lunches, no? wink, wink, nudge, nudge...
UAV's have a lot of benefits, there is a lot of things they can do smarter and cheaper than anything else (reconnaisance, mapping, etc.), but acting as a delivery service is never going to be anywhere near as cheap or effective as regular delivery from a van.
First, there is carrying capacity - a drone cannot carry a great deal of weight; second, there is fuel economy - a drone uses significantly more fuel per km per kg then any automobile on the planet; third, there are all of the other issues associated - securtiy, regulation, the actual delivery, etc. Your Fed Ex package might occasionally get thrown over the back fence, but in general if they cant deliver it, they take it back or maybe they give it to a neighbour, or it goes in your letter box, but a drone is unlikely to be able to do any of that. So your parcel will get dropped on the lawn and you can kiss that goodbye in many neighbourhoods.
So bring on more practical uses of UAV's but can please stop the nonsense about drone deliveries, it distracts from the useful applications!
A lot of companies having developed a proprietary system requiring extra bits of hardware would have stuck by their system indefinitely (if only to get the added sales involved in buying the proprietary bits of hardware).
So fair call to them, if they are dicthing the bridge because they dont need it anymore that's to be applauded. Have to say I'm quite happy with my Sonos system, but I might try switching over to the bridgeless system in the coming days. If nothing else, it saves me an extra bit of kit slurping the electrical juice!
A good lie contains at least half truth...
It's the ultimate answer (ok times 1000). Julian just thought the Ultimate Question was "How many pages of evidence do the US government have on me?"
Ahh yes, great game (if you dont mind low rent fun!).
I can clearly remember the Saber Tooth Tiger Race (i.e you raced away from the Saber Tooth Tiger chasing you and then up a tree (if you're lucky)), the Mate toss (sticks in my mind for when the cave lady in question got up and bonked you on the head with her club), and the Dino Race (because you just couldnt bloody well get the silly things to go where you wanted them to!).
But the Global Gender is 70% Male, 30% Female?
To the best of my knowledge I would guess its much closer to 50-50, otherwise I imagine there wouldnt be very many single ladies living out there!
If they mean Global Gender in Work around the world, I would have thought the figure would be even lower (considering how many woman are prevented from working due to various religious beliefs). So I'm really not clear on that graph. Seems a bit wishy-washy...
Look, not to be defending the cops too much, but I am certain they have walked into MANY domestic situations and been told "Everything is fine officer", when its quite clear that one (or more) people are clearly terrified in the situation.
Now in these Swatting cases, that terror might be induced by having a SWAT team arrive at the people's house, but again it might not be. And the police would be absolutely vilified if they came to such a situation, walked away, and then the next morning discovered that the entire family was murdered by that nice seeming father, who assured the officers that it must have been a hoax call and of course everyone in the house was fine and not at all about to be murdered.
This is a lose-lose situation for the cops. Either they are overbearing (when they arrest someone) or they are potentially negligent (when they walk away and the people end up being killed). It's not really a surprise given the choices that they go for overbearing...
I havent played Tropico 5, but I spent many a happy hour with Tropico 4. The city building is great fun, the atmosphere and theme is incredibly well done and the music is highly addictive. The game is very challenging, as you try to squirrel away as much money in your swiss bank account whilst setting up enough housing and industry to keep your people content. There's also numerous factions on the islands which you need to keep happy which often involves balancing your actions so as to favour the most popular factions.
All in all, a great game! I might have to dig it out again this weekend...
Sorry Paul, I'm afraid you're missing the point. With a conventional rocket you fire once in the direction you want to go, accelerate quickly up to speed, and then cruise the rest of the way, until its time to turn around and put the brakes on. That means you get quickly to a crusing speed and then its coasting all the way, you cannot go faster.
With a continuous action drive (like this one or an ion drive), you only need to apply a small thrust because there is nothing slowing you down. So you are constantly accelerating, the acceleration might be much lower, but you are always getting faster and faster. It doesnt take long even with very modest accelerations to start travelling faster then your conventionally powered satellite (which is still stuck at the same speed it was when its rockets turned off).And once your faster, you will quickly catch up and overtake the conventional satellites.
These things are no use in the atmosphere, where things slow you down, but out in Space, they have great possibilities...
I was actually thinking the same thing. A felony implies a crime, which means its not a lawsuit. A lawsuit is when one party sues another, and there is no involvement of the police. A person can be involved in both a lawsuit and a crime proceedings (think OJ Simpson), but those are two different things instigated by different parties (the state and the family).
So this guy doesnt seem to understand even the basics of law. That's a worry...
You're assuming that it was made of the same stuff as the first one. Who knows it might have been hollow? Or made from something lighter...
(It probably wasnt, but you know, volume does not automatically correlate with mass...)
If researchers were to find a particular primsing strain of DNA (say a particular mutation gives extra protection against a disease), I can see there being a desire by the researcher to try and get a few more samples from that person or there immediate family.
This legislation is designed to stop them trying to find these people, and instead go back to the governing body, who can decide if they want to contact the people or not.
Someone donating blood/DNA/whatever to a research body, might be willing to do so again, but that doesnt mean they want to be approached by random scientists demanding their liver...
I cant imagine in this day and age (especially after the first lot of NSA data breaches was revelaed) that he would have made such a definitiev statement if he knew it was bollocks. He would have used weasel words, and specially formulated statements that said something without ever denying the possibility of anything.
This sounds to me like he said what he thought was the truth, and which now turns out not to be. Mind you I could be wrong, and when he said those sorts of things what he meant was that they dont do it to USAians. Since Yanks dont usually consider the other inhabitants of the world to be people I wouldnt be surprised by that turn of events...
Step up one and all, place your bets:
5/2 North Korea
1000/1 All of the EU
"... the stock has outperformed both the S&P 500 and the stock of Icahn Enterprises."
And take that! ;)
You have obviously never worked with any sort of space based plant research project so really you should keep your mouth shut as you dont know what your talking about.
The space environment causes dramatic changes in the way plants grow and react to various stimuli. Different chemicals are produced or are produced in greater quantities in space comapred to terrestrial plants and as such small variations in the concentrations of chemicals in the plants and their seeds/fruits can turn something which is perfectly harmless (and quite tasty) on Earth into something quite poisonous in space. There are also the effects of various bacteria which react very differently under space environments, which can render the output of plants dangerous even when the plants themselves are not.
So frankly your assertion that this is useless research could not be further off base. This is great work from the Russians and the ISS to produce strains of plants which can grow (and multiply, which is also a huge problem of the space environment) in zero gravity. Well done those plant boffins!
I cant think of a single reason, why a third party firm should be given a list of Yahoo's users email addreses, let alone giving them the users email addresses PLUS the passwords. Honestly, can anyone tell me even a single reason that would happen? Anyone?
(and lets not go into the fact it seems to have been done in plain text, which is frankly gobsmacking!)
So in order for our species to thrive on a distant planet somewhere else, we need to go there and make the beast with two backs with the locals?
Where's Captain Kirk when we need him?
There's a Lego movie???
How did I miss that???
So you didnt actually read the end of the article where it specifically states NASA are investigating the damn thing?
Go run with your wolf pack you twit!
I was just thinking that. How is this a patentable idea? It's just that an idea. There are no robo taxis able to do the job (nor will there be in the near future) and the patent doesnt seem to be covering the design and building of robo taxis. All this is seemingly patenting is a business idea, which I honestly didnt think was patentable?
Does the USPTO even look at the patents they're rubbing stamping these days?
I've heard this reasoning a few times and its not really accurate. You have to remember that back at the times of the initial Moon landings by the US and the USSR, the nations were in a space race due to the cold war, and in a war situation, you have pretty much all the money you need to defeat the enemy, so sending up something that will "probably" work was considered acceptable if it meant you got there ahead of the commie buggers/capitalists pigs (delete as approppriate). Additionally, the concept of quality control really only got introduced towards the end of the space race (when you will have noticed success rates of missions climbing substantially).
These days, space agencies survive on minimal funding, so you cant just lob something into space in the hope it will work, you have to be sure it will work, so huge amounts of testing are done beforehand to try to account for every possible failure. Failures still happen (you cant catch everything!), but a lot less happen now than in the past.
I write this, not to belittle the chinese effort, but to point out that the success rate of all modern space agencies is astonishing considering the restrictions they are under and the science they are trying to achieve. I have every confidence that the Chinese will get some very nice data from the Jade Rabbit, not everything might work, but I guarantee that those things that do work will be used to perform great science.
I cant talk about the first company shown but 1st Contact are a pretty well known brand, especially for ex-pats. They cover a lot of things, and do help a lot of ex-pats with their taxes in the UK (I know a few people who use them), so not really seeing a problem with them being on the google results list for tax return.
Actually if the advertisement say the price is 19,99 a month for 2 years and they up the price in that time, you can at least take them to ASA, and bugger them for false advertising... ;)
If I was in charge of a company that was seeing revenue and income rising by 16% and 9% respectively, then I think I would not really be changing too much.
I wonder if dear Mr Icahn's portfolio is growing by so much... I doubt it...
Yeah, but take out the visits to the Page 3 girl and you probably have triple their actual visits!
Well done El Reg. Have a pint! -->
Microsoft I beg you! Please make one of the next Patch Tuesday files have some variant of sex in the name. When millions of Britons find they cant update their computers because of the filter, there will be outrage and condemnation. Hopefully it will be enough to create such a massive backlash that the filters will be relegated to the rubbish bin of history forthwith...
... oh wait I just realised that the chances of millions of Britons actually updating their windows machines on Patch Tuesday anyway are about as low as the chances of finding an honest man in politics. Oh well back to the drawing board...
Just give it a couple of years...
Google: "A case almost identical to this one was dismissed in its entirety three months ago in the US."
Fact: An investigation by the US Federal Trade Commission in August of that year led to a measly $22.5m fine being dished out to Google for its privacy slip-up.
On 19 November last year, the Wisconsin Attorney General ordered Google to cough an additional $17m to be shared out among 37 states and the District of Columbia.
I wasnt aware that the Jobsian Distortion field had shifted to Google?
Damn straight! Try and get the builders to come outside the M25 and see how much trouble you have, getting them to come to another star system! No wonder there millions of years late!
Why do people always assume research is mutually exclusive? Just because these people are investigating exoplanets in clusters, doesnt mean it stops other people investigating exoplanets on nearby star systems, And trust me there a lots of people looking at those.
So good work to the cluster researchers. More genuine science research is always good news....
Actually I have to disagree with you. Companies are given equal or greater rights than individuals in many cases. If a person was sending out these emails demanding money illegally, that person would be held to account and would more then likely go to prison for Fraud. Just because its a company doing the fraudulent activity, they should get away with it, with just a slap on the wrist?
It's time to start holding the company CEO's/principals to account for the actions of the company. If the CEO was at risk of going to prison for the fraudulent actions of the company, then those activities would stop immediately.
This isnt actually a new idea. In the Aerospace industry, if you produce a defective part or repair for an aircraft, and it fails and people are killed, the person who did the work, and the people who approved the work/design/etc, do go to jail for Manslaughter (just ask the guys whose repair of the aircraft in front of the Concorde in Paris caused it to crash). So making Patent Trolling company employees liable for the fraudulent actions they perform for the company would be a just process in my opinion.
In my opinion, the solution to the problem comes down to one thing, the patent office should be doing the proper research to check that a patent IS relevant. At the moment, the problem seems to be that you can patent anything, wether or not there is prior art, obviousness or it being relevant.
If the Patent Office did its job properly, a lot of these problems would go away...
You COULD send up a brand spanking new camera, but it would be unlikely to last even the trip to the Moon because of the lack of radiation hardening. A single stray Cosmic Ray or charged particle can completely lock up/permanently disable any piece of electronics that isnt suitably radiation hardened and shielded. It takes a lot of time and effort to develop a radiation hardened peice of electronics, which is why you will always find older camera tech on these missions. The quality might be lower, but you are at least guaranteed to get your pictures back.
Low quality visual data is better then none after all...
And thats the thing with the Steambox. There will not be a problem with backwards compatability. The games you buy today, will still play on your Steambox (upgraded or not) in 10 years. There's no need for you to pull an old machine out of the closet, in order to play your old games.
You also wont need to buy a whole new machine when the latest games come out. No more throwing away a perfectly good device, just because the console maker wants to sell you a new piece of equipment.
It's true you will probably have to upgrade parts of your steambox over time as games progress (just like on a PC), but adding some memory, and more hard drive space is a doddle in a PC. Additionally, the pace of PC upgrading to meet high spec games has slowed down massively since the 90's. My laptop is 4 years old, and I still havent seen a PC of software I cant run on it. The fact is that (provided I dont drop and break the thing), I expect my laptop to last me another 5-6 years and still run pretty much everything being released. A Steambox should have the same effect which is why they are being looked at so eagerly by many people...
Consoles dont need to be upgraded? So I take it your still using your old Playstation 1, and are quite happy with the selection of games you can play on it? I'm sure the new Call of Duty is available, right?
Of course Consoles need to be upgraded, they do every 5 years or so, and whilst you may not need to upgradeyour PS3 yet to a PS4, within 2 years you wont be able to get games for PS3 anymore, and PS4 games wont work on PS3's.
With the Steam boxes, you dont need to buy a new machine every 5 years, you might choose to upgrade certain parts (to get better graphics, more hard drive space, faster processing), but at least that can be done without requiring a whole new machine...
I can see a lot of PC users also getting one of these. Lets face it, how many people do you know who own a PC and a console? Or even more then 1 type of console? Replacing a console with a Steam Box would certainly not be out of the question for a lot of people.
Also keep in mind that if only 1% of the Steam user base also bought a Steam Box, thats 650,000 people, which is already 20% of the claimed Xbox One sales....
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2017