Re: No sympathy.
That Canadian 'civil liberty' groups got involved in trying to help this paedo get his conviction overturned is truly worrying.
I'm more worried that the evidence was NOT excluded, even though the court agreed it was obtained unconstitutionally. Since it's unthinkable that the actual police who made this mistake will be punished, letting him go may be the best way to ensure privacy is taken more seriously in the future.
They obviously just see setting such people free as the means justifying the end.
Uh, no. Protecting privacy is the end. Appealing cases of privacy violation whether the defendant is likable or not is the means. Setting the precedent is the important thing, not the individual case. CCLA regards this as a victory even though they didn't get the defendant off. Though I would imagine they share some of my concern that this outcome reflects a degree of wishy-washiness on the part of the court.
Oh, and by the way, Matt, you seem not to even know what the case is about. They are not trying to overturn a conviction. The state is trying to overturn an acquittal.