Indeed. The Bill of Rights does not work like that, as explicitly stated in the 9th Amendment.
1586 posts • joined 4 Mar 2011
It's very disheartening that the sex trafficking myth has been allowed to get so big as to threaten the entire internet. Even The Register seems to buy into it by shirking their journalistic duty and reporting the delusions of this dead girl's estranged family as fact. It's almost certain that she was never kidnapped or "bought". She ran away from home and stayed with her grandparents for a while, that much is known for sure. Then something tragic happened and she was murdered.
But that story doesn't sell books and laws, "sex trafficking" does. Why let truth get in the way of a good opportunity to sew fear in the public and reap financial and political gain?
No of course it's not a real thing!
Here's what really happened. A teenager ran away from home, stayed with her grandparents for a while, and somewhere along the line decided to make some money as a prostitute. Possibly with help from others, she posted an ad on Backpage. Tragically one of her customers proved unstable and murdered her.
There was zero people-purchasing involved.
Good by W3, you're now officially irrelevant.
Make sure you turn off updates before that happens.
I say go ahead, just insist your victims pay with both forks.
Re: Is american law stupid?
So that's a "yes' then.
Re: Here we go again..
Orv may be referring to a previous article here, but if so that's a misstatement of the what the study actually showed. They found that that contributions from accounts which were easily identifiable as belonging to a woman were accepted less often. Interestingly, they also found that that contributions from accounts which were easily identifiable as belonging to a man were accepted less often (though this was smaller effect). So perhaps "keep your private life private" really is the best advice.
In any case it did not get into the issue of women using male pseudonyms, as such. Perhaps Orv is basing that claim on something else though, I don't know.
Re: "may therefore not find documentation written by native English speakers easy."
I think it's mostly that writing docs is boring. If you're the type of person to get involved in an open source project, you're probably either enthusiastic about the product itself or enjoy the problem-solving aspect of coding.
So which would you rather do, work on that exciting new feature or write a detailed explanation of the existing product?
Re: Epson extortion
Recently Epson has (at least supposedly) puled a heel-face turn and started selling some printers with refillable ink tanks. Don't know how good a deal they are ultimately, but it's nice to see companies at least considering the possibility that pissing off their customers isn't necessarily the best business model.
Came too late to win me over though, I've already switched to laser. Toner may well be a ripoff too, but at least it doesn't evaporate when you're not using it.
There are no redundancies [...] taking place around this particular hardware
Well there's your problem. A system that big needs redundancy.
Anyone else notice a problem with the probabilities on the image match?
The article itself points out the car is not really vintage, but that's OK, that was only 88% confidence. That's not the problem. The problem is 99% car, 97% land vehicle. Since all cars are land vehicles*, it cannot by any reasonable definition be "more likely", a car than a land vehicle. I'm sure there are perfectly good reasons for these numbers, but it's another example of why "trust the tools, don't worry about how it works" might not be good advice.
*It's 2017, where's my damn flying car?
I'm not the only who thinks this article is kind of bizarre without any examples, right? Just something simple like "We all remember when Foocorp released Barbot which became sentient and tried to assassinate the president of Bazistan, but you may not have known... Yep that was a hackathon project."
I mean... there has been a real example of what the author is talking about, right?
Re: Is that a catapult?
Looks more like a ballista to me.
Re: Remote wipe.....
Hmm... Don't iPhones already have a wipe after X failed attempts feature? (Though it may be optional) So what if she just gives them X wrong pins one after the other?
Re: Maybe it's because Facebook's moderators simply refuse to look.
Interesting hypothesis. If true that means the thing to do is misreport ISIS videos as breastfeeding.
It's a carefully engineered moral panic
Human trafficking is a completely invented problem pushed by politicians and fake do-gooders who stand to gain by stirring people up. It's a great issue for them because it has appeal across party lines. Leftists hate because those poor womens. Conservatives like because that nasty evil sex. Who cares if it doesn't really exist? It's a great excuse for draconian laws, right up there with terrorism and a lovely gravy train for "charities".
Case in point: This attack on Back Page was initiated by California's Attorney General in an effort to look good while she was running for senate. Back Page has been around for years, yet in what would be an example of deplorable laxity if it were a real problem, she saved it until election season just to get her name out there.
Re: By hipsters for hipster
I don't think that's really true. That illustration in the article was just an example comparing grid to flexbox. After reading up on grid a bit (I must admit I never heard of it before) I have to say it actually looks very handy. It can easily solve classic layout needs like header/content/sidebar/footer that web designers might otherwise be tempted to use a table for.
Here's the article I read. Looks like it was originally written some time ago so I can't be sure it's up to date and complete.
I was curious if this is true, did a quick source peek at a few random web pages. Only Wikipedia used them. And to an extent at least, alot of their content really is table-like.
Re: The commenter needs to do some thinking
Oh fuck off. We have enough censors in the world without the register doing it too.
Nah, they've jumped the shark. Just ignore them.
Force employees to take DNA tests for bosses? We've got a new law to make that happen, beam House Republicans
To be fair, an employer is not a state.
Except when they are, of course...
Wondering if there's any legitimate use for EME
Where legitimate = helpful to the user, not harmful.
About all I can think of would be streaming illegal content (whether pirated or more illegal than that) and making sure no trace is left on your computer. Has anyone made an EME module for facilitate this? Maybe it would change the industry's tune.
Oh man, you fell for one of his stories? Sorry to hear that.
Can you still lock/unlock the keypad by pressing * and the left button?
Re: Holding post
How will down-voting this post before we reply make relevant comments easier to read?
You guys (El Reg) use cloudflare, don't you? Hope your HTML is well-formed.
Yeah, actually it looks like an "I know what I'm doing" kind of error. Unless there's some microsecond processing advantage I don't know about the only reason to use == would be misguided confidence that it could never be greater.
Re: Weasel words
I can think of some legitimate reasons for the distinction, for instance with a password, it's possible you forgot it or they've got the wrong guy and you never even knew it. But you can't forget your fingerprints and if it turns out yours isn't the right finger, that would been you're off the hook, rather up the creek.
That said, I totally agree with the judge that this kind of fingerprint dragnet is over the line.
This was pretty much my thought. I think he has a good point, it was not unauthorized access (or hacking in common parlance) but that doesn't mean he couldn't be guilty of some other crime.
Assumption Of Risk Doctrine?
If you've been hired to fix a company's sexism problem, wouldn't that mean you go in knowing you'll be working for a sexist company? That would be an interesting defense anyway, no idea if it would work.
Re: mac AV
Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't viruses, in the technical sense, nearly obsolete even on Windows? Worms and Trojans seem to be the hot thing now.
Pretty soon it will be no one but terrorist left who want to visit. I guess that will make them easy to spot though.
Did I read that correctly that vaping is not only safer than smoking but also safer than nicotine patches? This is frankly a bit hard to believe but if true ought to be the final nail in the coffin of fearmongering about it (but I'm sure it won't).
Russia (A) bans web porn as a 'bad influence' (B) decriminalizes domestic violence – or (C) all of the above?
I'm not saying it's a good change, but the assumption that the new domestic violence laws will be bad is a bit kneejerk in my opinion. Harsher penalties do not always reduce crime or lead to better outcomes in general. I do not know how they concluded this was the way to go, but I bet more went into the decision than some idea that domestic violence isn't that big a deal.
As far as the moral limits aspect, I'm doubtful that all (or perhaps any) of the attacker believed they were derailing and crashing real trains. They might have reasonably (and at least in this case correctly) concluded that there was no way a system that lets you derail trains would really be accessible over the internet.
Great for headlines, but I wouldn't read too much into it. Also, wasn't there a movie about this?
Re: What ???
I see. I guess it's possible only good guys found database. If so they were very lucky, but I don't know how they can be so sure of this.
But wait... which mouse turned cannibal? The one eating cardboard or cereal?
Seems like a surprisingly low random for a clever targeted attack on 4-star ho tel.
But perhaps that's why they went back for more.
Re: Vauxhall Cross
They rebuild it, obviously.
(And totally ignored the shortage of women in construction work while they did it!)
Regarding the fear that this will let criminals store their data where no government can reach, it's worth remembering that if this involves a serious crime Uncle Sam certainly has the option of presenting the evidence to an Irish court and getting a warrant issued there. This leads me to believe that either the government is more interested in the precedent than the case itself, or the reason they want these emails is incredibly trivial if not outright bogus.
Re: How much money spent campaigning???
It's probably fair to note that "one frigging state" has significantly more people than Australia.
But yeah, way too much money being spent on this, I certainly wouldn't disagree there.
And DougS, it's exactly like one guy giving $144M to a campaign. Except, one gal in this case, and it was her own campaign. If I'm keeping the numbers straight, she received a relatively unimpressive $16M additional from other people.
Paedo panic strikes again.
Re: @AC ... everyone picks and chooses the amendments they believe in
I don't think that follows, Ian. Lawyers frequently attack something from multiple angles at once. Also, both challenges are 4th amendment related anyway.
Re: Dear New Owners
Good ideas except for more integration. That's the main reason I don't use most of Google's services.
I think the FBI has been very naughty. So much so, apparently, that what the defendant was accused of pales in comparison. I don't buy the explanation that the exploit itself is too valuable to reveal. More likely than not it was something already fixed in Firefox but not yet patched in the Tor Browser. That's what they used on Freedom Hosting IIRC. So when they say "endanger future investigations" it sounds more like "endanger future convictions" (because judges might balk if they knew what was really going on).
Re: Come on
Of course not. It only simulated clicks.
I don't see any reason to believe this was concealed from the user either. The Firefox add-on listing (which still exists) clearly lists this behavior are a feature.
You realized they did bring clippy back, in a sense, right? I mean, I have no first-hand experience whether Cortana is as annoying, but on some level it's the same concept.
Good on them for not making it too easy I guess... unless they're only resisting because it would reveal the device really does record you at all times in they released the data.