* Posts by AnoniMouse

62 posts • joined 16 Feb 2011

Page:

Moore's Law isn't dead, chip boffin declares – we need it to keep chugging along for the sake of AI

AnoniMouse

There are real limits to silicon technologies

It's all very well to talk of muliple layers (for memory chips) but there are physical limits:

1. Transistors cannot be made much smaller (only a few electrons per gate);

2. Larger chips are more likely to have defects so there is an incentive to minimise the chip's area;

3. So there is a limit to the two-dimensional organisation and sizing of a chip;

4. Use of the third dimension (multiple layers) depends on what those layers are used for: if it's mostly single access memory then only a tiny proportion is active and scaling is feasible; if (highly) parallel processing (or memory access) is the aim then the need for heat dissipation is a severe limitation to the number of active elements per unit volume.

Interesting that wetware, which does operate in 3 dimensions, has inbuilt cooling thanks to cardiovascular circulation.

Silly money: Before you chuck your chequebook away, triple-check that super-handy digital coin

AnoniMouse

Currency must be based on TRUST - Facebook???

The prospect of Facebook holding a record of many / most / all of my financial transactions and selling that data to whatever buyer is prepared to pay them for it is more than enought to put me off this particular initiative.

And blockchain technology, although it has been "in development", and even limited real use for years, has yet to prove it is needed for, and capable of supporting electronic transactions on a global scale (and the Bitcoin manifestation of it is an environmental disaster).

Cough up, like, 1% of your valuation and keep up the good work, says FTC: In draft privacy deal, Facebook won't have to change a thing

AnoniMouse

Just the tip of the iceberg

Facebook's "flagrant, repeated violations of Americans' privacy" pale into insignificance compared to the global plundering of users' contact details that took place when Facebook acquired WhatsApp and "shared" [contact] data.

This was even more of a privacy-wrecking irony as WhatsApp had set out to help individuals protect their privacy.

No fine can be large enough to compensate for the growing lack of trust in Big Tech that has resulted from Facebook's arrorgance.

Bonkers British MPs rant: 5G signals cause cancer

AnoniMouse

This whole topic is mired by pseudo science - on both sides

Higher frequency does not necessarily entail potentially more damaging effects to living matter. Animal life on earth evolved in an environment continually bathed in electromagnetic radiation whose frequencies range from several hundred GHz upwards: sunlight.

Proper assessment of 5G technology and any risks it may pose, enabling informed debate about whether those risks are acceptable (remembering that NOTHING is completely "safe" - ask Edwina).

Trading emotive opinions and cherry-picking snippets of scientific research (mis-)quoted out of context will not help humankind to investigate the 5G opportunity AND mitigate its potential risks.

Bruce Schneier: You want real IoT security? Have Uncle Sam start putting boots to asses

AnoniMouse

The genie is out of the bottle

The cost of a chip that enables a "Thing" to connect to a wireless network continues to plummet. "Thngs" are becoming so small and so cheap that measures used by the US (or any other government) to control IT such as mobiles, laptops or even larger (and more expensive) devices will just not scale.

As such "Things" are incorporated into buildings, transport, homes, there is a need to ensure that the desirable characteristics identified by Schneier are fulfilled by the "Things" AND sustainable for the full lifetime of the eaxh "Thing" - which could be decades.

Begone, Demon Internet: Vodafone to shutter old-school pioneer ISP

AnoniMouse

Re: Bye bye.....

If Vodafone do not maintain the demon.co.uk domain and the associated nameservers (which hold the mx records) then all email addresses of the form <mailbox>@<x>.demon.co.uk will become broken.

In this day and age, when an email address is an important element of an individual's identity, such an action would be tantamount to corporate identity theft.

If Vodafone no longer have any use for the domain and are not prepared to maintain it then its ownership should be transferred to another organisation, such as NamesCo, who already manage email hostnames of the form <x>.demon.co.uk.

UK.gov failing to prevent £10bn of annual online fraud, say MPs

AnoniMouse

UK Banks don't care about fraud because it's the customers who lose

Regarding : "Unless all banks start working together, including making better use of technology, there will be little progress on tackling card fraud and returning money to customers."

Until banks are forced to accept legal responsibility for the consequences of their inadequate / broken use of technology to interact with customers, resulting in unnecessarily high levels of fraud being perpetrated on their customers, they will do little or nothing to improve matters.

Oh and how is the statement by a UK bank that "We'll also never send you an email asking for your Online Banking details or that include a link to the Online Banking log-in page." consistent with the "Login" or "View your Account" buttons in EVERY email sent by the credit card arm of the SAME UK bank?

Manchester plod still running 1,500 Windows XP machines

AnoniMouse

Oh, the arrogance of vendors

>> lead malware man at Malwarebytes, said Manchester Police seem to be suffering from a common

>> problem - reliance on custom applications which don't work with other versions of Windows.

Users must realise that they should only be using their PCs for the convenience and enrichment of vendors and should take every opportunity to buy new versions of wares that the vendors are peddling as soon as they become available.

The real fault lies with the vendors, whose strategy in respect of application / device / format compatibility seems to place users, their organisations and the purposes for which they, THE USERS, want to use PCs at the end of their list of priorities. After all, if a user's application / device becomes (or, is made) obsolete, why hey! they'll have to buy a new one. All good for vendor profits.

DJI strips out code badness, reveals some GPL odds 'n sods

AnoniMouse

Re: user freedom?

@ArrZarr

Your analogy is about the capabilities of the manufacturer - and I agree, that such capabilities might be abused.

I was more concerned about the capabilities of world+dog to reprogram any of the increasing number of devices that are "fully reliant on software" and on which we increasingly depend.

AnoniMouse

user freedom?

Will those in favour of unbridled hacking of drone code be content with the same freedom for the code in driverless cars on the public highway?

Infosec guru Schneier: Govts will intervene to regulate Internet of Sh!t

AnoniMouse

Re: That could become even worse than the original problem... if done badly

>> This worked fine for electrical engineering.

Yes, but I really can't see Trading Standards having the first clue about the end-to-end security of the ludicrously cheap devices, manfactured and (not) supported well outside our jurisdiction, that will predominate the Internet of Trojans.

Bruce is right to observe that market forces will do little to mitigate the impending threats that will arise.

But it's also very far from clear how any kind of government intervention might operate to be effective, especially since the IoT is a global phenomenon, with participants spread across the globe and hence spanning multiple jurisdictions.

NASA brainboxes work on algorithms for 'safe' self-flying aircraft

AnoniMouse

Multi-vehicle collision avoidance

Algorithms for reliably avoiding collisions between multiple, autonomous (i.e. not centrally controlled) moving vehicles (or, in 3D aircraft) are not plentiful, especially if circumstances where scalablity in numbers of vehicles (beyond two or three) vehicles is necessary.

All the challenges of complexity, with horrendously challenging scalability.

Internet of snitches: Anyone who can sniff 'Thing' traffic knows what you're doing

AnoniMouse

Internet of Trojans

And we are being encouraged to buy these "things" in their millions and connect them to our home networks INSIDE any firewall our routers may have.

US think-tank wants IoT device design regulated, because security

AnoniMouse

Wishful thinking

"Small cost-sensitive internet-of-things developer teams have little incentive to invest in rigorous security testing."

And since most of them will be developed, manufactured and (not) supported in jurisdictions outside the US, effective regulation will be very difficult to achieve.

Can ISPs step up and solve the DDoS problem?

AnoniMouse

Wishful thinking

"We can also encourage IoT manufacturers to impose better security in IoT equipment."

The IoT maniufacturers will be driven by competitive pressures to get new features into the market first, not to worry about security or support.

This is a very real challenge: in a world of open Internet access and relatively free trade, it is very difficult to discourage the consumer public from purchasing cheap electronic baubles, sourced from, and (not) supported by vendors in far-off jurisdictions.

AnoniMouse

Wishful thinking

"We can also encourage IoT manufacturers to impose better security in IoT equipment."

Things will be manufactured and (not) supported in a manner consistent with their plummetting cost. Vendors will focus on competing to get new features to market, not long term matters like security.

This is a very real challenge: in a world of open Internet access, and relatively free trade, it is very hard to discourage the public from buying cheap electronic baubles sourced from vendors in far-off jurisdictions.

Race for wireless VR headset heats up

AnoniMouse

Hacking virtual reality

Let's hope the makers have taken security really seriously.

The prospect that a hacker could convince the wearer of a VR headset of a false virtual reality is scary.

Str-NAND-ed: Flash chip drought hits tech world

AnoniMouse

Re: Things that make you go...

The fundamental issue is that even if the entire semiconductor fab capacity were dedicated to conventional flash memory proudtion it would not be sufficient to meet the ever burgeoning demand for storage.

As the economics shift the balance further in favour of solid state storage, demand for solid state storage will increase and the shortage will become even more acute.

Thanks, IoT vendors: your slack attitude will get regulators moving

AnoniMouse

Après nous le déluge

Creating IoT security groupings is a sure sign that the tech industry has missed the point.

Billions of Things will be produced by anonyous vendors who have no interest in IoT security and bought as cheap consumer tat by non-techies who have no consciousness of IoT security.

152k cameras in 990Gbps record-breaking dual DDoS

AnoniMouse

Re: Good news

It's very unclear that any amount of legal action could prevent a deluge of unbranded "Things" from finding their way into every nook and cranny of personal, home and civic life. These Things will be imported in their millions and almost given away. The channels will be so broadly distributed that it wil frequently be impossible to identify a supplier / manufacturer that is in our jurisdiction, just the local vendor / market stall / web seller / .

Wow, RIP hackers ... It's Cyber-Lord Blunkett to the rescue for UK big biz

AnoniMouse

Not enough

"Small organisations account for 92 per cent of cyber attacks, often because of limited resources. "

But in the (near) future it will be Things that will account for the majority of cyber targets, not least because there will be billions of them, with minimal trustworthy source or support. Their operators (including the public) won't be included in schemes like this and their suppliers mostly won't care.

GM crops are good for you and the planet, reckon boffins

AnoniMouse

Faulty logic = inaccurate reporting

There is all the difference in the world between " genetically modified foods [being] good for human health and the environment" and there being "no substantiated evidence of a difference in risks to human health between current commercially available genetically engineered (GE) crops and conventionally bred crops", as was actually stated in the report.

Most importantly, nothing in the report even attempts to state that all future GM/GE products will be risk-free.

As nature shows repeatedly, once genetic material appears in the wild it is virtually impossible to reverse that appearance.

Docker bags unikernel gurus – now you can be just like Linus Torvalds

AnoniMouse

Re: Less is More

Whether or not Unikernels or containers reduce the number of vulnerabilities, the need to patch each and every instance that contains a faulty code module will hugely increase the effort required to maintain containerised Apps.

Boozing is unsafe at ‘any level’, thunders chief UK.gov quack

AnoniMouse
FAIL

The dangers of "safe"

As many politicians and others have found in the past, there are huge dangers in talking about anything that is risk-related in terms of absolutes - "safe", "secure", etc.

In this case, "safe" has been defined as a less than 1% increased risk; which, as many others have pointed out, is small compared to many other risks to which we are exposed daily.

AnoniMouse

The dangers of "safe"

As many politicians and others have found in the past, there are huge dangers in talking about anything that is risk-related in terms of absolutes - "safe", "secure", etc.

In this case, "safe" has been defined as a less than 1% increased risk; which, as many others have pointed out, is small compared to many other risks to which we are exposed daily.

Researcher criticises 'weak' crypto in Internet of Things alarm system

AnoniMouse

IoT - Internet of Targets

A consumer boom, delivering cheap, already compromised or readily compromisable "things" into a large proportion of the nation's homes, cars, buildings, ...

What could possibly go wrong?

Happy New Year!

Boffins unwrap bargain-basement processor that talks light and current

AnoniMouse

Shame about the paywall

The continuing practice of publicly funded academics publishing their papers behind paywalls is reminiscent of the medieval church in which the clergy used Latin and physical screens to maintain their loftiness over the general public.

Google wants to add 'not encrypted' warnings to Gmail

AnoniMouse

A whiff of hypocrisy?

And presumbly Google also wants to warn users about the impact on their privacy of accessing Web Sites which, even though acceessed via HTTPS, are riddled with DoubleClick GoogleAnalytics and other Google SpyWare?

Voda boss claims 'turning point' as infra investment kicks in

AnoniMouse

Not all Vodafone customers are benefiting

>> "Our customers are benefiting from the significant investments we are making in high speed mobile and fixed networks," he added.

Not true for Demon Internet customers, for whom Vodafone has repeatedly failed to provide information about the future of Demon broadband and email services.

Windows 10 growth stalls during October

AnoniMouse

Duh!

"Windows XP market share declining less than Win 8.x or 7"

Not surprising, since Win XP is not (generally) subject to the embrace of Windows update, showering installations with unwanted Win10 upgrades.

Vodafone sales dip, waits for fixed broadband to kick in

AnoniMouse

>> This was also the quarter that Voda re-launched itself back into Blighty's fixed-line broadband market.

>> The company currently has just 70,000 subscribers in the UK, compared with an overall base of 10

>> million across the rest of the group.

Vodafone could make a start at making themselves attractive to new customers by paying some proper attention to existing Demon internet customes, who have been disgracefully ignored by a succession of owners, but are now Vodafone's responsibility.

.

NHS England backs down over another data extraction scheme

AnoniMouse

There is no such thing as de-identified data

Join anoymised data with a few other data sets, stir in a big data lake and, hey presto, all (well, strictly, much will be revealed.

The myth of data anonymisation needs to be debunked forthwith.

NASA guy to White House: Be really careful with that HTTPS stuff

AnoniMouse

So Google Ads all delivered via HTTPS. Web browsing slows down because of all those HTTPS connects. And - guess who - Google have just the answer: QUIC. How fortunate for ... Google.

HTTPS-only is a mixed blessing, since it protects the bad as well as the good: it will be all the easier for barbed Ads to reach their targets.

Free WiFi coming to UK trains ... in two years

AnoniMouse

One way traffic?

>> The measure's being promoted as a productivity-enhancer,

>> especially for those making lengthy journeys to the North.

Or even those travelling FROM the North.

Microsoft will give away Windows 10 FREE - for ONE year

AnoniMouse

Will it be an in-place upgrade?

"The question of 'what version are you running' will cease to make sense"

Oh yes it will, unless MS offer absolutely seamless, in-place upgrade and guaranteed backwards compatibility for applications.

Installing an OS is only the start: then there is all the hassle of installing and configuring the OS _and_ all the applications.

The future looks bright: Prepare to be dazzled by HDR telly tech

AnoniMouse

HDR based on a false premise

In the real world, human eyesight operates on a limited dynamic range - that's the purpose of the pupils, to adjust the aperture in response to different light levels. So one result of HDR will be to make our pupils work harder. Further, the brain's visual processing will, in practice, mask small variations in levels that are not the focus of attention - cf. preceptual masking in audio chains.

HDR will, no doubt, be a vehicle for gimmicky effects not otherwise achievable, but is this really "progress"? Or necessary (other than to sustain TV manufacturers' revenues)? And what did hppen to 3D TV?

No NAND's land: Flash will NOT take over the data centre

AnoniMouse

The writing is on the wall

>> The huge great problem is $/GB. New disk technologies such as shingling,

>> TDMR and HAMR are upping areal density per platter and bringing down

>> cost/GB faster than NAND technology can.

Disc technologies are heading towards their last gasp. HMR and TDMR have tahen FAR longer to bring to market than predcted. They are not just shrinks, but new technologies; and no follow-ons are apparent to follow in their wake. The fundamental limitations are a) domain size; and b) discs are 2 dimensional.

3D flash on the other hand is only just getting started. Already stacking 100 layers is believed to be feasible. That's equivalent to 11 years growth in capacity at 40% CAGR. Noone is envisaging HDD technologies continuing to improve at anything like that rate.

GP records soon wide open again: Just walk into a ‘safe haven’

AnoniMouse

There is no such thing as anonymisation any more

Once again, this is not a question of whether people wish to share data or not, but the circumstances under which, and by whom that personal data may be accessed.

I have no problem in my personal medical sharing data for the purposes of medical / epidemiological research. But it's quite another matter if Insurance compaies purchase personal datasets in bulk, join it with other datasets using Big Data processing, to de-anonmise the personal dataset, and then use that to set insurance premiums.

Boffins: Behold the SILICON CHEAPNESS of our tiny, radio-signal-munching IoT sensor

AnoniMouse

Everything except ...

"... a single silicon component that integrates everything needed to connect a sensor: computing, a communication stack, a radio and an antenna" - BUT NO SECURITY. Be very afraid!

Hackers' Paradise: The rise of soft options and the demise of hard choices

AnoniMouse

Worm Holes galore

As pointed out in other comments, many OSs were late to (or still do not) take full adavantage of hardware features in modern CPUs for memory protection.

Another massive route to compromising systems is the means by which "application code" invvokes (privileged) OS code (System Calls) with their API poor design and inadequate parameter validation. These are supplemented by numerous application-level "frameworks" which have the ability to escalate the privileges of the current process, so that vulnerabilities in_application_code can readily lead to compromise the whole system. Thus the number of worm holes penetrating the so-called protection of the priviileged parts of a system just continues to increase.

Sadly, the focus (from the sales and marketing community, not to mention the "got to have the latest" crowd) is on novelty rather than continual improvement; and change, especially, when not strictly necessary, creates needless opportunities for the creation of more vulnerabilities.

The fundamental issue is the lack of rigour or formality in designing and verifying almost all modern OSs. Not a great foundation for a world that is increasingly dependent on this stuff.

IDC interview: The five stages of business mobility

AnoniMouse

Mobility - but only within certain areas

The reality is that usable mobile telecoms is far far from ubiquitous.

The telecoms marketing machine *and, with IDC, market consultants) have a tendency to quote the best figures in terms of bandwidth, coverage, etc. - i.e. static use in the middle of a well-covered town or city area.

In the real world, being able to connect to, and use effectively, services delivered over the (unwired) internet in _any_ location - is not yet (and may never be) a reality. And this has implications for dependence on e.g. cloud services which, if only intermittently available, are at best frustrating and at worst unusable.

Is it the end of Big Data? Quarta Horribilis for high-end storage

AnoniMouse

Not the end of Big Data volumes, but a consequence of Big Data approaches

It's not that the (Big) volumes of storage are decreasing, but rather the eclipse of high end (and very expensive) storage controllers, brought about by a) increasing amounts of storage attached directly to servers (e.g. in HDFS clusters) and b) various SAN virtualisation (Software defined Everything) technologies.

Hackers ZERO IN on ZOMBIE XP boxes: Get patching, Internet Explorer 8 users

AnoniMouse

Where's the surprise? This is nothing short of a protection racket.

So MS withdraw support.

MS announce vulns, and that they affect now unsupported MS products.

Hackers have a field day

Numerous nefarious actors must be thanking their lucky stars that MS's drive to force people to buy new versions of its OS apparently absolves MS from any responsibility for defects in its past products (still used on 30% of PCs).

Next Windows obsolescence panic is 450 days from … NOW!

AnoniMouse

Domino effect

It's not just upgrading Windows Server - a sensible move in an ideal world - but the need to install updated versions of numerous other software component running on those servers, negotiating the mind-boggling challenge of being able to identify a set of software component versions that:

a) are certified to inter-operate with each other;

b) are guaranteed to support the server's current application set.

Why, oh why is the expectation of a continous evolution - as opposed to a succession of forced revoluionary changes - apparently impossible? The result is that FAR too much of the effort expended by the IT industry (and the hapless organisations that depend on IT) is devoted to managing the impact of a succession of "improvements" whose vendors seem to view backwards compatibility as a minority need.

Friends don't do tech support for friends running Windows XP

AnoniMouse

Friends (and family) will be DELUGED with requests for support anyway

Once REAL users (not the geeky types who "must" have the latest gizmos) are forced onto a new operating system, new applications, new version of Office, etc. they will be flocking in droves to their friends (or family) with questions such as how do I ... open this file that I coould open before / run this application that is no longer supported / find where the button / menu item to do X has been moved / etc.

We, who DO provide support for friends and family, are the ones who will bear the brunt of forced and unwanted change to new hardware, operating system and software.

And many, many users, not having a smooth evolutionary path from XP to the latest stuff, will look elsewhere.

AnoniMouse

The ethics of the IT industry

1. If users are forced to buy a brand new PC, they will be far more likely to consider an alternative - a MAC or a tablet (not Win 8).

2. Users who do want to persist with Windows are likely to be doing so because they have invested a large amount of time, money and their lives in applications that run on the PC and data locked up in those applications. This forced transition to a new platform, which frequently does not support the original applications (and strongly discorages the use of the original data formats), is abuse of MS's monopoly position, as a means of attempting to shore up revenues from their proprietry technology.

3. MS is positively engendering a digital throaway society - not just gadgets, but data as well. We should be ashamed that old fashioned technologies such as pen and ink will far outlast the information sustainability of which their modern counterparts are capable.

4. The ethics of a product strategy that focuses on the new and shiny rather than on the maintenance and evolution of things that work are highly questionable. The disruption to business and personal users of moving to a new platform is hugely costly. It may generate huge turnover every few years for the IT industry, but the net benefit to the economy and to society of continually starting over, only to reach much the same functionality - a liitle more here, a little less there (albeit re-skinned) - after considerable effort, is minimal. And the industry cannot plead "consumer demand" as mitigation - the industry invests hugely in stimulating this demand.

Oi, bank manager. Only you've got my email address - where're these TROJANS coming from?

AnoniMouse

The banks are flouting their own rules [surprise]

email from a UK High Street Bank, entitled "Avoid fraud - follow our top tips"

* Never click on a link from any email that takes you to an online banking log on page

email from card operation of same UK High Street Bank (and this is genuine, not a phishing scam):

":You can see the full statement by going online at ...." followed by a login button.

IT bods: Windows XP, we WON'T leave you. Migrate? Chuh! As if...

AnoniMouse

Keeping the IT industry in the manner to which it has become accustomed

It's not just the pain of updating the OS. It's the forced need to replace familiar applications that no longer execute on the new version of the OS and then how to extract valuable data created by those (now unusable) applications.

IT industry to business: you'll have to replace your entire IT estate.

Business: Why, what's the benefit to my business?

IT industry: If you don't you won't be supported and will be vulnerable to scarey consequences.

The built-in obsolescence routinely practised by IT vendors as a means of prepetuating revenues is highly questionable and condemns the whole IT industry to expend FAR to much of its resources replacing old with new, with very little identifiable user or business benefit and plenty of downsides.

If practised by organisations of a different type this might be termed extortion or a protection racket.

Win XP alive and kicking despite 2014 kill switch (Don't ask about Win 8)

AnoniMouse

The price of progress - and the systematic waste of human endeavour

"its use has been falling rather too slowly for the industry " - which says it all. The industry lives by forcing users to pay, regularly, to keep theie software "up to date". Leaving aside the geeks who always want to be seen having the latest versions of everything, for ordinary users this means that a whole raft of applications on which they depend suddenly stop working; old file formats now become unreadable; the user interface has been completely remodelled, using the vendors latest one-size-fits-all arrogance, to ensure that everything takes longer; and so on.

If the industry started focusing on the needs of its users rather than its own insatiable appetite to extract revenue from users who do not want reguler revolutions, enforced changes and new incompatibilities, an enormous swathe of human endeavour could be applied to useful activities rather than enduring the pain of enforced "progress" in order to be able to do rather less than they could previously.

Paul Allen: Windows 8 'promising' yet 'puzzling'

AnoniMouse

If Paul Allen is puzzled ....

"... a short period of adjustment" for Paul Allen could well be a FAR longer period of reduced productivity for those who have to use Windows-based computing at work. Figure that out and you've got billions of hours of wasted time worldwide. How much longer can the world afford the continual disruption caused by M$'s need to create discontinuities to sustain its revenue?

Page:

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019