Still working, still quirky as they ever were
For a trip down memory lane see my pic of the scientific and standard calculators here:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/somersetman/4037850828/.
6 publicly visible posts • joined 3 Feb 2011
I get emails from BT every week about "upgrading", and every single one of them is a phishing message from some time-waster. Quite how BT are going to convince me that I really do need to change my email I don't know :-)
Why the BT spam filter doesn't pick up spammers who are trying to impersonate BT themselves is beyond me.
The purpose of IP Rights (including copyright) is surely to encourage the sharing of creative works (be they photographs, art works, inventions, whatever) and the state granted protection privileges are a consideration for that. So to "maximise the public good" needs to take account of the very real possibility that people simply won't share stuff if they believe it's going to get ripped off.
@ Richard Gadsden
I believe that your comment and the original article are wrong in respect of Flickr stripping meta-data. As a long time use of Flickr I can confirm that Flickr does NOT strip meta-data but gives users the option to keep the meta-data for their photos hidden. I can't think of a good reason for hiding the meta-data unless photo doesn't actually belong to you, but there might be one.
Others have already mentioned that tagging *before* uploading is the best way of ensuring you have your own copy of the most crucial metadata. For the majority that have a lot of stuff uploaded already there are plenty of cheap/free tools (such as Bulkr) out there that can be used after the event to backup your Flickr pics with automatic incorporation of title, description, tags etc into the EXIF data.