Re: "the democratizing force of Microsoft technology"
Some people could afford it and others couldn't.
It's Democracy US-style.
790 publicly visible posts • joined 19 Jan 2011
This blog entry makes interesting comments about Security Policy and how to write one.
Even those who were big fans of Hydrogen are moving away from it as fast as they can.
"[Toyota] has set a target to sell more than 30,000 hydrogen-powered vehicles annually worldwide by about 2020, 10 times its 2017 production target. It also plans to introduce more than 100 fuel-cell buses in the Tokyo area ahead of the Olympics."
Where is all this energy coming from.. power stations
No, because you can produce hydrogen by many ways
Hydrogen is an energy transport medium, not an energy source! I
Absolutely, therefore the idea to use whatever source of energy to produce and store hydrogen, something you can do locally without having to be connected to a grid.
My bosses 6 series beemer and Range Rovers can therefor quite often uses more elecricity than my electric car!
There are around 30 miilions cars in UK. You can expect to to provide 10 kWh per electric car each night to give them an automony of 35 miles. That makes 300 GWh to produce and transport per night, around 110 TWh per year, without taking into account the losses by joule effect. The electricity production of UK was around 350 TWh in 2013. Do you really believe that the electrical grid is so oversized it can accept a load at least 30% higher?
How come that double amount of electrcity is always deemed to come from renewable sources whereas every electric car is deemed to be charged from coal fuelled powerstations?
Who said that? I didn't.
What I said is that is is easier to produce and store locally hydrogen than electricity,using energy harvesting.
It takes a minimim of twice as much electricity to make the hydrogen than it does to charge a battery
I wonder how you get that number, when there are several ways to make hydrogen.
You were silent about pollution generated by batteries making / recycling... you also forgot to mention that it takes 4 minutes to fill a tank of a Toyota Mirai (enough to ride 500 km), when it takes several hours to recharge an electric car.
Battery cars on the other hand seem to be degrading far slower than it was originally feared.
"Seem"? Anyway; the cost of replacing a battery enables to maintain a traditional car for years.
If all cars owners switch to electric cars, electrical grids won't be able to transport all the electricity required to recharge them. Add to this batteries that are polluting to make and polluting to recycle, and this make electrical cars a bad idea to preserve our environment.
That's why I bet on hydrogen: A refueling station could produce its own hydrogen by harvesting energy from its environment without having to be connected to an external network.
"money is now in place to put this right". Indeed, "if they weren't up to the job then the US and French navies would not entrust them with protection of their aircraft carriers in the Gulf."
Neither US (with Aegis classes) nor French (F70 / Horizon classes) navies require the Royal Navy to protect their aircraft carriers... however what the admiral admits there is that the RN is now a second-class navy, with no aeronautical capabilities, unable to strike anywhere, anyhow.
Does this concept exist in Australia, or should one pay for entire life the mistakes made in young ages?
Employers should not be allowed to access criminal records, they are no cops nor judges... or the opposite should also be true, workers should be able to access the criminal records of all the management.
Every story has several sides but we keep having the same one described again and again in Mr. McCarthy's articles, which are heavily biased towards one direction, justly or not I can't say
It would be interesting to get another point of view to be able to weight things, like this one: "EPO President Benoît Battistelli responds to IAM criticisms of recent union official dismissal".
I deeply believe consumerism is the root of nowadays explosion of selfishness. We are told for decades on newspapers, radio and TV that we should buy because 'having' will satisfy our ego:
we are worth it, we can indulge ourselves, we have the right, the duty to buy that thing that will make us happy for at least 4 secondes... , or speaking like Mr. Dabbs, we have to satisfy ourselves to reach the egotic orgasm, because pleasure is the most important thing in life, isn't it?
This message deeply influenced our culture: now selfishness is the norm, thinking bigger than oneself is being a communist punk, and Donald-not-the-duck Trump is going be President.
Woo-hoo.
Can't you find something in real wood in the next flea market, you could even transform as you wish to feed your needs? An old folding table for instance?
The ultra-consumerist attitude to buy and throw has to be amended. Let's reuse old things instead of making new junk.
JM2C, of course ^^
There's a small town in Southwest France which is fed up to have its city signs regularly stolen...
OK, in this case she only bent a plodmobile, but it could easily have been a child.
Ok so let shoot her because she could have hit a child instead of a police car, so she deserves it.... BTW I am surprised cops didn't shoot her... she was probably lucky not to be black.
I doubt humiliating her will save anyone life.
Looking at the losses suffered by AH64 Apache vs A-10 in Iraq, it seems safe to say that attack helicopters have been overhyped
How could a F-35 replace a A-10 on antitank / ground-attack missions?
F-35: one jet engine, a 25 mm GAU-22/A 4-barrel rotary cannon, internally mounted with 180 rounds, muzzle energy for API round: 107.5 kJ, Hardpoints: 6 × external pylons and two internal bays with two pylons
A-10: two jet engines for redundancy , a 30 mm GAU-8/A Avenger rotary cannon with 1,174 rounds, muzzle energy for API round: 203.3 kJ, Hardpoints: 11. Cockpit and parts of the flight-control system protected by 540 kg of titanium aircraft armor.
I wonder how many retired Air Force generals involved in the F-35 program are now highly-paid "advisors" in private companies, especially at Lookheed-Martin?
First, a 79-year old man shouldn't be obliged to work.
Next, a 18 month sentences is not far from a life sentence for such an old man.
Finally, this guy is not only an accomplice but also a victim from this bloody scammer (may the latter have his butt itching and the arms to small to scratch!)
If you set someone a target, they'll find the cheapest/easiest way to hit the target, which may not be done in the manner you intended.
Another formulation of the same wisdom:
The argument is that an AI might decide to hack its way out of itself. However, an AI won’t do something that goes against its purpose
That's an argument which doesn't work well with NI (Natural Intelligence), why would it work with AI?
I don't see any reason why an AI couldn't become suicidal, or be able to sacrifice itself for what it thinks being a greater good... Fear the day when your paranoid lightbulb will try to get you ^^
Avoid 'Ghostery', there's evil inside
Apple is not the only company to do so but it's no excuse. Apple blatantly exploits chinese workers to make stuff it sells with a huge margin in western countries, and does what it can not to pay taxes when using all the infrastructure paid by contributions.
We citizens are also consumers. Let make our choices really matter for big companies.