Re: PICS OR IT NEVER HAPPENED!
::whoosh::
26710 publicly visible posts • joined 7 Jun 2007
That, and most people are SO easily influenced and lead astray ...
Remember those triangular UFOs that were all the rage a few years ago, from the early '80s thru' the early 2000s?
I created one of those triangles in a campground in the Sierra by stringing three little dim lights about 40 feet up, in an open space between some pine trees. Come later in the evening, we were all telling tall tales around the camp fire, as is typical in such situations. I told a story about my supposed encounter, on Priest's Grade/Coulterville Road (one of the many back doors into Yosemite), and at the opportune moment had my Wife turn on the lights and point up with a "Just like that one?".
The lights were just bright enough to fool the eye into thinking that there were no stars showing between them .... Presto, huge dark triangular shaped "craft" over our camp fire. When the wife shut them off after about 5 seconds, I yelled "Shit! Did you see how FAST that thing was?". One of the guys not in on the trick commented that it made it over the next ridge (about four miles away) in under a second. Strangely enough, almost everybody agreed with him. At this point, some people were claiming they thought it was redish. They got quite inventive about what they thought they had seen.
The oddest thing is that when I collected my wire and lights the next morning, several people asked what I was doing. I told them. They did not believe me! So I told everybody the truth about the hoax over breakfast. Most of them refused to listen, and today many of them still tell the story of the huge triangle craft hovering over our camp that disappeared like a bat out of hell when we all looked up at it.
I never messed with that kind of mass illusion again. Too much room for error.
"release of the info would increase the paranoia and conspiracy theories"
Of course. Because the .gov will be so stupid as to admit that some stuff has been left out of the release "for security reasons", which is obviously where they are hiding the stuff about the aliens.
It couldn't possibly be because releasing the info would give China and Russia information on capabilities of hardware that is currently undergoing test and labeled "top secret" and/or our own capability of seeing what the bad guys are doing ... Nope, it must be aliens, innit.
"And for the folks behind Budgie to declare MATE as dead... That's just bollocks."
Indeed. In my travels in and around Silicon Valley (including the Unis in the area), I have never seen anybody using a Budgie desktop in the wild. Not once. MATE is almost common, although Cinnamon seems to have taken over that part of the desktop in recent years.
Don't listen to Marketing, folks! It's their JOB to cajole, nudge, bully and obfuscate you into listening to them, regardless of the suitability of their product for your needs.
"There are quite a few distros that don't but they are quite niche. It's over; systemd won. Sorry, but it did."
Only two major distros adopted it (RedHat and Debian). RedHat did it because they are trying to be Windows (were trying? gawd/ess only knows IBM's intent at this point). In Debian's case, it was an accident of history, in essence fall-out from a large internal power struggle. In other words, it was a political choice. It certainly wasn't for technical reasons. Thus Devuan.
The rest of the distros to implement it, being mostly clones of those two, blindly followed due to ignorance and/or apathy, with a pinch of sheer laziness on the part of the devs. They certainly didn't spend any time thinking about the ramifications, beyond "I use that software repository, so I must comply".
y
The systemd-cancer didn't "win", rather the community at large is losing. This can still be turned around.
"No one has a philosophical problem with it"
From my perspective, the arguments against Wayland are about equally split between technical and philosophical.
"just concerns about whether it is mature enough"
Which it isn't, not by a long-shot, and after 15 years of development (15!), I'm pretty sure it never will.
"and worries it may cut out the BSDs."
Frankly, the BSDs can handle themselves. They'll either make it available to their users, or not. Regardless, Wayland will not "take over" anything in the BSD world because the very idea of "taking over" is anathema to the BSDs. Something the kitchen-sinkware corporate Linux distros would do well to emulate.
Indeed. The ultimate OS is the one that blissfully gets out of the way and allows me to do my job with no histrionics. For my needs, the systemd-cancer free Slackware (sans Wayland) does exactly that. Try it, you might like it.
The only time I actually think about which OS I am running is when I'm responding in threads like this one.
Wayland overall is a huge step backward. That's why it's still an also-ran after 15 years. Nobody really wants it outside the Corporate world.
Remember, X is still available. And will remain available until roughly the heat death of the universe. That's one of the beauties of FOSS.
Yes, X has problems. It needs an upgrade or replacement. But Wayland is not that replacement no matter what the fanbois tell you.
"Reinstall the old driver and pin it so that it doesn't get upgraded, or switch to the open drivers."
Try both. Pin the one that works best for your needs. It's your computer, it doesn't belong to your video card manufacturer.
Note that one or more of the current LTS kernels might be your best option for older hardware. For example, LTS kernel 4.4 (released in very early 2016) will be maintained until at least 2026, and probably until 2036 ... and possibly beyond, if there is a need. If your hardware runs nicely on that, it might be an option for you.
"an indication that Linux is moving further and further away from being a UNIX-like OS to being something distinct from it."
And yet here I am, happily using a non-systemd-cancer distro, and not running Wayland. And I see absolutely no reason why this will change in my lifetime.
Linux is the kernel. It is not X or Wayland or the systemd-cancer or any other init. Linux is just the kernel. Shall I repeat that? Linux is just the kernel. You are allowed, nay ENCOURAGED, to graft the bits and bytes onto it that make an OS that suits you, the way you use a computer. There is no "one size fits all", and never will be, despite all the corporate interests trying to make it so.
"The people doing the the most promising Linux port to Apple M1 and M2 hardware have said that they do not have enough resource to both re-write the X.org backend display driver for the new silicon, and also do a Wayland compositor. So they've opted to just do Wayland."
Possibly smart. When Apple change their mind and do another radical switch in hardware (as is their wont), they'll have to re-write it all from scratch. Again.
I hate treadmill programming. Still, I guess it's a living.
For the Yanks in the audience who don't do Wiki, the Wagon Wheel (from 1947) is essentially a British copy of the Moon Pie (1917) (in some states the Scooter Pie is more common, but is essentially the same thing). If you prefer ice cream to marshmallow, here in the US you'll want an It's-it ... which is a whole 'nuther kettle of worms.
No, they are not identical, but they all share a common esthetic. Kids love 'em, adults maybe not so much.
All are easy enough for kids to make ... When we host birthday parties, we have 'em make their own.
RC cola optional (personally, I prefer coffee ... strong, black, no sugar. No kid's confection, either, come to think of it ... ).
... using DDG, the first six options when I search "RDS" are for Respiratory Distress Syndrome ... I would never have guessed this. I guessed Reliable Datagram Sockets would be near the top; it wasn't. I was actually hoping to see Random Dot Stereogram, at least by the second page, but no ...
... that I'm ever so glad I stopped caring about "Microsoft product experiences" (whatever the fuck that means!) thirteen and a half years ago.
Companies who pay more attention to marketing than they do the engineering of their actual product line are to be avoided at all costs.
"Remember the days when corporations sent ships to West Africa and picked up local workers, offering them nice new jobs"
Read your history. The "western" traders BOUGHT the workers from the locals, who had enslaved them[0].
Re-writing history to isolate one "bad guy" when there were many bad guys involved is worse than outright censorship. Tell it like it was, or don't tell it at all.
"These days "slavery" has been eliminated"
No. It has not. It's a huge problem, world-wide.
Note that I don't condone any part of this behavior, not by any stretch of the imagination.
"Kinda hard to force a client to install these at their own site."
Nah. It's all in the presentation. "It would cost you upwards of $BIGNUM per hour if that server were accidentally unplugged. If I install one of these simple devices, at a cost of $smallnum (including labo(u)r), that possibility is removed forever". In fact, they are so cheap and easy to install that I've been known to install them gratis and not even bother mentioning it.
"If you can get them to do that you can usually convince them to put the equipment in a server room off limits to cleaners"
THAT is easy. The hard part is convincing them that the former closet now needs its own AC ...
"(Unfortunately then you still have the problem of "security guards" who make it their life's mission to switch off aircon in unoccupied rooms - including rooms full of noisy equipment and racks)"
So remove the switch from places accessible to "security guards". It's not rocket surgery.
"it's becase the cleaners unplugged it"
For future reference, they make locking outlet covers that fit over an inserted plug or plugs, preventing the removal of same. The locks are trash, easier to pick than a file cabinet, but they work for this kind of thing. Under twenty bucks, and usually in stock at your favorite purveyor of sparky stuff. They make more expensive and harder to defeat versions, too. They come in both indoor and outdoor versions. Recommended.
And of course sometimes nothing beats hardwiring the machine(s) in question into either a J-box or the breaker panel.
1) The rover's computer runs VxWorks, which speaks UTF-8 like a native.
2) The rover's command and control systems only use 1byte/char. Saves bandwidth between here and there.
3) There is no reason to tell the rover that the rock has a name, much less what that name is.
4) Consider the source of your quote. They are not exactly known for their rocket surgery.
"I had several opportunities to travel on Concorde and every time turned it down because it went to New York, not Chicago where I was going."
Concorde was an experience, not a transportation device. Several of the companies I worked for/with used it as PR ... "He'll be on the next Concorde!". Never mind that flying me direct from SFO to Heathrow via 747 was often faster than flying me from SFO to New York, then wait for Concorde and on to London. Or vice-versa.
The Concorde flights were cramped, loud and bumpy, although fortunately short. The food, booze list, and service was excellent (the absolute best I've ever seen on commercial air) ... but I always felt like I needed a nap on landing. Note that I wasn't paying for it. Nor would I.
While I am glad that I had the chance to fly on her, I would not recommend it more than once, and then just for the WOW! factor. Which was real, and (almost) worth the price of admission. Once. If you're into that kind of thing (as most commentards are, I'm sure). Me DearOldMum? Maybe not so much ... For the price, she'd much prefer to take a boat across the pond. I'm not sure she's wrong, even in our fast-paced world.
"Like bankers, accountants, and so forth?"
In my experience, it's quite similar ... if not identical.
"There's also no "before" comparison, so how do we know they "turned" to drink and drugs versus keeping their usage steady or even cutting back?"
Again, in my experience they start using once they reach a level of respective incompetence. Suppressing the fear of being found out.
And they say "The Peter Principle" was supposed to be satire ...