Re: Six years of tax incentives ...
This administration is, however, the administration trumpeting this latest variation on the con.
26709 publicly visible posts • joined 7 Jun 2007
... if they run the joint for just about three years?
Putting the con back into both Wisconsin and Foxconn ... since 2017. One wonders if the fine folks in Wisconsin are educated enough to understand that they can vote the bums out of office.
\Will no one think of the golf carts‽‽‽
"We can do so much more with machines now that it seems pointless maintaining a permanent presence out there."
Incremental stuff makes a huge difference in the long term.
My Grandfather used to tell us tales about people (himself included) saying that the new-fangled electricity was a waste of time, it was too fiddly, and was a fad that would fade away with time. In fact he himself had it run to his house, used it for about a year, and then cancelled the service for the next fifteen years! At that point, he was quite behind the neighbors, much to his wife's displeasure.
Also Administrative groups, once they twigged how easy it was for us to track them down and report them to their ISPs ... and then block the ISPs which allowed such abuse of resources.
Abuse OF the net, not abuse ON the net ... Waste my resources & refuse to clean up your act, I'll block you. Permanently in some cases (the alphagootwats come to mind ... ).
Hell, I've never used a credit card on the Internet. Not once. Not planning on doing so, either. Not until the system is entirely rebuilt from the ground up with security in mind. And even then, I will probably not trust whatever system they come up with. Too many things to go wrong.
"- ban the use of C programming"
Can I use perl? Assembler? COBOL? Fortran? Forth? Whitespace? The sendmail configuration language? Mouse?
Mayhap they should ban all programming languages. And networks. And computers. And telephones. And the Royal Mail (maybe not that one, I was on a roll ... :-).
remind me to break out my PGP-in-perl T-shirt next time I'm flying into Blighty
Not a lot of good ol' suthun boys in CompSci, for what should be obvious reasons. More likely, computers will be best at both California Neutral and Received Pronunciation (for my fellow Yanks, that second one is as close as makes no nevermind to what we usually call "BBC Pronunciation").
But yes, your point is quite valid. It is an issue that is quite real, and will be extremely hard to resolve.
Oh, horse shit. That's corporations deciding what is and isn't allowed on their equipment, and individuals deciding which corporation(s) to draw their information from. It has nothing whatsoever to do with governmental censorship ... and only a government can truly be a censor.
A friend of mine and I were down in the engine room of a rather large boat parked in the Municipal Harbor[0] in Redwood City, California. We were doing routine maintenance, changing the oil & filters, checking seacocks and other through holes, shaft logs, bonding wire, and that kind of thing. As usual in such hot, cramped, potentially dirty conditions we were both wearing old jeans and t-shirts and ratty shoes.
It turned out that we forgot the oil, so the other guy volunteered to run up to my truck to get a couple gallons. He didn't return after fifteen or twenty minutes, so I went ashore to help. My friend was no weakling, but managing 6 gallons of oil by hand is a bit of a pain (even our wimpy US gallons).
I got to my truck just in time for the cops to show up, the harbo(u)r master had detained the suspicious character who was breaking into my truck, and called the police. Just as I arrived, the cops broke into laughter.
The boat we were working on was called "The Catch". The bum that the harbo(u)r master had detained was Dwight Clarke, the owner ... who also owned the restaurant "Clarke's By The Bay" located in the same harbo(u)r. Needless to say, the harbo(u)r master tried to bluster his way out of his embarrassment. He was a crap weasel of the first order.
[0] That's a proper noun, no (u) needed.
"It was that bullies will only try to bully those they perceive to be weaker."
And they don't bully those they perceive to be stronger, because might makes right.
"Your phrase is more fitting to US foreign policy, I'm afraid."
We learned from the best. Has the British Museum given back all the national treasures you lot stole from all those furriners you were bullying yet?
There is nothing inherently wrong with an NDA. I've signed many of them, mostly having to do with not commenting on proprietary technology, procedures, processes, formulae and the like, and always with a set start and end date.
A few have tried to include a "no working for the competition for X time" clause, but I routinely refuse to allow that (I'm a contractor, ALL of my work is in this field!). I just line out that clause in what is obviously just boilerplate with an initial and date. This has never stopped me from getting a contract.
Not a single "sign here before starting work" NDA that I have ever seen included anything to do with matters of personnel.
Occasionally, an HR department tries to hit me with that kind of thing during an exit interview on the conclusion of a given contract, but I just laugh at them. My contract is complete at that point, I'm not signing another one. This has never stopped me from working for that company again.
First you state that "employment laws rolled back to the eighteenth century to match the wild wild West that's the US employment landscape" ... and yet you go on to say that you have actually been employed by US employers who all had "good, decent contracts"?
Do you not see a problem with that dichotomy? Perhaps sharing your actual experience as opposed to what you may have been told would hold a trifle more credence.
I've seen people thrown out WITHOUT there being an official policy.
About a billion years ago in Internet time, call it roughly 1985, my Boss and I were in my office in Sunnyvale talking to the company owner on the speaker phone. The guy in charge of Advanced Manufacturing slammed into the office, making all kinds of demands, threatening us with firing and worse of we didn't drop everything to do his bidding. Until the owner's voice came out of the telephone, saying three magic words: "Dave, you're fired." ,,, My Boss was given the newly vacated AdvMan seat the following morning, and I took over his position. The owner cautioned both of us separately "Play fair with everybody, I don't like assholes". Needless to say we took him at his word.
I've seen similar for sexual harassment, and etc.
Really? Where? What country? How many is "many"? Can we please see examples? Surely you have multiple examples, given the serious nature of what you are charging the industry with.
Personally, I have never seen such a contract. If I did, I'd flat refuse to sign it -or- I'd line through that clause and date & initial the modification (which I have done for other things in the past; never stopped me from working),
Nor have I ever heard any of my friends (male or female) talk about such a thing. Are you trying to tell me that my friends have ALL been silenced? That would be quite the trick, given the nature of my friends ...
By way of reference, I work out of Silicon Valley, and have done for about half a century.
Interesting. Rather than answer my simple, straightforward question, the AC deleted it's post.
Hint: One correct answer (hopefully) is "I never even started beating my wife!". This points out the idiocy of the question, and perhaps points out the inadequacy of the questioner's logical process ... unless the questioner was using it as an example to point out the illogic of the questioned.
Another correct answer is "Mu". I prefer this one, but most folks don't understand it.
"Once it was modified."
Having owned a couple of bone-stock examples (a 1962 and a 1966), I disagree. But don't take my word for it, see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unsafe_at_Any_Speed#Criticisms_of_the_book
In the March 1963 issue of Mechanix Illustrated, Tom McCahill tried to get a 1963 Corvair to roll, at one point sliding sideways into a street curb, but could not turn the vehicle over.
The Texas Transportation Institute (TTl) Texas A&M University Research Foundation tested the car extensively and concluded "The 1960-1963 Corvair understeers in the same manner as conventional passenger cars up to about 0.4g lateral acceleration, makes a transition from understeer, through neutral steer, to oversteer in a range from about 0.4g to 0.5g lateral acceleration. This transition does not result in abnormal potential for loss of control. The limited accident data available indicates that the rollover rate of the 1960-1963 Corvair is comparable to other light domestic cars. The 1960-1963 Corvair compared favorably with the other contemporary vehicles used in the NHTSA Input Response Tests. The handling and stability performance of the 1960-1963 Corvair does not result in an abnormal potential for loss of control or rollover and it is at least as good as the performance of some contemporary vehicles both foreign and domestic.”
Nader, who is not an engineer, nor did he have a driver's license at the time, had absolutely no idea what he was talking about. I personally have taken everything he says, about anything, with a grain of salt ever since. But I have to thank him for his hand in helping to create the skeptic that I am today.
Don't tell me, show me.