Re: Always wanted to get into rust...
Well if you want to stick yourself with nails, nobody is stopping you, or being judgemental. Each to their own of course.
23 posts • joined 22 Dec 2010
>And if I've read the figures right you are more likely to be shot by a toddler in the US than by anyone with a gun in the UK.
That's ok though leftpondians, Secret service rules mean that a protectee cannot go packing. At least you're safe from Trump.
I Don't want to minimise your expertise in various fields, but, in the words of the Sussex Fire Brigade chief (at that time), how do you know if it is safe for you to attempt to tackle the fire? In his rather expert view it is not reasonable to expect people with zero actual fire training to know whether a given fire is of a magnitude for you to to know whether you should attempt to extinguish it. Fires can get alot more dangerous very fast, and that's before we get to talk about combustion gasses.
Just something to bear in mind :)
I have one machine that is rocking along just fine with 14.04 still- and I am going to need to update it to 18.04 before end of support next year, but this machine runs on an A10 and amd graphics card using the proprietary driver because I'm quite happy with the relatively large (for the gpu thats installed) performance boost running the driver in dual graphics mode.
The newer driver stack STILL does not support any kind of crossfire type mode including dual graphics mode. This hence means that the update will equate to lower graphics performance that one of my sons benefits from as he uses this machine for penguin flavoured gaming.
Due to 'advances' there is no way of getting round this and there is STILL no movement that I can see towards this being resolved :/
>>One the second amendment allows for gun ownership
>So - cancel the 2nd Amendment.
>Or, barring that, use it for the purpose intended (to be a check on a tyrannical government). Too many >people stop reading at the "bear arms" bit without going onto the militia bit.
I think there is a bit of a misunderstanding of intent with this.
A Militia recruits/drafts members expecting them to supply their own firearms (or did in this time in history).
So having citizenry unable to acquire said firearms would negate that.
Also the term regulated was not used in the manner we think of it today.
Not that this whole amendment isn't archaic, however you need to understand the framers' intents when they were drafting it.
a non gun nut who thinks the septics are far to heavily armed, and far to ready to use said arms for comfort.
The us government (ie taxpayer) did NOT spend the money to develop this, the pen was developed by private interest to work in zero g. It worked, and there were benefits in terms of the technology from that point, rather like alot of space program technology. A pencil would probably work great until you need to sharpen it, not to mention broken tips/graphite dust just from using them. You mentioned google further down in your post, how about you googled the Space Pen and actually get some facts before spouting rhetoric?
<snip> approximately 400 pens for $6 a piece </snip>.
THAT was what it cost NASA.
>>Not much of a fanatic → #
>>In Man sues boss for 'condemning him to eternal damnation'
>>A real religious nutcase would have voluntarily had an industrial accident on day #665, just to stick it to the boss.
a sensible religious nutcase would have organised an industrial accident for his boss. involving nails, or a crown of thorns, or something :)
It's a shame about all of this, because an ID card without all of the national identity register backend - and all that it entails (which was the bit I objected to) - being a single identity document card with LOCAL, NONRETAINED verification that the cardholder is indeed the authorised cardholder would be a Good Idea. Such a shame that bureaucrats in Whitehall would never allow such a simple, effective device without the backend.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019