Why now?
Clearly the government has been hiding something. Why didn't they put this Web site up back in 1969 right after the launch? This is just another sham to conceal the use of a sound stage on Mars to fabricate the lunar landing!
844 publicly visible posts • joined 4 Jun 2007
... FAIL detected.
1) Data Domain boxes actually do have a VTL mode, it's just an add-on.
2) DD may not have direct tape duplication functionality, but that can certainly be done by software.
3) DD also does post-process dedupe on top of inline.
Other than that, great article.
Clearly, rather than take responsibility for the raising of their own children, the only recourse is for parents to sue everyone. MySpace is only the first stop. After that, it's clear that Tim Berners-Lee should be held liable for inventing the Web, the telcos should be held responsible for carrying the traffic, DARPA should be sued for inventing the Internet, Cisco, Juniper, et al. should be sued for building the equipment that allowed the traffic to be carried, MySpace's colocation facilities are clearly responsible for housing the vile site, and finally the rest of humanity as a class should be hauled into court to face the music for not preventing the little Julies from falling prey to these molesters.
Nuke the site from orbit, it's the only way to be sure.
Everything that he said and more. Sharepoint's version control is crap: it's unable to track deltas, instead just making multiple copies of changed files (imagine doing that with Powerpoint or giant Excel spreadsheets!), and it only works for documents, not for actual site content. Also, backing it up reliably is a huge pain in the ass. Sharepoint is an overengineered POS which constitutes a nightmare to deploy and administer; it may be acceptable for users, but there are plenty of solutions which do almost as much for substantially less time, effort, pain, and money.
Strangely, people remain concerned about major historic events which had profound effects on later generations. For this reason, we still study the ancient Greeks because of their largely positive influence on the modern Western world, and we still study World War II because of its manifold effects on the entirety of the world. In addition, had you read the comments, you would realize that the Holocaust was not only directed against Jews but against many other groups as well; it is worthwhile to study, understand, and remember the Holocaust in order to prevent another one. Perhaps you've heard Santayana's quote, "Those who do not study the past are doomed to repeat it"? It's not just hot air.
I expect to see a gusher of caustic vitriol from The Usual Xuspects(TM) touting the advantages of Linux which, somehow, despite its amazing superiority, manages never to get more than 1% of the desktop market. And, of course, I think we can count on the TUXers never having actually used 7 and thus not actually being able to contribute anything meaningful to the conversation except to rehash tired cliches about Windows while continuing to overlook the many shortcomings of Linux as a desktop operating system.
Come on, guys, don't let me down.
I've seen the Xiotech presentation on what they do to improve drive reliability, and it's a lot more interesting than you suspect. In essence, one reason that drives fail is because of resonance which occurs as a result of a bunch of drives in a rack all facing the same direction and rotating the same way. The Xiotech canisters are set up to optimize rotational direction and improve air flow to reduce heat (the other big reason drives fail). In addition, the controller software has the capacity to detect when a hard drive is reporting errors, move the data off to a hot spare, and make adjustments to the "failing" drive's configuration to compensate for its condition, essentially remanufacturing the drive on the fly so that it can go back into service.
It's interesting reading the competing threads of people talking past each other. To summarize:
Thread 1: Ease-of-use advocates who assess that users have gotten used to having things "just work" and would not be keen on having to install drivers from CD/Internet to use their mass storage devices.
Thread 2: Linux users who assert that there are many technical solutions superior to FAT which are not very hard to implement.
Basically, as usual, the Linux advocates fail to understand that their solutions make things harder for the end user than the current solution . . . which reflects why Linux still languishes on the desktop.
Well, this article brought out the fanboi community in a hurry. My personal, anecdotal experience is that Mac hardware reliability is subpar, especially where laptops are concerned. IBM's laptop reliability used to be quite good, but then Lenovo bought the PC division, so it looks like Lenovo have finally caught back up.
The frothing madness of Internet chat boards can meet the frothing madness of the American Far Right (aka Sarah Palin supporters), and hopefully the lot of them will combust in a thermonuclear holocaust of rage and hate. At the very least, seeing the unleashed vitriol should scare off a good chunk of the more moderate Republicans.
As I commented yesterday, VDI == Virtual Desktop Infrastructure, which is VMware's term for a particular virtualization approach to serving up virtual desktops. Admittedly, the acronym for virtual desktop, VD, leaves something to be desired. Here's a hint:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=vdi&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&oq=
As a Mission-dweller myself, I would like to offer the stencil "artists" a free ride on the Whaaaaaambulance. Parts of the Mission have gone upscale, it's true, but there are still plenty of crack whores, drug dealers, and derelicts surrounding the BART stations (especially 16th Street), so it seems gentrification has not fully taken hold. Also, the locals have done a pretty good job so far of keeping independent bookstores, coffee shops, restaurants, and other businesses thriving.
The main problem with housing prices in SF is that the same people who bemoan the rising cost of housing are also highly active in making sure that only a paucity of new housing is built and therefore what gets built tends to be highly profitable luxury condominiums instead of more affordable housing.
. . . the overuse of "what is it with" in today's comments?
Also, what is it with the global obsession with binary electronic computers? What use are they to anyone except nerds with thick glasses and mathematicians? The only problems that can be solved with them are the ones that can somehow be rendered in 1s and 0s, and how many of those are there?
From a theoretical point of view it's interesting but is this really useful to anybody?