ICS
I wonder why it's limited to ICS. If Opera and Firefox can make a proper web browser on Android 2.x, why can't Google?
1712 publicly visible posts • joined 28 Jul 2010
I also think they shouldn't be as accommodating when carriers ask for their varient of Phone X to be called something completely different, which only adds to the confusion and the appearance of a large range of basically identical phones.
A bit of an old example here, but the HTC Magic is the same thing as the NTT docomo HT-03A and the T-Mobile myTouch 3G according to Wikipedia. I think HTC have a strong-enough brand now (especially with Sense) to be able to stick their fingers up at the meddling carriers. I mean, you don't see Nokia releasing carrier-branded handsets.
Methinks you're reading the parent comment wrong.
Lord Sharkey said;
"a pardon is not appropriate because he was found guilty of something that was a criminal offence at the time"
...to which the right honourable commentard above noted that it is only criminal offences that actually require pardons, in the fact that you don't need to be pardoned for something you've never been convicted of.
Which in summary makes Lord Sharkey's statement a little nonsensical.
""At no stage did any EU regulator suggest that any sort of pause would be appropriate. Since we finished these extensive briefings, we have notified over 350 million Google account holders, as well as providing highly visible notices to all our non-authenticated users."
Which is a bit like politely saying: "Tough luck, we're going ahead with this.""
Actually it's a bit like saying "FFS, we told you this YEARS ago and NOW you have a problem with it?"
I don't think Google are used to the, er, speed at which governments move.
Want to add to government coffers? Just legislate that rich internet companies have to do something impossible! Then when they can't do it, you can fine them every year or so - guaranteed income!
Bonus points for making the impossible thing something socially beneficial if solved - the internet companies employ lots of clever people, you never know but they might just crack perpetual motion, cold fusion or a cure for cancer.
Google *does* block* browsers earlier than IE8 on most of their web-apps (although notably not search). Didn't make much difference to *our* corporate IT, and we're an IT firm, so I doubt it would make much difference to t'others.
On IE8 finally now that they've managed to upgrade the intranet app that was reliant on IE6/7 but I feel for those less fortunate.
Not sure why the firms can't run IE6 for their intranet and install Firefox or whatever as a secondary browser for internet (with appropriate group policy settings) but I'm no expert.
(* Well, make their sites look rubbish and pop up a warning recommending an upgrade anyway, which is a bit like a block)
I think this is a bit rubbish of Moto, considering that they previously promised to release a bootloader unlocker for *all* of their recent smartphones (with the caveat that unlocking would possibly invalidate your warranty). Now they want people to buy whole new handsets to do this? Er... no I think we'll all pass, thanks.
All this has done is made me certain I'll never buy a Motorola handset.
I had a look at one of the Nokia Windows demos, and was impressed with the speed of the handset (although Androids of a similar price perform similarly well). I thought the tiles thing was a UI I could get used to. I also like the idea of getting timely OS updates without idiotic manufacturers and operators getting in the way.
But then I thought "what about all the apps I've bought?". I suspect a lot of Apple/Android users think the same way. I also like the customisable nature of Android and the Nokia seemed pretty one-size-fits-all.
I'm ambivilent towards Nokia, having never really tried Symbian after getting frustrated with their dumbphone software and moving to Windows Mobile. I disliked Microsofts attitude towards the WinMo community though, basically ignoring them, creating half-assed Windows Mobile updates and then dumping them by moving to a locked down Windows Phone 7. So I (and loads of others) moved to Android and have been reasonably happy ever since.
So who is the target market? The cheap handsets are mainly Androids. The desirable ones are mainly top-end Androids and iPhones. The ex-WinMo enthusiasts tend to get Androids. The ex-Nokia enthusiasts hate Nokia's guts now. Who are they pitching at?
I'd like there to be three strong players in the smartphone market but I can't see Nokia/WinMo being the third.
"the player isn’t DLNA compliant and can’t stream content across a network ... The good news is that it still offers full access to the Sony Entertainment Network IPTV portal."
So what you're saying is that the software (probably the same base build as other Sony devices) has been crippled so other devices can be sold at a higher price point?
God I hate it when manufacturers do that.
That said, it looks a nice bit of kit otherwise.
EXEC: SIMMONS! GET IN HERE!
IT TECH: Yessir?
EXEC: Ah Simmons...
IT TECH: Actually it's Simon sir...
EXEC: ...my daughter bought me this phone. It has a fruit on the back, some kind of designer I think, very trendy - my daughter has impeccable taste. Anyway, I want to be able to check my emails on it
IT TECH: That's an iPhone sir, we only support Blackberr...
EXEC: Well now we support these things too! Get on it.
IT TECH: Er, yes sir. Should we look into supporting Android handsets too?
EXEC: What handsets? Robots? Don't be stupid Simmons. Now you'll have to excuse me, I have a very important meeting in ten minutes.
IT TECH: *Sigh*
Whenever I think of Nintendo, I think missed opportunities. Take the Wii for example; phenomenonally successful, but so many missed opportunities.
- It has a DVD drive but doesn't play DVDs. Why don't Nintendo release a downloadable "DVD Channel" to enable the functionality? Hell, homebrewers managed it. You could even charge for it.
- For that matter, it's a wifi enabled box. Sell a Media Centre channel. I know it only handles 420p maximum but the current lowish price of the console would make it very cool for second TVs and kids/grandparents.
- Wii Fit was a massive craze. "Maybe for the next version we could allow people to connect up their wii fit accounts and get some kind of competition going? Nah, we'll just add a few more exercises and call it Wii Fit Plus"
I think that Nintendo make very good software but are at best lucky with their hardware choices. It will be interesting to see what ideas they come up with regarding the next Wii, and what they do to ruin the whole thing.
We shouldn't encourage them. Now Apple has beaten their estimates, the sum total of their analysis next year will be "Apple will earn EVEN MOAR NEXT YEAR!" which may or may not be true.
As for those saying this is some kind of blow to, er, "fandroids" - I can't imagine why. Just because Apple sold a tonne of phones didn't mean Samsung, HTC, Motorola et al didn't too. There's a lot of room in this (blatantly still) growing market.
Fortunately, I haven't been a victim but I think way too many companies seem to use the medium to be "in touch" with their customers.
T-Mobile used to text me every month to say my direct debit was due to come out in the next few days, and how much was due. That was marginally useful in that I could tell whether they were overcharging me or not and keep an eye on my usage. However someone must have complained about getting the bottom line sent to them in a text message anyone could read, so they stopped including the bill amount - turning the marginally useful service into a pretty useless one. After all, I know the direct debit is due - it happens every month, and isn't much of a surprise.
But can I work out how to unsubscribe from these helpful messages? No. And I don't even have a Nokia.
"Sure, there’s the underrated but pricey HTC Flyer with its curious stylus, but that’s still only boasting the earlier version of Android intended for phones"
Actually, the Flyer has an official Honeycomb update now. Granted, some don't much like it, but it's there. There are also vague rumours that it will get Ice Cream Sandwich. I doubt this Orange-branded thing will get any updates; why should Orange break the habit of a lifetime and update one of their devices?
And as others have said, TCO is a stupid amount considering how many competing options there are likely to be released this year now ICS is open-source and the cheaper manufacturers have their hands on it.
I can only assume that Sony expect people to believe they'd get better results from something with the word Sony written on it than from something with the word Humax written on it. Which I doubt is true nowadays.
Still, as an avowed cheapskate (spend more than £600 on a TV? Are you kidding?) I'm not exactly the target market.
No, telly makers need to make sure their TVs support more IPTV services.To be fair there's a distinct lack of IPTV services so their offerings may still not be compelling, but punters aren't going to be sympathetic if their TV doesn't play iPlayer/ITV Player/Whatever when it's billed as a "smart" (haha) telly.
At the moment as El Reg's articles have shown it's a confusing mess of manufacturers doing their own thing and making their own deals on a service-by-service basis. Even techies find IPTV daunting, I hate to think what Joe Average thinks of it all.
Probably "I bought a large flat panel HDTV two years ago and it still works fine".
As others have said, some versions of HTC Sense (and presumably other OEMs' interfaces) let you take screenshots. Also the functionality is built into Android 4.0 (Ice Cream Sandwich), the latest release, although admittedly this is a bit of an academic point considering only one or two handsets currently run it.
I'd come to Google+ to respond to people commenting on my posts (like they used to do with Reader shared items... happy days) but there's too much noise-to-signal on Google+ for me to visit more than once or twice a week at the moment.
That said I'm one of those weirdos who quite liked Buzz, so perhaps not typical!
"Apple's decision to launch a tweaked iPhone 4 - the 4S - rather than a brand new iPhone 5 may have flabbergasted some pundits, but punters have taken to the phone"
Face it, the punters don't care what "the latest iPhone" is called - they just want to buy "the latest iPhone". A lot of them will have been holding off buying until "the latest iPhone" came out, in this case the 4S. I doubt they even looked at the specs.
As long as Apple remains trendy that will always be the case.
Someone should patent "the use of English words in a description of a product or service, in order to increase usability for English-speaking users".
Then it wouldn't just be "design language" (a strategy boutique phrase if I've ever heard one) they could sue people about.
Spawn of satan == patent trolls.
Skype has been on Android for a while now, but apart from playing around with it for an hour or so I don't run it anymore - mainly as it drained the battery too much when I last tried it.
Since a lot of people (in the UK at least) get all those free minutes and don't have too many international friends to call, I can't see Skype being a major competitor to the telcos yet. Unless maybe they start selling smartphones like telcos do - i.e. subsidised and with Skype handling the telephony stuff instead of the carrier. But even then they'll have to fix the battery usage.
Just once I'd like to see a company be honest about the reasons for job losses.
"We've only made 2% more profit this year and said to our shareholders it would be 3%, so in order not to disappoint them next year we figured we could make up that one percent more profit by shipping these roles off elsewhere in the world.
This is clearly worth the massive stressful impact to our soon-to-be-former staff and their families. Now excuse me, I'm off to the golf course in my private chauffered car"