Re: laser mounting
I think your sense of humour is a touch too subtle for some people!
That (impossible) concept of 'pulling one's self up by one's bootstraps' is why we 'boot' computers.
7496 posts • joined 21 Jul 2010
I think your sense of humour is a touch too subtle for some people!
That (impossible) concept of 'pulling one's self up by one's bootstraps' is why we 'boot' computers.
>older El Reggers may remember a very decent sci-fi/fact magazine of the 80s, called OMNI
There's an online reboot of OMNI here:
More recently, Buzz Aldrin's novel Encounter with Tiber explores this method of laser propulsion.
>Never owned an LG phone
>Just put the decent DAC in your phone in the first place and I might have bought it
LG did just that in the G2, yet you didn't buy it. So, what was your point again?
LG also contributed 24bit 192Khz libraries to the AOSP.
The B&O module is more about the B&O Class D amp for driving headphones than it is about the DAC per se. B&O do make good Class D amps.
Oh well, glad you feel you can have an opinion, though.
>Does the B&O DAC include coaxial digital out?
No, it is a DAC, the clue is in the name.
What B&O do have a reputation for is Class D amplifiers ('IcePower'), so you'll have a reasonable DAC and amp combo for driving a variety of headphones. If you want your own DAC, you'd just use USB Audio, or a Chromecast Audio which has an optical out.
You'd be dealing with two lumps connected by a cable - not very ergonomic.
LG have missed no point.
Making a fully modular phone incurs structural weakness (so it would have to me made thicker and heavier, and is harder to waterproof), and it is also of limited appeal (cos really, most lower-mid to high end Android phone buyers will want a Snapdragon 8XX SoC, a good screen and a Sony camera sensor).
So whilst buyers haven't bothered with modular phones, they already fix things to their phones, such as external microphones, DACs, IR cameras, joysticks, bigger sensor cameras, LIDAR, external batteries and keyboards. However, the power/IO sockets they plug into are not mechanically fit for holding an extra lump of gubbins. LG have addressed that issue.
Whether the G5 will be bought in any numbers remains to be seen. Maybe by folk wanting a swappable battery.
The LG G5 has a removable battery, but doesn't have the waterproofing that its Samsung and Sony competitors do.
My Alcatel Pixi3 has a removable battery and SD card slot. It has many shortcomings, but since I bought it for £25 unlocked to any network I look upon it charitably. It does the basics well enough. ('Til I get around to getting my Sony Z3 C repaired)
>Apple has been running ALL OSX and IOS traffic (including Phone backups and email traffic) through their services for ages, scouring every bit of their users information to see what they can monetize.
That is Google's business model. Apple make plenty of money through high-margin hardware sales, and through taking a cut of music, video and app sales. If Apple really were making tons if cash from user data, then they would seek to bring more users into their fold (by selling cheap iPhones).
>Now all of a sudden he [Cook] acts as if he cares about the privacy of their customers, which I am sure he does not give a rat's behind about.
It helps differentiate his company's wares from Google's. Since Apple make plenty of money from people buying from/through them, they have a fairly good motive to keep that distinction.
Cook's talk about privacy may be all in his financial self-interest (his reasons don't really matter), but he has been talking about privacy for some time now. Do keep up.
Whilst I largely agree morally with your point, I suspect that legally it wouldn't hold water.
For the sake of your argument, you used the example of biological weapons - but that example stretches the argument a bit (on the grounds that biological weapons are banned by treaties). Perhaps a different example (an antidote to a poison, perhaps) would better help us to explore your point?
I can't think of a direct precedent - the closest I can think of is governments banning the sale of products (cars) that don't include another product (seat belts).
>On death doesn't the contents of account become owned by Apple? A few years ago I believe that it was mentioned widely that Bruce Willis had no ownership rights over his iTunes content so could not bequeath it in a will.
In the iTunes case you mentioned, the terms of the music licences meant that they couldn't be transferred to a beneficiary - the music licence in effect ceased (upon the death of the original buyer) and it didn't revert to Apple.
In any case, user's own data is covered by different EULAs than purchased music. If all data on a phone became the property of Apple, no company would allow iPhones anywhere near them - and we would have heard an almighty stink about it.
>I am not sure if terrorists need tour guides and I presume the BBC does not know either.
The BBC were merely reporting what a police officer said. The Reg has got it wrong, but hasn't published a correction yet.
>So why ... ... do the travellers have to be specifically terrorists? Why not hunters,
Hunters? Given the nature of some the weapons, (an anti-tank missile, and an uzi with a bayonette) that concept brings the Monty Python sketch Mosquito Hunting to mind:
The "nine coachloads" phrase was used by a policeman investigating the case, not by the BBC.
The Reg article has got this very wrong, so I'm not blaming you for writing a comment based upon the misinformation you have received.
> The idea of actually trying to find out which viewpoint might be closer to the objective truth now appears a quaint notion fading rapidly into the mist of the past.
The objective truth is the number of weapons of different types that were recovered, as given in all coverage of the story. Reports also published pictures of the weapons that were recovered.
That the policeman said "nine coachloads", is also a fact.
What is just plain false is that "nine coachloads" was concocted by the BBC.
Whilst John H Woods' point that they [journalists] will try to achieve "balance" by repeating what they are told from people with alternative viewpoints. is an important point in general, I fail to see its relevance in this case.
What about a Mini full of barmaids?
(Nominally 5, though the record is 23 in 2012. Technically, whilst all adult human females, they weren't all barmaids, but as a child of the eighties - when such attempts were more common - that's how I want to imagine it.)
>The only oddity I found was the capacitive navigation keys were not backlit, which defeats the object of having dedicated navigation.
My understanding is that Android navigation soft-keys remain the same, so don't really need to be visible once the user learns what they do. I may have missed something though, because I haven't kept up in the most recent versions of Android.
>to teach children addition, subtraction
They will learn those skills quicker if they play darts.
>Newflash - Facebook isn't a public service. Its a company that wants to turn a profit and it can set any rules it likes when you use its services. More fool you if you thought otherwise.
Absolutely. But if Facebook's existence is a de facto barrier to an alternative service (one that that just does what its users want, for a couple of quid a year), is there not grounds for banning it? I mean, can't we just be naive and ask our elected representatives to do what they are supposed to i.e act in our interests?
(Game theory: In some games, being the first to move gives a player an unassailable advantage. Take eBay as an example - once established, it will be the first choice of any self-interested buyer or seller)
A sad state of affairs. If only there was some sort of idiomatic reference book in which I could find a phrase that would concisely express my feelings on this matter.
> I've never seen a 1 disk NAS,
I have. Lacie made a couple.
However, these days many people have upgraded to routers (for better WiFi speeds and range) that provide a USB socket... this means that a standard external HDD can play the part of a 'single bay NAS'.
Even pirated material is easy streamed these days. If you can be confident of downloading a movie in five minutes legitimately or otherwise, or stream it, then you will be less fussed about storing it locally indefinitely.
It is possible that services like Netflix reduce some people's desire to store movies locally. Many of the devices people use to watch movies in their lounge are actually happier streaming content over the internet than they are playing media stored on the local network (Chromecast, NowTV dongle, some games consoles).
>Will they finally stop foisting crappy 1366x768 screens on laptop buyers?
There are plenty of very high res laptops available now. The issue is waiting for 3rd party software to play nice with it.
>I'm looking forward to AMDs new line up. Did no one talk about that?
Anandtech have twenty pages about AMD's lineup:
While the major OEMs, such as Dell, HP, Lenovo and ASUS will happily produce several models to fill the gap and maintain relationships with AMD, none of them will actively market a high-profile AMD based device due to the scope of previous AMD silicon and public expectation. If a mid-to-high end device is put in play, numbers are limited, distribution is narrow and advertising is minimal.
Performance per Watt is still on Intel's side.
Mikel is correct, a surveillance/coms payload of a given weight can do far more today than a few years ago.
Even having a day's downtime a week would allow one spare plane to provide cover for or six operational planes, allowing continuous uptime (weather and acts of dog, allowing). Having routine maintenance every month wouldn't be too onerous. Components, such as motor and prop assemblies can be swapped out / swapped in quickly.
I'm assuming the small size of it makes inspection of the airframe easier and quicker.
>This allows an NTP attack on almost any public wifi which permanently bricks your phone.
Has this this been demonstrated in a proof-of-concept attack?
I was under the impression that Jackie Chan underwrote his own film because he couldn't get conventional insurance.
Still, it would seem that nobody has been injured more in Jackie Chan films than Jackie himself (I've tried looking online to see if any of his employees have been seriously injured on set, but I can't see past the "Jackie Chan's Top Ten Injuries"-type articles.
The BBC reported it as being a criminal prosecution, so penalties beyond fines are possible.
On one of the Indiana Jones movies Mr Ford was keen to do his own stunts... until a stunt man pointed out that it was doing him out of work. Mr Ford was, by all accounts, genuinely embarrassed that this hadn't occurred to him.
(Remember he started out as a carpenter on a movie set).
(For a very young looking Mr Ford, search Google Images for "Terminate With Extreme Prejudice")
>AFAIK the M.O.D has a "sort-off" waiver for 'elth un safe'y, but ONLY during combat situations.
Indeed, I've heard of UK military compounds where it is compulsory for car drivers to reverse-park into parking bays. It is good practise - you are less likely to knock into a pedestrian whilst reversing into a bay than you are reversing out of a bay and into a thoroughfare.
>The one on the right looks like me.
You're Gérard Depardieu?
A rosier frame indeed, we likely won because we were more aggressive.
The Google search algorithms - and thus DuckDuckGo - are designed for the WWW, where any idiot can create a website (and search results are, in part, ranked by how many other pages link to it).
The approach to searching within a more structured, centrally hosted, collection of data would be different. The requirements of the user might be different, too. A user might, for example, want to search for all Wikipedia articles related to [SUBJECT] that have not been edited in the last [LAST EDIT DATE] and cite only those sources that come from [EXTERNAL SOURCE: ".ac.org"] or whatever.
>We had to rent videos - a VHS M*A*S*H cost GBP49 to buy
Is it possible that was the price video rental shops had to buy it at? They were not allowed to rent out copies that were sold to Joe Public.
The 1970s book The Joy of Sex by Alex Comfort featured black and white outline illustrations by an artist by Chris Foss.
Other readers might recognise him as the man who illustrated the covers of a good many sci-fi books, but in a completely different style (full colour, brush and airbrush), often on Asimov books.
He combined the two styles in a book called Diary of a Spaceperson. Citing an Amazon.co.uk review of the same:
Imagine you have this archive of fantastic science fiction art depicting highly original and organic spacecraft with vibrating colours, painted by a legendary artist. And you also have this even larger pile of pencil sketches of topless women. Wanting to show these to the world your natural reaction might be to compile a work about spaceships and another with drawings. Not so here.
>One wonders what they will make of each other.
Mutual disinterest, probably. It would make for a very boring monster mash-up movie, a la the SyFy Channel.
"Zombies Vs Skynet" The undead and terminators go about their daily business without disturbing each other
[In fairness to SyFy, whilst they are known for films like 'Sharknado!', their recent adaptation of The Expanse has been very good. Recommended for fans of hard sci-fi, set in a colonised Solar System with political intrigue. It sticks to its own measuered pace, but stay with it. Series 2 has just been commissioned.]
Hello Mr Haines. Are there any other examples of strange ToCs that you and your colleagues have seen over the years? Perhaps you could appeal to the readership here to provide examples they have seen?
Just an idea!
>It has certainly worked - the Register has now reported it twice.
I've read a couple of articles around the web about the release of Lumberyard, and this is the first I've read of the zombie clause in the ToCs - save for a comment by 'Clockworkseer' yesterday.
>Any self-respecting leach would, of course, refuse to put their mouth parts anywhere near the pervs prives.
You can believe that if you want to to, but if you go skinny dipping in a swamp and find a limp dangly thing clung to your limp dangly thing - please do share with us here at the Reg!
It's been said that Aristotle Onassis had the bar stools on one of his yachts clothed in sperm whale foreskin. I'd assumed that this was removed from a dead whale, until I read Mr Maloney's post.
>Idiots who self inflict either through drink, drugs or just being fucking idiots do NOT deserve first line care
On the grounds that laughter is a good medicine, it is appropriate that they be admitted to hospitals.
>Low flow priapism by any cause for more than four hours is a medical emergency. Deprived of oxygen the cells start to die
Again, just don't do it. Also, before any of you ask, a 'kiss of life' will not help oxygenate the cells.
(Although there is a joke in which a male patient, who has been instructed to relive pressure in those parts through manual manipulation, looks over to the next cubicle and sees the silhouette of a nurses head bobbing up and down over its occupant: "What about him?!" he asks.
"Oh, he's on BUPA" replies the Doc. )
[Edit: For the benefit of non-UK readers, BUPA is a brand of private healthcare available in the UK, as opposed to our free-at-the-point-of-treatment National Health Service]
There a few comments here along the lines of "Why not just make it shrink?"
In normal operation, turning off the pump is sufficient to reduce the pressure, since the blood will escape back into the rest of the body. Unfortunately in this case, the rings block the return path*. The patient would have been de-stimulated by the time he called for assistance - the pump had long been turned off - so another approach was required.
*That is the whole point of cock-ring, I've been led to believe - though I'm no expert on sticking my extremities into unsuitable apertures. I'm not an expert on sticking my face into a pan of boiling oil either, but my take on it remains the same: Just don't do it.
Weebles! (those egg-shaped figues that wobbled on their base... sort of the antidote to Barbie's equally unrealistic body shape)
Next time the Reg needs to recreate a scene featuring a yuppie:
It's a Playmobil exact scale replica of a Porsche 911 Carrera S, with functioning rear and front lights, customisable body and wheels, removable roof and illuminated dashboard.
Well if all you are training is Cockpit Procedures, then yeah, 64k RAM (and a a whole fake cockpit of switches and instruments) will do it.
However, if the now-more accessible techniques of simulating complex fluid dynamics and finite element analysis (to reduce, not replace physical testing) didn't save money and time in the design of aircraft, they wouldn't be used as widely as they are.
In engineering, product design and architecture, CAD isn't isn't just about visualisation (though that itself is often invaluable); it is also a whole suite of tools to help groups of engineers - often from different disciplines - work together.
At a more modest level, a man down the road from me makes wooden propellers for light aircraft. His CAD needs aren't as sophisticated (single user, standard file system), but to model new propellers and generate cutting paths for his CNC router he still benefits from a modern, consumer-class desktop.
For sure, one of the influences that has made 3D CAD cheaper is that GPUs were made in huge numbers (thus sharing the R&D and tooling costs amongst more people) for the price-concious gaming market, so on that point I will concede your point that a lot of computing power is 'wasted' on mere entertainment.
>The bloatware that my Samsung came with annoys me - duplication of Google ware mostly
> A Google Nexus is a nice phone, but I'd rather not have to trust Google so much.
So, you'd like to have the option of not using Google, but the preliminary work that Samsung has done to to offer you a non-Google Android annoys you?
Here's the thing: If a phone vendor ships a phone without Google Play Services version of Android, it is not allowed to ship *any* phone with Google Play Services ( APIs for location and other stuff, plus the Play Store, native GMail client, Google Maps etc). So, the only way for an Android phone vendor to break away from Google is to do it wholesale, and that would mean providing alternatives to all of Google's services.
Samsung have been hedging their bets for a while (I don't know what their own strategists currently think of their chances), hence the duplication of apps and services (an app store etc). It also explains their Tizen OS efforts.
Amazon tried an Android phone without Google. I haven't seen many of them.
>so what happens to the frozen goods that I might buy from them if they do the same?
That's a question of implementation, not concept. In theory a refrigerated delivery van *could* bring frozen goods to your door in a better state than you could (if your car doesn't have air-con). Other options include a reuseable thermal box, and maybe a phase-change thermal store 'brick'.
The rest of your points are valid. People's shopping habits vary a lot, but some might have a supermarket deliver the bulk boring stuff and get meats from a local butchers. I use Lidl for many items, but use Sainsburys/Waitrose for other stuff, a farmer's market if I'm passing... My habits are partly informed by my drive home from work.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2017