>Firstly, Bond has to be English and posh.
Sean Connery was less English than Idris Elba. Even the version of Bond played by Daniel Craig was Scottish (orphaned, raised in an English boarding school)
6621 posts • joined 21 Jul 2010
>Firstly, Bond has to be English and posh.
Sean Connery was less English than Idris Elba. Even the version of Bond played by Daniel Craig was Scottish (orphaned, raised in an English boarding school)
You could always use two password wallets, made by different teams, and combine their output:
Of course this approach isn't as convenient as using just one password wallet.
Substitution can have a place, as long as it not a common type. e > 3, 1 > l, o > 0 etc are no good.
batteryhorse > cbuudszipstd
'batteryhorse' is easy to remember, and 'advance each letter by one' is easy to remember. cbuudszipstd is slightly less vulnerable to a dictionary attack (though I note that zip is a word, and std is a standard (std!) abbreviation). If we started at batteryhorsestaplepurpleetc, there would be less chance of the output being mainly composed of dictionary words and fragments.
>So brute-forcing it is going to take that much longer.
It really depends upon how the brute-force program is written. It isn't going to start at
but will start with commonly used words and combinations - adam, angryant... ...zebra34.
There is no reason the brute-force program isn't using common substations - l0ve, Lov£, l0v3 - if the author of the program has decided (based on analysis of leaked databases of real-world users' passwords) that such an approach will be faster.
The investment that many companies are now putting into 3D depth sensing and autonomous car movement (nVidia, Google, MS, Intel, Tesla, Volvo and others) could be a good match for electric wheelchairs, especially for users with limited use of their hands.
>yet most trials are for military guys in the field to substitute for a fork lift. How sad.
That application is a better fit for the technology as it is now - fit operators, colleagues on hand to help don the suit, noise, power supply requirements etc. When it is refined, then yeah, it will be suitable for helping people who can't use their limbs.
Well, if I was in it, it wouldn't make much odds to me if it hit the ground at hypersonic or at merely supersonic speed!
I guess it depends upon how good the view is out of the window, and whether my state of mind would allow me to spend my last minutes/seconds admiring it. Most likely I'd be "oh shit of shit oh shit oh shit" or even inventing a new swear word, but you never know!
The term was new to me until today - when I read it in another Reg article.
According to Wikipedia, it means the same as 'research rocket', and 'sound' means to probe...
Hence the 'Lambda Sond' (Lambda sensor) grill badge on some older Volvos.
Thank you for your suggestions and feedback guys!
I'll see how well he adapts to a landscape keyboard first - then try a swpye keyboard. Then a new phone.
Some people have enjoyed using 'swype' keyboards using the Galaxy Note's stylus, according to one forum thread I've just read.
Despite having a number of compact cameras, his phone has become his main photographic device, so there is a case for him to get another phone anyway. A Galaxy Note 4 seems to have a well-regarded camera, big screen - and who knows, maybe he'll find the stylus handy.
Samsung's strange swapping of Android's [Back] and [Menu] keys will be fun for him!
My old man is getting frustrated with his Nexus 5 (5" screen) because his sausage fingers make typing difficult, so wants my advice in getting a new phone. Has anyone here with sausage fingers found that a 6" phone makes typing easier?
Thanks in advance!
...and it ain't bad at all! Seriously, it hasn't annoyed me once yet!
I needed a phone that day (having punched my painfully slow £25 (unlocked, from Sainsbury's) Alcatel Pixi 3 in the screen for refusing to read an SD card properly the day before) and went to an EE shop. I didn't want to spend much because I have a fancy phone in need of expensive repair. The price tag said £90 for a Huawei Y560, but the manager had a ring-binder and said I could have it for £45.
I'm really happy with it. Within 5 minutes of opening the box - it shipped with the battery at 50% charge - I'd popped in my EE contract SIM, restored my contacts from Google and had a fully functional phone. It's snappy and doesn't pause or lag for normal tasks (the Snapdragon 210 gets warm during modest strategy games, no matter), it's 4G, Android Lollipop, has a camera flash, GPS, 1GB RAM... I really can't find any major shortcomings with it. SD card slot, replaceable battery, it's all there. At its list price it has some competition, but at £45 it is amazingly good value.
If you do buy a budget phone, the important thing isn't the internal storage (most have SD card slots) but the RAM - shockingly, some Android phones are still sold with less than 1GB of RAM which is just asking for frustration.
(Meanwhile, the quoted repair cost for my Sony Z3 Compact remains £85. It's like when my mate's Hitachi disc cutter died and rather than pay £80 to fix it he bought one from Lidl or £50 with a 3-year guarantee)
Also, if you buy the phone outright you are covered by the Sales of Goods Act ("This phone has failed, please give me my money back now!") as opposed to having the use of a phone that remains property of EE/O2 until the end of your contract period ("What do you mean I have to wait a fortnight for you to send it off to be repaired?!").
In addition, you can ring your network operator at any time and say "You competitors are offering me the same tariff for less. Please knock a few quid off my monthly bill or I'll leave you for them!"
Sadly, the trashbat.co.ck website seems to be down... but I have found one image of the Wasp T12 Speechtool, though alas it doesn't show the T12's fold-out twin jogdials for one-the-go MP3 mixing, or its integrated business card printer.
Now, that's a phone!
I'm hoping that George Lucas decides to make Special Edition of Nathan Barley, by using CGI to add hipster beards and sailor tattoos to the characters.
>The trick is knowing what icons, and the names thereof, that are still lurking on the server.
Have you found the angel/demon Jobs/Gates icons?
>It seem to be more probable to me that this is a treatment for people who were just over the brink after a slightly late resusication than doing a frankenstien.
There are cases of brain damage occurring in a clinical environment - for example brain swelling some hours after admission to hospital. There are even cases of pregnant patients whose brains are dead whose bodies are kept alive for months until the baby they are carrying can be delivered by Ceasarian section.
The article's discussion of people surviving after spending time without breathing was to illustrate the point that 'death' isn't as easy to define as once it was - indeed, last month's National Geographic had an article on this very subject.
You raise a good point about the importance of CPR training. Ideally, the first responder will shout for someone else to call the emergency services whilst they administer CPR immediately. Hollywood and TV gives the impression that five minutes of passionate CPR might revive the patient, but that isn't the case - it's usually done continuously until paramedics arrive, and then only improves the patients chances.
Can anyone provide input about the 999 services being able to pinpoint a mobile phone - in the scenario that the first responder is alone with a patient?
>Until someone thinks up a way to spray pv on its not a good enough solution for most available locations.
Installation costs... not sure that spraying would save that much time. I imagine most of the installation labour costs are those associated with working at heights - erecting scaffolding, basically. This cost could be shared if it is combined with other maintenance work - or the installation of external insulation on the walls of the house (popular in Germany, I'm told, though I've seen it done in England).
Hmmm... I could imagine a cherry-picker hoisting a rolled-up array of solar panels above the apex of the house, and it could then be unfurled downwards.
Or a modular array of smaller PV panels, each lifted into place by a few robotic quad-copters, such as these: https://www.ted.com/talks/vijay_kumar_robots_that_fly_and_cooperate?language=en
I think you may be right, EddieD. My confusion may stem from Mr Ploppy featuring in the episode 'Head', in which other body parts were lopped off.
Oooh, you don't want to have a good idea. My grandfather had a good idea once and his toes fell off.
Yeah, he thought it would be a good idea to trim his toenails with a scythe.
- Mr Ploppy, Blackadder II
The use of 'a' or 'an' depends upon the pronunciation, not the spelling of the following noun. Because the correct pronunciation of 'h' is 'aitch', then 'an' should be used before 'HP' , as in "An HP engineer explained to us..."
We do the same with 'm' ('em'), as in "A Minister of Parliament was caught in an hotel room with..." versus "An MP was caught in..."
'Hotel' may be pronounced without the 'h' being stressed, so both 'a hotel' and 'an hotel' are commonly used. 'Heirloom' is always 'an', 'Hangman' is always 'a'.
>Neat and useful technology yes.
Er, so whcih one is it? Make your mind up!
>People have actually claimed "3D Printed Car"
So, you managed to find the words of some idiots on the internet... well done Jeff, that must have been hard! :) Meanwhile, the people who actually make cars, Ford, BMW et al, are interested in this - as they always have been in CAD and prototyping tech.
For sure, 3D printing has been over-hyped in the past - by idiots - but this HP process has my attention. It's worth noting that they bided their time - they bought Stratasys (fused material deposition) quite a few years back before letting them go without any HP product being released.
It ain't going to change the face of manufacturing, but it will be a consistent way of bringing products with short production runs (up to 10,000, say) to market.
Many parts of HP's printer are 3D-printed. HP aren't making tens of thousands of these things, so 3D printing is a suitable manufacturing process.
In any case, the plastic bits of the printer aren't likely to be those that wear out and need replacing.
>upwards of £30,000 per seat for CAD, and that didn't include the workstation.
>>Don't they still pay at least that much for CAD?
Actually, yeah, they do - but since I only introduced it to make the point that in some industries any advantage is worth a lot of money, I didn't see the need to stretch the credulity of the general Reg readership. Bless them.
Rhino 3D, 3D Studio Max are in the £ hundreds
SolidWorks, Alias, Siemens NX, etc are £ thousands
Catia etc £ tens of thousands
The pricing in part came about from a time when the hardware to run the software cost £ millions. It started to change in the mid nineties when desktop-class hardware, most famously by Solidworks, the start-up capital for which was raised by card-counting in Las Vegas casinos - the founder was one of *those* MIT blackjack students they made a film about.
More info here:
Fused powder bed
Colours and conductive parts
Bed size 16-in. x 12-in. x 16-in.
RepRap and Makerbot cost £500 are aimed at hobbyists that might not even know what they want them for.
If you are just about to spend £120,000 on something, your job depends upon reading the data sheets and justifying to your finance department why it is a good investment - who will not accept "I liked the name" as a good enough reason.
>19% annual rise of almost entirely cheap crap toy printer shipments somehow predicts a 400% rise in revenue over the next 5 years?
No, it doesn't, nobody said that will be cheap printers that will drive the market up to $16 billion - the Reg writer just left those two sentence together when he assembled his info from a research report. Whilst far more cheap printers are sold than expensive ones, the expensive ones are effing expensive.
The figures are fairly sensible, especially when you consider that a *mature* 3D printer can be economic at producing parts in fewer numbers (say tens of thousands) than injection moulding - it is a device for manufacture, not just prototyping.
The powder bed deposition method ( as opposed to stereolithography or fused material deposition - the basis of cheap hobbyist printers) which HP is using prints in nylon with conductive parts if needs be. Pretty darned useful.
The automotive industry are all over this - anything that saves time. Remember this is the industry that until a couple of decade ago would be paying upwards of £30,000 per seat for CAD, and that didn't include the workstation.
Or a Yahooing, in the case of this politician!
They had some great articles. Its hard to think of a significant American author who hasn't written for Playboy.
These days, the writers have passed away, and Playboy doesn't do nudity. Oh well.
>Shouldn't the real shaming be that he's using Yahoo! in the year 2016?
I came here to say that! Well done, well done.
And who pays the wages of people websites? Where does the revenue come from? For sure, the joy in the nineties was reading websites created by, and for, enthusiasts as their hobby - but at the time it was a supplement to magazines and newspapers. In reality, I spent a lot of pocket money on dead tree magazines, like PC Zone and later (thankfully I expanded my hobbies beyond gaming) Mountain Biking UK, the latter worth it for the beautifully painted full-colour artwork*.
Yeah, everything was more awesome in the 90s, but paying £14 for a CD album wasn't so much.
The buzzword back in the '90s was 'micro-payments' - it didn't take off at the time, but the idea was to make it easy to pay website you like a few pence per visit. Now one can imagine paying a modest subscription to read content from a group of websites. Some tradition journals now have apps or subscriptions available through tablets (primarily iPads). The tradition of having full access to a website if you have a subscription to a dead-tree magazine is long established (New Scientist, Which?)
It might not have escaped your attention that the focus of stories on The Register is changing slightly, with more stories about storage, since these are of interest to the people who might just buy the goods and services advertised.
*Nice picture: http://www.thisiswhy.ip3.co.uk/thisiswhy/index.html I do note that the hand-written text is often too small to read on a 1920 x 1200 display, but it looked lovely on the glossy page of a magazine. It would look good on a high-res tablet, though.
Four paragraphs about Stephen Fry? Tch,
Okay, we get it... he's earned a lot of money from his pen (er, succession of Macs and a non-Word word-processors), his columns for newspapers have been collected and published in book form, his novels best sellers, he was a close friend of the much championed constructive critic of technology Douglas Adams, he's spent a lot of money of gadgets and cocaine...
One can only assume that Mr Orlowski watches too much UK television if he is that irritated by Stephen Fry. I say this kindly: someone get him a PVR, or Kodi with extensions, or Netflix subscription or whatever... it's the 21st century FFS, you can do this with a £20 dongle and your phone these days! We do not have to put up whatever falls into your gogglebox over the airwaves anymore (I'm assuming Mr Orlowski has broadband internet). One can only assume passive over-exposure to Stephen Fry is the reason behind his animosity, because it would be impolite to ascribe it to the jealousy of one writer for another.
I like Stephen Fry, his writings, his performances in Black Adder and Jeeves and Wooster, his journey towards self-acceptance, his presenting of suitable TV shows even. I don't watch QI or advertisements, though. I'm not adverse to people taking the piss out of him, but since such people have included Clement Freud et al on Just a Minute it seems a bit redundant here.
@Bobchip + LDS
You might be arguing with @redpawn at cross-purposes... his comment seemed pretty ironic.
For some people, sure.
Some applications, in finance, engineering and content creation are still tied to Windows, though VMs and and WINE are sometimes viable options. For some of these applications, I see them becoming platform-agnostic before they become ported specifically to Linux - though the end result (no barrier to using Linux as primary OS) will effectively be the same.
A curious driver that I haven't seen much comment on - some organisations using fleets of old, second hand (but still perfectly fast enough for office tasks) PCs, where adding Windows and Office licenses would multiply the cost of the machine by a factor of four or five. (though I can't be arsed to find to find the info and do the sums to factor in the power consumption cost of using Pentium 4-era PCs over more modern efficient machines)
If only cancer could be cured by restoring from a known-good (genetic) system image!
>"those still struggling to get rid of IE & ActiveX crap are in for a massive re-wire effort either way."
>>Which gives them the opportunity and reason to make a long-term decision.
I get the impression that whatever one uses to replace IE5 and ActiveX is platform-agnostic. That is, people having learnt their lesson about getting stuck in the mud before will not make the same mistake again, and make the decision to keep their options open in future. I'm no expert, but it seems that if even productivity software such as 3D CAD can now be run through a web browser, the actual OS of the desktop computer (er, terminal?) doesn't matter so much any more for many tasks, so long as it's secure and reliable.
Android really isn't suitable - each OS update requires input from various OEMs. That's why Google developed ChromeOS.
However, many of the people who might move to ChromeOS - i.e those not dependant on Windows applications - may well have already moved to some mainstream flavour of desktop Linux.
>a plot-line about the Eurovision Song Contest being rigged by Aliens or the CIA?
That actually is the plot from an episode of Father Ted.
My Lovely Horse!
>as far as I can see, Innopolis is pretty much in the middle of nowhere
Zoom out dear boy, zoom out from the link you provided, and you'll see that Innopolis is about 15 minutes car journey from Kazan, a city with over a million residents. Indeed, Innopolis appears to be nothing but a technology park on the outskirts of Kazan, as the name suggests. A quick Google confirms Innopolis was created in 2012 as Special Economic Area.
I can't spot Kazan night clubs from the air, but they seem to have some massive civic buildings, an imposing a university, a huge basketball stadium... I get the impression that your entertainment tastes can be catered to, whatever they are.
Wikipedia then confirms that Kazan is one of the foremost cities in Russia for science and for sport.
Thank you, I had not heard of the place before!
>Such a simple CPU would be small enough to be understood by a single person so it can be audited easily.
I don't doubt what you say, but of course the handset/terminal is but one part of a chain... any audit would have to extent to all the systems the handset interacts with. Already this week the Reg has reported that the identity of GSM handsets (and thus Telegram, Whatsapp users et al) can be easily spoofed.
In support of @foo_bar_baz's comment:
(Page has link to mp3 podcast, no transcript, sorry!)
Peter Pomerantsev argues that the one great difference between historical Soviet propaganda and what Russians see today, is that for the Soviets, the idea of truth was important—even when they were lying. Today's regime displays its indifference to and playfulness with the truth.
It's an interview with Peter Pomerantsev, TV Producer, essayist for the LRB and The Atlantic. The host of the radio show is Philip Adams, a former film producer, advertiser, farmer and self-proclaimed 'old leftie'.... and he's been sacked by Rupert Murdoch twice. He's interviewed everyone from Monty Pythons to Mikhail Gorbachev.
I had to scan the article a couple of times too. They didn't pretend to kidnap a random member of the public, the 'hostage' was actually an accomplice:
Later that same day they staged a similar "prank" at Tate Britain - this time appearing to take a female hostage, although she too was part of the team.
And whilst I'd like to think I'd jump to the rescue of someone being kidnapped (if I could without further endangering the victim), you never know how you react in these situations until they happen.
A friend of mine has been 'phoney kidnapped', but that was all above board - it was part of a training course he was sent on before working for an NGO in some troubled countries.
'Battery' comes from the Latin 'the act of beating', and so organised groups of artillery became known as batteries. This usage was extended to other arrays of similar things, so a group of power cells became known as a battery. In fact today we often use 'battery' for mere single cells, as 'AA' often are - by contrast, square 9V 'PP3's are batteries of lower voltage cells. This power station is a battery of valves and turbines.
And should you be standing in the wrong place at the wrong time, it would certainly batter you, like an egg in a food blender!
Spanners are drop-forged then case-hardened, that is they are hard on the outside and tough on the inside - else they would deform when used or shatter if dropped.
Instead of cutting it off, they could heat the spanner, then rapidly quench it and then twat it with a large hammer, thus shattering the spanner and liberating the man's tool... oh, wait... well, I guess he wouldn't do it again!
>Better to have the ability to haul any potential asteroid-mitigating technology inro orbit, and / or wirk towards a self sustaining extraterrestial colony.
>>Genuine question: Why?
Well, y'know, it's good to have a hobby!
>the only real benefit would be some kind of political escape/hermitism to break away from the main cluster of civilization.
That and having some form of redundancy of habitat for our species. And if you see our future as being VR/Brain-Computer link/ Uploaded Conciousness or whatever, then what matters if our inert bodies / brains in jars are on a terrestial Eden or in orbit around the sun?
That's all well and good, but it'd only take one lump of space rock crashing into Earth to wreck any dteams of a terrestial utopia.
Better to have the ability to haul any potential asteroid-mitigating technology inro orbit, and / or wirk towards a self sustaining extraterrestial colony. Once wehave assured our survival we can tgen work towards making it a fair and beautiful survival.
Medical bods have been interested in a non-adhesive but very grippy surface for a while - potential applications include holding back skin during surgery.
Geckos achieve this by having an extremely high surface area of their pads - a surface which sub-divides many times.
You can already buy LCD-based films for windows, that will switch from transparent to translucent at the flick of switch.
It's available as a self-adhesive film for easy retrofitting to windows, apparently.
Look back to the past...
The only product known to have been bought by what is to believed Apple's car division is a 1959 Fiat 500 Multipla:
It doesn't look completely dissimilar to the Google car, but is more attractive. The use of interior space is good too, and could be further advanced with an electric drivetrain.
Who knows, it's all conjecture. Jony Ive is known to be a Fiat fan, though his daily vehicle is a chauffeur driven (at his bosses' insistance) Bentley Mulsanne
Volvo believes that Level 3 autonomy, where the driver needs to be ready to take over at a moment's notice, is an unsafe solution. Because the driver is theoretically freed up to work on email or watch a video while the car drives itself, the company believes it is unrealistic to expect the driver to be ready to take over at a moment's notice and still have the car operate itself safely. "It's important for us as a company, our position on autonomous driving, is to keep it quite different so you know when you're in semi-autonomous and know when you're in unsupervised autonomous,"
Volvo's Drive Me autonomous car, which will launch in a public pilot next year, is a Level 4 autonomous car — this means not only will it drive itself down the road, but it is capable of handling any situation that it comes across without any human intervention. As a result, the human doesn't need to be involved in the driving at all. If something goes wrong, the car can safely stop itself at the side of the road.
(Please don't take this post as a recommendation of Volvo's products - I'm no expert. However, their approach does strike me as being safer. There was a racing video game called WipEout which featured a 5 second autopilot 'powerup' - resuming control of the racing craft always gave me nervous, and would occasionally result in me crashing my virtual vehicle. )
This is exactly the point that Volvo are making. They claim they are making a system that can drive in all situations, and they are critical of Tesla's system that still requires a human driver to suddenly take over in the event of something unexpected occurring on the road.
Also, the size of a Volvo is more amenable to horizontal dancing than a Tesla... I think Volvo's marketing department has missed a trick by not making more of this!
People have said on forums that they give their phone's WiFi hotspots names like 'FBI Surveillance Van' to deter leeches, and 'Ebola Response Unit 2' just for the giggles, but just for when they were in earth-bound cafes - none of them advocated silliness on a plane.