Nauseous
From the smaltzy voice-over, not the swooping video footage.
814 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jul 2010
back in the days of my childhood the computer would frquently request that I 'PRESS A KEY' and for the first couple of years I would diligently press the 'A' key. It worked every time though, unlike a system much later on which would request that I press any key - which apparently didn't include the top left key marked 'ESC' ...
Was asked the other day, as part of a Display Screen Equipment assessment, whether the keys on my keyboard were all legibly marked. My immediate response was 'yes', followed by actually looking and realising some of the home row, a shift key and the arrow keys are somewhat worn. It was suggested that I should get the keyboard swapped for a nice new one with clear markings on it (which won't be a 'nice' keyboard like my current one). I persuaded them it wasn't necessary for now, but I may need to break out the letraset transfers to preserve my otherwise perfectly functional keyboard from the office 'elfensaftee patrol...
Now that there's huge outrage about the animal content of plastic fivers, are we going to see a rash of 'news' stories about stuff that people have been using for years suddenly being discovered to also contain animal by-products?
How do vegans / principle-based veggies feel about clothing made from wool, or stuff like hand-cream which contains lanolin?
I still haven't seen the compelling argument for how smart meters will benefit the consumer.
"You'll be able to see your meter readings online" - if I'm bothered about seeing my meter readings it isn't exactly a chore to open the cabinet and read the numbers.
"You can monitor your electricity use more easily" - well, as we don't tend to leave the oven and a bunch of fan heaters running 24/7 just in case we need them, seeing pretty graphs of energy consumption isn't going to suddenly enable me to use less.
That would explain it - as others have said above, I only ever hear of the agency being referred to as "EEE-SAH" so it sounds a little odd when I read the articles to hear (in my head) "the EEE-SAH" just as it would be odd to hear "the NAH-SAH", but if the author is hearing "the EEE-ESS-AY" when they write it that makes more sense.
Surely you charge an initial £200 set up fee and then £70 per month for a minimum 24 months, for the basic software package and then if you want to do anything fancy (like run a report or send a mailing) you need to upgrade your subscription to £100 a month, oh and your minimum contract term just renewed to 24 months from now...
(icon is the only weight lifting I try to do repeatedly)
Used to work in a building like that - rotating doors with single person sized vestibules that would turn just enough to allow one person through after a successful swipe from either side (it turned in opposite directions depending which side was swiped), and a general kicking if you didn't have matching ins and outs on the daily audit. If you tried to tailgate someone, you'd get stuck in the enclosed vestibule area, and it wasn't possible to transit the other side of the door - don't remember quite how it worked but we did consider it in detail at the time.
Right next to the rotating door was a large hinged door (glass) that was always locked, except when the fire alarm went off, when it would automatically release so everyone could just flood out quickly. took over 15 minutes to get everyone back in to the building through the rotating door once the alarm was over.
which was why it was 'improves' within quotes - claims to be better but isn't necessarily so.
certainly a bit more convenient though and probably good enough for me (and 90+% of the population) with how I use it, until somebody actually steals money from the attached account - then I'll probably have a rethink...
Not sure I entirely count for your requested group as I'm an old(ish) git and I only use one banking app, occasionally, to make intermittent payments to a pre-arranged recipient for occasional classes. It 'improves' on the website by allowing me to make the payment using only memorable data and not having to use the little card calculator doodad. Being able to pay once you are sure the class is happening is helpful. It doesn't let me set up new recipients etc. though.
All other bank accounts stuff (for this and several other banks) happens through web pages from a proper machine.
I've never seen the point of apps that are just wrappers to website pages - I have an app for that - it's called a browser.
I love that it used to be considered a sign of potential criminal behaviour to operate multiple bank accounts but they've been pushing for the last howevermany years to get people to chop and change banks for the new customer bonuses and then make it a pain in the proverbial to actually close the old accounts.
but the point, as was made in the article, is that the energy from footfall isn't there to be harvested in the first place, no matter how efficient your system, whilst the solar energy is already there and the panels are (apparently) becoming more efficient at converting the incident energy to usable electricity.
Ha! a previous life (About 7 years ago) had me supporting legacy Foxpro databases and a lotus-123 macro based spreadsheet, created, for attendance recording, by some (non-IT, beancounter) body who had left years previously, and the department *HAD* to track their staff time to the minute and it *HAD* to be done using this 'system' which now had nobody to support it. No, it can't be replaced with something else 'cos "the staff won't know how to use it"...
My Santander online access is a userid (can be customised) and password, which then presents you with a screen giving you a piece of information you have previously supplied to them so you can be more sure they're not a fraud site (unless it's doing some passthrough stuff) and then asks for a full 5 digit pin number.
I presume (faint hope) the banks that ask for individual character combinations from passwords / keywords have a slightly restricted list of combinations which are hashed? If my password is 10 characters long, then there are 120 different ways to choose 3 characters - it doesn't seem unrealistic to think they might have that many hashes stored for me...
Clinging to hope here!
I'm about to make a trip from the UK to Germany and back but I've grown something that nearly passes for a beard since I last went through an airport... I've been wondering how the automated bio-metric immigration machine will cope or if it will punt me off to deal with a real person? For that matter I also sometimes wear glasses (don't remember if they ask you to take them off for those machines?)
icon is a picture of me with a beard... never going to get that beer can through airport security though!
We were there a couple of years back when the Canadian Lanc was over on tour. We'd gone out for the day and were at the Dogdyke steam ~& diesel pumping station nearby when there was that very familiar sound in the distance - got some great photos as they came overhead, circled round for a couple of minutes and then came in to land - incredible.
The thing about the Hawks is that they are *relatively* cheap aircraft so it does seem that the T2 would be a sensible replacement.
The Typhoons would be more expensive, unless they roll out some of those spare ones (doesn't make them cheaper but at least they're already paid for...)
How effective do they reckon the reds are as a recruiting tool? Is it worth the cost of running them at all?
(Don't get me wrong, I think they're very impressive and have enjoyed watching them on several occasions)
So what counts as a desktop versus a tablet?
Are they analysing user agents for web requests, or something to do with screen resolutions?
Does a 12" tablet count as a tablet but a 12" eeepc (remember them?) as a desktop?
Lies, damn lies, statistics and report headlines!
(mine's the one with the latest election polling figures in the pocket... no, for our parish council referendum - Don't be silly, we don't have a president!)
... and let's see if you get assailed by the critical masses as I did for posting the same link in an article a couple of years ago!
The main issue I face with the CorrectHorseBatteryStaple approach is that most of the things I have passwords for insist on mixing upper and lower case letters with numbers and possibly symbols, but maybe not, and minimum and maximum lengths... so never mind reusing a password across different sites, I can't even reuse my password construction rules across sites!
But they've only been researching how liquid will run out of a vessel when it is on its side, not how easy it is to tip one over when full?
Next seven years spent determining the ease with which a full pint can be knocked out of
1/. tall, thin glass
2/. conical glass
3/. bulging glass
4/. stein
5/. tankard
6/. dimpled pint jug
7/. stemmed, fluted, 'call that a pint?!?' glass
(mine's the one with the dimpled pint in the pocket)
That's the third time this week that I've seen reference to that bloody toaster from Red Dwarf! Admittedly one was my own comment on another story and the second was someone else's comment on yet another story... I think the toasters are coming for us!
(or maybe, just maybe, there are enough technoprats inhabiting these reaches that we all have common memories/nightmares about that bloody toaster?)
Except that it was reported before they even got to the comet that the mission was Rosetta, and Philae was an added extra - if it woke up it was a bonus, if it made contact with the comet, that was a bonus, if it stuck, a bonus, if it did any of the science another bonus.
Okay, so the harpoons didn't launch and the cold-gas thruster didn't work either. After 10 years in space and ending up in a non-optimal location and attitude they STILL managed to do a whole bunch of bonus science thanks to the stuff that DID work on the lander.
If that's a failure, then I look forward to them continuing to similarly fail so spectacularly on future probe missions!
I didn't - all the ones I got in change during my trip last month were ratty bits of barely-legible paper that appeared to have been in regular use as a makeshift beer-mat for a leaky pint of Tennants!
<edit> quick check of t'webs suggests it was a pilot run last year by Clydesdale ahead of full release now, with RBS and BOS in November 2016 and 2015 respectively, which explains why they weren't more prevalant </edit>
It would be good if there was some sort of 'implementation' requirement where the current owners of a patent have to demonstrate the mechanism of the patent working (and not just identical to, or even just, a thing they bought from the previous patent owner(s) ) before they are allowed to sue for the infringement.