Sounds like it's an idea to give 17.10 a pass, but, saying that. I'm probably going to install to tonight anyway. I can always just roll back a backup.
Posts by Jonathan 27
451 publicly visible posts • joined 21 Jun 2010
Ubuntu 17.10: We're coming GNOME! Plenty that's Artful in Aardvark, with a few Wayland wails
HPE quits cloud servers, two weeks after telling El Reg it wouldn't do that
Windows Fall Creators Update is here: What do you want first – bad news or good news?
Re: Windows 7 ... missing features
You don't need to install Linux just to format or even re-partition a hard drive. The Windows installer can do both. Just pick "New Install" and then the option to pick a partition. You've been able to do that from Windows 98 at least, but the version in Windows 7+ is much more flexible.
Linux kernel community tries to castrate GPL copyright troll
New coding language Fetlang's syntax designed to read like 'poorly written erotica'
Rejecting Sonos' private data slurp basically bricks bloke's boombox
It's 2017... And Windows PCs can be pwned via DNS, webpages, Office docs, fonts – and some TPM keys are fscked too
Et tu Accenture? Then fall S3er: Consultancy giant leaks private keys, emails and more online
Microsoft Edge shock: Browser opts for Apple WebKit, Google Blink
Re: Microsoft need to accept that they are not the only game in town anymore
If you want to run SQL Server on a Mac "server" natively, you can just install Linux and then SQL for Linux. SQL server is going to use up all the system resources anyway. Otherwise just put it on a Linux or Windows VM and call it a day.
Oracle VP: 'We want the next decade to be Java first, Java always'
Re: The next decade...
Definitely won't happen, if anything software will be written in even more high-level languages. It's been shown time and again that productivity beats performance (at least as far as management is concerned). JavaScript everywhere! That's not even the next frontier anymore, it's the current reality.
Computers4Christians miraculously appears on Ubuntu wiki
Forget the 'simulated universe', say boffins, no simulator could hit the required scale
If we're in a simulation, then how do we know if it's possible to simulate our universe. Maybe physics is totally different outside the simulation. The simulation could be powered by a Dyson sphere, or a thousand Dyson spheres, there is literally no limit to the possibilities. This whole line of thinking is rather silly, the idea that we're in a simulation is a non-falsifiable statement. No amount of rational thinking can disprove it, although I suppose there might be some sort of currently unknown way to prove it, possibly.
Do i believe we're in a simulation? No, probably not. But that doesn't mean that this line of thinking proves anything. All this paper proves is lack of imagination. Also, the paper doesn't put forward the conclusion that the author of this piece infers. In fact that inference dies immediately if take away the idea that the simulation in question could easily be running on a quantum computer or another more sophisticated computer that we can't even imagine.
BYOD might be a hipster honeypot but it's rarely worth the extra hassle
Re: Just four years ago, Gartner reckoned by 2017....
Those are really for two different industries. BYOD is an IT thing, there the other two are software development ideas.
Did I mention my employer is successfully using DevOPS? Machine learning is very much a limited-use, high cost thing. The Amazons and Googles of the world are using that, but not really anyone else.
Drunk canoeing no longer driving offence in Canada
Re: Really? It's not a joke.
Sorry, you're not correct. The Queen of England can even declare Canada at war with another country and the statutory head of the Canadian government (Governor General) reports directly to her. While she doesn't actually exert her authority, it's there on the books. Canada didn't even become a fully separate country until the Constitution Act was signed in 1982. I feel like you might have slept through the mandatory Canadian history class in high school.
Don’t fear the software shopkeeper: T&Cs banning bad reviews aren’t legal in America
Want to get around app whitelists by pretending to be Microsoft? Of course you can...
Database biz MongoDB files to go public, hopes to raise a cool $100m
I'm just waiting for MongoDB to go tits up and get snapped up by Oracle, Microsoft or Amazon. They don't seem to have much of a business model. It's a shame though, the product is really good. I guess they could go the other way and transition to a community-driven open source project, but I don't hold out much hope of that.
Mobe reception grief turns LTE Apple Watch 3 into – er, a dull watch
You lost your ballpoint pen, Slack? Why's your Linux version unsigned?
Compsci degrees aren't returning on investment for coders – research
Re: Peak Code Monkey
I think it's more a factor of the amount of development that's web-based now than anything else. Front-end web development accounts for a large amount of that JavaScript demand. Combine that with HTML-based mobile app platforms and you're covering most of it. Some people are using JavaScript for server-side scripting too, primarily using Node.JS, but it's not a huge segment at this point.
It's more of a move towards web development than"hipster coders". If you value your future in this industry you need to make sure you web skills are up to date. If you're retiring in 10 years or less you can probably ignore it. I'm too young to ignore it.
Uber Cali goes ballistic, calls online ads bogus: These million-dollar banners are something quite atrocious
Microsoft teases web-based Windows Server management console
Why do I feel like this is just going to result in having to go 3 places to set things up in Windows server instead of the current 2. First Windows Server required using GUI tools, then they added PowerShell commands for SOME but not all functions. AND some settings are now ONLY accessible through PowerShell. Now they're adding a HTML GUI, that only supports a subset of functions.
I wish they'd at least finish ONE of those interfaces before building another one.
Noise-canceling headphones with a DO NOT DISTURB light can't silence your critics
Atlassian releases 'Stride', because HipChat isn't hip enough to whack Slack
Facebook ties JavaScript code together with Yarn
Dude who claimed he invented email is told by judge: It's safe to say you didn't invent email
Re: Constantly Lying.
If you repeat something enough times people will start believing you. That's the only think his claim is based on. Even at the time he wrote his program, similar programs were already available. There is no fact behind his claims, just repeated claims. He uses methods commonly used in confidence scams.
Connect at mine free Wi-Fi! I would knew what I is do! I is cafe boss!
Dell's flagship XPS13 – a 2-in-1 that may fatally frustrate your fingers
Yeah...
I have a last-gen XPS 15 (9550) and I can tell you that the keyboard isn't an issue after you get used to it. It takes a few weeks, but after that you'll never think about it again. It also has an issue with being hard to open, not because the slot is hard to get to, but because you have to hold both sides of the laptop to pry it apart because the hinge is so stiff, that's annoying. I can't say anything about your other issues, my notebook has a power/charge LED and a 5 LED charge indicator on the side. The power button is also fairly large.
But after saying that, I had a QC issue with my notebook that arose about 1 month in to my ownership of the laptop (GPU died) and it took, and I'm not exaggerating here, 3 months to get them to fix it. In the intervening time I actually got angry and built another computer. Since they fixed it I haven't had any issues with it, but it also doesn't get that much use... the desktop is now my primary computer. After my horrible experience with their support line I don't think I'll buy a Dell any time soon, especially since this isn't the first time I've had a problem with a Dell. I had an XPS 15 L521x and that thing was such a huge pile of crap that they bought it back, after 3 attempted replacements because the entire model is faulty.
Continuous integration platforms are broken – here's what needs fixing
Re: Stability
What I love is how npm package updates ALWAYS break something. Half the time the developer of the package has made so many breaking changes you have to totally re-write the code that calls that package. I wish I could say we're writing wrappers around every 3rd-party plugin now, but we're not...
This is annoying for front-end JS, but if you're using Node.JS it's horrible. Your entire application can require days of reworking when you update a single package, which then causes all of it's dependencies to update. And even simple Node applications have 50 - 100 packages because of dependencies.
Re: Here's what I'd like...
Visual Studio + TFS supports almost all of your points there.
1. The build server is still a separate thing, but it uses the exact same compiler and generates the same error messages as a local build.
2. As above, they're the same messages and are delivered to whoever pushed to the build server, which can reject the build (gated build).
3. You can send selfsets to other developers, I think that might cover this.
4. You can set TFS to deploy to a set environment after every check-in, or at intervals and you can do it multiple times so that covers this entirely.
Requiring tests to pass also an option.
Anyway, my point is that Microsoft's tooling already supports 99% of what you want to do here. I'm really surprised this isn't common across the board. What are you using? Subversion? CVS? TI Pocket Calculators?
Re: re: No one "checks in" anything any more.
Not breaking the build is kind of a low bar for software quality and unit tests can only really test for things the developer can envision, and most problems with things I've written come from situations I'd never have thought of. This is absolute bare minimum.
I'm not saying continuous integration is bad, just that's not fool proof. Even after code reviews and gated check-ins you can still have problems.
Biz sends apps to public cloud, waves 'bye to on-premises server folk. NO! WAIT!
The sky is blue, water is wet and UK PC shipments are down
Sorry, but those huge walls of terms and conditions you never read are legally binding
What weighs 800kg and runs Windows XP? How to buy an ATM for fun and profit
FYI: Web ad fraud looks really bad. Like, really, really bad. Bigly bad
Seeing as almost all real humans are running ad blockers now, I don't think many advertisers would pay for ads if the people selling them actually told them the truth. Online ad fraud has been a problem since 10 minutes after online ads were invented and the situation has been going rapidly downhill since 2005 which is about when the average user discovered ad blockers, because Firefox extensions just made it so easy. I'm even running one now, although I white-list sites I like, like this one. I'm even running an adblock detector blocker.
Fun fact, did you know that there is no actual proof that advertising really changes anyone's opinion on products. The only thing it's been proven to do is let people know a product exists, if they didn't already. So advertising well known products like Coke and Tide may actually be totally pointless.
How to build your own DIY makeshift levitation machine at home
HBO Game Of Thrones leak: Four 'techies' arrested in India
Pssst, wanna know a secret? MongoDB has confidentially filed for IPO, reports suggest
Not another Linux desktop! Robots cross the Uncanny Valley
Re: BBC TV programme "Hyper Evolution: Rise of the Robots" is
Technology hasn't failed us, there is just a subset of swindlers that oversell the current state of technology that ultimately disappoints us. AI that can genuinely learn is possible (although dangerous), but we're so far away from that at this point that it's only realistic in science fiction. Anyone who claims otherwise in the near-term is either a hopeless optimist or an intentional swindler.
Apple weans itself off Intel with 'more ARM chips' for future Macs
Re: Doesn't seem very feasible
It's more likely that app writers will have to write a separate background process that is executed on the ARM processor. You can't migrate processes between two different CPUs running different architectures.
Apple should just go all in and build an ARM-powered MacBook Air (Or MacBook Lite, or any other name marketing likes) to slot under an x86 MacBook and MacBook Pro. Then they can see if it will sell. I think it will, at least to their core audience, people who don't know what type of CPU is in their computer.