"Pure just swaps controllers, with no downtime. Find someone else that does that."
Uh...lots of companies? Especially the pure SDS ones.
6948 posts • joined 31 May 2010
"Pure just swaps controllers, with no downtime. Find someone else that does that."
Uh...lots of companies? Especially the pure SDS ones.
I'd love to do that sort of testing. Sadly, the drive manufacturers don't seem keen on giving me hundreds or thousands of free drives...
Open to practical ideas of how to get hold of enough units to do proper testing. I'm sure I could come up with something to fill them all with...
But with bitcoin, stealing the bitcoin deprives the owner of use of the original. It's not just making a copy.
If you download an image off my website, you are making a copy. You are not depriving me of the ability to use the original. If you download an image off mywebsite *and then delete the file from my webserver*, you are depriving me of the ability to use the original. You have "stolen" it, effectively. (Ignoring backups.)
This is the difference. They convinced a server to emit copies of a digital currency that is effectively unlimited. If the owner of the algorithm wants more currency, they can push a button and generate as much as they want. Nobody is deprived of the ability to use that digital currency.
At worst, it's digital counterfeiting. It is emphatically _not_ theft.
I would be okay with using the term digital counterfeiting to describe the activities of the miners. But counterfeiting is not STEALING. Stealing deprives the owner of the ability to use the original.
If you convinced my bank to give you a COPY of my money, without depriving me of my money, go hard! Why would i care about that?
Explain how you "steal" something by convincing a computer to emit copies of some code. "Steal", my ass.
Why would they? So long as the cost to migrate is higher than the price delta...
"Now, how about someone creates WebLawyer ? How long do you think it will be before people are logged in by the millions to search how to divorce (continuously trending topic), how to write their will, etc ?"
http://www.lawdepot.ca <-- this site has functionally been my lawyer for years now. What do you mean "when"?
You should feel that way about CETA. Canada was trying to fuck you hard, and you should have told us to go the hell home.
Harper was obeying orders, sneaking in the nasty provisions the US wanted in TTIP into CETA, "because Canadians are nice, and they won't screw the EU, promise". It was a shit deal for you, and a shit deal for Canadians. It was great for American corporations. That's all CETA was ever supposed to be.
I'm super bummed that our dancing monkey of a Prime Fuckwit actually signed it. That spineless coward hasn't kept a damned one of his promises to actually benefit Canadians in the past year, but he's sure managed to proliferate Harper's vision of a corporatist hellhole that crushes ordinary workers (of all nations) under the heel of the elite.
That's what Canada gets for electing a human sock puppet. *sigh*
How fortunate that we have entire organizations dedicated to explaining exactly that! Rather than flood with propaganda, I'll leave you with this rather concise summary from one of the world's leading experts in intellectual property: http://www.michaelgeist.ca/2015/06/why-canadians-have-good-reason-to-be-wary-of-the-tpp/
There, nop you can probably ignore the rest of this post.
Really short version: at a minimum, Canadians would end up paying significantly more for medicine, and any laws we put in place to protect our environment, or retain control of our resources would be struck down by corporations.
Outside of medicine and IP, the big one that does it for me is fresh water. Without fresh water, we're fucked. Any of us. All of us. Everywhere on the planet. Already, too many of Canada's fresh water reserves are polluted beyond the ability to use for human consumption. The toxins spread into those waters bio-accumulate, making the reasonably significant portion of our population that still rely on hunting and fishing unable to maintain their traditional lifestyle. That might not matter to some, but it matters to me.
Beyond the lovey-dovey feels portion, however, is that fact that even though Canada is one of the most water-rich nations in the world, we suck hard core at managing it. MY home province of Alberta is already seeing subsidence and other nasty effects of our severe drain on underground aquifers.
Right now, today, that maybe doesn't matter so much; we have spectacular amounts of water coming down out of the mountains, and we can divert rivers and other fun things. The problem is that even 10 years from now, the amount of water coming down off those mountains will be a lot< less. The glaciers are shrinking, most of them are almost gone.
Canada's potable and accessible freshwater reserves are something that I believe we need to manage. We need to manage it in order to provider for our own people. We need to manage it because of the raw economic reality that it fresh water is the oil of the 21st century.
In my opinion we simply can't enter into agreements that would treat access to our fresh water as something the government isn't allowed to regulate, tax, or otherwise get a piece of. We can't let a bunch of Americans waltz into our country, pollute and/or export all our fresh water, and stick us with the bill.
I don't give a rat's ASCII if it means we're left out of some oogly-boogly trade bloc. In 30 years, over half the world is going to be begging for access to our water, and we need to maintain the ability to milk them for every last rotten cent. Saudi Arabia created a financial empire on the back of oil, and we need to retain the ability to do the same on the back of water.
It's not like we have the manpower or military to otherwise defend ourselves. Controlling access to our resources and what's left of our environment is the only card we have to play.
And I, for one, am 110% against handing that to the Americans. Not for a trade deal. Not for anything.
The TPP is a bullshit trade deal that would fuck Canada and Canadians hard, and I, for one, will cheer its demise.
The exportation of American law to other countries is cracked, pure and simple. We don't want your insane approach to intellectual property, your lack of environmental protection or any of the other corporatist fuckwittery.
Death to the TPP and all other attempts to bypass national law. Trade deals are okay, but using trade deals as an end run around parliament to destroy the ability of the people to control their own laws, protect their own environment or strike their own balance on things like copyright is simply not okay. Lock that shit hard.
Excuse me sir, do you think in fractals? I've heard such people exist, but I've never met one. You strike me as someone who might fit that description.
For the record, you should have used "it's".
I got me a rope made out of tangible hatred, let's do this!
I'm on the spectrum. ADHD. No aspergers or direct autism here, though I can reach stimulus overload at a conference. (Or a really crowded shopping mall.)
The weird part is, I'm the functional ASD fellow in my group of evil compatriots. Most that I know are on the ASD side of the serotonin spectrum. We don't mix well with those on the schizophrenia side of the spectrum.
And yes, there are a LOT of ASD people in tech. The ASD side of the serotonin spectrum was for a long time naturally attracted to tech. It never seemed to appeal as much to the schizophrenia side.
TO ARMS, MEN! REPEL THE INTRUDERS!
Anyone who edits sendmail.cf by hand is several orders of magnitude more pee-in-jars than I could ever work with. I wouldn't know how to communicate with such a person. It would be like talking to a circuit board.
I'll stick with the M4 editor, thanks. Sendmail.cf...what the blinking...that's like writing an e-mail by first coding a new mail client in assembler!...
I'm going to build a wall and make spaces pay for it!
"though tab-using heathens should burn like the vermin they are"
I'll fight you! :P
Since when are all votes cast equally? And the mechanism by which they manage to force tabs on me is somewhat irrelevant. The end result is what I fear, not the means.
Who gives a rat fuck what Endpoint Antichrist thinks? He is the most customer hostile non-Oracle executive on the planet!
Windows has hostages.
Amiga has users.
Except I don't buy that vendor-service axiom at all. We can all of us name plenty of instances in which the cheaper gadget was the superior one. We can all equally name plenty of instances in which you end up paying a fuckload for a brand name, getting nothing better than the competition, because they're both selling the same damned thing.
You don't get what you pay for. In fact, everyone is trying to screw you and you pay whatever people can scam out of you. Some times the cheaper stuff is the shit choice, and some times it not. But there is little evidence whatsoever that increased price provides a superior product.
That's why reviews are important. To share knowledge, and to hold the feet of vendors to the fire.
Vendors can scam some of us some of the time, but so long as free speech exists, they can't scam all of us all of the time.
Thank you for posting some cables you believe work. Will Ubiquiti certify their functionality corporately? Also, a few nits to pick:
1) It would maybe help if these were on your "community list" of supported cables. And, you know, publicly listed as supported on a per-model basis.
3) Your products page lists no transceivers or cables for sale. That you sell such things is not mentioned on the community-supported list that your help reps point people to as "the list of things supported". I can find no mention of them in the official help documentation.
4) In selling your own modules, I fear you may be engaging in giving away the razors at cost and squeezing customers on the cost of blades. If that is the play...
I don't have any sort of Ubiquiti vendetta, and will continue to buy and use their UniFi equipment. But the EdgeMax stuff is now three for three on "not working out of box" for me. I think that's worth letting people know about.
"The first humans sent to Mars won't be coming back"
Who'd want to?
National regulation won't do a damned thing. International regulation is required.
The problem is, political negotiations get caught up in corruption. There is a very clear goal here, with a defined problem: define security and update standards for devices, as well as labeling, punitive measures and enforcement for networked devices.
Unfortunately, if the politicians are to be relied upon, they'll end up pissing away a decade trying to fight off the Americans' attempt to extend copyright and patents as part of the treaty, the Europeans' attempts to get a bunch more common goods renamed so that only those coming from a particular region can use the common name, and $deity only knows what India and China will try to worm in. I'm pretty sure Russia would just try to torpedo the whole thing for funsies.
Sadly, standards bodies are equally ineffectual in these circumstances. It took how long to agree on 802.11n?
TL;DR: This is why we can't have nice things.
My marketing hurts. Ow.
Or a really bad case of butts disease.
Are you implying Trump is intelligent?
Trevor go to conference. Vendor throw conference party and guilt Trevor into going. Trevor try to escape. Many drinks, many shake hands. Music too loud. Talk about breaking tech. Trevor finally allowed to escape.
Parties no have coffee.
^ Pretty much like that.
If you need me to connect you to the vendor, you know where to find my e-mail. ;)
So he's somewhat uninspiring. At least he's not Trump. Or Cruz. Or any of the other sack of social and/or cultural conservatives why so desperately want power so they can oppress groups they don't like.
When the choices are "kinda meh" and "completely fucking whackadoodle", "kinda meh" starts to look okay.
There are ways to manually trigger immediate replication, yes. So what? How is that solving the problems discussed?
I am not responsible for your ailing memory nor your inability to comprehend what you read. As usual, the so-called "inaccuracies" you detect are entirely in your personally errors regarding merging of what's read with what you think you "know".
"Regardless of the rest of this article I call bullshit...The exec would have to get their vanity items working for it first, load it with all their music and then make sure they had their really important power points available before they walked into that meeting...So how did this exec know to register their device? Clearly they were told and given instructions to do so otherwise the exec would never have been able to do it..."
A) Do you know anything about Microsoft endpoint solutions? From client software to the tools built into Windows Server such as Roaming Profiles and Folder Redirection? If they had logged in, they'd have all their stuff made available with rapidity and all their customization intact. If you know what you're doing, that part works reasonably okay.
B) The "how to register" was made available through the company intranet which, if I recall, wasn't checked by the marketing exec before the device purchase. There was some kerfuffle about screeching at the local store staff to pull up the info as the marketing exec was "in a hurry", and then scrambling to follow all the steps. War stories swapped over beers revealed hilarity...
Or, hey, they could put contention sensing code into the links that would scale replication times dynamically. Hell, they probably have 95% of that code in a repository somewhere...
Where did I say "change your password"? I remember discussing a password being locked out, and new device joins taking time, but not passwords.
Edit: I ctrl-fed the article, and "password" doesn't come up at all. Also, please note: "Today, AD is (mostly) an all-or-nothing affair. When AD replicates, it all replicates. (There are some exceptions, such as lockouts.) This needs to change."
That bit about lockouts was a reference to URGENT replication. Something that only applies to specific conditions, such as passwords and lockouts. Cheers.
I don't disagree! That does, however, bring me back to the "we need different replication times for different classes of object and/or object groupings". AD needs an overhaul. The ability to replicate faster is a bandaid, not a cure.
Actually, you're quite wrong. "Sites" are more than just a useful means to mentally break up domain controllers. They are used by other applications that hang off AD to determine network topology for their replication, to determine how to break up the load on the AD servers (latency matters!) and more.
Also: putting everything in a single site doesn't solve the problem of needing different propagation times for different classes of object, which is ultimately what is required.
No they don't. You really don't know much about the medical profession, do you? Sterilizing and cleaning tools is it's own profession. Complete with it's own tools, rapidly evolving technology and techniques and more.
A Doctor might have some very basic idea of what' going on "they are removing physical detritus and trying to kill all the bacteria and viruses", but I promise you most doctors don't actually know how that's accomplished. What those doctors are taught is essentially history. "These were the ways we mostly/kind-of-sort-of killed off bacteria in the past". Things like ethanol, fire, etc.
Of course, it's 2016, not 1816, and we know little bit more about the world now. There are all sorts of nasties that can stay on instruments, even after what many would consider to be rigorous attempts at sterilization. This is especially true in hospitals, where the oogly booglies have been in a constant state of evolutionary overdrive in an attempt to survive.
So now we're in to things like pulsed sonic detritus removal, acid baths, ionizing radiation, silver and/or copper coating/recoating, plus like a thrillion layers of testing at different intervals. That's before we get into the procedures around length of reuse before replacement, order of operations, number of cycles between different events, etc.
As a general rule, no. The Doctor doesn't know that stuff. Certainly not to the level of detail you are clearly demanding IT folks "know" what is going on under the hood.
it's also a completely irrational position for you to take. Nobody - and I mean nobody, not even your own over-inflated opinion of yourself - can understand everything there is to understand about IT. No human brain is even close to big enough. The true "full stack engineer" is biologically impossible.
Real human beings in the 21st century rely on understanding the basics. We then understand specifics about things we need to understand in order to do our jobs. For everything else there's reference material. Usually a user manual and/or Google.
So climb down off your high horse, mate. You aren't fooling anyone who actually is an IT professional. Actually being a professional means a sense of humility. It's required in any profession because admitting what you don't know is absolutely critical.
The difference between the apprentice and the master is that the apprentice thinks they know everything when, in fact, they know nothing. The master thinks then know nothing when, in fact, they have forgotten more than most practitioners will ever know.
Bullshit. Of course doctors, astronauts, electric engineers and so on use the easy button. All the goddamned time, in fact.
Doctors, for example, don't clean, sharpen and sterilize their own tools. They don't mix their own drugs. They don't research those drugs. Most of the time they rely on software to assist with diagnoses by running through checklists. Medicine is also a discipline of multiple specialties. Doctors - even specialists - routinely rely on tools, techniques, technologies and more that they themselves could not reproduce in order to do their jobs. Without these tools they wouldn't have a prayer of meeting the survival rates or the patients/day goals that are set for them.
I can say very similar things about astronauts, electric engineers and even the dudes who run around the forest on minimum wage planting trees. They sure as all hell wouldn't be making their quoats without someone else growing the seedlings and more someones making their boots, packs, hole-creation gear, etc.
This notion that anyone in today's society can be self-sufficient - even within the scope of a single profession - is complete and utter bullshit. Humanity is the most interconnected and interdependent species on the plant. Ants got nothing on us.
Assuming that Samsung are releasing those updates to anything other than the very latest models every month (and given the delays in getting Marshmallow onto the S5, I don't believe that's that case), there is still the issue of those updates not getting out to actual customers.
Pointing the finger at the carriers pointless. There are squillions of carriers and ISPs in the world and they have collectively proven time and again that they can't be trusted. Whether the issue is updating their Android images or delivering IPv6 connectivity in a G7 nation (like Canada), carriers and ISPs don't care about standards, security or usability.
So why are phone manufacturers like Samsung even giving these carriers the choice? Samsung (and everyone else) should be bypassing the carrier lockdowns altogether and allowing end users to receive (at least) monthly updates.
But, like everything else about their phones, Samsung just doesn't care. Minimum effort for the minimum viable product is the name of the game. :(
Consumer rights groups in Canada have little power, less funding and shockingly few rights. I also don't see how it is on me, personally, to steer a ship like that which is run by it's own group of people. I can (and have) recommended action to some of the consumer rights groups here in Canada, but bear in mind that these organizations have their own staff, with their own power structures and their own priorities.
Incidentally, bitching online does have a purpose. It makes me feel better. Also: it causes debate and discussion which may lead to additional people choosing not to buy from Samsung. All of that is a Good Thing. The more people choose a different vendor the more financial pressure there is on Samsung to change their ways.
And make no mistake about it, the only thing that will get Sammy - or any other enterprise - to alter their behaviour is financial pressure. Customer rights groups and government pressure ultimately result in irrelevant changes decades after the issue arises.
Lastly, posting about just how much Samsung sucks annoys you, personally. Don't underestimate how much satisfaction I derive from irritating you and everyone else like you who state that wanting a phone to just fucking work (and/or be patched regularly) makes one an "entitled millennial dick".
Also: if I can offend, irritate or dismay any brand tribalists at any time, then whatever efforts I engage in to do so are not wasted. Brand tribalists are among the most evolutionarily unfit members of our species, and I greatly desire to see them selected against. Causing them to expose their own irrationality is one means by which I can help ensure this occurs.
So, in conclusion: shitposting about Samsung has value to me in layers.
If the carriers are the ones holding up patches, Samsung shouldn't be giving them the option to customize ROMs. Period.
"Mine is regularly updated too; certainly would point to the local phone provider rather than sammy being to blame for the OP's missfortune."
Mine is patch level "June 01 2016". That's quite some time ago. Even that didn't bring the phone fully up to date for June 1, 2016. Prior to that, there was more than 6 months between patches. Not okay.
None of the patches actually seem to solve any of the fundamental issues with the device either. Driver issues, touch screen issues, wakelocks, terrible connectivity...
The S5 is a piece of shit, and so are all the modern "flagship" Samsung phones. Samsung used to be good. Now they peddle neglected crap. Simple as that.
"Why all the Samsung hate?"
The poor quality of any post Galaxy S 2/Note 2 Samsung phones. Understand, I loved both the S2 and the Note 2. The drivers on the stock ROM worked. The stock ROM was stable. The modding community managed to pull all the bits out they needed to make truly amazing third-party ROMs. Truly this was the heyday of Samsung devices.
Today I have tried the S5, S6, S7 and Note 3. All have various problems that go beyond exploding batteries or bad updates. The S5, for example, has a laggy and terrible touch screen driver. Taps are recorded erratically, not always where they're supposed to be, and the delay between tap and recognition can be up to three seconds long.
All of these phones have awful Wi-Fi that drops out randomly, abysmal 3G and LTE reception and every single one of them ships with at least one application or configuration that wakelocks the phone and drains the battery astonishingly quickly.
Look, I know Android. I know how to get in there and rip out (most) of the miserable bits, configure the thing to (mostly) not suck, solve driver issues etc. What I'm saying that I shouldn't have to. The damned things should just work. The stock ROMs should come with drivers that do what they're supposed to out of the box, be tested for wake locks, not have bizzare lags or glitches etc and so forth.
Samsung used to ship a polished product. A quality device with a quality ROM that an engineer could be truly proud of and customers enjoyed using.
Now all they ship are jars of shitinase and it's high time we stopped paying them for the favour.
"Do any Android manufacturers (who aren't Google) patch regularly?"
Not that I know of. Part of the problem, but, oddly, a separate problem from the bit that really makes me hate Samsung.
Hey, buddy, howzabout you go eat a bag of mouldy dicks? Cool? Cool.
A) There is no way I have the money to take on Samsung in the courts. You're a funny guy.
B) Cyanogenmod for the S5 is a bucket of shit-covered shit in shit sauce. Don't know if you've been paying attention, but third party ROM support for Samsung mobiles has been awful ever since the S2. There is always something that doesn't work properly that makes it even worse than the stock ROM.
C) The idea that having to load a third party ROM to get security updates is somehow acceptable makes you sound like an out of touch technocrat who hasn't had a dalliance with a member of their preferred gender in years. The part where wanting my phone to just fucking work is something you believe makes me "an entitled millennial dick" makes me want to force-feed you the aforementioned bag of mouldy dicks just for being an asshat on the internet.
Cheers and beers.
Here's betting my Galaxy S5 never sees a single one of these patches. A terrible phone by an increasingly terrible company.