Companies run IE8/9/10 on W7 because they're locked in to IE6? Good argument.
6128 posts • joined 28 May 2010
Companies run IE8/9/10 on W7 because they're locked in to IE6? Good argument.
Hey Eadon why don't you go and do some research on who uses IE... I'd guess you need to spend a couple of months. Then come and report back.
See you in August.
Do you also make sure to turn off unused power sockets so the electricity doesn't leak out?
Well IE9/10 doesn't run on XP for a start.
Yeah because W8 isn't more resource-efficient than W7, which was better than Vista. Oh wait, it is.
And good job for failing at science, when they eliminate the baseline the fact it's W8 is not a factor.
People were using it in this test. Try to come up with something that at least makes sense.
These days, you do NOT need to upgrade your PC every year. A beasty 12-core machine is going to be quite relevant for several years.
Just because it's a powerful workstation does not mean it needs to be any more easily upgradeable than a regular workstation.
Most Apple using-professionals don't spend their time upgrading the thing. The old Pro might be great from a PC user's perspective but the sales figures show it simply isn't that interesting to Apple users. Cool is what Apple do...
I'll wait for reviews, but I have to say I am tremendously impressed they have focused on such a genuinely useful improvement as all-day battery life, rather than simply making it even thinner and lighter just because they can. Of course this is mainly down to Intel and will (hopefully) be seen in WinBooks too, but it's a pleasant surprise nonetheless.
Please can we just ban cliched lines like "You're the product, not the customer"; honestly it gets so tiring and is just a way for people who nothing about the issues to trot out trite comments to sound current.
I hate companies trying to make their service better as much as the next guy, but really...
To write Culture books... it really is such a great SF universe. I can't decide if it would be a good or a bad thing but amongst SF writers, it is not unknown for great writers to write in homage to other writers they are fans of, especially where an author knows they are dying.
Putting aside the question of if this should happen, are there any authors who you reckon could write stories in a Culture universe?
...Alastair Reynolds' SF to you, especially the "Revelation Space" books. Definitely in the same vein.
May I recommend Alastair Reynolds' SF to you, especially the "Revelation Space" books. It's the closest SF to I.M.B I've come across.
Enough of the "it's supposed to be hard" snobbery please. He wrote books to be enjoyed.
Personally I think Player of Games is his most immediately gripping Sci-Fi novel which doesn't let sci-fi get in the way of the story. I think lots of his works take a little getting into but are always worth the effort.
I always wondered if the 'utopia' of the Culture was really meant as that, or a reflection on what society thinks utopia would be. i.e. was he a staunch liberal or was that a statement on liberalism?
I missed the part where you were forced to read the article. And where like an idiot you wasted even more time writing a comment about it.
Copied from W8?
Here's a radical idea. Stop using sites you don't like rather than whinging about them.
You can turn it off. Search online.
Or setting a good example to the world not to tolerate people videoing them just because the technology exists?
But please don't try to make "FB scale" some sort of metric.
Wow, not CBeebies. Almost like you just went looking for two numbers that add to almost £100m.
And hang on... the annual budget of BBC4 and beebies is ~£100m?! WTF do they spend that on exactly? BBC4 has good stuff and I guess beebies is good for what it is, but a pretty girl talking to puppets and some footage of The Who from 40 years ago are hardly big-budget broadcasting.
If you want to know, try watching TV anywhere else in the world and the current "low" standard will be a revelation.
Being fully timelord wouldn't mean he could magically become her. It's a new body for the same person, not stealing somebody's body.
Also since it's the same person, changing gender just seems implausible. Gender is a part of your identity, not something tacked on.
Couldn't you have shortened it or allow us a top-5... this seems too unwieldy and I like several candidates.
Seriously, how can you see to type with so much tinfoil wrapped around your head?
I wonder... if the used-game market is squashed will new-game prices reduce at all? I am not holding out any hope, but in theory it could do.
Stupid to predict One won't sell. XBox is an established big player with only one competitor.
Remember, most people plug their console into their router anyway. I predict the used-games thing will be a minor annoyance, not a deal-breaker. Speaking generally of course, of course there will be loads of people who are incensed.
However when you also factor in that serious used-game buyers who would not buy One based on this issue, are not buying many new games, and that games rather than consoles are where the money is made, it could be even less significant. Perhaps MS lose 20% of their customers, but new games sales fall only 5%, as an example.
Personally - I don't buy used games, I just wait for the cheap Platinum editions to come out.
Fitting the spec of a laptop into something the size of a tablet is expensive, surely that is not a surprise. Lugging a tablet and a cheap heavy laptop around is also a PITA so this does genuinely fit a new use-case... not one for everyone but if you travel a lot it could be great - watch movies on the tablet, get some work done on your tray-table with the keyboard.
Question... if the keyboard is bluetooth does that mean you can use it when detached?
All the convertibles I've seen look clunky but that one looks rather nice.
I can't decide if £600 for a full-fat Windows PC that dinky is good value, if I was in the market for a tablet and a notebook I imagine it would be.
Can't you just install/dual-boot Linux onto your older iMac?
It is amazing when you do a aesthetic comparison of Mac VS everything else how far ahead they are - of course many here favour function and cost over form but they are stunning these days.
More worryingly the other week I was looking at the bigger iMac in a store and caught myself thinking "that's not too expensive actually". I think I either got richer or stupider because clearly money > sense.
To find £10k is spent on upgrading TV for a household on benefits.
Like 2 orders of magnitude less!
It CAN stutter in the heaviest rain but that is a rare moment of pixelation, not anything that is a big problem. Satellite reception is affected depending if you are north or south, but you might want to get your dish re-aligned.
Every device I own runs an OS I've no interest in. OS are boring.
I'd imagine grating cheese in zero-g is interesting.
Surely the air is scrubbed continuously.
The underlying OS is an improved version of W7, why does it require changes when everyone says that's the bit which is good, and it's the UI that is the problem?
Yeah, because iOS and Android let you do far more. Oh no wait, they let you use one app at once, or a couple on limited numbers of Android with specialist customisations.
As a tablet OS, which is what WinRT is, 4 apps at once is actually AHEAD of the competition.
Wow. Oh wow.
Presumably they simply don't have the same depth of infrastructure... nothing wrong with Silverlight so it must be the back-end although that's a bit embarrassing considering this is Amazon we're talking about!
The quality isn't crap, and DRM is irrelevant when you're streaming.
How about you grow up and realise that just because YOU don't like something, that doesn't automatically mean it's pointless.
It's not a FPS.
You don't need one crammed into one corner of the screen either. You can't use any apps while the menu is open so why not use the screen to display more things at once?
Since when is Start-Menu the definitive last word in How Things Should Be Done? I seem to recall XP cahnged things quite a lot too, as have other versions.
Start menu is crap IMO. 4-deep nesting in one tiny area of the screen with menus that close if you move the mouse the wrong way, etc. When you're launching an app you are not multi-tasking so why NOT use the whole screen to show everything?
Except to the users, whose #1 problem is "where the f*** are my programs"
The whole point is a tablet is a device you take out of the building, that doesn't typically run internally on the corporate network, no?
They don't need to charge for Hyper-V if Hyper-V users are running Windows.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2017