Re: Let me know
I can't believe such a stupid comment gets so many upvotes.
6128 posts • joined 28 May 2010
I can't believe such a stupid comment gets so many upvotes.
Um, how do you know Galifreyans can be black? Having black skin is part of the human genetic diversity. The idea that would evolve on every world with humanoids is simply ludicrous. We haven't had an oriental doctor either, so what?
The doctor is Galifreyan not human. He doesn't change race.
Time to dismount the PC hobby horse. With James Bond you have at least a small argument, here it's just daft.
It's as big a cash-in as Star Wars V & VI... disgusting.
Come on you silly computer, open-source programmers don't have girlfriends.
Technically small businesses don't count as Enterprise but it would be interesting if there were a way to break down the figures based on numbers of PCs per company/location somehow. Any medium/large company - any company big enough to have an actual IT team - WILL be aware of 2014.
MS can extend support, but at an extortionate rate for individual clients only.
W8's supposed to be leaner than W7 so probably would be OK if you can get driver support.
What is with the
Finally they've found a way to make camera functionality easy and intuitive to use. I'm sure Canon et al will be desperate to introduce this!
Seriously that's a stupid idea. Maybe instead, some sort of button could be used. Or just say "Open Camera".
The only neat thing I can think of is that you could flick the phone in the air, catch it and the camera is activated. A bit like twirling a 6-shooter on your finger... pointless but fun.
Well, you shouldn't be - it's a serious issue. If I spend money designing something to sell and someone scans it and gives away the specs, this is a problem.
I see 3D printing should work something like sheet music - just because it's the music rather than a recording you still normally pay for it. Likewise if you want to make something I designed, pay me for the blueprints.
Seriously, they can't make a simple visual editor? It's 2013 for goodness' sake.
I think so too. Granted MS are a massive company with big legal guns who would terrify most under their gaze, but the companies who have signed up include some other real heavyweights. Samsung in particular is not exactly averse to spending $millions on lawsuits so this does suggest there is a real case here.
While it very well might be the case that Google Glass is unsafe for use while driving, that doesn't mean any wearable tech is. Glass can display anything like a video or a game or your email which is not a great idea. It could also display navigation apps, monitor your alertness and even detect and warn you of potential hazards before you spot them, which are great uses.
The problem is PC Plod cannot tell which you are using it for and that is a big problem. Wearable tech should maybe have to support a "I'm driving" mode to be allowed. Glass is really a prototype, there are many details to be worked out for real life use.
Have they got all the emails and social network data because companies are freely giving it to them, or through some other, cleverer route?
It doesn't give any credence whatsoever, you conspiracy nutjob. Just because you have access to every email in the world doesn't mean you can read them all, or that your analysis software is perfect
It's time to stop overreacting. Never mind the "if you've done nothing wrong you've nothing to fear" argument... what actual harm does it do you if people can view your emails, compared to the hassle you want to put yourself through just to stop them for the sake of it?
I couldn't really give a crap that the NSA knows what I post on the Register for example!
Nothing like a kneejerk reaction to technology nobody making the law has probably even used.
Why are you wearing sunglasses to do a poo?
If you think NSA wants to watch you pooing, I think you're getting things a bit confused.
"invented evidence" also has "evidence" in the name :)
I know two people who have them (as do I) but unless someone has their phone out I wouldn't be aware what phone they have unless they email with a "sent from my ..." signature or upload a picture to FaceBook with their phone.
In the same way, I have NEVER seen anyone use a non-Apple tablet which is plain weird as Android has supposedly got a decent market share now. I see loads of Android phones but no tablets. Also no Windows tablets but that is not very surprising :)
Except VS is one of the best development tools out there. It sure makes Eclipse look embarrassing.
How can banks have a monopoly? A monopoly means one company/organisation, and there are thousands of banks who are independent of each other.
Saying banks have a monopoly on money is like saying shops have a monopoly on selling things.
When exactly did you (or anyone) look at what powers the Bank of Thailand has?
Because it's better than IE10?
I was suspecting we wouldn't even get IE11 on W7, which would be a shame since they finally added WebGL support - meaning developers can finally start to use it as a serious option.
"That somehow alleviates ANY responsibility from Apple?"
Why is it Apple's responsibility in the first place? They have a business relationship with another business. It's in that company's hands to meet their laws and the terms of the contract signed with Apple. Even for Apple to stipulate the working hours for that company's employees is a little over the line, but if it's in the contract fine. Claiming Apple are responsible for it though, that's just hippy BS.
If you hire a company to clean your house and find they are using illegal workers, should you be punished for that?
No point, you won't be able to find it or any sites which talk about what's on it.
Aside from personal feelings about the idea of FF and Linux phones, I'd query that the big manufacturers will want to be producing handsets on such a wide range of OS. You want your preferred OS on a decent, competitive handset and surely you're not going to get Samsung releasing the same handset with a choice of OS?
Hell, manufacturers aren't even that interested in WindowsPhone - so are we going to rely on some dedicated company making phones for these bit player OS?
How is it planned to play out? Not an attack on FFOS I'll save that for another thread!) but a genuine question.
Although not having to let some guy inspect my meter reading every now and then is a blessing. And not having to keep track of my own meter readings so I can figure out exactly who would be the best provider based on real usage would be nice - sheer laziness but if someone else will record this so I don't have to, that's kind of the point of computers!
This has become an article of faith in the industry, and perhaps we're too cynical, but from Vulture Towers it seems the electricity bill has been fulfilling that role some years
There are already devices you can buy which you attach to your main power line, and have a little display unit in your living room which tells you of your usage. These DO get people interested in seeing how much energy is used, and tracking down what is using power, because the immediate feedback of seeing the numbers spike when you run the kettle makes it more 'real'
However, these are given out for free by some companies and they seem to work just as well as replacing the whole meter at a fraction of the cost. So while I totally reject El Reg's rejection of the suggestion a smart meter will save you money, I still agree with you that the whole scheme seems a bit daft.
Absolutely no one? So you are staking your reputation on there not being one single customer doing this?
Some people don't object to paying for software...
Why do I want to look at JDK source code?
And there's the Reg community in a nutshell - ask a totally legitimate question and get one answer and 4 downvotes.
Somehow despite being a part-time Java developer, I never heard of OpenJDK. How does it compare to the Oracle implementation (and any others still floating around)?
Is it possible, since Oracle are being so slow with Java, that OpenJDK could actually implement a new version before Oracle do?
Credit where it's due, they were struggling for ages to get mobile use up and find a way to generate revenue from mobile users.
The only reason tablets have such high DPI is because the manufacturers have decided this is an area they want to compete on. And then more pixels needs a better CPU to drive it and a better GPU for games.
Laptops haven't yet succumbed to this, they fight on other factors.
>>...it doesn't exist.
Android tablets with SD slots don't exist? Or one specific tablet doesn't support it... if only there were a multitude of Android products available.
So buy one with an SD slot.
He must have been going some
I'd say Nokia have the best mobile apps right now. Probably including paid map apps.
5Gb is probably enough for most of the full applications I have on Windows 7! When you take video out of the picture, a gigabyte is a lot of data!
It's probably going to be another quarter of sales figueres decline for nokia.
It's probably going to be another quarter of year-on-year decline for their smartphones.
But if we make this just about Lumias then by golly we might have found something we can spin as a positive!
Considering Android and Apple don't have a preceding OS to decline in the first place, hardly a fair point.
Does this mean we could end up with LO & OO being even slightly incompatible with each other's documents?
There is now, because of all the coal stations. If they are turned off or our usage increases this wouldn't be the case.
Regardless the point is they have a way of storing energy so why not use it? Pump water up during the day when it's windy and gain another 10%.
Since they have all that water hanging about, why not cover the surrounding hills with windmills in a sub-grid used solely to provide power to pump the water uphill.
Would have been a better fit looks-wise!
I don't think we need or want that, any more than I want my PC to be revolutionised - they already do what is needed of them.
And nerds would rather whinge about it on an internet forum than actually get off their arses and do something about it.
All you bike riders (what a surprise, cyclists being jerks) - just walk into the bloody shop. If you have a horse, tie it up outside.
If your local store only serves drive-thru at certain times, get there when it's open.
And stop expecting a burger-flipper to disregard the training they've been given and the rules they have to follow, to risk losing their job just so you can eat a crap burger.
"...another persons right to believe in god..."
There is no such right.
How very liberal of you, to say people must believe the same as you. It sounds very similar to how England forcibly "Christianised" much of the Empire... "you will convert". Also communist Russia & China.
This is progress into a better world is it, where we're still told what we're allowed to believe but it's a different thing?
I just can't understand people. The clue is in the fucking name "faith"! It's not FACT.
The two are not mutually exclusive. A fact is true whether or not you believe it and whether or not you have evidence to prove it... if I have faith in something without scientific evidence I may or may not be right, not having evidence doesn't automatically mean I am wrong!
Those who are not religious seem to be better, more decent folk.
That's the exact opposite of what I see in my day to day life. It's a totally subjective position to take and entirely biased by the position you take on religion affecting how you perceive people. Plus of course which religious people you encounter... or rather people who you even realise are religious.
If religion is supposed to be the moral pinnacle, why do the religious nuts all want to kill?
What? None of the religious people I know want to kill anyone, even (especially) the creationist fundamentalists.
The reason "religious nuts" want to kill people is because they're nuts, not because they're religious... the answer is in the question.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2017