a high-end Android smartphone ... Nokia 925
You know something about MS' Android plan you want to share?
6128 posts • joined 28 May 2010
You know something about MS' Android plan you want to share?
Good well-thought out reply rm. If you want to write stuff railing on MS without risking people pointing out how fallacious your claims are, head over to WordPress and start a blog. But be sure to turn comments off, lest someone disagrees with you. The added benefit is that nobody will read it.
Who said you would be using your iPad for that purpose - this allows you to create and edit files but doesn't mean they think it's a substitute for a proper W8 computer ;)
Also, if they have a great touch interface (a big if) I wouldn't bet on it being unusable although that's personal preference a lot - I don't find reading a page on my iPad to be a problem as long as it is sensibly zoomed and laid out.
SaaS isn't a MS obsession. It's a general IT obsession MS are jumping on to
Isn't it a bit embarrassing for a Linux user to be contacting support in the first place?
How does such a flawed analogy get so many upvotes? You don't pay for "gallons" of data, you pay for access to a pipe which can dispense X gallons/minutes. In a petrol station this would be like paying per minute for as much fuel as you could get out of the pump.
And you do realise that your local Yodel delivery boy isn't Yodel, or that one parcel is meaningless statistically?
I hope you make sure to send Amazon proper complaints every time something like this happens because that's the only way they would realise if one delivery company really is consistently below par. It costs them money after all.
Yodel is not part of Amazon customer service. Customer service are the people who fix the problems Yodel introduce.
Amazon, FirstDirect are notable exceptions
Or so I was told when I looked into it after buying a used iPad with a cracked screen for testing purposes. I was told Apple will simply swap your device for a new one (possibly even the newer model) for some fixed fee and then send the old one off (to be repaired, recycled, who knows).
Can anyone corroborate or refute this?
This whole thing for fitness functionality seems to ignore the fact most of the Western world is fat and lazy (myself included)
Or are such features akin to gyms offering cheap deals in January for 12-month memberships, knowing it makes them money but will never be used?
This is my big concern. When I looked into various DaaS providers they all seemed very expensive compared to using something like EC2. It didn't seem like it would take long to have paid more than a physical PC would cost - presumably my needs don't align well with their business cases though.
This isn't true. I've been looking into such technologies and been disappointed that while you can get DaaS, with a few niche exceptions 3D rendering was simply not provided.
It's not for everyone but definitely a powerful tool - for instance I create powerful 3D-simulators for business users who typically run basic business laptops, maybe even 5-year old business laptops with terrible onboard graphics chipsets.
This kind of approach means that rather than tell them they have to get brand new PCs for every user, I can provide an alternative.
What about those caps with the little propellors on top. FREE WIND ENERGY. And if you lower your head and run around, you can generate additional power FOR FREE.
"As for the rest of us we could try reading a map before we begin our drive."
Or put your destination in the sat-nav BEFORE setting off, by the same token.
The people that dumb are almost certainly the people already texting while driving anyway.
But if you don't want a massive system, you can buy a smaller one. For £300 - not £1500.
For the same reasons as the reviewer, we went for a soundbar by Philips - a full home theatre isn't of interest but TV speakers are sucky. We got the same kind of improvement in experience for £200.
The speech clarity is the biggest boon, although it's not perfect. It totally failed to help in the latest Riddick film because his voice is so deep, but luckily not being able to tell what he was saying in no way detracted from the film.
6.22 was amazing!
>>Just imagine an operating system 100% compatible with Windows, but without all the useless crap added in the newer versions?
Like performance and security features - yeah what a waste of time.
Another article I read claimed this phone DID let you take pictures and then alter the focus in the built-in apps. El Reg seems to be claiming it doesn't (yet)?
If you* want to be a dirty little thief, why bother going to that trouble when you could just find a ripped copy online?
*the hypothetical you, obviously.
12Gb on a graphics card.
Can someone convert this thing's likely real-world performance to units I can understand, like approximate number of i7 CPUs for general computation or something?
FF is a slow behemoth these days which is a shame as it used to be my favourite. I'd rather use IE10/11 than FF but Chrome is the best (if you don't have privacy hangups) although it too is succumbing to some early middle-aged spread :)
But he hasn't done those things.
But only on the basis it's crap these days. And I never realised I was supposed to tell people I was boycotting it.
Because obviously two people couldn't think you're an idiot.
Office, Chrome and I assume Libre & FF all support print-to-PDF natively.
I'd still recommend Acrobat because my motivation isn't to show how tech-savvy I am, but to provide standard tools people will have heard of.
As for "if you were up to date you'd know firefox has a PDF renderer already built in" yeah great so does Chrome. Often, links to PDFs open directly in the browser and this is pretty great. But then sometimes they demand you download the file and I don't want to be opening local files with my browser.
Also - I am up to date. That's why I don't use FF anymore.
I can't see why The Gimp is a standard tool to install, it's a bit specialist and not very easy to use. Paint.NET is better if you actually need something, but I doubt you do.
NotePad++ would definitely get my vote.
I'd say use MSE rather than Avast.
Surely Acrobat Reader is a requirement?
Not sure on why bother with FF and Chrome, I'd say pick one as an IE alternative personally.
AdBlock possibly makes sense but not script-blockers because it sounds like your target users will not know what's going on when pages don't work properly.
Ah yes, the smack in the face that you would never dare deliver yourself but hope to live vicariously through.
>>No, but I do. Hope I can still get them without Glasshole circuitry.
Is this your entry for "stupid comment of 2014"?
Pretty sure hipsters don't wear Oakley, do they?
Little engineer wage slaves in their protected environment. Safely isolated from the rest of the world and able to pontificate about how "marketing is a waste of time" and "engineering is all that matters", totally unaware that without the marketing department they would be out of a job. Occasionally, a talented nerd will come up with an idea for a new product and bravely let go of mummy employer's hand to set up on their own, only to realise that actually building the code is only about 10% of the work needed to create and sell their software - messing about with SEO, adwords, etc.
Marketing may not be to our taste but it makes a difference. Get your heads out of your cubicles.
Is Bob STILL banging on about that? He's a one trick pony.
I guess I "invented" this then because when I saw BBC showing Wimbledon in 3D as horizontal split-screen on regular TV, I wondered if I could get 3D by making one eye look at each half of the screen. It didn't work at all, are you saying it would've if I'd persevered?
So how does this work; does your device need to show content in a special way (e.g. left/right split-screen) or do you literally stick two lenses pointing at the same screen?
Even if most of these are commercial flops, it's nice to see people pushing in different directions. Who knows what will suddenly take off.
It is illogical to attack a product which competes against your own with arguments which can equally well be levelled at your product by the type of uneducated person who just hears something on the web and parrots it. It increases 'awareness' of criticisms generally. It's not in MS' interest to have people talking about "how interpreted languages are slow".
It's daft to call someone a MS shill for talking down Java, when the exact same ignorant arguments can be levelled at .NET (slow, interpreted, etc).
>>Come back when you understand how modern JVMs work. Wikipedia hint: JIT
To be fair, it's still not as fast as C++. The JIT evangelists claim JIT should mean Java/C# runs as fast as C++ or even faster (since it can compile for the exact CPU you're using) but I have never seen this in real life. What I have seen is that the difference in speed is not a big deal. Maybe a factor of 2 rather than a factor of 10, for doing heavy computation in a tight loop.
Nobody said it didn't support threads. But you had to create and run the threads yourself, make sure they don't fight over the same data dangerously, etc... this is the traditional model of multi-threading very similar to using threading in MFC/Win32. More modern approaches mean parallel logic can be automatically split off to threads without you having to do it, in a similar idea to how Java doesn't make you have to manage memory, but does it for you.
Are Java lambdas similar to C#/C++ - nameless functions - or something else? How exactly does this allow automatic multi-threading where doing for(Object o : collection) doesn't? And, do C# lambdas also do automatic multithreading?
So says someone who either hasn't used Java since 2000, or hasn't updated their learning since then. Java's performance is not matter for subjective opinion, it can be measured directly.
Java is not as fast as C++ for bare algorithm implementation comparison. But it is NOT "miles slower" and the difference in speed between Java and Ruby is far greater than the difference between C++ and Java.
I speak not just as a programmer, but one with experience in the world of competitive coding contests where you are given a limited time for your code to process input data and return a result, where language performance is a big deal. Rather than quoting middle-management "I read Java was slow because it's interpreted" levels of misinformation.
Well argued. People on W7 aren't going to find [m]any games require DX12 for a long long time, unless MS sponsor a few showcase titles. W8-only features WILL drive some extra uptake of the OS and there's not really a great deal of point adding new stuff to an older OS. It sends mixed messages.
As for Mantle - a vendor-specific technology is not a good plan. Even nVidia's PhysX has struggled,
Since it supports XBox too, they will.
Also, game-tech has historically pushed the industry. And it will take time to be adopted widely so it may well be W9 before a big shift is seen - loads of people still work with DX9.
Hand-winding a watch every day may be a slight inconvenience but it takes moments and you can keep the watch on, and do it anywhere. Having to take your watch off for an hour or 3 every day is a whole other issue. You'd get use to it but it is certainly inconvenient.
Yeah, but it's not. And nobody is changing that - we're still working with horrible CSS/DOM nonsense and this isn't set to change
If it were, he wouldn't have taken it down.
I think he maybe wants the money but hates the fame.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2017