Re: I've said it before, I'll say it again...
You may have overdosed on the fried frog pills. :-)
25427 publicly visible posts • joined 21 May 2010
I'm not in Scotland, but only an hours drive away. I've met at least three ladies over the years called Iona but none called Ilona, so I'd probably make the same mistake.
Some of the places I go have a fair number of people from the Indian sub-continent working there. When all I have is a printed job sheet with contact details, even with a full name I can't always tell if it's a male or female I'm looking for. It's what you are used to I suppose.
Yeah, agreed. Like "wild" camping and "wild" swimming. Back in my day, it was just camping and swimming. Camp grounds were usually, at best, a farmers field which might or might not have a shower/toilet block. Swimming pools have been around for a long time, but swimming in the sea, lakes and rivers was fairly normal too. Maybe it's because I grew up in an age where every school child was taught to swim and there were lots of awareness campaigns about swimming safely in the outdoors.
I think it's a sad reflection on society that we have to call everything outside the managed and risk-averse city as "wild something" to make sure people see it as a risk instead of them actually having a life-time learned sense of risk.
The Japanese, for obvious reasons, have an aversion to non-natural levels of radiation, but from what I gather, the levels have been safe for a long time now.
"Exactly what are the criminal charges for the DoubleVPN operators,"
Probably aiding and abetting for starters.
Para 4. of the article;
"Europol said the service was "heavily advertised on both Russian and English-speaking underground cybercrime forums," offering double, triple or even quadruple-layered VPN services to its customers."
...which indicates they were actively courting criminals as customers. It's a bit like the local pawn shop putting a sign in the window saying "we buy anything, no questions asked" and then posting flyers to all the local burglars.
Yeah. For one of our work webapps, printing only works in IE with Crystal Reports (yuk). Neither the app nor Crystal Reports are going to be updated (no idea if the suppliers have or not, but we won't be), so it's either use IE or, from other browsers, print to PDF then print that. And yes, printing is actually important and not optional in this case.
"Forcing him to only use his real name would be a horrible invasion of privacy and expose him to risks if he does online gaming or has hobbies that aren't work friendly, so when the summary mentioned this restriction my initial reaction was negative. What they've actually done though is a nice balance between giving him the means to protect himself online while making it either easy to check that he's behaving, or charge him with an offense if he ignores the ruling."
The way I see it, if this kid has any sense of privacy, this will make him think very carefully about what services he signs up to. It will hopefully instil in him the need for being careful about what one does online and respect for others privacy. This could be a very good life lesson for him. On the other hand, if he follows the rules and then signs up to "dodgy" places with his real name, he'll learn the same lessons the hard way.
I came here to ask if anyone knew what the point of the "attack" was.
Technically, yes, he "attacked" the democratic process, but really, who goes looking at a candidates website just days before voting for them? Unless it was expected to be such a close race as to require years worth of recounts by the Ninjas, what was the kid thinking?
He deserves to book thrown at him as much for being an idiot as for what he did.
"If we take a moment to reflect on our unbelievable product launches this past year, the products and the launch execution were built upon the base of years of work that we did when we were all together in-person."
So, they don't actually know what the effect of remote collaborative working is yet? Maybe if this years and/or next years launches go ok, they'll eat a little bit of humble pie?
" leaving the hardware in the previous configuration but this not causing issues."
I once came across a system whereby the audio had "failed". Cust had power cycled multiple times, reinstalled/updated the audio drivers and even re-imaged the PC before we got called in to do a hardware diag/fix. For no obvious reason, I just happened to wonder what would happen if I booted a live Linux distro. Sound worked. Re-booted into Windows and the sound worked. Clearly, none of the Windows steps did a proper hardware reset on the audio subsystem but the Linux drivers, most likely open source and written from reverse engineering or somesuch, was doing a proper hardware reset to make sure it was in a known state at start-up. I only ever saw this happen that once, but I still try booting Linux on recalcitrant hardware, not only because "just in case", but It's likely to show failures on some hardware during the boot rather than just crashing with a sad face on the display.
Relatively few artists / musicians / what-have-you are able to make a living doing what they do."
A mate of mine was in a band. They supported some very big names back in the day, but never made it themselves. He owned all the gear, amps, speakers and whatnot. He went into the rental business and made more from that than performing.
The old adage about the guy selling shovels in a gold rush. Most miners will fail but the people selling the gear are guaranteed to do well, if not as well as the successful miners.
While I agree with the sentiment, you clearly have no idea what is involved or how long it takes to build and operate a human pharmaceutical grade manufacturing plant. If they'd started immediately after the first announcements from Wuhan, it'd still not be up and operating yet.
"This particular rabbit hole appears to lead to a whole city, sounds like a good time to set an investigative reporter on to that one."
As per the article, there are already investigative reporters looking into it. I heard about the Philippines connection to 10's of 1000's of UK umbrella companies each doing small scale agency work for the likes of Serco on BBC Radio 4 show at least a month ago.
"The "negotiations" bit will be interesting - person to person sometimes it can be done via lights, horn, small movements of the vehicle but often massively aided by a facial expression / hand gesture (not an option open to an AI unless start adding external animated screens so AI can do a "beckoning on hand gesture" or whatever."
I've seen many references to cars being able to "talk" to each other, mainly in relation to sending out notices of slow/congested traffic etc. But I don't recall any mention of standards so that cars from different manufactures can "talk" to each other. Fun days ahead!
Just being Canadian doesn't prove a thing about your ability.
I've seen Highway Thru Hell and Heavy Rescue 401. Canada seems to have it's fair share of people who don't know what to do in snow, even when it's fairly light :-))))
"... knows you don't plumb two water sources together. Ever. For lots of reasons."
I'd guess that your average person would not know that the cooling system was pressurised and so it wasn't a "source" in that respect, even if they did know that you should not mix two or more sources in that way.
"Generally speaking if companies are recycling plastic then it means that it is something they are doing on cost grounds, or availability grounds. Companies mostly aren't charities and don't do something unless it's in their interest."
Also, you need to take into account "green grants" and tax breaks for recyclers. And the premium on "green" goods that sections of the population are prepared to pay. Also the public relations aspect for some companies, as per the article.
"I wonder who DOES dump all of that plastic?"
A lot of the current concern for plastics getting literally everywhere there is open water is the microplastics. Lots of that comes from make-up products and the waste water from washing machines (microscopic fragments of nylon, polyester etc break off when washing clothes) and goes straight through the treatment plants into the rivers and oceans.
On the other hand, the big multi-nationals seem to have no problems setting up independent subsidiaries in local jurisdictions when it financially advantageous to them.
Governments can make it so a local subsidiary is financially advantageous by blocking access or levying fines against the parent if they choose not to follow local law. A local subsidiary would be able to follow local law without hindrance of the parent companies own local laws. Of course, the subsidiary would have to be properly independent so the US TLAs can't demand they send data back home from sovereign countries such as Ireland.
"Law supersedes any conditions in a private contract. At least in civilised parts of the world."
Ts&Cs for the likes of Twitter et al are usually so long and complex that not only do they commonly contradict themselves but if challenged in a court of law will quite likely have swathes marked as unfair, unenforceable or simply illegal in many if not all jurisdictions, even the USA.
It's a bit like those who like to quote the bible to defend their positions. You can pretty much guarantee that you can find another quote from the same tome to defend the opposite position too.
"The problem is that the law applies to services that EU citizens, not EU residents use, so you can't just block EU IP addresses if you don't want to have anything to do with the EU."
I'm struggling to see your point. It's how the US has operated for years. PATRIOT Act anyone?