Do not want, will not accept
Unforgiveably stupid. No replaceable battery means I will never touch this abortion. Fawning review with no rationale.
194 posts • joined 21 May 2010
SFC's charge is brain-dead stupid. Canonical is in the right. Canonical's action would in NO WAY harm the openness of either linux or ZFS. The bottom line is that SFC is stirring up trouble over a fabricated "problem" where no problem of any kind in reality exists.
Big John, if 9 years is "long" after, I won't quibble over "long". But 1958's NASA was just a name change for and extension of 1915's NACA. All the interesting NACA airship technical reports and memoranda have been held by NASA since 1958. I think you're right that NACA didn't get much if any involved in investigations of looney tunes UFO stuff.
You're also right this was two months before the establishment of the USAF (and the same month as my date of birth). This is another quibble, but it was the USAAF (US Army Air Forces) from 1941 until September 1947. Before 1941 it was USAAC (US Army Air Corps).
I won't pretend I was boning up on this stuff as a newborn baby, but I sure was eating this stuff up from age 6 on. I do still have memories of the fighting in Korea, which was a bit before age 6.
They are still fussing around with Xen? Everybody I know couldn't move to KVM fast enough as soon as it became solid, seems like a lifetime ago now.
Xen badly mishandled selling itself to get linux to build in DOM0 support, and it's much too late to change the momentum now. I still remember the bad old days of RHEL5, pre-KVM, with the horrible headache of a completely separate, specialized kernel implementing DOM0 support.
"Battleship" is a term for a particular class of naval vessel, one which hasn't been built for 60+ years, and one which has not been in service anywhere for 20+ years. A battleship has 30+ cm of hardened steel armour - not 1.5 cm of mild steel hull plating. And guns of 28+ cm caliber. No guns of over 13 cm exist on any in service naval vessels that I am aware of.
The blunder is on the sub-title. The title and the text use the correct term, "warship".
</berserk mode>, sorry for the outburst.
The Galaxy S II still stands as the best phone yet. Look up "Super AMOLED Plus" before you mock me. Plain AMOLED or Super AMOLED doesn't come close to Super AMOLED Plus, and TFT needn't even apply.
Neither too small, nor too gigantic, makes a lot of others look ludicrously thick in comparison, the battery is easily changeable.
It's still my phone, and I'll never upgrade until it breaks down.
<blockquote>If Murdoch is so dumb, why is he so rich?</blockquote>
Seriously? The same reason 99% of rich barstids are rich. He was born with a silver spoon in his mouth, and he hires guys whose job it is to make his treasure grow without limit. I don't have any knowledge of whether his general IQ is low or high, but it is irrelevant to how rich he is.
<blockquote>Which mandatory reboots are these then? - Archlinux Desktop user (with both systemd + pulseaudio) and frequent updater. My current uptime is 1 week, 1 day, 12 hours, 32 minutes....oh, and the kernel was updated yesterday,...</blockquote>
I use Arch too, but I know what I am doing. If you update to a new kernel and do not reboot, YOU ARE NOT USING THE NEW KERNEL YET. Arch does not hold your hand. You can say it is not mandatory to update after a kernel update, but that strikes me as a bit distorting the point. You can put off rebooting Windows, too.
All of them are GARBAGE. Even the blacks. Now that WD's HGST is set to disappear, and Toshiba is replacing the good stuff it inherited from Hitachi[*], and Seagate drearily remains complete rubbish, there will be no acceptable hard drives any more. SSDs win by default, at prohibitive prices though.
[*] For the doubters, that's right. I have some early Toshiba DT01ACA300s that have "Device Model: Hitachi HDS723030BLE640" in the SMART data, and a lot more that are later and have "Device Model: TOSHIBA DT01ACA300", but they are all the same design from the same production line, and all of them have the identical "Firmware Version: MX6OABB0". Now Toshiba is rolling out the P300 which has essential identical specs but is a complete unknown, and will doubtless replace the superb DT01ACA300. I have very poor expectations.
Switched to a German Merkur safety razor and Astra Platinum razor blades at 100 for a tenner and got a better shave.
This is the way to go. Any decent quality double-edge razor from 55+ years ago will last your life, the life of your son, and probably HIS son - and more. The Merkur is a great one you can get today brand new. The Feather is an excellent blade, as well. I never got suckered into disposables or multi-blades. The idea was stupid. Plastic doesn't give you any heft; no momentum. I have EXTREMELY tough wiry bristles on my chin and upper lip.
Haven't seen anyone post the correct fact anywhere, but a number of flat-out WRONG posts.
Jet fuel is not "the same as" diesel fuel. Jet-A is essentially kerosene (terminology in the US, Canada, India, Australia, and New Zealand), which is called paraffin in the UK, Southeast Asia, East Africa, and South Africa. Of course Jet-A has strict specifications not guaranteed to be met by common kerosene.
Diesel motor fuel for road use is either #1 or #2. #1 is essentially kerosene, and #2 is the well-known substance most people recognize as "diesel fuel". There is also a heavier cut used by ships at sea and by railway locomotives, but that is off-topic when discussing road use.
Most pump diesel fuel is #2, except that in regions which get cold weather in the winter, it is cut with #1 during the winter time in order to most easily reduce the problem of cold-gelling.
Jet engines can happily burn either kind of diesel fuel, as well as a wide variety of other liquid fuels, but are not certified to do so reliably or long-term.
Historically, diesel engines have been able to burn Jet-A very well. That is essentially what they are burning when they use #1 diesel fuel. In fact, with the diesel technology as it existed up to the 1980s, savvy owners knew that in a pinch you could fuel up with gasoline, cut 5-10% with motor oil in order to afford viscosity and lubricative properties more appropriate to the diesel injection pump and injectors. The vastly higher injection pressure which later came about for emission reasons made this a poor idea, and common-rail pretty much drove a nail in the practice. You can still use Jet-A; in fact aircraft diesels are only certified for it; but to use it long-term it would be best to have an injection system adapted and tested for it, as aircraft diesels are.
<blockquote>Regardless of one's views on which side of the argument is correct, you do yourself no service by in one post complaining that the use of the term "denier" makes the article suspect, and then referring to "enviro-wackos." Cognitive dissonance.</blockquote>
There is wisdom in your point. Caution in the review and examination of one's terminology is always wise. However, the religious fervor I perceive is essentially all on the side of the pro-anthropogenesists. It's not that surprising, because generally those convinced that "we're all going to die" tend be passionate about it.
At the same time, when the pro-anthropogenesists label with derogatory terms those who are not buying what they are selling, it is only natural that there will be a backlash in kind from the latter.
I'm going to "heartily" disagree with various goofballs here. The Mk I late-70s Giugiaro-designed Scirocco was a visual orgasm. It was heartbreakingly beautiful. I felt a little funny "down there" every time I glanced at it in the driveway. It also only weighed 900 kg, and 76 hp drove it with gusto.
You could turn it into a supercar for peanuts. Throw in GTI springs, Bilsteins, and 205-60 Pirelli P7's on 13x6's in place of the stock 175-70 Contis on 13x5's and you had a Ferrari handler. But you could tell the difference between heads and tails when rolling over a dime. Fact.
You can still play the same handling games with the Golf, even though you're battling far too much pork, like any of the current depleted-uranium slugs on wheels. For me it's a Mk IV TDI, and Bilstein PSS-9 adjustable coilovers are the secret sauce. It's quite possible I have the only PSS-9 TDI on the road; certainly in the US.
I am old enough to remember before there were FETs. FETs brought absolutely BLINDING speed and incredibly low resistance in the on-state. What you have to be careful of, and you always did have to be careful of, is operating FETs in the region between full-on and full-off.
When they are full-on, power dissipation is limited by I times R, where R is thousandths of an ohm. When they are full-off, power dissipation is limited by the incredibly low leakage current. What you don't want is to have them "sort of" on but not "full on". You can cook the bejeezus out of them in an all-fired hurry.
I couldn't care less about the transfer speed. The slowest SSDs from yesteryear are more than fast enough - as long as they hold up in use (I'm looking at you, Samsung, the transfer speed collapsing to cripplingly slow after a while in use).
No, what matters is power-loss data protection. Both internal table structures protection, and cached write data protection. If it doesn't have it, it is UTTER CRAP and I wouldn't touch it. I see no information presented here that either level of protection is present.
Anandtech found that the M500, M550 and MX100 do not have the cached write data protection at all. What they have is a measure of protection against corruption of internal table structures - i.e., a half-assed level of protection; better than none but still FAIL.
I am worried that the BX100 and/or MX200 might not have even the half-assed protection - that they are no better than ticking time bombs.
Note that the large expensive tantalum capacitors of the M500DC enterprise drive give real full protection. The wimpy teeny tiny ceramics on the M500 do not. And most other brands are not even THAT good.
<blockquote>- 'router' or 'switch' - I forget, one routes packets by IP to the ONE PC it is for, the other just sends the packets to ALL connected PCs..</blockquote>
Incorrect. A switch replicates incoming packets to single SELECTED ports based on the addressed MAC vs the MAC of the attached device. A router redirects all incoming packets on the LAN which are addressed off the LAN subnet, to the WAN port (and vice versa). A NAT router (which basically everybody thinks of when you say router) adds rewriting the source IP/port-number pair of LAN packets which it redirects to the WAN, and reverses the process on responses from the WAN so they get to the right place.
You are thinking about a "hub", which simply replicates all packets coming in on any port, to all other ports.
To put it as simply as possible, a hub filters/rewrites nothing; a switch filters by destination MAC; a router filters by destination IP; and a NAT router filters by destination IP and rewrites source IP and port number.
Ahem, it is Shinano, not Shimano.
It is true that details were a closely guarded secret at the time, but with the passage of history all has become known in intricate detail.
See "Design and Construction of the Battleships Yamato and Musashi", by Kitaro Matumoto. Anyone who didn't buy this massive painstaking work when it came out in 1961 is not a serious historian. The main text is Japanese, but there is an English table of contents and appendix with copious tables and diagrams. From this we know such details as:
The exact dimensions of course[*]
details of 24 progressive designs leading to the final design
For secrecy the gun was officially termed Type 94 40cm, 45 caliber - actual bore was 46cm
Weights: gunnery, 11,802; armor, 23,500 tonns
The exact number of watertight compartments (1147)
The side armor being manufactured in 88.5 ton segments, 5.9x3.6m x410mm
The engine room floor area was 640 square metres
Superheated steam at 25 kg/mm^2 and 325 C from 12 boilers
[*] length overall, 263m; waterline, 253m; between perpendiculars, 244.0m
mean draft at full load, 10.86m
prismatic coefficient, 0.612
tactical turning diameter, 640m (heel 9 degrees)
period of roll 17.5 seconds
metacentric height at trial conditions, 2.88m
Mr. Matumoto defied an official order to destroy all documentation, saving voluminous notebooks.
Musashi did not have "36" 25 mm antiaircraft guns. That would have been an absurdity in 1944. By then she had 130 of them.
Unfortunately the 25 mm was a very poor weapon, especially compared to the excellent 40 mm Bofors on US ships. Musashi, like all Imperial Japanese Navy ships, was wholly incapable of mounting a credible AA defense.
As a USAian, may I say that the idea of rolling this back legislatively is STUPID DENIAL. Hello, all idiots with an R after their name: it DOESN'T MATTER what bills you pass to undo this, the President owns your ass! He will just veto (thank god). After 2016 it may be up for grabs again, but until then, JUST SHUT UP.
I am still in the elation phase over the FCC's action. Sure, it may turn into something bad, but you don't just abandon all attempts at governing because you're afraid your governing structure is going to be evil or incompetent.
In what world is FreeBSD limited to "intel/amd"? In the world I inhabit, we have:
ARM 32-bit: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/arm/armv6/ISO-IMAGES/10.1/
PowerPC 32-bit: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/powerpc/powerpc/ISO-IMAGES/10.1/
PowerPC 64-bit: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/powerpc/powerpc64/ISO-IMAGES/10.1/
PC98 and SPARC admittedly seem to have been dropped.
Apologies for not making proper links, but TheReg won't let me play with html until I've mae a billion posts or something.
It's perfectly obvious that 3D NAND has the potential to allow MANY TIMES more density in the package, so why in the nine hells do they reject 3D SLC out of hand? The rationale for having to resort to MLC crap in the first place has just been exploded. THINK.
Is stupidity an absolute requirement for running a corporation?
I'm just a lowly user. I don't want to see WD swallowing HGST because WD is a shitty company that produces shit and will turn HGST products into shit.
As it stands now, HGST and Toshiba are the only drives I would willingly touch. WD and Seagate are both garbage.
<blockquote>So the same should happen for bricks and mortar stores.</blockquote>
I don't think so. For a brick and mortar store the transaction is simple. For every transaction made at a particular store address, only one state and maybe one or a couple of local taxes are charged. It is a trivial matter to do the accounting. And it has nothing whatever to do with where the customer lives.
It is a different matter altogether for online purchases. You have to ascertain where the customer lives and keep track of 9600 tax codes.
See the difference?
The issue of sales taxes on internet transactions seems crystal clear on the face of it. Just say HELL NO DAMMIT to those 9600 state and local sales tax jurisdictions for online transactions[*], on the basis of simple insanity. If the brick and mortar guys cry about their business model, let them commiserate with the buggy whip manufacturers. And yeah, that would mean so sorry, states, "use" taxes won't fly so screw you and fix that shit NOW.
[*] If your online transaction happens to be with someone headquartered in your state/locality, then yeah, I don't see how you can wave away the sales tax(es) in that particular case. But I'm not talking about "local presence" bullshit; I'm taking about the headquarters location.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019