Let's start a ficitcious betting pool. And since I get to go first, I pick 'Windows+CryptoLocker'.
15 posts • joined 4 May 2010
Galileo, Galileo, Galileo, where to go? Navigation satellite signals flip from degraded to full TITSUP* over span of four days
Re: Hirzon angles??
With GPS, they knew from the start that four satellites in view would be required, three if the receiver had a good atomic clock. The system preceding Navstar-GPS was Transit; That one, with three satellites, was fine to provide daily position updates to your handy battleship or nuclear sub. The rest could be - and still can be - handled with inertial navigation.
I did get a navigation fix back when only four Galileo sats were usable. I also just managed to build a receiver and get a fix before Loran was crippled. There are a few ways to build a navigation system, but if it isn't really expensive, it's not politically hot, so forget about those solutions.
Re: Still getting worse?
And another second. And a half.
I began monitoring the power line awfully early sunday morning; It looked reasonably under control for the first 24 hours, now it is entertaining again. If you are the type who enjoys waching phase drift.
This is plotted every 20 minutes, so jumping on the refresh button more often than that won't help.
Gigantic data file available on request.
Actually, 50ns is not bad compared to DRAM. It is true that latency is much better than that once a row is opened, but when you then want to access a different row you have to close the row, precharge the sense amplifiers, open the new row, and only then can you read quickly (or rather the memory controller in the SoC you are using does this for you, but it still takes time).
If constructed in a similar way (wide rows), NRAM will, if the access time is ~50ns, be about the same.
The first market I expect it to appear in is small nonvolatile memories for industrial purposes. I currently use 32kByte MRAM and FRAM parts, and I pay around USD3 each for them in quantity.
Not the only encryption TODO in 7.0
This is not the only mess-up. They also managed to lose SECP384r1 support from the TLS stack used by the apps. Firefox and Chrome have their own stacks, they are not affected. But the mail client is a biggie, in 7.0 it can no longer talk to imap and smtp servers using nicely strong ecc crypto. This leaves me with the option of either turning down encryption for all users (yeah, right), maintaining duplicate service just for android 7.0 clients (expensive), or deciding not to support android 7.0 clients.
30GWh in 5 months lets us do some calculations. 5 months is 3600 hours, so the average power is 8.3 MW. The surface area of both sides summed is approx. 0.12 m^2, so temperature rise with the device vertical in still air with convection currents will be ~0.5K/W. So this thing will idle at ~4.7 megaKelvin. Display brightness will not be a problem.
Embedded? Not so simple.
On the production floor I have a few million pounds, dollars, or euros worth of machinery, with some of the embedded machines running XP. It has custom hardware and drivers. Basically, components go in on one end, earnings comes out the other. Am I going to turn it off?
Not likely. At this point it's on its own network, with tight access controls. That's all I can do.
How heavy is your remaining XP box? Mine's about 20 tonnes.
No L5 equivalent?
This is pretty much GPS L1 (not surprising, DSSS is a good way to do it), at a slight frequency offset, at twice the chip rate (better code tracking precision, position/timing wise).
What surprises me is that there is no L2/L5 (in GPS terms) equivalent signal. Your everyday L1 receiver depends on a ionosphere model to compensate for the delay through the atmosphere. In GPS, L2 allows the delay to be measured, resulting in great precision enhancement. The reason your everyday receiver doesn't do L2 is it is military-only and encrypted. Thus, the latest GPS sats have L5, which is the same thing, just not encrypted.
There isn't enough sunlight out there, our sun looks like a star. So it uses radiothermal generators. The fuel is plutonium, and as it decays, over the years, the power output drops. So now they have nowhere the power they started with.
The biggest risk with RTGs seem to be people stealing the outer casings for scrap value, luckily the Voyagers have adequate theft protection.
As someone sitting on an already-enabled network, it was an interesting day.
The phone did not ring. And I had even told people to report problems.
IPv6 traffic was pretty high. At least 10x usual. Mostly because of google and youtube.
My ntp server, being the ONLY IPv6 server in the ntp pool for the given zone, got a bit of traffic.
which was fun to watch.
The server-end providers got it right. No surprise, it really is pretty simple.
If you are a IPv4-only user, get IPv6. Because it is not a question of me 'just being cross'. Very simply, I do not have any more IPv4 addresses. My upstream will not give me any more addresses. If you want to use my newer services, you will have to use IPv6.
Not much pain
3 years ago I started a slow 'when convenient' slide towards IPv6. Today I am sitting on a fully working and tested dual stack network. But if you have been completely ignoring it, yes, you will be staying up. So why have you been ignoring it?
dig AAAA www.theregister.co.uk returns no records, so go get some Provigil.
@cowards: Even if you could find and reclaim the (fragmented) unused IPv4 space, it would be like peeing in your pants, so for one I welcome the first RIR pool depletions. It turns 'expected to happen' into current reality, which is much easier for management to relate to. And we're still running stateful firewalling on IPv6. Just like on v4. NAT makes zero difference. Zero state tracking does.
And it is not necessarily a downside box office wise
More than half the times I visit the big screen, it is because a someone I know - and know the tastes of - says that this is a movie I will like, and we should make an event out of it. Friends, beer (good stuff), and good sound. Funny thing is, the planning takes longer than the attention span of cinemas here.
With digital projectors now in place, I must assume they try to find the balance between disinterest and hype.