So thin I can't see it
Oh wait, that's because you're faffing around with pointless videos again. Anyone know of another site with actual pictures?
357 publicly visible posts • joined 29 May 2007
I'll be interested to see if they just do a BluRay drive, or put the price up a bit by making it dual-format. LG's internal dual-format drive for the PC is only around £30 more expensive than a Blu-only one, and it would save me from having TWO external drives balanced on top of my 360.
The high positioning of BluRay titles at Amazon.com won't be linked to their near permenant 2-for-1 sales they've been running since mid-November, would it? If I lived in the US I'd have a massive Blu collection thanks to that offer, but the duty and postage to ship them here is a killer.
It looks like it was taken with a flash, so you've got the right-hand screen reflecting, and looking less good than the left-hand one. Oh well.
Yes, the Pioneers are plasmas, and bloody amazing. Even with natual light they'll kick any LCD's backside. At £3000 for the 50", they bloody should do, however.
Since it's a real struggle to find a Wii without at least £50 worth of bundled rubbish, the XBox 360 Arcade is actually a feasible purchase now it has a HDMI socket, wireless controller and bundled memory card, and even a 360 Premium available for not much more if you shop around a bit, the price differences really aren't all that big between the two. Now you can get a PS3 for £299 they're not massively more expensive, either.
In that they've already said they made more money in the first week than the sum total of online sales of their EMI catalog, ever. All for a project that was more about getting the record out there in a legitimate manner before some random journo leaked it, as happened with every other release post OK Computer, and making a bit of cash on the side was a bonus.
...but according to Colin Greenwood on Radio 4 the other week, they as a band still made more money off the "pay as much as you like" release than the sum total of download royalty cheques they've ever received from EMI for the rest of their catalogue. So it can't have gone that badly.
Complaining about DirectX being a one-horse system used to work. But now it's the only option for running on the 360; a far nicer platform to play games on than Windows. Ever since I got mine I've given up on the concept of PC games. I suppose I might as well take the hints above, and get an OSX box.
I vaguely remember Sony throwing the Folding team a pretty large wedge of cash to keep it exclusive, or at the very least pay to get the best client possible. Microsoft obviously haven't done the same.
I remain unconvinced it's worth it, with the 360 - the energy usage for the payoff probably isn't good enough with its general-purpose CPU. Meanwhile the Cell is pretty much designed to deal with this sort of data; maybe Microsoft just don't want their performance to look bad?
We had this one out with the Reg staff the other week; a working party is in place to investigate the possibility of adding region coding to the HD-DVD standard, but they've yet to report any definite findings back. So current discs don't have anything on them, and current players don't know to look for it.
Apart from Fox, who demonstrate their outright contempt for consumers in so many ways (they're by far the worst in the constant re-release and repackage game, and only very recently started putting any extras on BluRay titles whatsoever, after seeing consumers ignore the rubbish they were shovelling out the door, for instance) most studios have a more sensible attitude to region encoding - using it on new-release titles that require staggered worldwide release, but not on catalogue stuff that is already available elsewhere. Paramount (while they were still releasing on Blu) and Warner match regionless HD-DVDs with regionless Blus across the board.
It's my personal opinion, but that's all anyone can offer when it comes to the subjective quality of videogames. But "over-hyped trash" are precisely the words I'd use to describe the PS3's F1 game. It's the worst-handling driving game I've had the misfortune to play in years, and a massive letdown coming from Sony Liverpool, the team that singlehandedly made my PSP purchase worthwhile with wipEout purE. It's this one that set me off a bit.
Uncharted looks like it has very good exploration bits, even if the cover system reminds me of the horrid time I had trying to play Gears Of War on the 360 (another game that "over-hyped trash" was meant for). Ratchet & Clank suffers from coming out within a week or two of the latest Super Mario game, but in its own right is downright lovely.
I think that, rightly or wrongly, a huge part of the perception that the PS3 has "no games" is because most of the best games are multi-platform. So while they clearly have appeal for anyone new to this generation of consoles, 360 owners don't regard them as reasons to stick a second (or third, or whatever) machine under the telly considering how much it costs to do so.
Actually, BluRay's higher bandwidth has indeed proved to be useful. It's almost certainly the reason that Bay's Transformers HD-DVD doesn't have a lossless audio track on it, for a start. HD-DVD has plenty of room to encode a 1080p video stream, but not to have too many audio streams alongside it without a hell of a lot of work.
No, both HD-DVD and BluRay use a selection MPEG4 derivatives. All of which are superior to DIVX's implementation. So your compression routines won't help there; you really have got to download 30Gb worth of stuff if you're going to take them on at the quality game.
Both VC-1 and the HD-DVD interactivity layer are owned by Microsoft. That's why they're involved in a format war.
How far do you trust the neutral opinion of a man whose entire back catalog apart from the Transformers movie he's in such a tizz about is owned by Blu-backing studios?
Microsoft have a significant investment in the revenue streams for the iHD interative layer of HD-DVD and codec patents (BluRay also supports VC-1, but it's less popular because encoding with H.264 and the higher bitrates BluRay allows is faster, and therefore cheaper).
So yes, I can believe they're investing in HD-DVD support. What next? Sony could have avoided a format war by killing off the PS3 and just releasing games on the more popular 360 and/or Wii, but I don't think anyone would seriously expect them to either.
That's kind of what I meant, though. The update supports an official version of the DivX standard. Which doesn't mean it will support all of the multifarious knob-twiddling bits of Xvid.
Most self-respecting pirates seem to be (from a Google! Of course I wouldn't download them!) using .mkv packages for anything HD, anyway. Which needs to be repackaged (and the audio re-encoded) for .mov or .mp4 to work on the 360.
Where did you get the idea that the 360 won't do H.264, RancidM?
It has no idea what to do with the Nerd-Favourite .mkv container, but H.264 files in standard .mp4 will play just fine. I use it all the time - download trailers from Apple, use Quicktime Pro to re-encode the audio from 5.1 to 2.0 AAC (the 360's AAC codec won't let you use 5.1, which is a touch irritating) and hand the resulting .mp4 to the 360 to watch in shiny HD. It only take a moment, because the video is a straight passthrough.
As for Divx, you can blame the fact it's a constantly moving target, mainly used by pirates. Official ones should work just fine.
The MCE playback problem is due to a slightly different issue. It's actually your PC that has the current MCE code, as part of Media Center itself; that code isn't touched by the 360's dash update. You've got to wait for the Media Center team to pass that one for release, then you'll get it in Windows Update.
Sadly, HDCP is already needed if you're going to play HD-DVD or BluRay on a digital output. The DRM that ruins your analogue VGA output hasn't hit yet, but it's there already on digital.
I've not done it yet, but a look at the specs for Power DVD Ultra looks like a T2500 or better would do it. As for audio, an optical output is ok, but really you want to go analogue outs in order to use Dolby TrueHD or PCM lossless.
I suspect the answer on the HDMI is probably to buy a 'proper' graphics card so you know the H.264 acceleration is up to snuff.
The only reason I'd buy one of these things would be to shove in a small case with a BluRay drive as a HTPC. Does the HDMI output do all the HDCP rubbish you need to deliver the full 1080p to a display properly under Vista? And how is the onboard audio, now I think of it? That's usually the biggest problem for these tiny 'do everything' boards.
Laserdisc had no competition, bar VHS. Unless the price of movies rather radically alters, DVD vs. BluRay will go the same way.
Personally, I plan on adding a BluRay player to my current HD-DVD setup, but I don't feel too put out that I've got one. The add-on drive for the 360 wasn't terribly expensive, and I've enjoyed watching Potter, Serenity, Mission: Impossible, Bourne and so on in the format. If nothing bar the announced discs ever comes out, I'll have a library big enough to be happy with my purchase for a while.
My first DVD player was £500. I've still got a fair way to go before I've lost that much money in what might turn out to be a 'dead' format.
The way things are going, I suspect that BluRay will "win" in the sense that it is turning out to be more popular than HD-DVD. For a combination of reasons, though the main ones are Disney support and PS3 owners getting the best player out there for "free". Although that latter point must be rather galling for all the dedicated player manufacturers, who can't use software sales to subsidise their hardware.
But while DVDs continue to make up the vast majority of sales, and prices for the HD format software remain high thanks to unavoidable manufacturing expenses that come from the coating process, I wonder if it will ever take over the mainstream.
Re: 1.1/2.0 issues, as a fellow HD-DVD owner I say that they're not worth making BluRay owners worry about too much. Any BD-ROM disc that won't play on a PS3 would be commercial suicide, so it's just not going to happen.
Yes, if you've got a PS3, or a 360 for that matter, it's pretty simple to connect the camera straight to the console to view images in HD. I tend to dump them onto the PC and view them streamed over the network, personally.
The only really interesting thing about the camera in this respect is that it allows you to (relatively) easily frame a 16:9 image without shooting at 3 megapixels and then doing a manual crop. Unless you're the sort of person who has gone and bought a 1080p telly, but has no computer or console that you could hook up to it, I suppose.
It's had a boom in demand due to the price on the new 40Gb cut-down model. Which also comes in a really nice shiny white edition.
There aren't many new games worth worrying about, but BluRay has the Spidey, Pirates and Die Hard movies. So that might be an influence.
Strangely enough, when Codemasters were launching the first Colin McRae Rally, they had demopods that went round all the major racing events that year.
The game has a nice big laptime leaderboard in there, and a certain "M. Schumacher" had the fastest on just about every single one of them...
So not every sport is hurt by videogame versions...
"Bluray is at 3.2 million WITHOUT heavy discounting" - sorry, how much profit do you think Sony makes on PS3 sales, exactly?
Highlander - if PS3 owners are so aware that their machines are BluRay players, why is the movie attach rate 0.6? That's an awful lot of owners that haven't even bought one film.
The whole thing is completely up in the air. Lets see what the early '08 figures say. Sure a lot of players on both formats have been sold, but those formats have also been giving away stacks of free films with the players. So plenty won't feel the need to buy any more just yet.
Personally, I'm predicting that both formats will continue to bounce along with their sales levels, neither pulling enough of a lead to kill off the other. It's still largely selling to people who like films enough to end up dual-format - the 2:1 ratio has been fixed like that all year, despite concerted efforts from both sides and the odd bit of moving with big titles.
I've got both at home, and while my wife loves the DS and won't touch the PSP, I end up spending more time on the latter, myself. I love the various Mario games, but I'm a Sega racing games fanboy, and between OutRun 2006, Sega Rally Revo and Crazy Taxi I'm very happy with it. PS1 games run really nicely as well.
Re: things other than games, the DS has a better browser (even if you have to pay for it), but the music playing (that I don't really use much, since I have a 30Gb iPod) and particularly video playback (the screen is better than the iPod's) is an awful lot nicer.
You really want to update your PS3 rants, you know. Heavenly Sword isn't 'upcoming'; it came out a few months back. You may have missed the info, however, on the grounds that it turned out to be a load of rubbish. Modern fanboys have moved on to Little Big Planet and MGS4 as their upcoming saviours.
Yes, the PS3 is more powerful technically than the Wii. But not ten times more powerful, and certainly not ten times more fun.
It's hardly a big effort to turn your Wii off at the mains. Or a 360, for that matter, since it'll go get clock settings and the like from the net as soon as you turn it on.
Also, you can turn off the automatic updates and make the standby as frugal as the other consoles, if that's your thing.
I don't suppose you could drop any hints on where to find the SD DVD multi-region hack? I've been waiting since this time last year for one to come out, and indeed gave up and bought a (really very poor) upscaling Philips player to handle SD discs until it became available.
Although, I have to say that I'm tempted to just keep using my 360 as an R2 and HD-DVD player, and get a US PS3 to play R1 and BluRay. Even if there isn't a single game I particularly want to play on it yet. That would still leave the odd R3 and R4 disc I have, but they're a tiny minority that could be ripped and rewritten if push came to shove.
"Why care? There's VERY little content of any value in HD as, until very recently, most material is produced in non-HD."
Where on Earth did you get that idea? Buy or borrow a HD-DVD player, a 1080p HDTV and a copy of Casablanca. That's a 65-year-old film, but the detail is absolutely stunning, and rather substantially better than standard-def. As mentioned above, I don't have a Blu-Ray player yet, but I've no reason to believe you wouldn't see the same effect on old movies for that format either, since it is just as capable technically.
Or are films not "of any value"? Even the 60s series of Star Trek is pretty stunning on HD-DVD if you're of that mood, since like the vast majority of US productions it was shot on film. It's only UK television that uses cheap video to save a bit on the budget, and that's a decision I'm sure will come back to haunt them.
Over in the US, the year-so-far stats have been pretty steady at 66:34, give or take a couple of percent as big releases for either format come out, all year. BluRay is winning, but to listen to the fanboys (and indeed studio heads) at the beginning of the year they were expecting a lead more like that 17:1 el Reg reckon exists for European hardware.
It's a somewhat arbitrary figure, anyway - the two formats are still early-adopter-only, and every single person I know with HD-DVD gets a fair proportion of their discs from the US. I'm running about 50:50 myself, as sometimes (Serenity and Planet Earth, for example) it's worth paying the UK price premium for the local disc, and sometimes (Potter, notably) the UK one came out first.
Right now, I'm expecting the stalemate to last well into next year, unless those Alba players are sub-£150 or something insane. Either way, by the time I run out of films I like on HD-DVD a BluRay (or even dual-format) player will be more affordable, so I'm not too worried about it all.