Re: The Wheel of History
>And Lotus Improv was out of this world at that time too....
Still is, Excel 2019/365 still can't do 3D spreadsheets as simply as Improv did.
10737 publicly visible posts • joined 23 Apr 2010
>Yes, but the users aren't always doing this out of blind stupidity.
Particularly, as once you've learnt how to do pivot tables, charts etc. in Excel, you can use that knowledge for any other package, whereas knowledge of SAP Analytics pivot tables is only applicable to SAP...
>If I want to be with someone, then I am with someone. ...
In the current lockdown, you can only do this (and some of the other things you list) with someone who is a member of your immediate household...
I did a variation of what the BBC is offering (same time different place) with a movie for my teenage daughter's birthday recently, she and her friends watched the same film, whilst in a 'meeting' (*), so whilst not as good as being in the same place at the same time, did permit some real-time interaction and viewing control (pause, rewind).
(*) Need to be careful about sound feedback. I would hope that someone will implement some form of noise-canceling (on the movie) which would enhance the meeting experience ie. would permit audio/spoken word conversation.
>Still, the Beeb idea is bizarre.
Given the omission in your comment, I suspect you also don't see the point of multi-player gaming and in game chat - something my teenage son does a lot with his friends.
>Perhaps it's time for developers to ensure ...there's a way for users to obtain the latest versions
Its more than just the latest versions.
Do a factory reset and you may find that many apps can't be installed because the latest version doesn't run on your particular version of Android.
However, with a little digging around you can often find a site - of unknown repute - that has a few old versions, which you can try and find one you can install and then update.
>It seems you may have finally come to realise the outsized role Google has in your everyday life, yes?
I suspect it hit them like a brick...
It has taken the Huawei P40 to make the reviewer realise that what they thought was "Android" isn't Android at all, but Google services.
A few years back people talked about walled gardens - mostly with respect to Apple and Microsoft, it seems Google has quietly over the years turned "Android" into a walled garden without people noticing too much.
>That's an old-world view that's at the source of many of our current challenges.
err no...
Design of an system application such as the NHS app, starts before anyone has even thought of designing software. When I pass a system design to the Software Engineers (to contribute their component of the solution), I've already solved the real-world problem and identified many of the key security hurdles the design of the software elements need to get over...
So you are correct in that Software Engineers on being given a brief can start to think of security from the start of their involvement.
>Will the app ask if the user has a cold or is asthmatic?
There is already an app for that.
My partner signed the family up, we report on a daily basis on a range of questions - she had a migraine earlier in the week and ticked four symptoms from the long list, that evening she received an email offering her a test slot.
>I therefore suspect that their offering will be pretty much gold-standard.
you are forgetting they also control the platform OS, so you need to assess things in the context of what can be extracted via the OS reporting (remember Apple have already said they are making some of the app functionality OS functionality...) rather than the app itself does dodgy stuff...
> Its major advantages are no central database of identifiable information and clean iOS/android interaction.
Big assumptions there:
1) It's okay for Apple and Google to limit what others can do with their platform - and actively take measures to prevent rooting...
2) Whilst the approach places different requirements on the central/distributed DB, you are assuming that their approaches don't upload any of: phone number, Google unique device id., icloud/google account details, usage of other app's etc...
3) In using an iPhone/Android you've already given Apple and Google permission to upload usage information to them, so no legal recourse...
>it took less than 30 minutes looking at the code the day it was released for me to spot multiple issues ranging from the basic to the severe, including many day one rookie mistakes.
Expect the Apple and Google apps to be similar, only expect the data to be replicated to an offshore DB to allow non-GDPR compliant processing...
As the first commenter said, for the app to work, information that identifies a phone/person needs to be retained and exchanged with other identifiable phones/persons. All solutions require the information to be shared via a 'trusted' broker...
>"...and how long did we have to wait for the first data breach? A week after launch of the Beta!"
Puts the entire Huawei b*llocks into perspective; if the UK government can't secure a relatively trivial DB then it has already lost the security battle with other nation-states. Ie. we should assume the Chinese, Russians and the US via the Israeli's all have full and unhindered access to UK government systems...
>"Design it to be secure from the start."
The laugh is that you can't design something to be secure from the start!
You first have to solve the real problem then you can evaluate how that solution can be made secure, this may take several iterations before you arrive at a solution that hopefully satisfies most of the requirements.
You do realize both the Apple and Google app also has a "central" DB - remember a 'central' database is just a distributed DB with a single instance; alternatively, a distributed DB is just one implementation approach to a central DB...
Once you start looking at the Google and Apple app's and appreciate what they already know about your phone, you start to appreciate they are not that much different to the NHS app from a personal privacy point-of-view. At least with the NHS app we stand a reasonable chance of not getting spammed with adware for: fake cures, will writing, funeral plans, etc.
>Because of the complexity, I think it's where a centralized approach has more value.
Also, the centralized approach permits the government to utilize its privileged access to mobile network location data. Cross-matching this to the data from the app and there is the opportunity for some real scientific insights to be gained.
The more I assess the app, the more I see it's real value is in providing metrics to input to NHS admissions forecasts. Yes it should help to reduce the rate of infection, by alerting people to the need for them to self-isolate before they actually develop symptoms themselves.
>I never got to use Algol 68 because it was difficult to write a compiler for
Yes, the really powerful and useful languages are a bugger to write a compiler for.
Aho and Ullman's "Principles of Compiler Design" was the must have text book on the subject (still got my first edition) and explains why , although it was very helpful in writing a Pascal compiler, in writing compilers for languages requiring bottom-up LR parsing, such as C and Ada, there was much left to the reader...
>Not sure GDPR specifies lengths of time, but you aren't allowed to keep the data for years after it is useful.
Well given the extent to which modern medical research uses historic (personally identifiable) medical records, it would be relatively easy to justify the "useful" retention life of CoVid19 data to be at least 100 years.
>Not sure if GDPR allows personal data to be transferred elsewhere without express consent
You get express consent to permit you to "share data with selected third parties".
I think there are also article(s) on el reg that describes how malware can survive a factory image flashing (PC and phone) - due to much hardware having its functions defined by software which has its own memory that isn't touched by an OS reimage...
In undating a bunch of PC's recently, I found one device family required a Bios downgrade (to a specific version) followed by an upgrade to the new patched version to ensure UEFI disk and memory areas were overwritten and thus erased.
So what Open RAN seems to be is a US 5G patent pool, which in order for it to work either needs to steal patents from Nokia, Ericsson and Huawei (and other non-US contributors) or bully them to agree to license their Patents to Open RAN on terms favourable to the US.
Naturally, the companies that will have goods stopped by US trade officials will be consumer devices from companies such as Samsung - all above board and in accordance with the US's take on WTO's rules.
"One standout programming blunder was CVE-2020-1067, a remote-code execution (RCE) vulnerability in all supported versions of Windows."
This would suggest the vulnerability is in both 32-bit and 64-bit code and thus has been around sometime; I wonder which is the first version of Windows it occurs in - NT 3.51? - has anyone investigated?
>but they make it clear that this is the FIRST wave of the disease and there is worse to come
However, this seeming clarity is being eroded by the testing of biopsy samples taken last year, in which evidence of SARS-CoV-2 is being found, suggesting there was an initial wave in UK/Europe last autumn...
What people are ignoring is just what government policy (around the world) actually means, basically, they are accepting CoViD19 is here to stay, it won't be eradicated and achieving herd immunity is a pipedream, the best seems to be to keep it's R-value below 1, in the hope that a vaccine can be developed within the next year then mass produced and then a programme of injections started - which to me indicates CoViD19 and thus lockdowns and social distancing are going to be part of 'normal' for at least the next 3 years.
There is one thing we can be certain of: CoViD19 is action research on a grand scale and is providing many opportunities for people to see scientific problem solving - warts and all - in real-time.
>If you stop the spread early, you can open up early so the total effect on the economy is less. If the UK had taken the required action when it was required you wouldn't have community transmission now and you could open back up.
Agree, however, given the nature of the English - and the typical Brexiteer, Cederic is absolutely right,
people would not of have accepted a government (even a Conservative one) enforced lockdown. Even waiting there were and still are people who think CoViD19 shouldn't be treated any differently to seasonal flu, however, they just grumbled rather than get out on the streets, like they have been doing in the US and Germany...
>Our DR plans most certainly considered several scenarios where nobody would be allowed into the offices and everyone would have to work remotely for extended periods.
Bet they didn't take into account social distancing, unavailability of parts, spares etc.
Not saying the plans didn't help, just that having had to restore Internet connectivity for a client (trunk fibre lines out of the town were servered - took BT/OR 3 weeks to fix), I did find the plans only went so far before it was "get your thinking hats on" - what do we have that we can use to restore some form of connectivity so people can resume working tomorrow morning and continue to work until such time that BT are able to restore normal service...
>the secretary had to be furloughed immediately as she is high vulnerability.
Missed a few steps in your reasoning.
You only fuloughed staff you don't need to run the reduced business.
Now you look at the staff you retained and assess whether their vulnerable/high vulnerability status prevents them from doing some or all of their normal job and what would need to be put in place to enable them to do their job...
Last month I renewed my car insurance, I spoke a very pleasant lady who, whilst we waited for the systems to process my renewal, I discovered was in a high vulnerability group, her employer had set her up to work from home...
>Of course they've put themselves in this position by not having working DR plans
Did any of the DR plans you drew up or contributed to contain any consideration of the circumstances we are currently in; I suspect not, as I know despite all my years of experience, none of my Business Continuity plans covered the current situation.
>and not having enough IT staff to do things properly
Actually, it more of not having the right IT staff. One client the IT staff wanted to buy a load of laptops etc.; I visited their offices and got them to empty out their cupboards - 5 days later all those laptops (some dating from 2012) were running Windows 10 etc. and in the hands of employees pleased to be able to work from home.
> Look no further than COURTS using Zoom...
It works and provides good enough security for public proceedings.
Obviously, we can expect some big product enhancements in September, embedding some of the key learnings from the current mass usage of video calling/meeting/conferencing systems. So I would not be surprised if some user groups move away from Zoom, Teams etc. to more appropriate platforms.
>"see how long it took to be able to have mobile phone handsets work across all telcos, that was the result of a deliberate policy choice to allow competing standards instead of competing companies"
I thought the US only achieved this by adopting 3G - the output of 3GPP; an organisation born out of European co-operation on GSM...
Mind you Qualcomm did try their best to scupper 3G by its questionable patent claims...
But not all PDF readers are equal.
Over the years I've found differences between Adobe, Nuance, FoxIT, ExpertPDF, Chrome...
I think the best was finding that displaying an A4 document at full width on a 15" laptop screen in one caused some horrid (bad on the eyes) font display, reduce zoom by 5% and it displayed perfectly legible fonts.
Yes, the decentralized approach is tempting, however, a big issue is what can we learn from it, to better prepare us for the next time, and there will almost certainly be a next time. Given the number of SARS/Corinavirus outbreaks in the last 20 years, I suspect we'll see another SARS/Coronavirus pandemic within the next 10 years.
Not saying the UK NHS app is better or actually does the job, just that it might be wise to think of the bigger picture. From what I can see the UK NHS app provides more data to researchers.
>Every death is one too many, but we're still looking at something comparable to a severe flu season.
That is only because of the measures taken to limit contact and reduce the rate of transmission. Without these measures, we could expect to see a death rate somewhere between x10~x44 higher. From memory, CoViD-19 could kill between 2~5M people in the UK between March and Christmas if we carried on as 'normal'...
Remember, no one gets admitted to the high dependency wards with flu, only the few who develop pneumonia.
>How about they stop trying to chase Chrome
It is worse than that.
With the integration of password management, they are also chasing: the dedicated password manager vendors and all the security suite vendors that now include a password manager.
Personally, I use LastPass for a reason - its cross-platform, not locked to a specific browser or security suite. I suspect others use other reputable password managers for similar reasons. So this just becomes yet another feature that will be turned off, just as I uninstalled the free version of Kaspersky's password manager that gets included with their security suite.
Given browsers are becoming an entire containered OS, I suggest it is about time they started having published API's and better support for third-party enhancements. Perhaps this is something the Open Group could resolve and deliver a POSIX standard.
>I guess I would expect booking.com.au to be the Australian outpost of booking.com serving antipodean tourists, so they might have a claim.
But you would be totally wrong.
In general ownership of one label and TLD combination, does not give you any rights over anyother combinations of your chosen label with other TLDs and subdomains. Although given the US seems to think it owns the Internet and that US law applies globally...
If in doubt I suggest you search back and reread the 'Brexit' articles about the use of .EU domain names currently held by UK companies/individuals that will become available (to EU residents) in the near future when the UK finally completes its withdrawal.
From the discussion in the article, I suspect a case could be made for trademarking: iCloud.com (and similar) because iCloud is a made-up word.
What is interesting is that Booking.com BV don't seem to wanting to trademark their business name (or is it already trademarked in the Netherlands and EU?), just their domain name.
Morpria is included in Windows 10 from build 1809 (October 2018 Update) - 8 years after Apple launched Airprint....
Suspect many people don't know it is there because they updated a pre-existing Windows system which had OEM print drivers installed.
Just goes to show just how much energy MS has been devoting to non-essential stuff such as one version of Windows for all platforms, TIFKAM etc., rather than on stuff that would actually help people better use of their laptops, tablets and MS Surfaces...
The auto-download of firmware updates over the internet is only part of the problem, the issue as we have seen with Microsoft Windows updates is knowing what is in those updates.
A big question has to be whether HP made it explicit that this specific firmware update contained significantly changed functionality with respect to third-party ink cartridges and gave the user the option to rollback to an earlier release etc.
Remember this update from HP is equivalent to Microsoft updating Windows 10 to only permit the usage of Microsoft Office, Defender, Edge etc.
>n other news almost everyone else is going cloud to escape managing hardware, OS, applications, infrastructure...
Yes and as the original commenter said - all works well until it all goes titsup and you need to either restore your IT ahead of the scheduled priority your cloud provider has assigned to restoring the systems hosting your load or you wish move away from that provider.
Everyone tends to assume that once you move something into the cloud, DR/business continuity, data backup and archive etc. are solved problems.
Well given the ease with which people will be able to "play around" with stuff on their phones, it does seem the solution is to rely mostly on network data and use the app to provide unreliable but more granular data.
Now try and sell that to the people; given peoples well-founded wariness of letting state agencies accumulate large amounts of data on them...
>Yep. Here, our web filtering list is relatively short.
It works well until you explore a little.
A client had barred "gambling sites", it worked well until they decided to bid for funding from the National Lottery.
On investigation, yes the filter did block the big name sites, but none of the smaller sites - neither did it have an exclusion list. Not naming names but the web filter was from a popular business provider (£) of web filtering services.
The Advisory doesn't mention anything that can be taken to mean "substandard component fitted".
In fact from the wording of the advisory:
“Due to a manufacturing process issue, some ASA5508 and ASA5516 security appliances might have a damaged resistor component,”
I suspect some machine was set up incorrectly so that the component on installation was subject to stresses (mechanical/thermal) that weakened it.