Re: Cisco hasn’t explained why you’d run fibre to the desktop
>1. There's the SFP port.
The SFP port is for the uplink ie. connection to the building wiring. Obviously, the (Cisco compatible) SFP module will be an additional cost.
>2. Do you have a use case for a desktop 10G
Yes, talk to a CGI production house. However, given how relatively cheap 100Mbps/1Gbps/10Gbps LAN adaptors are, it would make sense for Cisco to have an equivalent offering - but then perhaps these micro switches might impact sales of more expensive (Cisco) kit...
>40G uplink would probably need active cooling as well
It's fibre, none of my 100Gbps SFP modules have active cooling...
>Why not 100G for the lulz?
Well currently 10Gbps over copper is reasonable, thus 4 ports implies 40Gbps, but yes it is more cost effective (for the customer) to go with 1/10/100Gbps fibre uplinks.
>The PSU is 80W
From rereading the spec. it seems for the desktop variant, depending on which PSU option you take, the max. passthrough power budget is 120W and so it can support USB-PD, whilst the PoE budget seems to be limited to 60W max. (30W max. per port). I suspect Cisco intend the PoE to be used by a (Cisco) desk phone.