* Posts by veti

2633 posts • joined 25 Mar 2010

Happy birthday to you, the ruling was true, no charge for this headline, 'coz the copyright's screwed

veti Silver badge

Re: "envy of less happier lands"

No, the ruling has nothing to do with the copyright expiring.

All it means is that, most probably, nobody actually knows who owns it, therefore there's nobody with standing to sue you for violating it. And that applies worldwide.

veti Silver badge

Re: @ PassiveSmoking

The ruling doesn't touch on the validity of copyright in general, or even on term lengths in particular. It merely finds that there's no evidence that this specific copyright belongs to this specific party.

So there's no real legal point or precedent being established here. This is about the facts of the case, not the law. If Mr Orlowski is grinding his teeth, then he's wearing them down quite misguidedly.

Cyber peace deal still possible despite China's US cyber-spying denials

veti Silver badge
Trollface

The Chinese government...?

I can well believe that "the Chinese government" doesn't engage in corporate espionage. In exactly the same way as the US government doesn't support terrorism, and the French government doesn't condone genocide.

If I say "my company doesn't sell animals", but someone in Accounts is offering an entire tankful of terrapins on eBay right now, does that make me a liar? I don't think so.

Of course there are people and government agencies in China whose job is to spy on the USA. I'm pretty sure the Americans don't even attempt to deny that they also pay people to spy on China. That's how the game is played.

Privacy, net neutrality, security, encryption ... Europe tells Obama, US Congress to back off

veti Silver badge

Re: And suddenly ..

You need to remember that governments in general, and the US government in particular, are not very united. Not everyone on their team is necessarily pulling in the same direction.

It may well be that some players in the US - quite possibly, including Obama himself - are pressing forward with that case hoping that Microsoft will win, because getting the law struck down by the courts is a lot quicker, easier and cheaper than trying to persuade Congress to change it. In fact, all people of goodwill should be in favour of the DOJ pressing it, because that's the only way to establish clarity about what the law really is.

Don't bother buying computers for schools, says OECD report

veti Silver badge

Is it my imagination

... or have we seen this story before? Approximately once every four to eight months for the past ten years or so?

And yet there has been, so far as I know, no slowdown in the sale of computers to schools. Nor will there be this time.

Because if any politician wants to be seen as spending on education, buying a few computers is a lot cheaper than training and employing more teachers. Ditto if any company wants to burnish its "community" credentials. And for the schools themselves, it gives them something to brag about to prospective punters. Deploying computers is a lot easier than improving test scores.

So yeah. I don't doubt this is true, but it's irrelevant because nobody cares. That's not what the computers are there for.

Anti-peeping-tom drone law nixed in California

veti Silver badge

What's the difference between this, and the president of the US vetoing a bill from Congress?

Or the House of Lords sending a bill back to the Commons?

Or the president of France "asking parliament to reconsider" a law?

Or... oh, you get the picture. Looks to me like standard practice, at least in most places that have pretensions to constitutionality.

Don't want to upgrade to Windows 10? You'll download it WHETHER YOU LIKE IT OR NOT

veti Silver badge

You, presumably voluntarily, installed Windows 10, and you're complaining about "the update madness"?

I've had Windows 8.1 for about six months now, and in that time it's never, not once, told me to reboot for Windows updates. If W10 is doing that, that's a huge step backward.

veti Silver badge

Re: What a load

This. I finally figured out how to stop the nagware from badgering me about "reserving my upgrade" (because hey, you never know when they're going to run out! - or something), but does that prevent the files from being downloaded? And if I delete them, what prevents them from being re-downloaded the very next day?

Bloody cheek.

Europe yawns at EU robo-commish Ansip's digital plans

veti Silver badge

They don't. But the cost of distributing it, and collecting the payments (at a reasonable level, at least), might be higher than the available revenue.

Spaniard claims WWII WAR HERO pigeon code crack. Explain please

veti Silver badge

Re: IP over Avian Carriers RFC 1149

Reliability is probably about as good as UDP...

The real killer is latency.

veti Silver badge

With "book" codes, a lot depends on the discipline of the person writing the coded message. If they do as they're supposed to, and refrain from repeating the same reference too often, then they're pretty good. But if they get lazy and start using the same reference for a particular word - maybe an uncommon word that they can't avoid repeating - then the code becomes much easier to crack.

(That's one reason why they've fallen out of favour - they're inherently labour-intensive, and only really robust when used by experts.)

veti Silver badge

Re: Useful

You mean WWOnline, or WW365?

So, was it really the Commies that caused the early 20th Century inequality collapse?

veti Silver badge

Re: Scarcity of resource

You totally can have 75% of the populace being poor. History shows us that's the norm - the golden age of the middle class in the late 19th-20th centuries is an outlier - and make no mistake, if the invisible hand is allowed to govern everything in its own way, we'll be back there in no time.

The question is whether that's what we want. Because we have the tools, now - democracy, economic models, government infrastructure (or "bureaucracy", as Tim would probably call it) - to do things differently.

If we want to.

Vote now: Who can solve a problem like Ashley Madison?

veti Silver badge

Clear winner

Taylor Swift is clearly the only person in the universe with the charisma and credibility to persuade husbands and wives alike that it doesn't matter what's in the archives of some stupid website.

Because Love. Or whatever.

Scrapheap challenge: How Amazon and Google are dumbing down the gogglebox

veti Silver badge

Re: No to 'smart TVs'...

Quite. A TV only lasts 7 years? I'm not sure, but right now I don't think I've ever owned a TV that was less than 7 years old.

That's what decoder boxes are for, after all.

veti Silver badge

Re: Now you need a TV license, a SKY sub, Amazon Prime, Netflix, BT, etc ad-bleedin-nauseum

Well, to be fair to "competition" - that's not the real problem here. These issues are caused by people having "exclusive rights" to broadcast things, which is pretty much the opposite of competition.

And then the same broadcasters who buy those "exclusive rights", also sell you the exclusive right to view their content by buying their subscriptions.

Remember when you could just twiddle the knob on your TV until you found a frequency level that looked like something more than random static? You didn't have to pay anyone, you didn't even have to know what the channel was or who was broadcasting it - it was out there, you could receive it. That's what "broadcasting" meant, in those happy-go-lucky days.

Doesn't work any more. That's what digitisation has done to us. Now the broadcaster can, at their own whim, arbitrarily lock you out of any content it thinks you might be persuaded to pay more for.

Technology is not good or bad, it's neutral. The people who benefit from it are the ones who position themselves to do so. And guess who plays that game better - some couch potato who spends 3 hours a day watching TV, or a sharp-suited executive who spends 12 hours a day analysing, conferencing and planning about it?

Why Nobody Should Ever Search The Ashley Madison Data

veti Silver badge

Re: Oh dear

If it's "laughable", then why aren't you laughing?

veti Silver badge

Re: The Important Fact

Oi! Whoring is an honest trade, and I resent it being bracketed with crooks.

Pimps are a borderline case, it's a sometimes necessary job but one that's generally conducted by nasty people. Much like debt collection, or cold calling.

veti Silver badge

Re: Whoosh?

"A bit too subtle to succeed" - depends on your criteria for "success", obviously. I thought it succeeded pretty well.

"Open to misinterpretation because people can't be bothered to read it properly (but can still take time out to log in and post half-arsed judgmental comments about it)" really says more about those readers than the writer.

veti Silver badge

Re: Wait, what?

Heyrick: it's the word "seriously" in your first post that makes you part of the act, rather than part of the audience.

Do you seriously think this article was meant "seriously"?

Could our fear of fracking be appeased with CO2 sequestration?

veti Silver badge

Re: Talking about how the fractures never get near the aquifer

@Francis Vaughan: The US EPA identifies several mechanisms whereby fracking may affect drinking water, of which groundwater contamination is only one. They further say that they have identified real-world examples of several of these hypothetical mechanisms.

And to say that "Compromised well bores ... ha[ve] nothing to do with fracking" seems to me on a par with saying that "water has nothing to do with drinking". I just can't parse that claim in any way that makes sense.

veti Silver badge
Mushroom

Re: It's not about AIR, it's about WATER

@Ivan 4: This would be the same EPA that says:

Of the potential mechanisms identified in this report, we found specific instances where one or more mechanisms led to impacts on drinking water resources, including contamination of drinking water wells.

It may be rare, but by denying the very possibility that it can and does happen, and by citing authorities that don't support your case, you undermine yourself.

OFFICIAL SCIENCE: Men are freezing women out of the workplace

veti Silver badge

"Regulations on building temperatures are responsible for 30 per cent of global carbon-dioxide emissions worldwide"

Err... no. Just no. This claim not only fails the smell test, it reeks.

In the first place, only about one-third of CO2 emissions are related to power generation at all. So you're basically claiming that more than 90% of all electricity generated is used for air conditioning. That's - wrong.

In the second place, while some 30% of electricity in the US is used for indoor temperature control - the US is an outlier in this respect. Other countries have milder climates, better building codes, more efficient technologies, hardier people, or some combination of these.

A more realistic figure would be "well under 10%".

Biz that OK'd Edward Snowden for security clearance is fined $30m for obvious reasons

veti Silver badge

Re: Seems like a symbolic fine

Regardless of his background, there's a procedure they should have followed - talking to certain people, making certain efforts to track and find certain people, making certain efforts to conduct face-to-face interviews rather than phone or email... And if they can be shown to have skipped some of those steps or faked the numbers, then they're squarely in the frame for screwing up.

Really, the blame belongs to whoever in government decided to contract out this job on a commercial basis. They're the ones who created the incentive to cut costs, and converted "an obligation to national security" into "a quantifiable, rationally assessable business risk for a limited-liability company".

And then they cry foul when it turns out that the lowest qualifying bidder - probably shouldn't have qualified.

Fucktards.

And it begins: Ashley Madison bonk-seekers urged to lawyer up

veti Silver badge

"for research purposes in legal cases" has got to be the oldest story in the book...

I'm curious about the guy who had two accounts, though. Why?

Ex-Prez Bush, Cheney sued for email, phone spying during Olympics

veti Silver badge

Re: partisan hack

In the first place, the suit is about something that happened in 2002. Blaming Obama for that seems far-fetched, even for a partisan hack.

In the second place, "all those who got angrily outraged about 'warrantless wiretapping'" haven't been silent over the last six years. Let's start with your own example of Snowden, who's been anything but silent - then go on to count all the journalists, bloggers and miscellaneous other hacks who've written about his revelations - and what you get is not a picture of "suspicious silence", unless your definition of "all those" is really very selective indeed.

In the third place, "Berkeley overpass signs"? You sound like you're still sore about the Vietnam War. Or are you talking about 2008/9? In which case you might want to check your facts.

Choke on it! Brit police squeeze pirate site advertising money trail

veti Silver badge
Angel

"I've never seen Coca Cola or Apple advertisements on a hardcore pornography or pirate site."

Me either. Isn't Adblock wonderful?

Microsoft replaces Windows 10 patch update, isn't saying why

veti Silver badge

Those of us who haven't "upgraded"

Meanwhile, the Windows 10 Update Badgerer has upgraded itself from "lying dormant in the system tray" to "popping up at me several times a day".

I never understood why I was supposed to "reserve my copy of Windows 10". Are they in short supply? Need another printing? And why is there no option, on this system tray doohickey, to "remind me to think about it in six months"? Because that would, just possibly, be a useful function.

In the meantime, they can pry Windows 8.1 from my cold dead hands. Yes, that's right: I actually like 8.1, and until 10 starts getting unanimously rave reviews, I'm not moving.

Skills crisis? Not for long: More and more UK kids gain STEM quals

veti Silver badge

Re: A-Level results

Engineers ... are the life blood of society, without them our civilisation would grind to a halt

I've been hearing that whinge (from engineers) for 30 years.

But what none of the people who say it seem to realise is, you can substitute any profession for "engineers" in that sentence and it will still be true. Farmers, miners, factory workers, salespeople, barristas, beauticians, journalists, administrators - heck, even politicians - without all of these, our civilisation would grind to a halt. Everything depends on engineering, yes - but engineers, in turn, depend on all of the above. That's what living in an advanced economy means.

And that may be why pleading for special recognition on that basis hasn't worked.

Australian court slaps down Hollywood's speculative invoices

veti Silver badge

I don't know what Australian law says about this specifically, but in most places - owning the movie on DVD or Blu-Ray does not automatically give you the right to download it from an unauthorised source.

It's like trying to argue that it's OK for you to buy cocaine from a street dealer because you're a pharmacist. I mean, you can try, but I wouldn't give much for your chances.

veti Silver badge

I think a pig just flew by

That's got to be the most sensible legal ruling I've ever read about digital piracy. And coming from Australia, of all places...

Maybe, just maybe, it'll successfully send the message to the copyright holders that Australia is not the US and you can't get away with those kinds of shenanigans there. But I fear it's more likely, the received message will be "we need the TPPA to straighten out these uppity Aussies and bring their law into line with good ol' American law".

How the Arab Spring blew the lid off the commercial spyware

veti Silver badge

Timing?

The Wassenaar Arrangement was amended in December 2013 (source), and we're only noticing this now? Has every security researcher been asleep for the past 18 months?

Samsung looks into spam ads appearing on Brits' smart TVs

veti Silver badge

Did anyone *not* see this coming?

Ads? On TV? Whatever next?

After the experience of smartphones, I can't help but wonder about anyone who's been taken by surprise by this.

Copyright troll wants to ban 'copyright troll' from its copyright troll lawsuit

veti Silver badge

"Referring to..."

There's a difference between "referring to" and "describing". This motion wouldn't prevent the words from being introduced in the courtroom, provided they're not used as a reference for the plaintiff.

So, "Copyright troll's motion is bollocks" - not allowed.

But "Plaintiff is a copyright troll" - fair comment, allowed.

Makes me wonder what, precisely, goes on in these courtrooms...

Global spy system ECHELON confirmed at last – by leaked Snowden files

veti Silver badge

Re: Put a stop to it...

Until we can terminate those in power with extreme prejudice, and ensure those replacing the corrupt politicians will face the same threats, we will never see the end of corruption.

Doesn't work.

The Russians did it in 1917, and within a generation they had corruption on a scale the Tsar had never dreamed of. The French did it in 1789, and found a similar result. More recently we've seen it happen in Uganda, Zimbabwe...

The more "extreme prejudice" you apply to the old regime, the more devious the new ones will be. For all its faults, voting is the only way that has any chance of working.

veti Silver badge

Re: Where are the OBEs?

Labour and Tories each have their own quota of honours they can propose people for.

Which do you think is going to propose someone who'd been a thorn in the flesh of both of them?

The Lib Dems are about the only party who'd even think of it, and I don't know if they still even have a voice...

Hacking Trump: Can we not label web vandalism as 'terrorism', please?

veti Silver badge

Alarm and despondency

Historically, the people who've banged on endlessly about online security have been - not by coincidence - those who were looking to make a living out of selling it.

That means that everyone - users, network owners, the media - have all been taking advice on this subject from people who have a vested interest in talking it up. There is no-one who has a business model based on constructing a fair, balanced description of online "threats". There are only "people who want us scared too silly to count the money we're about to throw at them".

That, I'm convinced, is the reason why every little incident like this gets described in the most incendiary language possible. If the T-word hasn't been used yet, I'm damn' sure it's been described as an "attack", which itself is pretty alarmist language. If someone applies spray-paint to a roadside billboard, is that called an "attack"?

So thank you for this, it's a long overdue attempt to start a reasonable discussion on the subject.

Windows 10 collects colossal 0.375 per cent market share in July

veti Silver badge

For statistical values of "no one", yes. The number of people in the Windows Insider program seems to be a closely guarded secret, but I'd be surprised if it's much more than a couple of million, worldwide. That compares with 1.25 *billion* Windows machines worldwide. So we're talking about less than 0.2%.

Twitter will delete jokes after a DMCA takedown – but NOT my photos, fumes angry snapper

veti Silver badge

Who first posted it on Twitter?

This is Not Even Remotely The Same as the "retweeted joke DMCA takedown" the other day.

Seems to me there's a difference between "posting something you own on Twitter and having it retweeted", and "posting something that someone else owns and you don't have the authority to publish on Twitter, whether it's retweeted or not".

If you post something on Twitter, I'd say - as a purely lay commenter - that you shouldn't really have a leg to stand on when others retweet it. If it's not explicitly set out in Twitter's terms of use that that can happen, then it should be; and in the meantime, that's within the parameters of what you should expect. It's like posting something to USENET and then complaining that it's quoted in replies.

But if someone else steals your photo and tweets that, without your authority, then that's exactly what copyright law is supposed to protect against.

So for me, the question is who was the first person to put it on Twitter? If that person had authority to do that, then the photographer boned and server her right for being so careless. But if that person was acting unlawfully, then she's 100% in the right and Twitter should be taking down all instances of the photo.

New EU security strategy: Sod cyber terrorism, BAN ENCRYPTION

veti Silver badge

Re: Oh drat!

"Electronics Letters" is a "rival" to El Reg?

I don't think you'll find much peer review going on here. And last time I looked, the comments section in EL was pretty tame compared with commentards here.

Oh, Obama's responded to the petition to pardon Snowden. What'll it be?

veti Silver badge

Re: So?

Not really. Pardons are one of a very, very few things in US politics that are absolutely within the gift of the president and no-one else. If Obama were to say "he's pardoned for all crimes committed in such-and-such a timeframe, or relating to such a statute", then there'd be nothing the authorities could legally do about it.

That only leaves illegal options. Which, sure, are always options, but there's a cost attached to them.

How British spies really spy: Information that didn't come from Snowden

veti Silver badge
Black Helicopters

96 "cyber-attack campaigns" - in two weeks...

... is the sort of figure that makes me wonder, what exactly constitutes a "cyber-attack campaign"?

I mean - sure, some of them are probably really dangerous. Some of them probably involve theft of personal or financial data. But how many of them involve DOSsing a web server for a couple of days, or defacing the website of a company that's incurred the displeasure of some script kiddiez? Can we see the (anonymised) threat assessments of these "96 cyber-attack campaigns"?

Universal Pictures finds pirated Jurassic World on own localhost, fires off a DMCA takedown

veti Silver badge

I just tried 127.0.0.1, and it clearly belongs to an evil hacker. The bastard has all my files.

Pirates also buy content legally, Australian gov study finds

veti Silver badge

Newsflash: lots of places don't have Google data centres

And it's going to take more than copyright reform to change that.

For instance, Google is very conscious of its green credentials; Australia is about the most green-hostile country on earth currently.

Then there's its government's constant attempts to censor and filter the net at every level. This is simply not the behaviour of a government that's interested in attracting that sort of business.

For Australia to pursue that sort of business would require a complete political overhaul. No mere "election" could bring that about.

Arctic ice returns to 1980s levels of cap cover

veti Silver badge

Re: Arctic sea ice extent for June 2015 was the third lowest in the satellite record.

@Panicnow: "damaging your brand!!!"?

I suspect you don't understand what El Reg's brand is.

veti Silver badge

Re: No

All this is "clear evidence" of, is that Lewis Page is an accomplished troll who can reliably get The Faithful to click through and approve his articles without checking the sources.

If you could be bothered, you'd have noticed that the authors of this paper don't dispute that Arctic sea ice is in decline. What they do say is that it " may be more resilient than has been previously considered."

This is good news, but anyone who extrapolates from that to "therefore, AGW is bunk" is someone who is not even trying to pay lip service to logic, science or facts.

The US taxman thinks Microsoft owes billions. Prove it, says Microsoft

veti Silver badge

Re: I hope this will be useful

I hate to break it to you, but no amount of income tax is going to keep your mother from dying. Maybe not this year, maybe not next, but sometime, and statistically speaking it's likely that you'll be alive to see her do it.

As for corporations: I'm perfectly happy with corporations not paying income tax. What matters to me is the money paid out to people, such as the corporation's owners. That's what we should be taxing.

Microsoft to spoofed Skype users: Change your account passwords NOW

veti Silver badge

Re: Those tweets...

Yep, apparently scanning Twitter is considered the gold standard in confirming a news story nowadays.

You must allow, it's quicker than waiting for a spokesdrone at Skype to return our call. And such are the incentives of web journalism that when speed and accuracy conflict, it's poor ol' accuracy to get it in the neck every. single. time.

Cyber-security's dirty little secret: It's not as bad as you think

veti Silver badge

I've often thought that all the usual suspects we see talking about security - are people who have a vested interest in talking up the danger. I've often wanted to see some counterpoint to the general wails of buy-me-buy-me-now alarmism.

But this? This is very disappointing material. Can't we do better?

Adobe: We REALLY are taking Flash security seriously – honest

veti Silver badge

I got a brand-new, pristine PC about four months ago now. Hard disc completely blank. Installed Windows 8.1, then as much other software as I've (so far) wanted, all manually - so I'm pretty damn' sure that no version of either Flash or Java exists anywhere on it.

And so far, I haven't missed either one. Sure, occasionally - quite rarely - there'll be a video that doesn't play, in which case it might take me all of 30 seconds to find one that does. And that's about it.

Free yourself. Flash and Java are as bad as each other, and unless you're developing in one or the other - in which case you're part of the problem - you don't need either one.

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019