Re: Desktop Wars!!!!!
"Microsoft are currently on an exponential trajectory"
Would that be exponential growth or decay ?
2541 posts • joined 24 Mar 2010
"Microsoft are currently on an exponential trajectory"
Would that be exponential growth or decay ?
"Remember back to the Linux world before Ubuntu."
Certainly do - Installed my first Linux ~1995. I DON'T remember any particular need for editing config files after I moved to Suse and then OpenSUSE.
"Big pharma get extensions of term on their patents in most countries."
Big pharma may be able to get extensions of term on their patents in most countries. It's not routine.
"similar way to pharmaceuticals - you get ~5 years to use your patents, then it gets opened up.""
In most countries pharma patents are exactly the same as any other 20 years
"Maybe you're just using the wrong frame of reference "
But it's been mentioned before that a card index is better
"I can't use the software provided with my Canon DSLR without Windows"
I only use Linux and have 2 Canon DSLRs - I don't find it necessary to use the Canon software.
I can process the raw files to 48bit tifs, adjust exposures etc and drive the camera remotely all from Linux.
"KDE4 is (mostly) fine, but KMail is an inflamed pustule on its nether regions."
So use Thunderbird, that's also installed by default
NVIDIA drivers install perfectly in my experience (OpenSUSE) and that's on about 10-15 occasions in recent years.
I've never seen "You appear to be running an X server please exit X before installing"
I just install from the NVIDIA repository and logout and back in. NO CLI
"Security seems to be such an afterthought in Linux with add-ons like SEL and having to run specific file systems to get proper ACLs, instead of having security built in from the ground up like in Windows."
Well you stick with Windows if you are so confident - I know what OS is feel most confident with.
(Are you related to RICHTO because there is an AC whose been posting a lot of funny stuff recently who seem to write just like him ?)
"Yes, but you might, just as you might in Windows or OSX"
I did qualify it by saying it enhanced the experience, I also used the words "most modern "
You might well have had a problem with one install of one distro where you needed the command line but most people don't have with most modern distros
"Until you want to use something that isn't in the official package manager,"
I do often without using the command-line - the point is that an install and use of the (GUI) installed packages doesn't need the command-line. I'm not against the CLI - indeed I use it all the time as I write a lot of programs as well as building/running scripts but there are far too many people out there who spread the FUD " Linux installations need CLI or programs compiling or whatever else. "
They don't !
"Nothing worse than downloading an ISO, burning it to disc or USB and then watching it crap out half-way through a real hardware install"
Don't do it then. Use a LiveCD that will not affect your existing setup. Check if the hardware works that way then install.
There are several liveCDs at : http://software.opensuse.org/122/en
""Comfortable with the terminal" "
For the last griefing time - You do NOT need to use a command line to install or use most modern Linux distros.
BUT if you do it can greatly enhance the experience.
Whilst it might be useful to try a few distros I find that long-term sticking with one distro/desktop means a much easier life. Of course I occasionally still try new or 'improved' distros but generally in a VM.
For me OpenSUSE/KDE has proved super stable, easy to install on all sorts of hardware including by USB pendrive and has a wide range of programs including many not actually in the distribution.
"Although I think a lot of their experiments are far fetched this is actually an area which the Mythbusters covered quite excellently (in my humble opinion that is)."
I think JassMan has already pointed out above that a number of solar furnaces/power stations using mirror arrays are already established. So Mythbusters or legend means nothing.
See also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_power_tower
"The MOF is produced using the massive energy of a beam line at the Australian Synchrotron?"
Er, no. The beam-line was used to analyse the structure during the development.
"the development of the materials used the powder diffraction beamline"
" Somebody takes it...
and hopefully makes some kind of liquid fuel from it"
As mentioned previously.
Carbon burning to CO2 gives off ~400 kJ/mol or ~ 34MJ/kg - there's no other oxidation state to go to - any other chemical change NEEDS energy so it's hardly likely to be a useful power source. Maybe you'd take a hit, use energy to make a new liquid fuel, but it's now just an energy carrier like batteries or hydrogen.
And then it still ends up back in the atmosphere !
"There are some uses for CO2 that could soak up some of it"
AFAIK there's no use for CO2 on any significant scale that doesn't return it to the atmosphere eventually
"just find a way of using CO2 as a reliable power source"
Is that a joke - in which case I'll let you off otherwise please explain the magic.
Carbon burning to CO2 gives off ~400 kJ/mol or ~ 34MJ/kg - there's no other oxidation state to go to - any other chemical change NEEDS energy so it's hardly likely to be a useful power source
"and converting the C into something solid like"
and converting the C into something solid like CARBON
In any case the problem is, even in theory, it needs energy, lots and lots of it, indeed somewhat more energy than was obtained by burning the carbon in the first place.
I think you are confusing a specific chemical with the azobenzene class. As far as I can see a particular azobenzene is bonded to this large-surface area material.
The analogy would be sodium cyanide is very toxic but the cyanide group (a nitrile actually) can be part of an organic molecule without any sig. toxic effects. In fact the breast-cancer treatment Arimidex contains 2 nitriles.
"but buying processing power on educational/governmental supers"
Agree entirely, we had ( I'm now retired) several in-house Linux clusters of 1024 & 2048 nodes for computationally intensive jobs but would also buy time on more powerful systems. It's the norm in many areas of science.
"he post said copper insoles. No mention of steel toecaps."
Then why was the title " How well insulated are steel toecaps? " ?
"The material needs to be ferrous AFAIK."
And what metal do you suppose steel toecaps are made from ?
"They manage to beat Bing in the search engine rankings."
Wouldn't a card index do that ?
Remind me what do they actually do ?
As 85kWh has been used as an example just calculate using whatever your local electricity cost is - here it would be ~£10 excluding any losses. I could travel ~ 90 miles in my diesel for that - mind that weighs 1.7 tonnes and carries 5+2
On the other hand if electric vehicles did take a good portion of the market they'd be taxed in some way
" Gas is easy to transport or make on site (for H)"
This hydrogen, if you make it on site presumably by electrolysis the efficiency is poor. Electrolysis generates a lot of waste heat. If the electricity is generated by coal/gas/oil the overall efficiency is likely to be < 20%.
How are you going to store it in the vehicle ? Either compression or cryogenics requires a large amount of energy and each has it's own problems anyway. The overall efficiency is now ~~ 5%
"NM = torque, so presumably they mean you can use it as a really short lever?"
It's both torque and energy and it should be Nm BTW
"There must be something missing in this sentence"
Like what HEIGHT it was dropped from. I pretty certain most things would stand it being dropped 0.01mm
"We all have to work with MS software whether we want to or not"
Only the unlucky ones !
"Gimp has CMYK now"
It certainly has had the ability to generate a range of color separations ( including CMPK) for a while, whether this is sufficient for the OP I don't know as my knowledge in this area is limited.
For info the menu option is Colours - Components - Decompose - Choose 1 of~12 options (GIMP 2.6.11).
I don't actually use GIMP a lot as my main interest is processing RAW digital photo files and there are much better programs in Linux to process in 48-bit etc
"Alas my post was taken seriously by some. It was humour."
Sorry if I upset you - it's just one of my things. I don't care what a program looks like as long as it has the performance/stability/etc.
In my case being totally Linux only I use LO as I don't have much choice anyway.
"LO should divert all coding efforts from the engine and into the UI"
Oh yes, style over substance every time </sarcasm>
Searching on-line for usage figures for LO & OO gives widely varying and likely highly inaccurate figures. This to be expected of course. However the more telling statistics are how many articles try to downplay the usage.
One can ask to what purpose. If the usage is minimal it scarcely warrants mention surely. Have all these people nothing better to do than be critical of something they seem to think has very limited distribution ?
"used by about 6 people globally..." plus 13000 in Munich.
"This project got in jeopardy around 2003"
AFAIK the project only started in 2003 and it wasn't until 2006 that implementation started. By 2013 there were ~13000 workstations running a specific Linux variant based on Ubuntu but with a KDE desktop.
I also find it rather telling that MS claims that the move to Linux cost more than staying with MS but has declined to publish the study they did on this.
"and it is much cheaper than diesel anyway,"
I doubt that. A quick google got me 15L for £24.99 which is more than the price of diesel in these parts at the pump.
Have you a ref.for this cheap oil ?
"He is bound to find a bunch of share holders which believe his version of reality and vote his way."
That's the way companies work. If other shareholders are stupid enough to not check what he's saying then they deserve all they get. Generally large shareholders are NOT stupid and can employ people to check.
I wasn't thinking specifically of this case when I discussed returning shareholder value but in general it's true with the caveat that the shareholders would have to vote for the dissolution/merger/takeover of the company.
I've no idea of the motives of Einhorn, I'm just taking exception to the idea that shareholders have to accept what THEIR board of directors says. It isn't so. Remember the directors work for the shareholders. If I own part of a company and the directors either make a mess or merely collect a cash pile that they might be using to grow the business it's MY investment that is affected ( and of course the workers)
""When you buy stock in a company, you must agree with the way the company is managed""
When you own stock you own a share of the company. If you have enough stock or supporters then you are fully entitled to change the way the company is managed. That's why shareholders can vote.
Indeed if a company can't see any future in what it does it's the duty of the directors to return as much value to the shareholders as they can. One of the reasons for taking a company private is to avoid shareholder involvement, although like Dell you might end-up in regretting that.
London is indeed a great city - but much of what people think of as 'London's' history derives from people from all parts of Britain -it may appear to outsiders that it came from London but on the whole it passed through London.
"so much of history came from this brightly-lit city."
so much of history came from the country whose capital is this brightly-lit city. - fixed that
"Ever seen flies on a touch screen ? I have last summer and it was hilarious - they are happy to open Control Panel for you or whatever ... close random windows ...."
It's just a bug
""Steam would of course provide a simple enough alternative - fireless steam""
Note : the fireless steam is generated from methanol + hydrogen peroxide + catalyst. This does not seem a realistic method for transport etc. Local, small scale generation of steam without heat maybe.
"he amount of current required is significantly reduced to within the scope of a standard car battery and unmodified alternator."
Perpetual motion then ! Should make a fortune !
All you need now is a low-cost, low energy way to make methanol & hydrogen peroxide. - oh wait !
Thermodynamics is thermodynamics - there is no way round that. The energy you get out + losses had to come from somewhere.
"Have to say its a great bit of kit. Great to use."
Good to hear but so many here would say it's barely usable because it can't run Office etc..
( Please note I wouldn't say that )
NYSE Trading Platform
The Universal Trading Platform for International Markets runs on commodity
Linux hardware and standards-based communication protocols."
"Unix servers experienced a revenue decline of 14.2% year over year "
Yes but Linux != Unix !
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2017