Computerless computing, workerless working.
1073 posts • joined 10 Mar 2010
Computerless computing, workerless working.
"A+ certification is a joke"
Yes, yes it is, and I say that as A+ certified technician.
A multiple choice exam where more than one answer is right but you can only pick one, or only one is correct they one they say is correct isn't, is not a good measure of anything except your ability to pass bullshit exams.
Unfortunately there is a lot of cheap tat around in Windows 10 tablets now, much as with Android. iwork chuwi and other odd brands all tend to be garbage. Linx I have mostly read good reviews of, apart from those where people were clearly expecting more than they should given the specs. I am quite pleased with mine.
As with all purchases of items not from major brands (and some of those from major brands frankly), read reviews and be sure of what you're buying before purchasing.
No thanks, I'd rather buy cake for myself, plus I have now received my Linx tablet and am not disappointed at all. Performance is more than adequate, especially given the price (£145 for a Grade A refurb unit)
The WiFi dropouts should supposedly be better now, there have been driver and BIOS updates to fix it.
As for performance, like others have said it depends what you're doing with it. I tend to use small laptops/tablets as web browsers and remote desktop clients.
I had a HP 2in1 with a Bay Trail Atom and 2GB RAM previously, it was just about ok for everything I wanted, only lack of RAM let it down really. Given that this is a generation of CPU newer and twice the RAM it should do for me.
If you're on a budget but want a Surface it might be worth looking at the Linx 12x64. Surface lookalike with a quad core Atom and 4GB RAM, available for under £200.
I don't have one yet but most of the reviews are good, so I have one on the way.
Not to mention several instances of "the" missing from the details of the trip to Seattle downtown
In fairness the being known as G thing might be more to do with stopping people mangling the pronunciation of Guillermo than it is to do with being hypercool.
In a world where people often don't bother to learn the correct pronunciation of names from countries other than their own, I'd imagine having people call you Gwill-err-moh instead of Gee-yair-moh becomes a little tedious after a while.
Statistics for probable data loss are all very well but they don't take account of the most important rule of data loss/recovery.
That is, if the statistics indicate that you may lose a file once every 8 years then it will happen at the worst possible time and/or the file will be the worst one you could possibly lose. AKA Sod's law.
Never had a single problem with Virgin of any significance. A handful of outages that rebooting the router fixed, and one that wasn't but was somewhat obviously explained when I looked up the road to see a team of Virgin engineers with a cabinet open and hundreds of meters of cable all over the place, a scheduled upgrade I'd missed the letter about.
"Virgin Media are the worst"
Nah they aren't. Sure they advert that says Fibre with a picture of coax is jarring, but at least they provide speeds that are actually remotely worthy of Fibre unlike others.
"Three claims to sell High speed broadband. They have NO broadband. That is their WiFi hotspot fed by Mobile. Mobile can sometimes offer ADSL2+ speeds, but rarely and is never broadband."
As much as I love to bash misleading headlines like "Fibre broadband" when they're inaccurate, describing a 4G SIM card powered WiFi hotspot as high speed broadband could well be considered one of the more accurate statements.
I can't speak to Three's network specifically, but I've just done a Speedtest on my mobile which is on EE with 4 out 5 bars signal with 4G connection and got 122Mbps down 6.88Mbps up. By many people's standards this would be considered high speed and well in excess of anything ADSL2+ can provide at least on the downstream side.
Clearly this is dependent on the mobile signal available where you place the 4G device, but this isn't significantly different to the caveats of copper line quality for supposed "Fibre" broadband. At least in this case they aren't claiming the product uses a technology or transmission medium that it doesn't
"As longs as the final run is short enough (yards, not miles) that its not significantly impacting performance"
Sure but unless that final run is shielded Cat5 or better, which it isn't, it WILL be impacting performance. It may not be by very much if you live within spitting distance of the local cabinet, but it could be by a lot, especially if the cabinet is nearby but the cable takes a rather circuitous route to get there.
For example my nearest cabinet is on the corner of the street only 3 houses away, but the cable goes overhead to a pole on the other side of street then underground to get back across to the cabinet, making the run more than 3 times longer than it otherwise might be.
As a result for BT's Superfast Fibre package that can provide up to 50Mb the estimated speed for my address is 33Mb, only two thirds of the maximum.
If BT's Superfast Fibre was actually Fibre all the way to my house, I would get the absolute maximum the equipment on each end of the cable could support.
" the dust that gets blown around is enough to kill a lot of kit"
Not heard that one, but one known problem is that the sound pressure/vibrations generated by the gas exiting the nossles at high speed is sufficient to wreck mechanical hard drives.
Ironically it's potentially possible to loose more data to the fire suppression going off, that if the fire had just been left to burn out.
BPDU Guard is your friend.
It's my understanding that data regulations will fall under the UK government policy that Boris Johnson announced of "Fuck business!"
"It takes a hell of a lot of bullets to chop down a douglas fir!"
That would depend on the size of the bullets. It would definitely take more than one, but probably less than 5 or 10 .50 cal rounds.
"The safe option would be to shoot a single warning shot through the top of the door, at an upward angle."
Or alternatively, given that she appears to have shot him while he had his arm through the window of the door trying to open it, shoot him in the arm that you can see.
"possesion of material likely to be of use to a trrrrst, i.e duct tape"
While that charge does have the potential to be abused, I'm pretty sure they'd be tying it to the knife and pepper spray rather than the duct tape, which is somewhat more justifiable they'd only try for the duct tape as a terrorist implement if that's all he had.
Plus, honestly if you travel round the world and buy weapons with the clear intention of breaking into a house to attack a teenager you deserve zero sympathy and should be charged and convicted of anything that will stick.
Violent crimes are sometimes, to a greater or lesser extent at least in some way understandable, when done in the heat of the moment in immediate response to some kind of perceived slight.
But if after spending more than 24 hours in airports and on planes not to mention the time it would take to arrange those flights, you're still committed to violence against a person you've never even met then you're clearly a lunatic who should be locked up for as long as legally possible and subject to psychiatric treatment.
USB-C can do those things but in my experience rarely does all of them, or often any of them. The majority of USB-C implementations I've seen on laptops and even desktop PCs are actually just plain old USB connections and don't support any of those things, in fact some of them weren't even USB 3.x they were just USB 2.
Frankly the whole one port to rule them all philosophy seems like a waste of time and effort to me, especially if that port isn't always going to do all of the things it can be used for. The whole point of USB is that it's Universal so that generally speaking if you see a USB socket you know you can plug in a USB device and it's likely to work, USB-C may as well be RSOUFSB (Random Subset Of Unlabeled Features Serial Bus)
I don't get why you'd especially need a USB-C port on a laptop, handy perhaps but not essential.
With the exception of a handful of USB memory sticks (most sticks that have C have an A at the other end) most devices you're likely to want to connect such as phones or USB HDDs/SSDs are going to be a USB-C socket on them not a plug, so a USB A to USB-C cable will work just fine. Further I have yet to see a device such as a phone or USB HDD that has a C socket that comes with only a C to C not an A to C cable.
"The plan was to be able to blame someone else."
Yes that usually is the plan, and both IT management and senior management tend to be on board with the idea that not having any control or ability to fix it yourself during an outage is acceptable, right up until there actually is an outage at which point senior management shout at IT management to fix it and IT management shout at the people who actually know what they're doing to fix it, and we say "Sorry boss, but you took it out of our control".
"I believe that the average member of public would not be lenient on a Judge breaking the rules."
Sure, but she didn't break the rules because apparently there weren't any. She didn't "hack" anything she just opened some files that she clearly had access to. No training or guidance was given on appropriate use of the digital records system and an email advising not to use it this way was only sent out after she did it.
Excuse me, did you just assume my physical appearance? How facist of you!
Is it me or does that asteroid in the picture clearly have a face?
"No doubt Mogg's view on abortion will be go down very well with the average DUP supporter in the street"
As much as I detest Mogg, and am pro-choice, I actually have no problem with his view on abortion. In the interview where he was questioned about it he made it extremely clear that it was his personal view and not the position of the Government or Conservative Party, and that he was not trying to put it on the political agenda. He was explicitly asked about his view on abortion and gave an honest answer.
I can respect a politician being able to hold a personal view that is unpopular that they don't try and push onto the political agenda without a mandate to do so from their voters.
No of course we can do things that can't be undone, my point was that if you're going to something that can't be undone it should be with the consent of an actual majority of the population not ~38%.
You seem to misunderstand my position on the EU. I don't like it in it's present state, I think it's mess of beurocratic bullshit with lots of stupid ideas like the single currency.
I certainly believe it has benefits, but most of these are related to the EEA, single market and customs union. The ECHR has done a good job at preventing our government from being a bunch of total bastards. I'm not in favour of total centralisation of everything that the EU is aimed at, most especially not the single currency. (The single biggest problem with the EU right now though is that douchecanoe Juncker).
But that's why our existing membership with opt outs is the best option.
To decide the EU isn't perfect so we must be better off out and quitting without any idea of what that will entail is like deciding you'd be better off quitting a job you don't enjoy without bothering to look for another one first.
My reason for wanting to remain in is simple and doesn't really come down to whether I like the EU or not it's a simple equation as to whether we as a country (and I personally) are better off in the EU or out.
As an absolute certainty we're better off in the EU in the short to medium term, no-one with half a brain could argue that we're better off now than before Article 50 was triggered. The value of our currency is substantially reduced, major companies and banks are beginning to relocate large portions of their business out of the country, the already crippled NHS is facing massively increasing staff shortages because foreign doctors and nurses feel unwelcome.
In the long term? Things might well be OK, but only OK not some fantastical land of milk and honey trading with the poorer non-EU countries that Boris and co promised. It will take at least a decade to get us back to the financial state we were in pre-Brexit if not longer and that's just to get us back to where we were.
If there were ever a good time for Brexit it would have been at a time of economic plenty not in a stagnant plateau at the tail end of a recession.
"True, and 72% turnout would certainly meet most such requirements."
Indeed it would. However the quorum being in place doesn't generally affect the majority requirement i.e. only 75% of the board/Senate vote but it still requires more than 50% of the total membership of the board/Senate to pass.
It works well this way for those type of organisations because they have a much smaller total membership who are generally whipped into line one way or another. So although only 75% turn up almost all of that 75% will vote the same way, thus giving a real majority of over 50% of the membership.
"Every election over the last 100 years came with an 'oops' clause; a quick opportunity to reverse a mistake."
THIS! Exactly this! I wouldn't exactly describe it as quick, but changes made by one government can largely be undone less than 5-10 years after they were made by the next one should the public vote in someone else because the results were unpopular.
However in the case of the UK's EU membership, it isn't possible to ever undo the change. Even if we had another referendum in 5 years and decided to rejoin the EU, we wouldn't be in same position we are now.
If we were to rejoin as a new member we wouldn't get the special allowances to not adopt the Euro and other measures that we put in place for ourselves due to our negotiating power when the treaties were written. As a new member we'd have to adopt the Euro within a short time frame, loosing control of our banking and interest rates. We'd most likely be forced into Shengen as well, which we currently don't have to be in.
"That's because you lost."
No it's because I believe major change on binary decisions that can't be undone should require real majority consent.
If we'd had the same percentage results but an =>85% turnout, or the same turnout as we got but a real solid majority like =>70% leave, I wouldn't dispute it at all.
"I presume you mean 52%?"
Nope, more like 4% because that's the difference between the Yes/No result.
But the constant argument by ardent Brexiteers that a whopping 52% majority of the population voted to Leave is extremely annoying.
52% is a very slim majority, If I cut a cake into 2 pieces one of 52% and one of 48% you wouldn't even be able to spot the difference that readily.
Another important point is that the turn out was not 100%. So it was 52% of the people that actually voted, and whose votes weren't discarded. In December 2017 (closest published figure) there were 46,148,000 people registered to vote, in the referendum 17,410,742 people voted to Leave and 16,141,241 voted to Remain.
As a percentage of the registered voters that's 37.73% Leave 34.98% Remain. Your ~38% vs ~35% result seems a bit less convincing now.
Of all the people who could vote, 38% were bothered enough about the way things are to vote to change it. Certainly you can argue that only 35% cared enough to try and prevent it, but that's a flawed argument because you cannot say why the 27% of voters didn't vote trying to claim them for either side is just plain wrong.
The general consensus about most things in life is that in a group/organisation the burden to drive change is on those who want it and then you need a majority to agree, and in many other situations not voting is considering not being for the change in one way or another.
This is achieved by simply counting abstentions as against or by setting a minimum turnout, or making voting mandatory. Having a minimum required turnout is most common, from small voting scenarios to large, in company/organisation board meetings and some government houses this is known as "having quorum".
Putting aside Brexit as a specific issue. Is the consent of 38% of the country's population sufficient to initiate massive legal and constitutional change? I certainly don't think so.
"Doesn't really matter if you knock 50 years off of the life of v6"
I'm inclined to agree especially if this is accurate
"The model shortens the expected usable life time of IPv6 by at least 25 per cent, or 42-plus years at the current internet growth."
It would imply that 25% of the projected life of IPv6 is 42 years, meaning that even under this flawed plan it would have a life of ~126 years?
I would be shocked if it was still relevant in 126 years, or would be if it weren't for the fact that I'll be long dead, I'm more than happy to let my great grandchildren deal with running out of IPv6 addresses.
Unlike climate change this is definitely a problem where a plan that only works for another 100 years will do just fine.
Oh yes it's definitely Fortnite and PUBG. Nothing to do with cryptocurrency mining at all.....
"we'll need to label every person with a Prop 65 warning"
Yup, definitely need warning labels on people. They can be extremely bad for your health if consumed or improperly used.
"But I think the most egregious part of this is the gag order. They should not be allowed for wide-net data collections like this."
The problem is that without the gag order the search becomes pointless. If Google tell a murder suspect they've just given the police his location at the time of the murder he's going to be off to another country faster than you can say accessory after the fact.
While I'm not totally comfortable with warrants like this it does seem reasonable to catch perpetrators of violent crime. Theft, criminal damage and other such crimes of harm to property do not warrant such sweeping invasions of privacy, but violent crime most certainly does.
Maybe he should also learn about the "Protect from accidental deletion" tick box.
BOFH - Peter Capaldi
PFY - Mackenzie Crook
You'd also think a professional journalist wouldn't contradict himself in the same paragraph.
"Huawei used a more powerful Intel M core rather than the parsimonious U core because it reckons its battery and power technology is sufficiently superior to anything else on the market. The model I saw under embargo last week boasted an i7 8550U part at 1.8Ghz."
Which is it? U or M?
Those are some terrible points you've tried to make. Android is far from perfect but if you're going to pick holes at least pick real ones, especially ones that are OS related not specific app related.
"For example if I want to take a photograph and send it via e-mail"
Like most Android things this varies by what apps you install in this case your choice of Camera,Gallery and E-Mail client. But certainly the gallery app on every Android I've ever owned has an edit function which can do many things including resizing quite easily and also has a button to share via email which automatically passes it to your mail client as an attachment on a new email. While the Gmail client doesn't offer an option for resizing attached images, others do including Nine which I use.
"Same goes for simple things like access to fileservers. Yes you can get an SMB client for Android, but for that you need Google Appstore access or root. On a normal Linux system that's just installing a package and running a mount command."
So you're saying on a "normal Linux system" you'd have to install a package (presumably from a distro provided repo via their preferred package manager) to be able to mount SMB.
But you have a problem with Android because you have to install an app from the vendor provided appstore using their preferred appstore interface (and actually you could find the APK for an SMB capable file explorer and install via some other method if you wished). If you can't see that these two process are very nearly functionally identical then you're clearly deliberately blinding yourself to Android because you've chosen not to like it.
I love using Linux for lots of things, but a small form factor device with a touch screen is not one of the areas where Linux shines.
"It's only a vocal few who want a full Linux on this."
Indeed, and many of those who claim to want Linux would be better served by Android anyway because most of the reason they want Linux on it is to ssh to other Linux stuff which you can do perfectly well with Android while simultaneously not making it difficult to use as a phone and cutting yourself off from a whole ecosystem of apps.
"I would've thought the screen would swivel outwards so you could hold it with the screen facing you"
Like the old XDA Exec (HTC Universal). https://www.gsmarena.com/o2_xda_exec-pictures-1279.php
If the Gemini was like this I'd be a bit more interested. If it had a power button I'd be a bit more interested still (I can understand key combos for lots of things, but power seems a pretty key thing to have a hardware button for), and if it wasn't so damned expensive and impractical to insure (because most phone insurance providers won't have heard of it) I'd have bought one already.
I'm hoping they're successful and v2.0 ticks all of my boxes, but unfortunately my practical sense tells me that this isn't going to be case.
"What are the odds
That her former coworker just happened to be the one affected by this mysterious cloud problem? "
I wonder if rather than a cloud problem it's some sort of in-store content transfer service when you buy a new handset. It sounds like the phones were bought in the same store, which is likely given they are former co-workers so presumably live near each other, so this could easily be another staff cock up in-store.
Indeed it's extremely unlikely that any pictures were sent by MMS, if they were there's be less of a problem due to the crap resolution.
Far more likely is WhatsApp or similar end to end encrypted platform meaning evidence will be hard to corroborate with logs, the only solution would be to show the pictures in court.
Assange could leave in a box, literally.
If they put him in a large box which is marked as a diplomatic pouch they could take him out of the embassy to a ship or plane and take him to Ecuador. Once outside of UK airspace/waters he could safely leave the box.
UK authorities couldn't legally open the box under the Vienna convention.
Less of insane option would be to designate Assange as a diplomatic courier to take a diplomatic pouch to Ecuador. Although the UK has to officially accept designated diplomats for them to be allowed to operate in the UK, an option Ecuador has already tried and failed, under the Vienna convention diplomatic couriers can be designated ad hoc so the UK can't refuse him if he is issued with the correct papers.
Also BOFH branded shovels, BOFH branded bags of quicklime and BOFH branded rolls of old carpet.
It's only really missing a comma to make it acceptable
"Victoria Tube line part shut, hit by wet concrete flood"
All of these puns are riveting.
Everyone Torx about this like they are Pozitive they know what went wrong. But no-one knows Hexactly which flat head screwed up.
"The small print is very clear, there is no commitment on either side until the employee accepts the offer."
Except that as per the article
"35 employees had submitted EOI and 29 offers made, with 21 of those accepted. Until last week – when those offers were retracted."
It would appear contractual redundancy offers were made, accepted, then retracted. This does seem like it might either be illegal or at least leave IBM open to swift defeat at tribunal.
"Even North Korea gets away with it."
That very much depends on what you mean by "gets away with it". Doing it and then denying it is not the same as getting away with it if everybody still thinks you did it. Do you think they "got away with" killing Kim Jong Nam?
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2018