Re: quite the contrary
...and dogs will lie down with cats, and pig shite will cease to smell.
6734 publicly visible posts • joined 23 Feb 2010
"Now the ones I buy for my nephew give you a handful of bricks to make a specific thing."
Buy different kits then. There's still plenty of kits which have little-to-no custom pieces.
Here's the first kit that come up for me on Amazon, and I can only spot a few "non-brick" pieces. There's the moped which looks like a modern version of x81c01 from thirty years ago, the parasol, and the weird chip/fries thing. All the other pieces are the sort of bricks Lego have always been making.
Just be a bit more selective when you're looking for Lego, rather than buying the first one on the shelf.
An unfortunate accident involving a window and a potted plant involves less legal ramifications...or so I've been taught.
Before you resort to ASCII boobs, don't forget that Wikipedia has images of many artworks, much of which contains naked people. But that's ok because this is art and definitely not porn.
Even if they blocked all the art on Wikipedia, there's still the image of the plaque on the Pioneer probes which you can find on the NASA website (ie an official US government website) which has a picture of naked people on it.
It's almost like the definition of porn is complicated.
"Recycled jokes are never as funny the second time"
No, but by the fifteenth time they start being funny again.
You don't need to find unbiased sources (there's not many because everything is subjective), you need to find sources with opposing bias. The parts where they agree are probably correct.
If you can't find both, picking a source that's ideologically different to you will help, because you'll probably notice most of their biases yourself.
Well, 'star wars' helped persuade the USSR to bankrupt itself trying to keep up, so these lasers might do the same to Putin?
I do tend to drink less these days, but that's not because the health warnings, it's because my hangovers are so much worse these days.
I remember as a student being able to go out drinking all night every night, with naught but an occasionally sore head. These days three pints on an empty stomach can leave me (wishing I was) bedridden.
You'd be surprised how much fuel this approach can save.
Firstly the aircraft can add a few hundred metres per second to the rocket,. Not much, but it's a start.
The largest help though is lifting the rocket up the first few thousand meters, because that has a relatively large effect on the air density that the rocket has to push though. It also reduces gravity losses somewhat.
As other people have noted, it also give you complete freedom in orbital inclination, and launch times and locations.
"You can just imagine what #hashtag Amber Rudd signs off"
Using the latest in making-stuff-up technology, I can exclusively reveal to you how such a meeting happens:
GCHQ: "Hello HomeSec, we'd like to tap all the communications of this person"
Home Sec: "Are they a naughty person?"
G: "Oh yes"
HS: "Oh go on then, here you go *scribbles signature*"
Check and balances eh?
"Just like with games the pirate gets the better experience"
That's true of films, but I've found with television programs that pirated shows often have really obnoxious advertising banners across the bottom of the screen at some points (I have no idea how US TV watchers put up with them). Netflix et al. don't have this, (although Amazon do insist on showing an advert before shows which is bloody annoying when you've paid already.)
Plus, and I think I'm probably like most pirates in this, if I can watch a show legally without much messing about, then I will. Then I know the creators are hopefully getting a bit of cash, and the viewer figures will be one higher so there's slightly less chance of the show getting cancelled. Unfortunately there's a lot of stuff I watch that is unavailable if you don't live in the US, so piracy it is.
Just after I passed my test I had to put petrol in my (mum's) car for the first time.
I was pretty sure I knew how it worked, having watched people do it many times before. So I park next to the pump, get out, stick the key in the lock, turn the key and try to remove the cap.
No deal. For some reason the cap would just revolve, without ever unscrewing. So, I put the key back in, lock it and unlock it again and keep trying, but still no success.
I kept fiddling for five minutes, trying to lock and unlock it multiple times, while my bother, who was sat in the car with his girlfriend of the time got more and more embarrassed. I even tried asking a bloke who'd just driven up but he had no idea.
It wasn't until I tried locking the cap and then turning it that I realised what was happening. My mum hadn't bothered to lock the petrol cap, so every time I'd "unlocked" it, I'd actually been locking it, which made it freewheel rather than unscrew.
I did feel like a bit of a numpty.
The Nova was basically the follow up to the Chevette, but it's based on the Opel Corsa from Spain apparently. From the second gen on they just called them Corsas.
The entire wiki entry is worth a read, but I'll leave you with this gem:
"A very significant security problem with the Nova was that removing the hazard light switch, turning it upside down and inserting it back into its slot would cause the ignition to come on with no clear explanation."
"how long would they take to make a backup"
People said exactly the same thing when the first 1TB drives came out, or the first 100GB drives, or....
You get the idea. My first guess for the solution would be incrementals. You don't need to back up 100% of the disk every night as long as you arrange your backup schedule right.
@Uffish
It's more than just bean counters who're worried by the GDPR, in the UK (when it comes into law in May), company directors can be personally prosecuted, as well as the company itself.
It's funny how much suits will suddenly start to worry about other people's data when they can actually go to prison/be fined over it.
"Do you watch weather forecasts? own a phone? drive using SatNav? etc."
Well, pretty much every country with a launch capability, and some of the ones without have launched weather sats (here's a list), so that's international.
Phone calls that are routed via satellite rather than cables will be going through commercial satellites, some of which are US owned/built/launched, but quite a lot aren't.
Pretty much every sat-nav system from the last five years can use a variety of different positioning systems (GPS, GLONASS, BEIDOU, QZSS, SBAS, GALILEO etc.) because fortunately they all use pretty similar frequency ranges (I suspect this is dictated by physics).
So no. None of your examples are exclusively US centric.
Ok, so what we really do is tell the government that we can do the work, and that we'll need £££££ (and every six months say it's tricky and could we have more £££ please).
Then we create a demo system that does whatever they want.
Then we take the rest of the money and set up a bolt hole a long way away, and then run away with the cash.
That way no impossible 'secure backdoors' need to be made, and we get loads of money.
It's the perfect plan, all we need is a name for our company...
"better than £1000 plus audiophile kit for a fraction of the price."
Which is basically pointless, because Apple fans will buy this regardless of how it sounds, and audiophiles will stick with their separates and handbuilt amps, because even if the Homepod thingy was the aural equivalent of oral sex, it's not expensive enough to be 'audiophile grade'.
"With education spending being the HIGHEST IN THE WORLD"
No. The US is actually the 56th highest in the world behind, well basically everywhere.
"per-dollar performance some of the LOWEST"
Well, this is a tricky one to prove either way, what's a measure of 'education performance'?. Different countries have different educational focuses, eg, some countries focus on maths skills as being more important than languages. Some countries ignore humanities, in favour of the sciences.
Either way, the US has a slightly above average rate of secondary education, which given how little they spend is ok.
Not great, but not terrible either, which seems a fair assessment of US education in general.