Re: And yet....
"Could care less" = Americanism of "Couldn't care lass" - which actually makes sense.
270 publicly visible posts • joined 2 Feb 2010
I remember when geocities was around people were happy to make a hobby website on their subject of choice.
Some people just have a passion to share their knowledge and experience on the things they care about without worrying about whether or not they can get microtransactions out of people.
"no, Canonical don't have work with the rest of the Linux community - but it smacks of the arrogance and short-termism of a multi-millionaire VC to fail to see the huge benefits (to Ubuntu as well as other distros) of developing for Linux generally rather than just Ubuntu."
Well that's only true for Canonical if what the rest of the community wants aligns with what they want. They clearly believe it doesn't so they're striking out on their own.
If it's all open source then the community can still benefit if they choose to use it. If not they don't. I'm all for plurarity of ideas - the best ones should rise to the top.
It's kind of a problem that solves itself in the long run.
As with all such problems. It's really only our way of life at risk. And I think it's probably hard to accept for most that it was probably never going to be realistically sustainable.
Unless you get some real heavy-duty terra-engineering technologies going.
They have no concept of abstraction so trying to get them to respond to a screen respresentation of anything is like expecting them to look at where you're pointing and not your finger. So WTF is really expected to come out of this?
Except separating the credulous from their monies of course.
<quote>but to have morals as an atheist is irrational. </quote>
No.
<quote>Conveniently ignoring the fact that under atheism, there is no intrinsic curb on my hatred and greed.</quote>
No.
<quote>Sure you can look after the poor and the homeless, but what is the reason? Surely that is going against evolution, the survival of the fittest - you are diluting the gene-pool with failed material.</quote>
Populations evolve. Not individuals. We're all in concurrent genetic experiments. Fittest is relative. We engineer our environment more than any other organism except microbes. Many people don't look after the poor and the homeless. It may or may not be beneficial to the overall population. Survival rates for populations with those traits over the changing environment will change that.
In short: we do *not* implement evolution according to some Malthusian definition. We implement genetic strategies which may or may not lead to their survival. They vary - that is enough. And with meme theory much the same war of strategies may well be playing out in our minds and now with temes in our machines.
Note: genetic strategies are not absolutes. Environments may vary. No guarantees are made as to whether your genetic transport system implements complex environmental feedback systems or not. Warranty void if dead. The value of your genome may fall as well as rise.
It's not whether or not they teach them it's whether or not they teach them as factual or not.
I learnt about Egyptian and Greek mythology in primary scool and did Latin in secondary.
I will never forget asking in a RE class in first year of secondary school to the teacher - can't have been too many lessons in since we're starting off with the Pentateuch - if he believed any of this and he said he thought it helped. Since I found this stuff boring and the Greek and Egyptian mythologies interesting I wasn't convinced.
> I dunno - one's man trash is another man's treasure, and all that.
Given Murdoch's attitude towards news it is really hard to take any of his news output seriously. News International is not exactly a company that is shy about promoting an agenda if it wants to *cough* FoxNews *cough*.
It's nothing new really. Hollywood actors are more than happy to appear in ads outside of the US. Just look for the Arnie ads he did in Japan for some whacked out craziness.
Taking the ad dollar domestically definitely gives a negative impression of how well they're doing.
But it does so here and the movie market is more international nowadays so...
In conclusion - no idea. Maybe Bruce Willis and Al Pacino owe Rupert Murdoch something?
The shock gun was a great example of how alternate fire modes could provide some new gameplay experiences. I don't remember when I first found I could detonate the alterante fire energy orb with the primary fire beam but when I did I used it all the time. It might have been in UT actually but there was nothign quite as satisfying as being able to send off a core, dodge and hit it to avoid enemy fire and gib the ever-loving out of your opponent - even if I did miss most of the time.
I preferred UT as well. Much preferred it to Quake 3. Very much enjoyed playing the level set on the rooftops in FFA and there was a CTF server I found 7 years or so ago that was playing a level with a massive rock feature splitting the map in half with various little routes through it. Does make me wonder if there are any servers out there still running as I feel a little nostalgic for it now.
".. would be to be able to turn off gratuitous background music, all pre-recorded trails and interference on the tv screen like "coming next", "press red", silly little logos and continuity announcers crashing credits."
This comes up on Points of View basically every week and the response is always the same,
"yeah, we know you don't want that shit but damn it you are going to know what is coming next, you have to know what the damn channel is without pressing your info button and you will use those damn red button services - or not, but fuck if we're going to listen to the mere people who watch TV on this".
Have no idea why anyone would object to your comments but have an upvote on me.
The problem will be that even if you have a cure for cancers you'd have to be able to treat them on any vessel where you'd think it'd be likely - that'd mean detection and treatment equipment would need to be factored into the cost of the trip and it may not actually be reasonable to have that equipment available.
There are lots of medical problems - humans are just not built for space. Hell if we're going to speculate then why not start genetically engineering people to cope better in space?