Re: Would you actually, really get in one?
Speak for yourself :P
155 posts • joined 23 May 2007
I installed and attempted to play the wolf among us. The apps store says it runs on the iPad2, they lie! It's frame rate is terrible so I got it on PC instead.
My iPad is really just for watching fails of the week and other various YouTube detritus.
Other than aesthetic and weight changes I don't see the point of upgrading.
2K res is all well and good but how much stuff is running that?
Just thinking about how they'd get around GPS spoofing to misdirect the packages.
I suppose there'd be health and safety concerns too with a machine flying over peoples heads with up to a 2 KG payload.
I wonder if someone would try and shoot it down to collect the loot.
Sorry if im confused but i thought the specs for the PS4 were that it had 8GB of GDDR5 Memory but this teardown says 4GB of GDDR5 and 2GB of DDR3
I thought they had to use one type of RAM because of the bus design, thats why Xbox One had only DDR3.
Also doesn't this all add up to 6GB of RAM?
That sounds like the plot to a sci-fi movie
The AI at Kaspersky's lab was asked the best way to make windows secure.
Computer thought well all these problems are coming from in via the network adapter. I will prevent it working it in the future.
Maybe if given longer it'd think, but they come from the internet I must dismantle the internet.
Longer still and it would realise that people are the problem and get rid of them.
We got of lightly... this time.
Hey guys look at me! Where are you going? Wait a sec, I'm gonna do something...You'd better keep looking... because it's going to be awesome...any minute now...
What's the point of stating you're working on something? That much is obvious, people would be alarmed if you weren't.
But all this talking while saying nothing is pointless, trying to keep shareholders happy?
Oh please don't patronize me saying I need to look it up, I do know what innovation means but here's a dictionary definition "innovation - The act of creating something new." which to be honest doesn't help the case in either direction.
Its simply not innovation to take a technology invented by another company, manufactured by another company and then slap your brand on it. Or if Apple is innovative every person/company who makes anything is innovative so its nothing to boast about so as you say it's subjective.
There's Motorola phone that was released 2 years ago that had a fingerprint scanner which worked, but no one bought it.
Most things with fingerprint scanners work. The trouble was and still is that its easily tricked.
Its a silly idea to fingerprint protect something that is normally covered in the uses fingerprints.
When you're talking arguing for innovation the only thing that Apple could say is innovative is the processor, again, its not their processor, it's ARM's.
That 64 bit architecture is just a marketing gimmick, no ones going to make 64 bit apps in the app store to take advantage of it with all the 32 bit iPhones out there, why would they?
I like the product well enough. I'm happy with my iPhone 5, I just hate them tossing around and cheapening the word innovation when they're probably one of the least innovative of smartphone manufacturers.
Tell you what, I'll say this no one is more innovative on Apple devices than Apple. Except Foxconn, and ARM, oh and Samsung...
Maybe the original iPhone was an innovation, it was still combining existing technology innovations, not by apple.
The iPad is an not really an innovation its just a bigger iPhone with some software changes and no phone.
Everything since 2007 has been an improvement yes, but not an innovation. Again all improvements were not down to Apple either.
That said they're completely right, MS is all over the place with its smartphones and tablets etc.
The thing that made Microsoft successful with computers was the variability and utilitarianism of what it would run with.
If you want to beat Apple you need to make a tablet for the masses that can be dismantled and serviced.
Make something modular with expandable memory, replacable screens and chips and at the very least battery and casing.
I'd buy something that I could upgrade and replace parts. Companies would buy tablets for the workmen to use on form filling. NHS would make great use of a tablet if it had a hygienic case.
Just make something that your partners can work with!
This cloud computing stuff for gaming sounds very interesting but the advantage that console games have over PC as everyone one knows, is the every console is the same and they can tweak it to get the most from the hardware.
Internet connections vary massively, a game dev can't be sure that offloading the work to cloud will work the same on every console so I don't see how it'll be taken up.
I suppose they could introduce a minimum requirement for the internet connection but that will start dividing the install base which is usually the last thing console devs want to do.
We still have to breed and the circumstances bringing about the ability to find a mate still are needed.
We will still continue to mutate so we will still "evolve" in some kind of direction.
Any one seen Idiocracy? It was about the intelligent people focusing on careers and stupid people kept on having more and more children till everyone was stupid. (this was a comedy and not even a good one IMO but you get the idea)
I doubt it 50% more powerful, I do think it has a performance edge though. I doubt there'll be any visible difference in the games cross platform games for a long time. Developers will go with the lowest common denominator. Exclusives will be what to look at maybe?
As it stands though Xbox One has 3GB of RAM reserved for OS and the PS4 3.5GB
I don't think it's fair to say boring old DDR3 :P it's still much faster than GDDR5 in terms of latency so it still has its place. There's a reason why PCs don't use it for it for CPUs.
When it comes to the CPU and GPU sharing the memory I have no idea which is better over all for gaming. I'd guess the GPU ought to have higher priority though.
I don't think we can really say what system is better till there's been some real world testing done.
I doubt I'll buy either for a while anyway, not at these prices, but I will get an Xbox one pad and use it on my PC.
I wonder if either chip will be harder to fabricate than the other.
I have an iPhone 5, the only reason I got it is because I dropped my 4S and broke the screen.
The iPhone 5 has a faster processer and more RAM I just have no idea what that extra stuff is accomplishing.
I have seen no real difference in real life between the 4s and 5 though, has anyone?
This new iPhone 5s... what's the point of it?
It's not surprising really, chances if you're going to be recording gameplay you'll already be on Xbox live gold anyway.
Any word on if Sony will do the same? They are charging for online play now at least.
I didn't subscribe to Xbox live back when I used to have a 360 and remember most services weren't available. I think they even wanted you to have to have gold to watch the iPlayer at one point.
I remember a there was talk of a subscription subsidised price that was going to be for the Xbox One that is the only way I could justify having both Xbox live and an Xbox One.
With people moving away from laptops and desktops to tablets, doesn't this hurt the IT industry in some ways?
Laptops and Desktops have replicable parts that users/technicians can repair/upgrade. Tablets are not like that there's nothing modular to them and very little in their range of accessories.
All the companies that sprung up around PCs barely get any benefit from tablets do they?
I guess a change over to tablet is just the natural step in the end. With processing power and miniaturising of the tech and cloud services there's less of a need for a big computer in the home.
PCs get upgraded and replaced because they need to run new software and right now other than gaming there's not much around that a typical consumer can get now that really needs a computer under 2 or 3 years old.
If there was something big to come out that required more processing power than a tablet can provide it'd swing back.
I too loved xwing and tie fighter. There was also Freespace 1 & 2 and Starlancer and Freelancer. Oh and the wing commander games.
They don't make these kind of games any more. It's a lot of FPS's now.
Starting to hope FPS's get banned by Governments, not because I think it will have any effect on gun crime. Just that we might get some more interesting games at the end of it.
It seems the Japanese have more loyalty to their home product.
Isn't Sony bleeding money at the moment? I'd be interested to know how PS3 and xbox game sales rank against one another.
The PS3 used to be a good deal as just a blu-ray player and that may influence things.
Not sure what is going on with Nintendo really. They announced the Wii U ages ago dropping sales of original Wii consoles and then after that they made the mini Wii.
Also they made the 3DS that sold poorly, so naturally they made an XL version of it and put that out.
Seems like they've lost the plot
I bought an 4S and there's no compelling reason to upgrade to the next one and a few things holding me back. I dont want to use an adaptor for my docs, and with updates coming along and being able to wipe apps of MY iPhone I'll stay where i am. There's less reason to stick with apple when I'd have to change my docks anyway.
I also have an iPad2 but cant see a reason to upgrade. The 3 is too heavy and the mini is too small and adaptor is wrong. Again not feeling a need to upgrade.
If you look at how Microsoft has been behaving it looks like it’s trying to make all its products appear more unified.
They change Hotmail to outlook. They Create the Windows 8 OS for phones. They mirror that with the metro interface on the PC side of Windows 8 and then match it with their tablet.
Their new Xbox will be called the Xbox Infinity. Symbolised with an 8 on its side (see Microsoft buying up URLs of xbox8).
I think it’s not a bad idea but I just hate the way it looks on the desktop.
If I were Microsoft I would have windows 8 for the PC keep the standard desktop interface as we've always had with the option to use the Metro interface with an icon or key press.
Then have the Metro settings for the interface sync by cloud across all devices so you're looking at the same screen whatever device you're using phone, computer, tablet, or Xbox.
That is really where Microsoft strength is, having it finger in all the pies.
You wouldn't steal a handbag.
You wouldn't steal a car.
You wouldn't steal a baby.
You wouldn't shoot a policeman. And then steal his helmet.
You wouldn't go to the toilet in his helmet. And then send it to the policeman's grieving widow. And then steal it again!
Downloading films is stealing. If you do it, you will face the consequences.
Why not play life on Mars? More appropriate methinks.
Why did they fit speakers to the thing though. When every gram costs money to get to space they put speakers on the think.
Is it in case they meet some Martians and need to say hello.
With the delay the locals would get bored and wander off.
I just didn't like it.
Nothing was in the right place. Nothing was intuitive. I kept on having to Google where everything lived.
Maybe this is because I have the old windows style so deeply ingrained since having used windows forever but this just feels wrong.
It's like they're forcing us to do it a certain way so they can unify the Phone, Xbox and Computer OS in there new releases.
I'm happy with 7 so maybe I'll wait till 9 is out. Every other OS release is good. Same with Star Trek movies :P
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019