denies report
Love the headline. (target) denies report of (subject). You can make anything look true. As in,
"The Reg denies report that space aliens have invaded London."
1483 publicly visible posts • joined 29 Jan 2010
People aren't allowed to be prejudiced against one group of people but then expect to be able to claim prejudice when that group takes action against them.
No, you are wrong.
As the wise Dr. Martin Luthor King once said, "The means by which we strive must be consistent with the ends we seek".
This means that you can't preach tolerance, while practicing intolerance against those that oppose you.
I have to say I'm amazed they are still a going concern considering how horrible RealPlayer was.
There used to be a Crapware rating website, and RealPlayer was awarded the #1 Crapware title. I remember RP as being horribly bloated, using up CPU, memory, and network bandwidth. When setting up new off-the-shelf computers I went out of my way to uninstall RP, then manually removing all traces of it from files and registry.
There were also serious issues with RP violating user's privacy. This is worth a read, for no other reason than to laugh at how oblivious RealNetwork's executives are:
https://www.grc.com/downloaders.htm
What RealNetworks has probably counting on is a new generation of young users that don't know just how horrible RP was/is.
I wonder how many other countries were 'tricked' or coerced into signing extradition deals which require no evidence to be disclosed before extradition.
To my knowledge, evidence is never required before extradition. All that is required is a valid extradition order.
To release evidence before extradition invites having an evidentiary hearing, then a pre-trial hearing, then a pre-trial in the country of residence before the real trial at the requesting country. This sort of continuous process can can clog up courts, cause never-ending delays, and bankrupt all but the most wealthy people from legal fees. it also introduces a loophole to prevent valid extraditions.
the "fridge that can order you milk when it notices you are getting low".
This is the old "connected home" crap from the late 1990's that never happened. I was consulting for a semiconductor company back in the day when everyone - Motorola, Intel, Microsoft, Oracle - everyone was screaming about the Rise of the Connected Home. With scenarios like this:
Boss: Bob, what are you doing on your office computer?
Bob: I'm starting my dishwasher at home!
Boss: That's great thinking, I'm going to promote you
Bob: Now I'm flushing the upstairs toilet!
Me, I actually called the appliance manufacturers who were thrilled that someone wanted to know what they were doing. Every one of them told me no, we are not making refrigerators that can talk to the supermarket - if we thought they would sell, we would, but surveys show nobody wants them. They all thought it was funny that the "experts" predicting what connected home appliances would do never actually spoke to the people making home appliances.
I see IoT having success in Business-to-Business (B2B) applications, but outside of maybe personal fitness I don't see it having the gazillion dollars/pounds/yen of impact that pundits pretend it will have.
A 'blackmail notice' that you would consider paying - because why exactly?
The blackmail is that, if you don't pay up, they crap all over your credit rating. They do it by exploiting a loophole in the credit reporting systems in the US and UK in that if you have access to modify credit scores, you don't need to prove a business relationship to damage someone's credit rating!
My 'knowledge' of the CIA is limited to what you see in the movies but I thought they weren't allowed to operate in the USA itself. Won't they get into trouble for that?
No, when Obama reaffirmed the Patriot Act the second time he also approved the CIA operating inside the US, just as the Secret Service can now operate outside the US.
When it comes to civil rights in the past six years, all Americans are frogs, being slowly cooked, slowly cooked...
The Barack Obama administration has filed a civil lawsuit against US wireless operator Sprint, alleging that the carrier intentionally overcharged law enforcement agencies for services related to American government wiretapping programs.
PLEASE El Reg, you *really* need an icon for irony!!!
Isn't the "solution without a problem", as you put it, to not continuously shovel shit into our atmosphere?
CO2 isn't shit. It's needed for plants to survive and is balanced by the world's oceans. And alongside advanced irrigation techniques it's one reason why agriculture is thriving today.
Do you want to take the risk that the planet hasn't adapted to increased CO2 by growing more plants to process it? Do you want to take the risk that dramatically reducing the CO2 in the atmosphere might result in massive crop failures and global famine? Or are you incapable of doing that math?
Or are you Dilbert's pointy-haired boss whose motto is "anything I don't understand must be easy"?
I've thought for a long time that the opponents of the global warming proposition are like those people who play Russian Roulette. Sure, there's only a small chance of death, but personally I won't take the risk.
You are taking the "just in case" position. Problem is, what if there really isn't any man-made global warming? Then the "solution without a problem" could be what really causes global planetary damage!
Reviewers almost never have a critical word to say about products - for fear that tomorrow's mailbag won't contain any more swag
That's not the entire story. Reviewers almost never have a critical word to say about products because if the product actually does become the next wonder hit, they can also brag to all of creation that they predicted it.
What I was told is that it's almost impossible to predict what will be the next big hit, because the people that control the room-fulls of money needed to fund these companies will admit that they themselves don't even know why Facebook and Twitter are so popular.
The basic business model this that, you can get bought out if one of two things are true:
a) Get lots of people to register for your service, or
b) Get lots of journalists or bloggers to say it's cool.
The Underwear Gnomes will be getting funding any day now...
"SCADA systems have not been patched in years for various reasons: isolation of SCADA networks making the process of patching awkward; lack of motivation to perform what is sometimes seen as a risky process to a critical plant component; terms of software support contracts".
Or, as a business mentor told me early in my career, "nobody gets promoted for preventing 'screwing-up'. Nobody gets promoted for taking preventative actions"
Change the reason you're refusing service from "because they're LGBT" to "because they're Black/Jewish/Muslim/Christian/disabled/gypsy/Native American/your personal belief group here[*]" and see if still feels right to you.
The law doesn't care how you "feel".
If a private business decides to refuse service to a particular group, just allow the market to let them go out of business. But you can't jump up and down and claim that you don't like a law because it doesn't "feel right". Arguments like that tend to fail in court.
1) A doctor to refuse aid, based on his/her religious belief, and not get sued/fired
Wrong. By separate law, because a doctor is licensed by the government, a doctor may not refuse life-saving aid to anyone for any reason (other than the doctor's own ability) that is presented to them. Because doctor is licensed by the government. You may also want to read up on the Hippocratic oath.
2) A cop to refuse aid, based on his/her religious belief, and not get sued/fired
Wrong. A cop is not an employee of a private business, they are a civil servant and therefore not subject to this law.
I have to agree with the "bad guy". It's not illegal for a shop in the USA to have a sign that says "We may refuse service to anyone for any reason". The reason behind this stupid law might be bigoted, or it might be religious, but it doesn't matter. If a person is running a PRIVATE business then they should have the right to refuse service to anyone, including LGBTs.
Truth is, by a strict interpretation the only major religion that would object to LGBTs is Islam. A strict interpretation of Christianity and Judaism would mean acceptance and understanding of all. Gays are allowed at all Christian and Jewish religious services. But in Islam, being gay = death penalty.
Let the law stand. Let the marketplace decide if these businesses should fail.
The question is, How did this happen? I've worked as a vendor for Ford and they have an extensive six-month QA test program for all new technologies. What is described here would never had passed Ford's QA testing - unless there was a "deal" (wink, wink, nudge, nudge, Bob's your uncle) between MS and Ford's upper management.
Something I see all the time as an analyst
"After these workforce adjustments we are focusing on market1, market2, and market3"
We laid off people in these three markets because we put no R&D in them. We hope to throw you off the track by pretending these three gashing head wounds are really healthy.
And just like the AT&T - T-Mobile deal, this will results in thousands of people losing their jobs.
Another parallel - T-Mobile has outstanding customer service while AT&T's sucks.
Comcast has terrific customer service while Time-Warner's is absolutely horrible.
I have to say that when I had Comcast as my ISP, I was constantly having trouble streaming YouTube videos. It was a constant race to see if the playing point would catch up with the buffer and frequently it did.
When I switched to AT&T, YouTube played flawlessly and streaming problems stopped.
because, to Microsoft, the idea of separating your OS and data partitions is an unknown concept
That's why, on all my Windows computers whether XP, 7, or even 2000, I have the C: drive for the OS and programs, and I partitioned a D: drive for data only.
Computer is faster, defragging makes sense, and nasty software doesn't know where to find my data files. Migrating to a new computer is a breeze.
Dave Chapelle described what it was like when he went from obscurity to having $20M in the bank. The analogy he used was when Elmer Fudd would look at Bugs Bunny and all he would see was a side of meat. Dave described people he thought were friends as cold, demeaning, and demanding. He was rich and constantly under personal assault when he suddenly couldn't take it anymore and ran away to Africa.
Money doesn't change you, it changes the people around you.
Past polls have consistently shown a large number of devices running Android 2.3 "Gingerbread," a comparatively ancient version that debuted in late 2010. But these days such devices only make up 20 per cent of the total.
I don't understand the use of the word "only" here. 20% is a large percentage of a customer base, GB is #2 to JB's #1 and dwarfs ICS and KK combined.
Part of the problem is actually the manufacturers. For example, LG has refused to allow carriers to upgrade many of its phones off GB, or even supply drivers.
BillG has been firmly in charge all along
I politely disagree (I have to). If you put MS bias aside, it wasn't until BillG stepped down from the day-to-day responsibilities of managing Microsoft that the company started losing it's grip on what their customer base wanted. It was BillG that decided to integrate IE into Windows because after he abandoned his initial skepticism with the internet, he realized that the browser was the most important app in any computer.