Re: ?
"'Those users might just bugger off somewhere else.' We already have."
Well, *I* haven't buggered off anywhere. I'm staying with XP.
1888 publicly visible posts • joined 23 Jan 2010
"I am not an audiophile, so I don't really care about bitrate or codec quality, what this means is that Youtube is absolutely perfect for me and probably another couple of hundred millions other viewers/listeners. I don't need to pirate anything, I don't need to pay Spotify, it's a freetards wet dream....."
Since YouTube receives, literally, hundreds of millions of DMCA takedown notices yearly, and since even Google admits that 97% are legitimate, then, if using YouTube is not, technically, piracy, what then do you call it?
I see kids wearing their pants like this all the time. Always makes me laugh! Although the "people" who really need to be "up in arms" about this are the purveyors of fine underwear, like, well I guess Calvin Klein and Ralph Lauren and similar trash. After all, in order for these kids to show off their fashionable frilly panties (or equivalent), said frilly panties (or equivalent) need to be obtained in the first place, right? That's got to be good for someone's, er, bottom line.
"There is, however, one small problem. No one has ever seen a government drone flying over the town. 'This is a very symbolic ordinance,' said Steel. '"Basically, I do not believe in the idea of a surveillance society, and I believe we are heading that way'."
Obviously if Deer Trail wants to actually do something about surveillance other than simply engage in publicity stunts that make themselves look like drooling inbred hilljacks, they need to expand their little ordinance to permit people to attack Google Streetview Cars with Improvised Explosive Devices (or RPG's if obtainable).
"Do you: (a) Click on “Proceed anyway” because you really want to see the pussy picture someone Tweeted to you; (b) Click “Back to safety” because it's not worth having crims empty your bank account for a peek at one cute pussy."
1) When we substitute one euphemism for another, we begin to better understand the situation, which is that:
2) according to empirically verified data, yes, it is "worth having crims empty your bank account for a peek at one cute pussy."
This should help resolve the question of gendered pronouns, as discussed earlier in the thread. But, for inclusivity's sake, maybe not...
What the fuck do those Nork assholes expect? Do they think that South Korea is going to simply fall apart if they can make online banking sufficiently difficult? Whatever they might think - and who the fuck knows what they are "thinking" - it comes across as a tedious and petty waste of time and energy.
"Their problem was that of budget. A serious budget, with little to no cost overrun tolerance. It wasn't unique to the space program, it was endemic to anything not military during the Cold War, later to everything due to economic depression."
Not strictly apposite to your comment but the phrase "There's never enough time to do it right but there's always enough time to do it over" did come to mind.
(I guess we'd have to change that to "There's never enough money to do it right but there's always enough to do it over.")
"Or is Google Translate being overly modest?"
No, that's very mild. No real obscenities in the cited Russian sentence. Just a bit of euphemism.
(Note that the following is an unnecessary excursus on colloquial Russian. There's no need for anyone to read it...)
The Russian language has a very extensive collection of expletives, known as "mat' ". (I'm not going to bother typing in Russian here, so forgive me.) See for example Flegon's "Za Predelami Russkix Slovarei" which, to be sure, includes not only "real" mat' but also euphemistic cases, such as the aforementioned "yaichka" (a diminutive form of the feminine noun "yaitsa" in the nominative singular) which translates, literally, as "little egg" but which here means, well, you know. Dictionaries of "blatnaya muzyka" (thieves' cant) and prison-camp slang are also very heavily larded with the various uses of profanity and obscenity, much of which is due to the way that Russian forms words by the use of prefixes, suffixes, and diminutives.
Whereas, for example, one would take a verb, such as " et' " (to fuck, either literally or figuratively) and by combining it with the prefix "s' " (meaning, among other things, "motion away from") and putting a verb ending followed by a reflexive particle "(vats'ya" ) you would end up with one word, s'ebyvat'sya" which is an exactly equivalent of the the English "fuck off". I.e. Russian forms new words, where English collocates existing words into set expressions. (I'm simplifying here, of course, but it's generally correct.) This method of word formation has enabled the very, very luxurious growth of Russian obscenities into an extremely extensive and expressive lexicon.
(Note that the stray apostrophes here are for two Russian "letters" which do not in themselves signify any sounds, but indicate whether the consonant preceding them is palatized (palatalized) or not. Well, don't ask. Really.)
"The then-CEO Sir Harold Stringer told us that 3D was going to be the most important technological change to TV since the shift to color..,"
I have seen any amount of brilliant cinematography in black and white films. There are numerous cases where, in both film and still photography, black and white/monochrome is more expressive and evocative than is color. The "shift to color' might be "the most important technological change" but as an artistic and creative change, the matter is more equivocal.
"You're ripping on the founders because AOL were dumb enough to cough up 800m?"
Perhaps you could explain to me, just for the sake of a bit of amusement, exactly how you derive the idea that I was ripping the Birches from my post. I know it can be difficult to follow pronouns and their antecedents, for people with certain kinds of learning disabilities. Unless, of course, English is not your native tongue...
"A few months later global financial markets imploded, a collapse in the economy followed, and suddenly that $850m price tag looked ridiculously large in light of Bebo's deficiencies."
Newsflash! The price looked "ridiculously large" as soon as it was broached. There was never a moment that it looked anything other than "ridiculously large". Or "ridiculously stupid". It would have looked that way had the price been a fraction of $850m.
Too bad AOL didn't have a sanity clause written into the contract: they could have then have Randy "Der Kommissar" Falco* declared mentally (well, and "professionally" too) incompetent, and so voided the contract and annulled the deal - thereby saving themselves huge amounts of money and self-esteem!**
"The couple ... are building a luxury members-only drinking and discussion club in San Francisco..." Might be worth going if - and only if - they can resist the temptation to let themselves join.
*Maybe that was a different "Falco". Not really sure.
** Some people contend that there ain't no sanity clause. In this case they were right, apparently.
"All this furor over DRM and security hasn't hurt the game company's bottom line at all – profits were up 73 per cent last year – but gamers seem to enjoy buying and then 'mouthing off' about games that require an internet connection to function." (Corrections indicated by italics.)
Right?
"As Sony has shown, there's a lot of market share to be gained by not assuming your users are pirates..."
What sales figures are you using here?
"Valve has already ported some of its AAA games to run on Linux, as have a number of others."
Examples? I've looked through the entire list and I didn't notice anything that comes close to being an AAA title. I saw a few good games - Amnesia The Dark Descent and Penumbra Gold Edition stand out (for someone of my particular tastes, of course) - but those are not triple A. The only Valve games I noticed were Half-Live - the original from 1998, and the two expansion packs - along with Team Fortress, and Counter-Strike. So no AAA titles there, either...
If I've overlooked something, I'd be interested to know.
"Though if I thought I bore even the slightest resemblance to one of the world's most famous nutters leaders..."
He might be a lot of things but "nutter" would almost certainly not be among them. Possibly the things that make someone like you think that he's a "nutter" are the things that any intelligent ruler would do in order to maintain their iron rule over a country. It's a matter of perspective, really.
To most people claims to have scored half-a-dozen holes-in-one in a single game of golf might seem so preposterous as to be "batshit insane" - but heaven help any North Korean who expresses doubt; and that serves various purposes: 1) it allows the government to find and render harmless anyone with an incipient tendency to "think for themselves"; 2) punishing such people will "encourager les autres" (Voltaire, "Candide", repeated by Foch, well, you know); 3) it gives anyone who disbelieves the official propaganda a renewed sense of their own powerlessness and a general sense of complicity...
"ZXX fonts are designed to work in a similar way to Captcha challenges, of the type internet users are often required to go through to register for a new web service, in that they are difficult for computers to solve but straightforward for humans."
No, they're not "straightforward". Depending on the level of difficulty chosen by the entity implementing the captchas, they can verge on "impossible".
"It's not sustainable, even over the short-term. Wikipedia puts the current figure at about 1300 billion barrels of oil left as proven reserves and we are burning through oil at the rate of about 30 billion barrels per year. That's 43 years left of oil at current consumption rates. It's obvious that we are using the oil unwisely driven by short-term greed rather than using it in a more strategic long-term way."
It's a stupid point of view and for a very simple reason. Let's assume - for no good reason - that your figures are correct. If we make the clearly impossible assumption that we cut our use of oil in half, starting today, then the supply of oil will last, not 43 years, but 86 years. Do you *really* think that an extra 43 years before there's no oil, is going to make any kind of real difference in the long run? The chances against it are stupendous! Is there some sort of new technology that will not be ready in the next 43 years but will be ready in the following 43 years? No, those extra 43 years are highly unlikely to supply us with any new advances that couldn't be made in the 43 years which we already have and don't serve as a bridge to any sort of assured future. It's not as though we need to stretch the supply in order to last to some specific date.
And that's a 43 year reprieve under some clearly impossible assumptions. If we use more realistic assumptions, such as, let's say, a 10% reduction in oil consumption, the benefits of reduced oil consumption become positively ephemeral.
And one has to wonder if the modernization of India and China (37% of the world's population, bear in mind!) is going to make it impossible for the total world consumption of oil to do anything other than rise. And if it does rise, perhaps those 43 years of oil left to us becomes 40 years, or 35 years, or even less.
In the event that the supply of oil is such that will run out in the near term, then as a remedy, conservation is a complete waste of time. And the resources that would be invested into conservation of the oil supply would be more wisely and intelligently invested in finding petroleum substitutes that can be used with the current, already-existing and already-deployed infrastructure. And if you really believed in the impending exhaustion of the world's oil supply, then that's what you would be agitating for: massive investments in finding petroleum substitutes, and not some foolish and not-fully-thought-out ideas of solving the problem by conservation.
"So, to really find out, we need some silly "in-depth" study, when collecting the data might be as easy as taping a piece of film (suitably shielded from light) to the side of the plane with duct tape."
I might be missing something here but wouldn't an "in-depth study" (read: health survey) of flight crews to find elevated cancer rates be fairly easy to arrange?* (And one could not unreasonably expect that elevated cancer rates would have been noted by flight crews long ago, if they exist.) Aside from whatever other scientific interest dark lightning has, wouldn't the health effects be the main area of concern?
* I realize that while the existence of elevated cancer rates in such a survey would not necessarily mean that the increase was due to dark lightning, the lack of elevated rates would seem to strongly suggest that dark lightning has no effect on the incidence of cancer of the population under study.
"As to Windows server 2012, we want the menus back, why have server OSes got worse since Netware stopped?"
I am not sure that OSes have gotten worse since Netware stopped, but I am sure that the UI's for every type of software, for reasons completely unconnected with Netware in any way, have been degenerating for a long time now.
"So, Windows 8.1 to give PC sales a shot in arm? BZZZZT, wrong answer."
Far be it from me to disagree with the experts but I am not so sure that PC sales are capable of getting a shot in the arm at all, for any reason, under any circumstances.
I think that a lot of people who might have once bought computers now find that all their "computing needs" are satisfied by a smart phone. There are huge numbers of people whose needs consist entirely of email, and Facebook (and/or whatever shitty "social apps" people use). That's lots and lots of people.
And I wonder how many businesses and enterprises really need to upgrade to the latest generation of hardware. Not every business needs it users to run AutoCAD, after all - one has to think that certain businesses have found that a five-year-old desktop will run all the software that their employees need to run, I should think.
"Today's special guests are Tim Carroll, a director at Dell Research Computing Group; Drew Schulke, a director at Dell Data Center Solutions; Brian Payne, executive director at Dell Servers Solutions; and Ganesh Padmanabhan, director of products at Dell Converged Infrastructure Solutions. Listen into [sic] find more about the computer technology enabling doctors to personalise medicines to patients' genetic makeup,"
Great. No doctors involved. One day, ALL doctors will be replaced by tech salesmen. I'm looking forward to that. I'm sure we all are.
"Guess what America, the terrorists won. In the haste to stop them your government became the monsters they believed you to be. Well played."... Aaron Milne @wigginsix 14h Retweeted by Trevor Pott"
Oh so THAT'S what it's all about! Islamic fundamentalists attempting to get the United States to have mobile users' "number, location, handset signifier, and possibly IP address" recorded in various "repositories".
It's good to know this stuff... I guess.
"The crappy Firefox spellchecker has put a red line under 'antidisestablishmentarianism' and 'agglomerative'. I guess it's only happy with a language level like 'See John run. John runs to the shop.'"
"Basic English" - now redesignated "Firefox English"!
"We always dreamed of getting married in Big Sur, one of the most magical places on earth..."
So "magical" that they felt the need to "improve" it and, generally, shit all over it.
One has to think that he sat down with his wedding planners and lawyers, told them what he wanted, and they told him what the consequences would be and how to minimize and avoid them, and how to handle the public relations side of the matter so as to emerge with no ill consequences other than being fined a sum of money that will never, ever have any sort of impact on him or his life, and which could simply be conceived of and treated as a rental fee for the scenic location.
That's the magic.
"'it's going to take lower PC prices, increased availability of touch, the ‘re-launch’ of Windows with 8.1 and more stylish designs to really get the PC market going again'."
I guess that they still haven't realized that current and even recent generation smartphones are pretty nearly as powerful a computer as most people need and such people have no use for more powerful desktops or even laptops than they already have - assuming that they even have such in the first place.
The only rates that subscription-supported streaming will ever be able to pay are rates that are practically indistinguishable from "nothing". We will have to see how much ads will cost on the Apple streaming service to know if the income it generates will be any more generous than that of Spotify or Pandora.