Just to get this straight...
...the Windows 64bit version is late because the OSX 64bit version is late. The Office for Mac team is now taking the lead in office development?
1112 publicly visible posts • joined 14 Jan 2010
So many people have made so much money over the years from lock-in's and de facto 'standards' that sweeping them away was always going to be a difficult job. Look at the never ending argument about video encoding. So many middle-men trying desperately to cling on to their meal tickets.
All this crap is just the death throws of the leviathan old school computer industry that has keep itself alive for far to long. The Hardware-OS-Apps lock-in should have died years ago. There is no need for it. HTML5 is just one more plank for its coffin. It's a lot of work to keep per-browser special coding going on a commercial web site but it's nothing compared to what it will be like if standards are not rigidly applied. More and more divers hardware is becoming capable of browsing that it will become impossible to keep track of every PC, laptop, palmtop, tablet, phone, book reader, TV, radio, domestic appliance, wristwatch, car, advertising hoarding, alarm clock and god know what else they will think of in the next few years.
There is a lot of negativity here about how much less suitable electric power is than the internal combustion engine. hey seem to forget that the current systems and infrastructure have been growing organically and naturally over the the last century or so.
Most of the problems of running an electric car are soluble. If you run out of power, for instance, the roadside assistance could bring out a battery pack trailer that you tow home and they take away again. You wouldn't need to wait 8 hours while it charges up. All these problems are soluble given enough of a market.
It's all very well criticising the Tesla but it has certainly moved the argument forward. Can you imagine ten years ago anyone would be saying that a commercially available electric car would not be quite as good as a super car for some track day fun?
The average length of a commute is only relevant if you want everybody to have one. A lot of people seem to be arguing that because an electric vehicle can't do everything that any ic vehicle can it is therefore useless. The relatively long refuel time and short run time is only relevant if you need 99% up time and have no alternative transport. A Tesla fire truck might not be a good idea for instance. However, a large number of people have a relativity small commute and have an alternative vehicle should one be required. They could have small electric vehicle which they use to drive to work, probably in town, and occasionally nip to the shops etc. Any other trips can be made using their other car or truck or whatever. That may be a worthwhile lifestyle choice for those people that fit the demographic and it would indisputably bring some advantages.
Stating that the whole market for electric vehicles is worthless because as an individual you personally do not fit into this group and can therefore demonstrate that it would not suit you is clearly ridiculous. You might as well say there is no market for heavy goods vehicles because you never have to carry 40 tonnes and a Scania is far more expensive to run that your Mini.
"Muglia said there are now 40 million customers for hosted Exchange, SharePoint, and Live Meeting"
I wonder what percentage of that 40 million is using only using Exchange? Pretty high is my guess. Sharepoint and Live Meeting are only mentioned here in case people have forgotten they exist.
Microsoft are being very careful when choosing their anti-linux battles. They have to win via private agreement because if it becomes worthwhile for the opposition to fight the whole thing become precedent. If it becomes precedent then other companies also appear to be involved and must also defend or pay by default. Even if the patent holder wins in court they may find that a later ruling overrides their claim and they would have to give all the money back.
It is not the winning or loosing that matters here but simply the going to court . It is too big a risk for the big portfolio owners to risk.
... put a small sealed balloon to contain the air reservoir inside the syringe? Something thin but very strong would be required. Probably latex would be best, if it were lubricated it might help the movement of the plunger ....
... Hey. now there's an idea that ties into the Paris theme quite well.
...
"No, seriously: check out the stats from the recent OS X release of Valve's Steam. OS X clearly has a bloody sight more than a 7% market share of the *consumer* market, and has done for years."
The point is on the difference between a 'user' and a 'consumer'. Some users think about what they want and then buy it. They are willing to pay good money for want they want. Some users get along with the default and what they can get for free. They do not actively differentiate between the best of breed and the market leader. Almost all Apple users fall into the first group and could rightly be called 'consumers'. A large number of Windows users, especially home windows users fall into the second group. This is why the number of installed units is not a measure of the market for additional sales.
1.Becta stands between a Tory politician and his back-handers from commerce, of course they had to go.
2. The comprehensive system is designed to feed industry with grunts. Your kids are taught what is useful to industry in your area. If you want then to get an education in how to make decisions and do stuff you have to pay for it.
The Times writing a knocking piece about Brussels. Oh then again let me have a closer look.
unnamed insider... check
speculation used as fact... check
proposal stated as done deal... check
figures plucked from thin air... check
No I take it all back. It's just the same as always.
Does the law still apply? Can having your laptop hacked or nicked expose your fingerprint to the criminal world for nefarious activities?
P.S. No way am I'm not allowing the government to get any biometric data on my kids. I sent them to school in hockey masks so no one could use recognition of their biometric faces in future criminal cases. I they made a fuss at the time but I think they will thank me in the future ( when they come off the medication anyway).
Where I live there will only ever be a Tory MP. The constituency borders were drawn up to ensure that. Frankly I don't know why the other parties bother. For there to be any real choice here there should be 4 or 5 Tory MP's standing for the same constituency. We might have a chance of getting rid of the corrupt and the useless then. As it stands a turnip in a blue tie would get in. Democracy, huh!
The one vote is made to do two jobs. In my mind this leads to the following.
1. Two votes. US style. but then you can end up with a minority cabinet. All well and good in one-man-and-a-dog control system but party politics gums up the works by making sure that anything cabinet says, parliament disagrees with.
2. Vote for the local representative. To make this work you have to be sure there is no conflict of interest, no political allegiances. You can ban political parties but I think you would just drive it underground. At least with the current system you can see the underhanded, unelected power brokers at work.
3. Vote for the cabinet. You loose the 'local link' of your MP but gain a fair grasp of the country's overall view. If the localness of an MP ever existed I can't see that it still does. Gordon Brown is one of the few who actually come from the place they represent and even he doesn't live there. There are very few who aren't actually based in their 'second home' in London. Not really a great loss. plus you might actually get the services of an MP who represents you views. It's quite rare for an MP to get more than 50% of the local vote so most represent the views of less than half the population.
This is the system that the Conservative desperately want to keep so it is no good complaining about it now.
If the country hated Brown and loved Cameron as much as the Sun et al keep telling us we do, they would have got an overall majority and would be in power now. <sarcasm> It's almost as if Murdoch wants a Tory government or something. </sarcasm>
It may be true that there is no way to force an MP to vote as the electorate who put them there wish; but at least if they turn out to be a thieving peace of sh!t, you can (try to) get rid of them.
Yes but only after 4 or 5 years. There is no mechanism for recalling you MP from parliament before the General Election.
3) Where "NOTA" gets a majority, a random member of the public who didn't vote is forced to represent the electorate for the life of the next parliament.
This would not only force the party's to engage with the electorate it would also force the electorate to engage with politics.
Most parties do not use first-past-the-post to elect their own party officials. It is not democratic enough!
They usually have a system requiring multiple votes, where the least popular drop outs after each round until only one remains. In this way the supporters of an unpopular candidate are forced to choose again. The winner of the first round often looses in the end because the others dislike someone else less. This is how Cameron became leader of the Tories. Good for them but not for us apparently.
Look at the figures and see if you think he would be Prime minister if they adopted this system for the General Election. I suspect not.
Read the other posts before commenting.
As has been stated over and over again. We all ceased to be voting for a local representative in any real sense as soon as they started joining political parties. If you don't believe me ask your local MP what his party's Whip's Office is for and watch him (or her) squirm.
"Well, there we see how they fail to understand the democratic vote and how it is supposed to protect society from the rule of the mob."
Don't you know that just because you say something does not automatically become true.
Before Magna Carta the Kings of England stated that whatever they said was true because god had ordained it, to disagree with a King was blasphemy as well as treason. You seem to believe the same thing about yourself. You are, however, not an ancient king but an idiot. hence the title.
There's a Linux penguin, a fanboi, and a Windows luser in a plane, and the pilot says, we're carrying too much weight, one of you has got to go, and the fanboi says, well, I can't jump because...
I don't have a parachute. iChute was not approved because it was created using a third party interface as c# strings where not strong enough. Anyway there are always far more apps on Windows the luser must have something he can use.
The luser says I can't jump because although there are a lot of app, iChute was not released so we have nothing to copy. I will be able to jump in another 5 years when Windows 8 has it built right into the OS but I prefer to wait another year or so until SP2 comes out.
The penguin sees that a parachute is required but that current a parachute does not exist. Using freely available tools he creates his own. He (or she) then offers them free to everyone else. The pilot takes one as he can recognise a good thing when he sees it. after all if the plane was OK a few minutes ago but now will not support all of them there is a good chance it's not going to make it.
The fanboi doesn't like the look of t as it is not officially endorsed and is sure that his Steviness will not let him down.
The luser doesn't take one as he is sure that if he doesn't have to pay for it, it must be a trick. After all they are going to die here who in their right mind would not extort him for all he was worth.
The Penguin and the Pilot jump and although the parachute is a bit crap at first, by the time they reach the ground many modifications have been added by many other Penguins and their lives are saved (as are the lives of other Pilots and Penguins in later Planes-too-heavy jokes).
The fanboi and the luser plummet to their deaths with their eyes closed and their fingers in their ears shouting 'Ha ha, stupid Penguin trusts his life to home made crap. Our superiors told us everything will be OK if just do as we are told, they will never lets us down.'
The problem with FPtP is that an MP elected under FPtP can't afford to ****-off his/her unelected local party officials as they'll be out of a job.
There fixed that for you.
and yes, Iwe know how it is supposed to work. If it wasn't for the party whips, it might have some chance of working too. The MP's can't represent both constituency and party so they stick with the party as that is where the power comes from.
"we vote for a local MP who represents us in parliament."
We should, but we don't.
We vote for someone to represent us in parliament who has already, prior to standing for election, given their word that they will do whatever the party tells them to do. Without a party they cannot get elected with a party they may as well not bother. They do not represent us, they are simply part of a block vote for the party machine. It is the party we vote for. whatever we might think we are doing.
You can see just how thin a grip on power the two main parties have.
Current % PR
Conservative 290 36.10% 222
Labour 247 29.20% 180
Liberal Democrat 51 22.90% 141
Democratic Ulster Party 8 0.60% 4
Scottish Nationalist Party 6 1.70% 10
Sinn Fein 4 0.50% 3
Plaid Cymru 3 0.60% 4
SDLP 3 0.40% 2
Green Party 1 0.90% 6
Alliance Party 1 0.20% 1
UK Independence Party 0 3.10% 19
Brittish National Party 0 1.90% 12
Ulster Conservatives 0 0.40% 2
English Democrats 0 0.10% 1
Traditional Unionist Voice 0 0.10% 1
Respect-Unity Coalition 0 0.10% 1
Christian Party 0 0.10% 1
Independent Community 0 0.10% 1
Trade Unionist 0 0.00% 0
Scottish Socialist Party 0 0.00% 0
Others 1 1.00% 6
...and you de-tabulating forum text controls. It looked quite nice in the edit box.
Still the point is that Labour and The Conservatives get enormously more power out of the first past the post system and the border reforms they have both introduced over the years than the voters actually give them.
The main parties never countenance scrapping of Trident because they are both 'in' on the secret: it's all a big bluff.
Britain and the US pretend to have a nuclear deterrent. Which is both unassailable and costly. Costly so that huge amounts of tax payers money can be redirected into pet projects and slush funds. Unassailable because if they ever had to prove it's existence it wouldn't really matter any more would it?
After all who in their right mind would hamstring their own armed forces by spending most of the defence budget on a weapon they can never use. Much more sensible to pretend you have one and spend the money on yourselves.
... A software supplier talking down all flaws? Say it ain't so.
In other news ...
...Not disclosing a flaw is found to be not the same as no-one knowing about it. In a shock revelation today...
... Turns out that simply not talking about a problem does not make it not-a-problem it just means that people who trust you are let down.
There is the professional market sure but it is very small. Someone earning their living from photography will always require good kit. Not the most expensive necessarily but the most cost effective. They will want a dedicated DSLR for the versatility and a new technique becomes fashionable there will be an add-on for the de facto standard DSLR. They won't have to ditch and replace.
Then there is the amateur market. This goes professional-level-but-doesn't charge, who will probably have the same stuff as a professional, to the crap-but-talks-a-good-shot, who will buy the latest thing just for the bragging rights at the club/pub. Again DSLR's or whatever the newest craze is. They have a cupboard-full of previous must-have's.
Then there is the biggest market of all. The gadget freaks more-money-than-sense guys who just buy stuff because it's there. They flit from one passion to another buying all the latest kit then get bored and move on. They have DSLRs, compacts, high end compacts, film cameras, camera phones, smart phones, underwater cameras, web cams etc because it was 'best' at some point, because it's what the professionals use and because they thought it made them look good. They also have carbon fibre golf clubs and Rolex/TAG watches. These are the people who buy 95% of the top end stuff and so create a mass market and so keep the price down to affordable levels for the others.
Last of all the rest of us who want 'nice' pictures sometimes. you want something 'good enough' and convenient. we already use camera phones most of the time because it's what you have with you when the moment arrives.
That's why you won't replace DSLRs with camera phones. The professional needs something versatile and dependable. The industry need the mass market to make it affordable and the mass market will always oblige.
The whole of US history is littered with political conspiracies but they are usually about self enrichment rather than idealism. It's payola that kills American innovation and by that I mean accepting an inducement to favour the poorer argument. If the argument stood on its own it would need no inducement to carry it through so it must be up against a better rival. Do that too often and you get stuck with the richest but worst companies taking the lead.
Does that sound familiar?