>Are you trying to say we have other people up there, just not ones that have been publicly acknowledged?
That's why you never see Lizard People astronauts - even though they would make much better astronauts than mammals.
21371 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Dec 2009
>While the end-of-life drill for the ISS is very clean
Erm possibly, the ISS isn't exactly manouvaerable once it starts to re-enter and big bits with communications break off from the big bits with motors and the big heavy bits that are going to reach the ground in one piece
Why this is exactly in shareholders interest.
IBM is transitioning to support of legacy installations and government jobs where they are the only approved supplier.
Eventually they will just be a patent troll.
To do this they need a few cheap salespersons in the customer country and a bunch of report generators in a cheap country.
The board achieving this at the cost of a few small fines rather than $$$ in redundancy is money in the shareholders pockets.
I don't know if it applies to a company as large as IBM but in the USA companies more directly pay for unemployment if they fire staff. So it's in a company's interest to argue that you quit or were fired for cause and get you denied unemployment
The problem is that, unless you make everything in house and just stockpile silicon+steel, you need a year's stock of every single component - so why not just build a year's production of finished cars and park them in a field 'just in case'.
This is obviously insane, but it also doesn't make sense to have a months stock of just 1 component out of 10,000. So all you can do is a risk assessment on every component and ever input into every component and the shipping risks for every component.
Upto now the US market has been dominated by large, noisy, inefficient, polluting presidents. But recent trends suggest this has gone too far and people now want smaller stylish european style presidents with lower emissions.
Since they aren't allowed to import them from Canada, America is now trying to manufacture them locally
It's also a fear that you are going to get ripped off later.
Suppose next year they introduce special emergency drought rates that 10x your costs 'due to the emergency'
They introduced smart electric meters here which potentially allow them to adjust the electricity rates in real time to match the market price. Coincidentally the standard fixed consumer rate is often less than the spot price that they could sell our green hydroelectricity to California. But I'm sure they won't take advantage of this
The problem is that almost all the cost in water supplies are fixed, it costs money to run the pipes even if you use no water.
So either you have bills with a large fixed service charge and trivial usage rates or you charge for usage based on the expected average and then end up massively overcharging anyone who uses more, such as families with kids.
You can't have nationalised water companies, it would be like the USSR with only one single kind of water and no consumer choice.
With a dynamic free market of water you have a thriving Silicon Valley of choice in new innovative forms of water. Containing added ingredients you would never have thought of under the old system
Science and space research is really worth it - it's not clear that this means the SLS is really worth it.
eg. Vaccine research is vitally important. So we made a single diamond-encrusted gold LamborghiniPickup Truck and gave it to the director of CDC, so we have "invested" $Bn in vaccine research