Re: 99.6% accuracy sounds good
Unless you hold the case in certain rural states and the prosecution gets to reject jurors
21396 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Dec 2009
The actual accuracy isn't as important as the claimed accuracy.
The point is to grab a 'person known to the police', confront them with a 99.9% match and suggest that the might like to confess to a minor charge, or you will go up against a jury with a guaranteed 99.6% guilty match by the computer.
One back door would be a security risk
There are 27 Eu members, so 27 * Sum(police agencies,military intelligence agencies,civil intelligence agencies,government depts,quasi-government depts, federal/state/province agencies, archives, state broadcasters) + MMB
With so many secured agencies with secure access it must be really secure - it's like putting 10,000 locks on a door !
(Well more like putting a single lock on a door and having 10,000 different keys that open it, but the principle is very similar)
We must have transitioned from MFM to ESDI at some point, there were definitely separate data / control cables but we had 330Mb cos we had to run Kodak (!) Unix on the 386, installed from boxes of 5.25 floppies
I remember in the mid 90s when external 1 Gb SCSI disks dropped to £1000, we got one for each Sun so that we would never have to worry about disk space ever again.
ps I'm not sure that Moore's law didn't actually stop at around 14nm designs for the original purely financial defn
Features have got smaller, and that's necessary for speed/size/power consumption, but I don't know if a 3nm fabbed device is cheaper/transistor than at 5nm
No it was an observation that the process cost of each wafer was proportional to the wafer area but the cost of going to smaller features was a one-off cost of a mask stepper (at least until we got into insanity-optics of EUV) and making a gate 30% smaller lets you fit twice as many parts in the same area.
"Chair" is ablist unless you also specifically include wheelchairs
I think "facilitating coordinator" or "coordinating facilitator" but all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified at a special bi-weekly meeting by a simple majority in the case of purely internal affairs, but by a two-thirds majority in the case of purely external affairs.
ps the "man" part in chairman is actually "main", French for hand and nothing to do with bloke-ness i.e. from the hand of the chair - cos the nobs were French when committees were invented
All our optical engineers are mainland Chinese
You know how schools cut back on STEM cos specialist teachers and labs were expensive ?
And the universities cut back on physics and chemistry cos specialist teachers and labs were expensive ?
And top physics dept stopped teaching classical optics in the 70/80s cos it was old and boring ?
And the few top optics research depts shut because all the students wanted to do cooler/better funded topics ?
Well this was also true everywhere outside china
Sounds way cooler than sending "voting advisers" and has the advantage that you can send them to countries that don't have votes.
Not sure about using article 5 against cyber attacks, I seem to remember Germany's leader was cyber attacked by a foreign superpower and their Eu trade negotiators were hacked by a foreign no-longer-super foreign power.
>(54 byte packets, anybody?)
53 bytes (well 48byte packet and 5 byte header) cos even numbers are for squares.
It's perfectly sensible, the datacoms guys wanted larger 64byte for high speed efficiency and the telecoms guys wanted smaller 32byte for better latency - so they decided on a perfectly reasonable compromise of 48bytes. then they added a separate header so you wouldn't have to bother reading the packet to find out what to do with it. then the committee went for a series of long lunches